您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (12): 101-109.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.1201

• • 上一篇    下一篇

山东省部分地区PM2.5和PM10暴露与妊娠期糖尿病的关联性分析

萧阳1,陶宇1,王方怡1,梁俞秀1,张晋1,季晓康1,2,王志萍1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学齐鲁医学院公共卫生学院, 山东 济南 250012;2. 国家健康医疗大数据研究院, 山东 济南 250002
  • 发布日期:2021-12-29
  • 通讯作者: 王志萍. E-mail:zhipingw@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81773386)

Association between PM2.5 and PM10 exposure with gestational diabetes mellitus in certain areas of Shandong Province

XIAO Yang1, TAO Yu1, WANG Fangyi1, LIANG Yuxiu1, ZHANG Jin1, JI Xiaokang1,2, WANG Zhiping1,2   

  1. 1. School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. National Health and Medical Research Institute, Jinan 250002, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-12-29

摘要: 目的 探讨孕妇在孕前及孕期细颗粒物(PM2.5)和可吸入颗粒物(PM10)暴露与妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)发生风险的关系,并进一步分析其敏感暴露窗口。 方法 基于山东大学健康医疗大数据研究院山东省平台数据库孕产妇医疗数据,选取2018~2020年期间孕产妇资料;收集山东省64个监测站公布的PM2.5、PM10、NO2和SO2的逐日监测资料,选取研究对象各暴露时间段内的空气监测数据;根据孕妇家庭住址和监测站地址的经纬度坐标,采用反距离加权法(IDW)计算每位研究对象暴露时间段内逐日个体暴露浓度,进而获得每位研究对象在孕前期、孕早期和孕中期每个暴露窗口期内的平均暴露浓度;采用Logistic回归方法探讨PM2.5和PM10暴露与GDM发生风险的关系;进一步通过分布滞后非线性模型(DLNM)分析PM2.5和PM10的敏感暴露窗口。 结果 (1)符合纳入排除标准的研究对象18 407名,其中1 020例孕妇患有GDM,基于本健康医疗大数据GDM患病率为5.54%。(2)PM2.5在孕中期的平均暴露浓度为(52.45±18.26)μg/m3,高于其在孕前期[(50.71±16.98)μg/m3]及孕早期[(51.08±17.15)μg/m3]的平均暴露浓度,差异有统计学意义(F=21.98,P<0.001);PM10在孕前、孕早及孕中期的暴露浓度差异无统计学意义(F=2.36, P=0.124)。(3)调整协变量后,PM2.5和PM10在孕中期的平均暴露浓度与GDM发生风险呈正向关联,暴露浓度每增加10 μg/m3,GDM发生风险分别增加18%和15%(OR=1.18,95%CI: 1.07~1.31; OR=1.15,95%CI: 1.09~1.21)。(4)DLNM分析结果显示,PM2.5和PM10暴露导致GDM发生风险增加的敏感窗口期分别在第18~24孕周和第14~22孕周。 结论 孕中期PM2.5和PM10暴露明显增加GDM发生风险。

关键词: 妊娠期糖尿病, 可吸入颗粒物, 细颗粒物, 分布滞后非线性模型, 反距离加权, 患病率

Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between fine particulate matter air pollution(PM2.5)and inhalable particulate matter(PM10)exposure before and during pregnancy with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM), and to analyze the critical exposure window. Methods Based on the provincial platform database established by Health and Medical Research Institute of Shandong University, maternal data were collected from 2018 to 2020. With reference to daily monitoring data of PM2.5, PM10, NO2 and SO2 from 64 monitoring stations, and the longitude and latitude coordinates of pregnant womens addresses and monitoring station addresses, each subjects daily exposure concentration was calculated by inverse distance weighting(IDW)method to obtain the average exposure level before pregnancy, and in the first trimester and second trimester of pregnancy. The relationship between PM2.5 and PM10 exposure with the risk of GDM was analyzed with Logistic regression. The critical exposure window of PM2.5 and PM10 were determined with a distributed lag non-linear model. Results (1) A total of 18,407 people were eligible for inclusion, including 1,020 pregnant women with GDM, with a prevalence of 5.54%. (2) The average exposure concentration of PM2.5 in the second trimester was(52.45±18.26)μg/m3, which was higher than that before pregnancy [(50.71±16.98)μg/m3] and in the first trimester [(51.08±17.15)μg/m3], and the difference was statistically significant (F=21.98, P<0.001). The exposure concentration of PM10 before and during pregnancy had no statistically difference(F=2.36, P=0.124). (3) After the covariables were adjusted, the average exposure concentration of PM2.5 and PM10 in the second trimester were positively correlated with the risk of GDM, which increased by 18% and 15% with each increase of 10 μg/m3 exposure concentration(OR=1.18, 95%CI: 1.07-1.31; OR=1.15, 95%CI: 1.09-1.21). (4) The critical exposure window of PM2.5 and PM10 were 18-24 weeks and 14-22 weeks of pregnancy, respectively. Conclusion PM2.5 and PM10 exposure in the second trimester significantly increases the risk of GDM.

