您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (12): 33-41.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.0890

• • 上一篇    下一篇

集约化动物养殖区饲料-粪便-饮用水中β受体激动剂的残留特征及其健康风险

夏慧禹1,刘仲2,刘树民3,李学文1   

  1. 1. 山东大学齐鲁医学院, 山东 济南 250012;2. 济南市疾病预防控制中心理化检验所, 山东 济南 250021;3. 济南市长清区张夏镇畜牧兽医站, 山东 济南 250308
  • 发布日期:2021-12-29
  • 通讯作者: 李学文. E-mail:lxw@sdu.edu.cn

Residue characteristics and health risk of beta-agonists in fodder-faeces-drinking water in intensive animal breeding area

XIA Huiyu1, LIU Zhong2, LIU Shumin3, LI Xuewen1   

  1. 1.Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Physical and Chemical Laboratory, Jinan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China;
    3. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station, Zhangxia Town, Changqing District, Jinan 250308, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-12-29

PDF (PC)

93

摘要： 目的 以中国东部某养殖区为例,探讨β受体激动剂的饲料添加情况和粪便残留特征,评估饮用水中β受体激动剂的人体健康风险。 方法 利用高效液相色谱-质谱联用(HPLC-MS/MS)检测不同养殖场饲料(n=70)、粪便(n=75)和饮用水(n=59)中12种β受体激动剂的含量,利用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析其在不同畜种粪便间的差异性,通过每日允许摄入量(ADI)评估其健康风险。 结果 该地区各类样品中均存在β受体激动剂残留。饲料中12种β受体激动剂的检出率均高于50%,其中溴布特罗检出率高达100%,非诺特罗浓度最高(102.94 μg/kg)。粪便中β受体激动剂的检出率高于80%,其中溴布特罗和溴代克伦特罗的检出率达到100%,浓度最高为非诺特罗(395.84 μg/kg)。不同畜禽粪便的β受体激动剂存在浓度差异,除特布他林外,其他11种物质均以牛粪中残留浓度最高(P<0.05)。饮用水中亦检出所有12种β受体激动剂,且检出率大部分在80%以上,其中溴布特罗检出率达到100%,非诺特罗浓度最高(30.09 ng/L)。通过单一饮用水暴露,克伦特罗和莱克多巴胺非致癌健康风险较低。 结论 该养殖区饲料中存在添加β受体激动剂的情况并导致较高的粪便残留,已通过环境扩散引起饮用水的污染,需引起相关部门的高度重视。

关键词: 畜禽, 集约化养殖, β受体激动剂, 饮用水, 健康风险

Abstract: Objective To investigate the residual characteristics of beta-agonists in fodder and faeces in an animal breeding area in eastern China, and to evaluate the human health risk of them in drinking water. Methods High performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry(HPLC-MS)was used to detect 12 beta-agonists in fodder(n=70), faeces(n=75)and drinking water(n=59)samples of different farms. Differences among faeces of different animal species were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test, and the health risks were evaluated by allowable daily intake(ADI). Results Beta-agonists were detected in all kinds of samples. The detection rate of 12 beta-agonists in fodder was higher than 50%. Detection rate of brombuterol was as high as 100%, and the concentration of fenoterol was the highest(102.94 μg/kg). Detection rate of beta-agonists in faeces was higher than 80%, and the detection rates of brombuterol and bromocreentrol were 100%; fenoterol was predominated(395.84 μg/kg)in faeces samples. The concentrations of beta-agonists in faeces of different livestock and poultry were statistical significant. Except terbutaline, the residual levels of other 11 substances in faeces were the highest in cattle farms(P<0.05). All beta-agonists were also detected in drinking water, and the detection rate of them was mostly more than 80%, of which brombuterol reached 100%, and the median concentration of fenoterol was the highest(30.09 ng/L). Through drinking water exposure, the non-carcinogenic health risk to human body of clenbuterol and ractopamine was relatively low. Conclusion A variety of beta-agonists were detected in the animal fodder and animal faeces in this study area. Beta-agonists in animal faeces can cause drinking water pollution through environmental diffusion. Thus, beta-agonists administrated in fodder needs to be paid great attention by local government.

Key words: Livestock and poultry, Intensive breeding, Beta-agonists, Drinking water, Health risk

中图分类号: 

