您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (12): 87-95.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.1218

• • 上一篇    下一篇

2016~2020年济南市两城区大气PM2.5中多环芳烃浓度特征及慢性健康风险评估

曹萌,王丽珩,彭秀苗,崔亮亮   

  1. 济南市疾病预防控制中心地方病防制所, 山东 济南 250021
  • 发布日期:2021-12-29
  • 通讯作者: 崔亮亮. E-mail:cll602@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重大研究计划(培育项目,91743114);国家环境健康风险评估试点建设项目;中国疾病预防控制中心环境与健康研究基地;2021年济南市卫生健康委员会公共卫生计划专项项目(2021-公-02)

Concentration characteristics and chronic health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric PM2.5 in two districts of Jinan from 2016 to 2020

CAO Meng, WANG Liheng, PENG Xiumiao, CUI Liangliang   

  1. Endemic Disease Control Institute, Jinan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-12-29

摘要: 目的 分析大气细颗粒物(PM2.5)中多环芳烃浓度特征,并评估PM2.5中多环芳烃吸入途径的慢性健康风险。 方法 2016~2020年在济南市市中区和历城区两监测点每月定期开展PM2.5及其萘、苊烯、芴、苊、菲、蒽、荧蒽、芘、、苯并[a]蒽、苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[a]芘、二苯并[a,h]蒽、苯并[g,h,i]苝、茚并[1,2,3-cd]芘等16种多环芳烃的成分监测;参照《化学物质环境健康风险评估技术指南》(WS/T 777-2021)进行大气PM2.5中多环芳烃对成人慢性健康风险评估。 结果 2016~2020年市中区共开展监测448 d,历城区共开展监测442 d,历城区萘、苊烯、荧蒽、芘、、苯并[a]蒽、苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[a]芘、二苯并[a,h]蒽、苯并[g,h,i]苝、茚并[1,2,3-cd]芘平均浓度水平大于市中区,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两监测点多环芳烃浓度自2016年以来呈逐年降低趋势,且呈现出明显的季节性变化规律,冬季为污染最严重的季节;两监测站点苯并[a]蒽、苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[a]芘、二苯并[a,h]蒽、茚并[1,2,3-cd]芘的致癌风险均有一定的比例超过风险推荐值1×10-6,苯并[a]芘的慢性非致癌风险也均有一定的比例超过风险推荐值1。 结论 十三五期间济南市大气PM2.5中多环芳烃的浓度呈逐年降低趋势,但PM2.5中苯并[a]蒽、苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽、苯并[a]芘、二苯并[a,h]蒽、茚并[1,2,3-cd]芘均有一定的健康风险,应在今后的空气污染治理中给予重点关注。

关键词: 大气, 细颗粒物, 多环芳烃, 浓度特征, 慢性健康风险评估

Abstract: Objective To analyze the concentration characteristics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)in atmospheric PM2.5, and to assess the chronic health risks of inhalation pathway of PAHs. Methods Monthly monitoring of PM2.5 and its 16 PAHs were conducted, including naphthalene, acenaphthylene, fluorene, acenaphthene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, chrysene, benzo [a] anthracene, benzo [b] fluoranthene, benzo [k] fluoranthene, benzo [a] pyrene, dibenz [a, h] anthracene, benzo [g, h, i] perylene, and indeno [1, 2, 3-cd] pyrene. The chronic health risks for adults were assessed with reference to The Technical Guide for Environmental Health risk Assessment of Chemical Substances(WS/T777-2021). Results A total of 448 and 442 days of monitoring were carried out in the Shizhong District and Licheng District, respectively. The average concentrations of naphthalene, acenaphthene, fluoranthene, pyrene, chrysene, benzo [a] anthracene, benzo [b] fluoranthene, benzo [k] fluoranthene, benzo [a] pyrene, dibenz [a, h] anthracene, benzo [g,h,i] perylene and indeno [1, 2, 3-cd] pyrene were in Licheng District higher than those in Shizhong District(P<0.05). The concentrations of PAHs at the two monitoring sites decreased year by year since 2016, showing an obvious seasonal variation, and winter had the most serious pollution. The carcinogenic risks of benzo [a] anthracene, benzo [b] fluoranthene, benzo [k] fluoranthene, benzo [a] pyrene, dibenz [a, h] anthracene, indeno [1, 2, 3-cd] pyrene exceeded the recommended risk value of 1×10-6, and the chronic non-carcinogenic risk of benzo [a] pyrene exceeded the recommended risk value of 1. Conclusion During the Thirteenth Five-year Plan period, the concentration of PAHs in atmospheric PM2.5 in Jinan decreased year by year, but benzo [a] anthracene, benzo [b] fluoranthene, benzo [k] fluoranthene, benzo [a] pyrene, dibenz [a, h] anthracene, indeno [1, 2, 3-cd] pyrene still have certain health risks, which should arouse more attention in future air pollution control.