Key words: Gestational diabetes mellitus, Inhalable particulate matter, Fine particulate matter, Distributed lag non-linear model, Inverse distance weighted, Prevalence

中图分类号: 

  • R122.7
[1] Davis JL, Checkley W. Characterization of air pollution exposures as risk factors for tuberculosis infection [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2021, 204(10): 1130-1131.
[2] Li X, Wang M, Song Y, et al. Obesity and the relation between joint exposure to ambient air pollutants and incident type 2 diabetes: A cohort study in UK Biobank [J]. PLoS Med, 2021, 18(8): e1003767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003767.
[3] Xin YG, Li JL. Air pollution and cardiovascular diseases in young adults [J]. Eur Heart J, 2021, 42(40): 4192.
[4] 吴含. 孕期大气PM _(2.5)和PM_(10)暴露与足月低出生体重儿关系的研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2018.
[5] 袁蕾. 孕期细颗粒物暴露对出生结局及婴儿神经发育的影响及机制[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2020.
[6] 曹蕾, 王婷, 王丽君, 等. 邯郸市妇女空气污染暴露与妊娠期高血压[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 21(2): 161-164. CAO Lei, WANG Ting, WANG Lijun, et al. Maternal exposure to ambient air pollution and gestational hypertension in Handan [J]. China Environmental Science, 2021, 21(2): 161-164.
[7] Herath H, Herath R, Wickremasinghe R. Gestational diabetes mellitus and risk of type 2 diabetes 10 years after the index pregnancy in Sri Lankan women-a community based retrospective cohort study [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(6): e0179647. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179647.
[8] Alderete TL, Habre R, Toledo-Corral CM, et al. Longitudinal associations between ambient air pollution with insulin sensitivity, β-cell function, and adiposity in Los Angeles Latino children [J]. Diabetes, 2017, 66(7): 1789-1796.
[9] Pope CA, Bhatnagar A, McCracken JP, et al. Exposure to fine particulate air pollution is associated with endothelial injury and systemic inflammation [J]. Circ Res, 2016, 119(11): 1204-1214.
[10] 武丽, 缪华章, 陈乐, 等. 空气污染暴露与妊娠期糖尿病关系的研究[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2019, 10(4): 11-15. WU Li, MIAO Huazhang, CHEN Le, et al. Relationship between air pollution and gestational diabetes [J]. Chinese Journal of Women and Children Health, 2019, 10(4): 11-15.
[11] Plows JF, Stanley JL, Baker PN, et al. The Pathophysiology of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19(11): 3342.
[12] Zhang H, Wang Q, He S, et al. Ambient air pollution and gestational diabetes mellitus: a review of evidence from biological mechanisms to population epidemiology [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 719: 137349. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020. 137349.
[13] Fleisch AF, Kloog I, Luttmann-Gibson H, et al. Air pollution exposure and gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant women in Massachusetts: a cohort study [J]. Environ Health, 2016, 15: 40. doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0121-4.
[14] 姚梦楠, 陶瑞雪, 胡红琳, 等. 围孕期空气污染物暴露与妊娠期糖尿病的关联研究[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2019, 53(8): 817-823. YAO Mengnan, TAO Ruixue, HU Honglin, et al. Prospective cohort study on association between periconceptional air pollution exposure and gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2019, 53(8): 817-823.
[15] Padula AM, Yang W, Lurmann FW, et al. Prenatal exposure to air pollution, maternal diabetes and preterm birth [J]. Environ Res, 2019, 170: 160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.031.
[16] Zhang H, Dong H, Ren M, et al. Ambient air pollution exposure and gestational diabetes mellitus in Guangzhou, China: A prospective cohort study [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 699: 134390. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134390.