  • R127
[1] Sai F, Hong M, Zhao Y, et al. Simultaneous detection of residues of 25 β2-agonists and 23 β-blockers in animal foods by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with linear ion trap mass spectrometry [J]. J Agric Food Chemi, 2012, 60(8): 1898-1905.
[2] Shao B, Jia X, Zhang J, et al. Multi-residual analysis of 16 β-agonists in pig liver, kidney and muscle by ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Food Chem, 2009, 114(3): 1115-1121.
[3] Sheu SY, Lei YC, Tai YT, et al. Screening of salbutamol residues in swine meat and animal feed by an enzyme immunoassay in Taiwan [J]. Anal Chim Acta, 2009, 654(2): 148-153.
[4] Wang X, Liufu T, Beloglazova NV, et al. Development of a competitive indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for screening phenylethanolamine A residues in Pork Samples [J]. Food Anal Methods, 2016, 9(11): 1-8.
[5] Salpeter SR, Ormiston TM, Salpeter EE. Cardiovascular effects of beta-agonists in patients with asthma and COPD: a meta-analysis [J]. Chest, 2004, 125(6): 2309-2321.
[6] Wang P, Liu X, Su X, et al. Sensitive detection of β-agonists in pork tissue with novel molecularly imprinted polymer extraction followed liquid chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry detection [J]. Food Chem, 2015, 184: 72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.073.
[7] Yan H, Xu D, Meng H, et al. Food poisoning by clenbuterol in China [J]. Qual Assur Saf Crop, 2015, 7(1): 27-35.
[8] 中华人民共和国农业农村部. 中华人民共和国农业部公告第193号 [EB/OL].(2002-04-09)[2021-07-31]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/govpublic/SYJ/201006/t20100606_1535262.htm.
[9] 中华人民共和国农业农村部. 中国人民共和国农业部公告第1519号 [EB/OL].(2010-12-27)[2021-07-31]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/gk/tzgg_1/gg/201101/t20110113_1806088.htm.
[10] Cao J, Liang S, Zhang H, et al. Sodium 4-styrenesulfonate functionalized nanofibers mat as 96-well plate solid-phase extraction adsorbent for quantitative determination of multiple β-agonists residues in pork samples [J]. Food Chem, 2021, 335: 127631. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127631.
[11] Yikilmaz Y, Kuzukiran O, Erdogan E, et al. The determination of β-agonist residues in bovine tissues using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Biomed Chromatogr, 2020, 34(10): e4926.
[12] Tuyet-hanh TT, Sinh DX, Phuc PD, et al. Exposure assessment of chemical hazards in pork meat, liver, and kidney, and health impact implication in Hung Yen and Nghe An provinces, Vietnam [J]. Int J Public Health, 2017, 62(Suppl 1): 75-82.
[13] Sakai N, Sakai M, Mohamad Haron DE, et al. Beta-agonist residues in cattle, chicken and swine livers at the wet market and the environmental impacts of wastewater from livestock farms in Selangor State, Malaysia [J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 165: 183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.022.
[14] Shao B, Chen D, Zhang J, et al. Determination of 76 pharmaceutical drugs by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in slaughterhouse wastewater [J]. J Chromatogr A, 2009, 1216(47): 8312-8318.
[15] 刘欣, 刘文钦. 沂水县现代畜牧业发展现状存在的问题及对策 [J]. 山东畜牧兽医, 2012, 32(8): 72-73.
[16] 李丹妮, 严凤, 吴剑平, 等. 在线净化液相色谱-串联质谱法测定畜禽粪便中7种β2-受体激动剂 [J]. 分析化学, 2014, 42(12): 1797-1803. LI Danni, YAN Feng, WU Jianping, et al. Simultaneous determination of seven β2-agonists in livestock manure by on-line cleanup liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 42(12): 1797-1803.
[17] 贾涛, 刘辉. 液相色谱-串联质谱法同时检测饲料中13种β-受体激动剂 [J]. 饲料研究, 2014(3): 55-57. doi: CNKI:SUN:SLYJ.0.2014-03-016.
[18] Hanna N, Sun P, Sun Q, et al. Presence of antibiotic residues in various environmental compartments of Shandong Province in eastern China: its potential for resistance development and ecological and human risk [J]. Environ Int, 2018, 114: 131-142. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.02.003.
[19] World Health Organization. Evaluations of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives(JECFA)[EB/OL].(2020-06)[2021-07-31]. https://apps.who.int/food-additives-contaminants-jecfa-database/search.aspx.
[20] 赵秀阁, 段小丽. 中国人群暴露参数手册:概要.成人卷 [M]. 北京:中国环境出版社, 2014.
[21] 韦会琴, 易宗容, 冯堂超. 浅谈当前宜宾规模养殖场饲料兽药投入品的监管[J]. 畜牧市场, 2009(10): 34-36. doi: CNKI:SUN:SQKF.0.2009-10-015.