Key words: Atmosphere, Fine particulate matter, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Concentration characteristics, Chronic health risk assessment

中图分类号: 

  • R123
[1] 李韵谱, 刘喆, 唐志刚, 等. 北京市某城区冬季细颗粒物中多环芳烃的人群健康风险评估[J]. 中国预防医学杂志, 2021, 22(2): 98-104. LI Yunpu, LIU Zhe, TANG Zhigang, et al. Health risk assessment of PM-bound PAHs in an urban area of Beijing in winter [J]. Chinese Preventive Medicine, 2021, 22(2): 98-104.
[2] Chao S, Liu J, Chen Y, et al. Implications of seasonal control of PM2.5-bound PAHs: An integrated approach for source apportionment, source region identification and health risk assessment [J]. Environ Pollut, 2019, 247: 685-695. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.074.
[3] Abbas I, Badran G, Verdin A, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon derivatives in airborne particulate matter: sources, analysis and toxicity [J]. Environ Chem Lett, 2018, 16(2): 439-475.
[4] Zhang Y, Tao S, Shen H, et al. Inhalation exposure to ambient polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and lung cancer risk of Chinese population [J]. PNAS, 2009, 106(50): 21063-21067.
[5] IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures [J]. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, 2010, 92: 1-853.
[6] 中华人民共和国国家生态环境部. HJ656-2013环境空气颗粒物(PM2.5)手工监测方法(重量法)技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2013.
[7] 中华人民共和国国家生态环境部. HJ6472013环境空气和废气气相和颗粒物中多环芳烃的测定高效液相色谱法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013.
[8] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. WS/T777-2021化学物质环境健康风险评估技术指南[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
[9] IRIS. IRIS advanced search [EB/OL]. [2021-09-26]. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/search/index.cfm?keyword=.
[10] CALEPA. OEHHA Acute, 8 -hour and chronic reference exposure level(REL)summary [EB/OL]. [2021-09-26]. http://oehha.ca.gov/air/general-info/oehha-acute-8-hour-and-chronic-reference-exposure-level-rel-summary.
[11] 安玉琴, 郝海燕, 金红, 等. 河北省四城市PM2.5中多环芳烃污染水平及健康风险评价[J]. 职业与健康, 2018, 34(22): 3129-3133. AN Yuqin, HAO Haiyan, JIN Hong, et al. Pollution level and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in PM2.5 of four cities in Hebei Province [J]. Occupation and Health, 2018, 34(22): 3129-3133.
[12] 梁秀梅, 邹云锋, 王钰钰, 等. 广州市大气PM2.5中多环芳烃的季节变化特征及健康风险评价[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2017, 34(3): 220-224. LIANG Xiumei, ZOU Yunfeng, WANG Yuyu, et al. Seasonal variation and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric PM2.5 in Guangzhou [J]. Journal of Environment and Health, 2017, 34(3): 220-224.
[13] Guo X, Li C, Gao Y, et al. Sources of organic matter(PAHs and n-alkanes)in PM2.5 of Beijing in haze weather analyzed by combining the C-N isotopic and PCA-MLR analyses [J]. Environ Sci Process Impacts, 2016, 18(3): 314-322.
[14] 郁倩, 张娟, 安可, 等. 徐州市大气细颗粒物中多环芳烃人群健康风险评估[J]. 中国校医, 2019, 33(12): 884-886. YU Qian, ZHANG Juan, AN Ke, et al. Assessment on health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in airborne PM2.5 in Xuzhou City [J]. Chinese Journal of School Doctor, 2019, 33(12): 884-886.