[17] Jo H, Eckel SP, Chen JC, et al. Associations of gestational diabetes mellitus with residential air pollution exposure in a large Southern California pregnancy cohort [J]. Environ Int, 2019, 130: 104933. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.104933.
[18] 翟一凡,王兆军,白硕鑫,等. 孕期PM_(10)和PM_(2.5)暴露对新生儿出生体质量的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59(8): 99-106 ZHAI Yifan, WANG Zhaojun, BAI Shuoxin, et al. Effect of PM10 and PM2.5 exposure during pregnancy on neonatal birth weight [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Science), 2021, 59(8): 99-106.
[19] International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy [J]. Diabetes Care, 2010, 33(3): 676-682.
[20] Wilson A, Chiu YM, Hsu HL, et al. Potential for bias when estimating critical windows for air pollution in childrens health [J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2017, 186(11): 1281-1289.
[21] Gasparrini A. Modeling exposure~lag~response associations with distributed lag non~linear models [J]. Stat Med, 2014, 33(5): 881-899.
[22] Wang Q, Benmarhnia T, Zhang H, et al. Identifying windows of susceptibility for maternal exposure to ambient air pollution and preterm birth [J]. Environ Int, 2018, 121(pt 1): 317-324.
[23] Zhang M, Wang X, Yang X, et al. Increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women with higher prepregnancy ambient PM2.5 exposure [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 730: 138982. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138982.
[24] Shen HN, Hua SY, Chiu CT, et al. Maternal exposure to air pollutants and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in Taiwan[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2017, 14(12): 1604.
[25] Hu H, Ha S, Henderson BH, et al. Association of atmospheric particulate matter and ozone with gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. Environ Health Perspect, 2015, 123(9): 853-859.
[26] 冯瑞,邵红梅,朱红,等. 妊娠期糖尿病危险因素的meta分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2014, 29(17): 2824-2827.
[27] Yu G, Ao J, Cai J, et al. Fine particular matter and its constituents in air pollution and gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. Environ Int, 2020, 142: 105880. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105880.
[28] Choe SA, Eliot MN, Savitz DA, et al. Ambient air pollution during pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes in New York City [J]. Environ Res, 2019, 175: 414-420. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.030.
[29] Choe SA, Kauderer S, Eliot MN, et al. Air pollution, land use, and complications of pregnancy [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 645: 1057-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.237.
[30] Cai M, Tan KH, Ang SB. I-ACT: Integrated study on effect of Activity on ComplicaTions in pregnancy: study protocol of a multiethnic prospective cohort study [J]. BMJ open, 2019, 9(4): e025970. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025970.
[31] Hu Q, Wang D, Yue D, et al. Association of ambient particle pollution with gestational diabetes mellitus and fasting blood glucose levels in pregnant women from two Chinese birth cohorts [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2021, 762: 143176. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143176.
[32] 刘新爱. 孕期大气复合污染物暴露对子代小鼠哮喘影响的研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2021. doi:10.27272/d.cnki.gshdu.2021.005501.