[22] 石奥. 超高压液相色谱-串联质谱法测定畜禽粪便中3种β-受体激动剂残留[J]. 分析测试学报, 2016, 35(1): 74-78. SHI Ao. Determination of 3 β-agonists in animal manure by ultra high performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry [J]. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2016, 35(1): 74-78.
[23] Sakai N, Yusof RM, Sapar M, et al. Spatial analysis and source profiling of beta-agonists and sulfonamides in Langat River basin, Malaysia [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2016, 548-549: 43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.040.
[24] Rose MD, Shearer G, Farrington WH. The effect of cooking on veterinary drug residues in food: 1. Clenbuterol [J]. Food Addit Contam, 1995, 12(1): 67-76.
[25] Suo D, Wang P, Li Y, et al. Evaluation of β-agonists in blood meal: validation of determination method and potential pathway for reentry into the environment [J]. J Chromatogr A, 2020, 1612: 460624. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460624.
[26] Lust EB, Barthold C, Malesker MA, et al. Human health hazards of veterinary medications: information for emergency departments [J]. J Emerg Medicine, 2011, 40(2): 198-207.
[1] 单冰,崔亮亮,张迎建,曹萌,秦大中,王丽珩,彭秀苗. 济南市宾馆、理发店和美容院室内空气中常见化学污染物的健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 110-119.
[2] 孙成瑶,唐大镜,陈凤格,赵川,关茗洋. 2016~2020年石家庄市大气PM2.5化学成分变化趋势及健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 78-86.
[3] 张盈盈,岳帅,杜艳君,班婕,李湉湉. 2017年某地重金属多介质多暴露途径的健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 127-133.
[4] 曹萌,王丽珩,彭秀苗,崔亮亮. 2016~2020年济南市两城区大气PM2.5中多环芳烃浓度特征及慢性健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 87-95.
[5] 潘璐,王炳玲,王寅,张秀芹,徐春生,李丹丹,段海平. 2014~2019年青岛市生活饮用水健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 42-49.
[6] 刘芳盈,赵志强,孟超,王丹,李平,刘晓利,张殿平,王勤,王敏. 淄博市生活饮用水中硝酸盐暴露及其健康风险的时空分布特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 50-57.
[7] 彭秀苗,王雪峰,公为美,张扬,周敬文,崔亮亮. 2016~2020年济南市居民饮用水中8种重金属浓度变化趋势及健康风险特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 24-32.
[8] 李湉湉,王情,孙庆华. 加强环境健康风险预警研究,推动风险预警公共卫生服务[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 1-5.
[9] 张迎建,彭秀苗,朱云昆,周敬文,崔亮亮. 济南市涉农区县农田土壤重金属污染现况及多途径暴露人群健康综合风险研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 120-126.
[10] 杨似玉,闫晓娜,彭靖,张杰,王永星,张欣烨,张书芳. 郑州市两城区大气PM2.5中金属、类金属污染特征及健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 70-77.
[11] 王丽珩,彭秀苗,张迎建,单冰,曹萌,崔亮亮. 2016~2020年济南市两城区大气PM2.5中金属元素浓度特征及慢性健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 63-69.
[12] 柴然,张秀芹,徐春生,王寅,潘璐,王炳玲,段海平. 青岛市生活饮用水中微塑料分布特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 58-62.
[13] 杜艳君,班婕,孙庆华,张翼,王情,陈晨,刘园园,李湉湉. 《化学物质环境健康风险评估技术指南》解读[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 20-23.
[14] 王金涛,苏萍,袁中尚,薛付忠. 部分分布竞争风险模型及其在健康风险评估中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(6): 37-41.
[15] 王停停,王金涛,袁中尚,苏萍,薛付忠. 原因别竞争风险模型及其在健康风险评估中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(6): 42-46.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 史爽,李娟,米琦,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 胃癌miRNAs预后风险评分模型的构建与应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 47 -52 .
[2] 李洧,李道卫,叶茜,高顺翠,姜淑娟. 经支气管镜针吸活检在纵隔疾病诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(11): 1063 -1065 .
[3] 唐芳1,2 ，张颖倩3 ，王志强4 ,康殿民4 ,王洁贞1 ,薛付忠1 . 自然疫源性疾病疫源地空间结构的二维
最小生成树模型及其应用
[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(01): 106 -110 .
[4] 吕龙飞,李林,李树海,亓磊,鲁铭,程传乐,田辉. 腔镜下细针导管空肠造瘘在微创McKeown食管癌切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 77 -81 .
[5] 邵海港, 王璇, 王青. 山东地区人下颌第一前磨牙根管系统解剖研究[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(9): 85 -89 .
[6] 王旭平,赵玲,冯玉新,商林珊,刘金成,曹伟朋,朱晓音,辛华. 绞股蓝总苷对谷氨酸诱导的胎鼠大脑皮层神经元氧化性损伤保护机制的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(6): 564 -567 .
[7] 王学萍,杨洪玲. 洛汀新治疗高血压50例报告[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, (2): 213 .
[8] 朱晓丽1，郭淑玲1，苏磊1，冯玉新2，袁方曙1. 蠕形螨全蛋白提取及相对分子量鉴定[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(5): 58 -62 .
[9] 姜保东,马祥兴,王青,王茜,冯晓源,李克,于富华 . 脑CT静脉造影扫描时相及重建层厚的选择[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(11): 1084 -1086 .
[10] 黄圣运,张东升,张世周,刘桂军,赵跃然,王来成,刘义庆 . 重组表达载体pIRES-CD、pIRES-TK的构建及其在ACC-2细胞中的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(2): 117 -123 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发