[15] 吉秀亮, 杨君胜, 谢晓媛, 等. 2019年西宁市城区PM2.5中多环芳烃的污染特征及健康风险评价[J]. 现代预防医学, 2020, 47(22): 4056-4059. JI Xiuliang, YANG Junsheng, XIE Xiaoyuan, et al. Pollution characteristics and health rish assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of PM2.5 in Xining in 2019 [J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2020, 47(22): 4056-4059.
[16] 王焕新, 张续, 马琳, 等. 北京市昌平区大气颗粒物中多环芳烃暴露及人群健康风险评价[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2016, 33(11): 999-1002. WANG Huanxin, ZHANG Xu, MA Lin, et al. Health risk assessment of inhabitants exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and particulate matter in air in Changping district of Beijing [J]. Journal of Environment and Health, 2016, 33(11): 999-1002.
[17] 李四生, 单晓梅, 常君瑞, 等. 合肥市大气颗粒物PM2.5中多环芳烃污染特征及健康风险初步评估[J]. 现代预防医学, 2020, 47(11): 1954-1958. LI Sisheng, SHAN Xiaomei, CHANG Junrui, et al. Pollution characteristics and health-risk initial assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of PM2.5, Hefei [J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2020, 47(11): 1954-1958.
[18] 梁秀梅. 广州市大气PM2.5中多环芳烃的污染特征及健康风险评估[D]. 南宁: 广西医科大学, 2017.
[19] Xuan L, Tao Z, Bin G, et al. Assessing Beijing's PM2.5 pollution: severity, weather impact, APEC and winter heating [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2015, 471(2182). doi: 10.1098/rspa.2015.0257.
[20] 焦海涛, 杨月莲, 于志刚, 等. 2014年济南市十六里河社区大气PM2.5中多环芳烃的污染特征及健康风险评价[J]. 现代预防医学, 2016, 43(20): 3688-3691. JIAO Haitao, YANG Yuelian, YU Zhigang, et al. Pollution characterization and health risk assessment of PM2.5 in Shiliulihe community in Jinan 2014 [J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2016, 43(20): 3688-3691.
[21] 黄季维, 范正轩, 樊文明, 等. 自贡市城区大气PM2.5中多环芳烃污染特征及健康风险评价[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2020, 37(1): 54-57. HUANG Jiwei, FAN Zhengxuan, FAN Wenming, et al. Characteristics and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric PM2.5 in Zigong [J]. Journal of Environment and Health, 2020, 37(1): 54-57.
[22] 焦海涛, 孙湛, 刘仲, 等. 济南市社区大气PM_(2.5)中多环芳烃的污染特征及健康风险评价[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2016, 33(5): 425-428. JIAO Haitao, SUN Zhan,LIU Zhong,et al. Pollution characterization and health risk assessment of PAHs in PM(2.5)in Jinan [J]. Journal of Environment and Health, 2016, 33(5): 425-428.
[23] Wei W, Huang MJ, Chan CY, et al. Risk assessment of non-dietary exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)via house PM2.5, TSP and dust and the implications from human hair [J]. Atmos Environ, 2013, 73. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.007.
[24] Feng B, Li L, Xu H, et al. PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)in Beijing: Seasonal variations, sources, and risk assessment [J]. J Environ Sci(China), 2019, 77: 11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.12.025.
[25] 王敏, 邢燕, 高慧, 等. 2018年淄博市某城区大气PM2.5中多环芳烃的源解析及健康风险评估[J]. 预防医学论坛, 2021, 27(6): 437-439. WANG Min, XING Yan, GAO Hui, et al. Source apportionment and health risk assessment on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in PM in an urban area, Zibo city, 2018 [J]. Preventive Medicine Tribune, 2021, 27(6): 437-439.