[33] Robledo CA, Mendola P, Yeung E, et al. Preconception and early pregnancy air pollution exposures and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. Environ Res, 2015, 137:316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.12.020.
[34] Pan SC, Huang CC, Lin SJ, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus was related to ambient air pollutant nitric oxide during early gestation [J]. Environ Res, 2017, 158: 318-323. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.005.
[35] Zheng Y, Wen X, Bian J, et al. Associations between the chemical composition of PM2.5 and gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. Environ Res, 2021, 198: 110470. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.110470.
[1] 郝强,高琦,赵然,王海涛,刘志东,姜宝法. 2014~2016年气温和相对湿度对深圳市5岁以下儿童轮状病毒腹泻的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 89-95.
[2] 冯一平,孙大鹏,王显军,纪伊曼,刘云霞. DLNM和LSTM神经网络对临沂市手足口病发病的预测效果比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 96-101.
[3] 翟一凡,王兆军,白硕鑫,林少倩,王方怡,杜爽,王志萍. 孕期PM10和PM2.5暴露对新生儿出生体质量的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 99-106.
[4] 杨似玉,闫晓娜,彭靖,张杰,王永星,张欣烨,张书芳. 郑州市两城区大气PM2.5中金属、类金属污染特征及健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 70-77.
[5] 王丽珩,彭秀苗,张迎建,单冰,曹萌,崔亮亮. 2016~2020年济南市两城区大气PM2.5中金属元素浓度特征及慢性健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 63-69.
[6] 杜爽,韩德新,林少倩,白硕鑫,赵小冬,王兆军,王志萍. 孕期环境温度对早产风险的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 134-142.
[7] 曹萌,王丽珩,彭秀苗,崔亮亮. 2016~2020年济南市两城区大气PM2.5中多环芳烃浓度特征及慢性健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 87-95.
[8] 孙成瑶,唐大镜,陈凤格,赵川,关茗洋. 2016~2020年石家庄市大气PM2.5化学成分变化趋势及健康风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(12): 78-86.
[9] 吴姝丽,靳传娣,王洪娜,李云霞,张黎黎. 因病致贫人群的患病状况调查[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(8): 103-109.
[10] 张丹丹,王旭,许勤勤,郑兆磊,王珮竹,李吉庆,刘静,许青,李秀君. 菏泽市与威海市气温对流行性腮腺炎发病的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(8): 88-94.
[11] 王珮竹,郑兆磊,李润滋,许勤勤,康凤玲,许青,李秀君. 济南市昼夜温差对麻疹发病的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(8): 101-106.
[12] 孙湛,刘仲,张鑫,于志刚,李新伟,崔亮亮,张谊,刘岚铮. 济南市空气细颗粒物浓度和金属及类金属元素变化趋势和预测[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 123-129.
[13] 吴卫东,安珍,贵双俊,许洁,范威,宋杰. PM2.5暴露促进动脉粥样硬化发生发展的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 18-26.
[14] 施小明. 大气PM2.5及其成分对人群急性健康影响的流行病学研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 1-11.
[15] 刘晓利,刘芳盈,孟超,李平,张殿平,殷茂荣,翟慎永. 淄博市大气污染物浓度与急救人次关联的时间序列分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(11): 42-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 史爽,李娟,米琦,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 胃癌miRNAs预后风险评分模型的构建与应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 47 -52 .
[2] 黄飞,王怀经,邢毅,高薇,李永刚,邢子英,李振中. NGF和GM1联合应用对坐骨神经损伤大鼠初级传入神经元的保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(4): 332 -335 .
[3] 姜保东,马祥兴,王青,王茜,冯晓源,李克,于富华 . 脑CT静脉造影扫描时相及重建层厚的选择[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(11): 1084 -1086 .
[4] 吕龙飞,李林,李树海,亓磊,鲁铭,程传乐,田辉. 腔镜下细针导管空肠造瘘在微创McKeown食管癌切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 77 -81 .
[5] 邵海港, 王璇, 王青. 山东地区人下颌第一前磨牙根管系统解剖研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(9): 85 -89 .
[6] 李洧,李道卫,叶茜,高顺翠,姜淑娟. 经支气管镜针吸活检在纵隔疾病诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(11): 1063 -1065 .
[7] 王旭平,赵玲,冯玉新,商林珊,刘金成,曹伟朋,朱晓音,辛华. 绞股蓝总苷对谷氨酸诱导的胎鼠大脑皮层神经元氧化性损伤保护机制的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(6): 564 -567 .
[8] 王学萍,杨洪玲. 洛汀新治疗高血压50例报告[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, (2): 213 .
[9] 黄圣运,张东升,张世周,刘桂军,赵跃然,王来成,刘义庆 . 重组表达载体pIRES-CD、pIRES-TK的构建及其在ACC-2细胞中的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(2): 117 -123 .
[10] 刘海春 张剑锋 陈允震. 骨质疏松大鼠股骨生物力学特性与骨胶原质量变化的相关研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(5): 42 -45 .