-
Clinical application value of the new guide for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- PAN Qing, LÜ Zhifang
-
JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES). 2016, 54(3):
63-67.
doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.483
-
Abstract
(
1199 )
PDF (881KB)
(
251
)
Save
-
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
Objective To investigate the clinical significance of the clinical classification of the Spanish new clinical guidelines in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)in 2013. Methods A total of 640 cases who had been diagnosed as COPD and hospitalized in the department of respiratory medicine of Anqing Municipal Hospital Affilicated to Anhui Medical University were collected from January 2009 to December 2014. According to the typing method of Spanish guidelines in 2013, the 640 cases were divided into four groups named A, B, C and D respectively. The pulmonary function, index of analysis of blood gas, morbidity of complication, the usage of antibiotics and hormone of each group were analyzed and compared. Results Pulmonary function forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1)and forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity(FEV1%)in groups C and D were significantly lower than those in groups A and B(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in each group about the morbidity of diabetes and hypertension(P>0.05), while the incidence of coronary heart disease, arrhythmia and heart failure in groups C and D were significantly higher than those in groups A and B(P<0.05), and in group D higher than in group C(P<0.05). The usage time of antibiotics in groups A and B were significantly lower than that in groups C and D(P<0.05), and in group D was obviously higher than in group C(P<0.05). The use amount of hormone in group B was higher than that in groups A, C and D(P<0.05), and in groups C and D higher than in group A(P<0.05). In all groups, hospitalization time in group D was longest and shortest in group A. Usage of mechanical 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)54卷3期 -潘青,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病新指南对临床患者分类的应用价值 \=-ventilation, mechanical ventilation time and mortality rate in group D was significantly higher than that in other groups(P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical classification of the new guidelines has important guiding role, but it needs further studies to verify its clinical value.