[26] 冯利红, 崔生, 陈阳, 等. 重污染天气PM2.5中多环芳烃健康风险及预期寿命损失分析[J]. 公共卫生与预防医学, 2019, 30(4): 16-20. FENG Lihong, CUI Sheng, CHEN Yang, et al. Analysis of health risk and life expectancy loss of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs)in PM2.5 under heavy polluted weather [J]. Journal of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 2019, 30(4): 16-20.
[1] 翟一凡,王兆军,白硕鑫,林少倩,王方怡,杜爽,王志萍. 孕期PM10和PM2.5暴露对新生儿出生体质量的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 99-106.
[2] 萧阳,陶宇,王方怡,梁俞秀,张晋,季晓康,王志萍. 山东省部分地区PM2.5和PM10暴露与妊娠期糖尿病的关联性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 101-109.
[3] 杨似玉,闫晓娜,彭靖,张杰,王永星,张欣烨,张书芳. 郑州市两城区大气PM2.5中金属、类金属污染特征及健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 70-77.
[4] 王丽珩,彭秀苗,张迎建,单冰,曹萌,崔亮亮. 2016~2020年济南市两城区大气PM2.5中金属元素浓度特征及慢性健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 63-69.
[5] 孙成瑶,唐大镜,陈凤格,赵川,关茗洋. 2016~2020年石家庄市大气PM2.5化学成分变化趋势及健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 78-86.
[6] 孙湛,刘仲,张鑫,于志刚,李新伟,崔亮亮,张谊,刘岚铮. 济南市空气细颗粒物浓度和金属及类金属元素变化趋势和预测[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 123-129.
[7] 崔静,孙治涛,谢萌,张倩,王炳玲,高汝钦. 青岛人群孕期多环芳烃暴露对婴幼儿发育的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 111-115.
[8] 游颖琦,朱晶颖,张旭辉,张熙,周伟杰. 无锡市大气污染对成人内科门诊量影响的时间序列研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 53-60.
[9] 吴卫东,安珍,贵双俊,许洁,范威,宋杰. PM2.5暴露促进动脉粥样硬化发生发展的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 18-26.
[10] 贾晓倩,崔亮亮,岳克三,李新伟,韩联宇,吴兴彬,周敬文. 济南市大气颗粒物与儿童呼吸系统疾病就诊量的时间序列分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 84-90.
[11] 满金宇,崔亮亮,韩联宇,于坤坤,吴兴彬,岳克三,周敬文. 2014~2016年济南市空气污染严重地区大气颗粒物对社区人群门诊就诊量的急性效应分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 61-67.
[12] 刘晓利,刘芳盈,孟超,李平,张殿平,殷茂荣,翟慎永. 淄博市大气污染物浓度与急救人次关联的时间序列分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 42-47.
[13] 孔凡玲,赵琳,崔亮亮. PM2.5与心血管疾病[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 12-17.
[14] 崔亮亮,牛纪伦,于坤坤,戴志翔,阮师漫. 2013~2015年济南市大气污染物SO2和NO2对居民心血管疾病应急呼叫事件影响的急性效应[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 105-110.
[15] 施小明. 大气PM2.5及其成分对人群急性健康影响的流行病学研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 1-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙维彤,邹伟伟,李爱国,席延伟,张娜. 脂质体粒径对促进托氟啶口服吸收的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(6): 639 -642 .
[2] 肖伟玲,林亚杰,牟东珍,孙萍,梁淑娟 . 分泌型人IL-1β表达载体的构建及在H7402细胞中的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(2): 119 -122 .
[3] 于清梅,武玉玲,宋海岩,尹华伟,庄园 . p38丝裂原活化蛋白激酶在小鼠早期胚胎及围植入期子宫内膜的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(2): 123 -127 .
[4] 高静,陈雯,张同霞,王小花,戴廷军,姚红,赵秀鹤,迟兆富,单培彦 . 颞叶癫痫大鼠海马线粒体细胞色素氧化酶亚基Ⅲ和Ⅳ表达的变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(8): 817 -820 .
[5] 张勇,叶静,郭新星,肖水清. 牙周膜牵张成骨快速移动牙牙髓中IL-8表达的变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(4): 379 -381 .
[6] . 干细胞标记物LGR5在结直肠癌发生发展中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(8): 85 -88 .
[7] 于渊1,李岩1,荣风年2,梁婧1,刘晓琳1,王福立1. 自体CIK细胞治疗对卵巢癌调节性T细胞的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(5): 101 -104 .
[8] 杨奎忠,孙雪飞,项继顺,杜庆聪,黄凤昌 . c-FLIP反义寡核苷酸对食管癌EC109细胞裸鼠移植瘤抑制作用的实验研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(12): 1234 -1238 .
[9] 俞新爽,韩俊庆,王兴文,盛巍,王瑜. 乳腺癌患者细胞免疫水平与预后危险因素的关系及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(9): 934 -937 .
[10] 王海峰,史本康,张克勤,李永智,朱耀丰,王海新. B超检测的精索静脉直径及返流与术后精液质量的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(7): 751 -752 .