头罩与面罩无创通气对呼吸衰竭患者临床疗效的Meta分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2018.1274

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评价头罩与面罩无创通气方式对呼吸衰竭患者临床疗效的影响。方法通过检索文献数据库包括Medline(Pubmed)、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和万方数据、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库,根据纳入标准及剔除标准,筛选出比较头罩与面罩无创通气治疗呼吸衰竭的随机对照试验。提取数据,采用Cochrane协作网提供的“risk of bias”标准和Jadad评分体系进行文献质量评价。采用Review manager 5.1.0统计软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入10篇随机对照试验,包括头罩组228例,面罩组223例。Meta分析显示,相比面罩,头罩可降低呼吸衰竭患者不耐受率(RR=0.18,95%CI:0.08~0.41,P<0.001),减少面部皮肤溃疡发生率(RR=0.19,95%CI:0.08~0.48,P<0.001)和胃肠胀气发生率(RR=0.15,95%CI:0.05~0.42,P<0.001),降低呼吸频率(MD=-3.01,95%CI:-4.87~-1.16,P=0.001)、气管插管率(RR=0.39,95%CI:0.26~0.59,P<0.001)和住院病死率(RR=0.59,95%CI:0.36~0.96,P=0.030),提高Ⅰ型呼吸衰竭患者氧合指数(MD=60.45,95%CI:20.44~100.46,P=0.003)。然而,在相同压力支持下,头罩降低Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者二氧化碳分压的能力低于面罩(MD=5.86,95%CI:3.64~8.08,P<0.001)。结论相比面罩,头罩可提高患者耐受性,减少不良反应,增加氧合作用,降低气管插管的风险,但在清除二氧化碳潴留方面无优势。

关键词: 头罩, 面罩, 无创通气, 呼吸衰竭, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of helmet and face mask noninvasive ventilation on patients with respiratory failure. Methods By searching literature database including Medline(Pubmed), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI and Chinese Biological Medicine Database, randomized controlled trials comparing helmet and face mask noninvasive ventilation, which were defined as helmet group and face mask group, for patients with respiratory failure were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted and quality assessment was conducted by using “risk of bias” criteria specified by the Cochrane Collaboration and Jadad scoring system. Meta-analysis was performed by using statistical software of Review manager 5.1.0. Results Overall, ten randomized controlled trials were included, with 228 cases in helmet group and 223 cases in face mask group. The Meta-analysis showed that, compared with face mask, helmet could significantly decrease the incidences of intolerance(RR=0.18,95%CI: 0.08-0.41,P<0.001), skin ulcer(RR=0.19,95%CI: 0.08-0.48,P<0.001)and gastric distension(RR=0.15,95%CI: 0.05-0.42,P<0.001), reduce the respiratory rate (MD=-3.01,95%CI: -4.87 - 1.16,P=0.001), endotracheal intubation rate(RR=0.39,95%CI: 0.26-0.59,P<0.001)and mortality(RR=0.59,95%CI: 0.36-0.96,P=0.030), and increase the oxygenation index of type-I respiratory failure(MD=60.45,95%CI: 20.44-100.46, P=0.003). How- 山东大学学报 (医学版)57卷7期 -洪树坤,等.头罩与面罩无创通气对呼吸衰竭患者临床疗效的Meta分析 \=-ever, the ability of reducing PaCO₂ of type-II respiratory failure of helmet was less than that of face mask(MD=5.86,95%CI: 3.64-8.08,P<0.001). Conclusion Compared with face mask, helmet can improve the patients’ tolerance, reduce the adverse events, increase the oxygenation effect, and decrease the risk of endotracheal intubation. Helmet has no advantage over face mask in eliminating the retention of CO₂.

Key words: Helmet, Face mask, Noninvasive ventilation, Respiratory failure, Meta-analysis

中图分类号:

R563.8

洪树坤,田勇刚,李亚红,乔鲁军. 头罩与面罩无创通气对呼吸衰竭患者临床疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(7): 92-101.

HONG Shukun, TIAN Yonggang, LI Yahong, QIAO Lujun. Clinical efficacy of helmet and face mask noninvasive ventilation on patients with respiratory failure: a Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2019, 57(7): 92-101.

参考文献

[1] Pettenuzzo T, Fan E. 2016 year in review: mechanical ventilation[J]. Respir Care, 2017, 62(5): 629-635.
[2] Miske LJ, Stetzer M, Garcia M, et al. Airways and injuries: protecting our pediatric patients from respiratory device-related pressure injuries[J]. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am, 2017, 29(2): 187-204.
[3] Cooper JD. Tracheal injuries complicating prolonged intubation and tracheostomy[J]. Thorac Surg Clin, 2018, 28(2): 139-144.
[4] Joshi N, Estes MK, Shipley K, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for patients in acute respiratory distress: an update[J]. Emerg Med Pract, 2017, 19(2): 1-20.
[5] Patel BK, Wolfe KS, Pohlman AS, et al. Effect of noninvasive ventilation delivered by helmet vs face mask on the rate of endotracheal intubation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(22): 2435-2441.
[6] Yang Y, Sun L, Liu N, et al. Effects of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation with different interfaces in patients with hypoxemia after surgery for stanford type A aortic dissection[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2015, 21: 2294-2304. doi: 10.12659/MSM.893956.
[7] Ozlem CG, Ali A, Fatma U, et al. Comparison of helmet and facial mask during noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled study[J]. Turk J Med Sci, 2015, 45(3): 600-606.
[8] Navalesi P, Costa R, Ceriana P, et al. Non-invasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: helmet versus facial mask[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2007, 33(1): 74-81.
[9] Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [EB/OL]. http://handbook.cochrane.org. 2011-03/2018-11.
[10] Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?[J]. Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17(1): 1-12.
[11] Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses(PRISMA)statement and publication bias[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2011, 39(2): 91-92.
[12] Page MJ, Moher D. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA)Statement and extensions: a scoping review[J]. Syst Rev, 2017, 6(1): 263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8.
[13] Wang H, Hong S, Liu Y, et al. High inspired oxygen versus low inspired oxygen for reducing surgical site infection: a meta-analysis[J]. Int Wound J, 2017, 14(1): 46-52.
[14] Wang H, Hong S, Teng H, et al. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2016, 29(22): 3705-3711.
[15] Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2005, 5: 13.
[16] Pisani L, Mega C, Vaschetto R, et al. Oronasal mask versus helmet in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure[J]. Eur Respir J, 2015, 45(3): 691-699.
[17] Antonaglia V, Ferluga M, Molino R, et al. Comparison of noninvasive ventilation by sequential use of mask and helmet versus mask in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a preliminary study[J]. Respiration, 2011, 82(2): 148-154.
[18] Ali A, Turkmen A, Turgut N, et al. [Comparison of non-invasive mechanical ventilation with helmet or face mask in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease] [J]. Tuberk Toraks, 2011, 59(2): 146-152.
[19] 张文梅,沈策. 头罩式无创正压通气在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者中的临床应用[J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2008, 15(28): 900-903. ZHANG Wenmei, SHEN Ce. Clinical use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation using a helmet in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. International Journal of Respiration, 2008, 15(28): 900-903.
[20] 张文梅,沈策. 头罩式无创正压通气在急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的临床应用[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2010, 15(1): 48-50. ZHANG Wenmei, SHEN Ce. The clinical use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation using a helmet in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, 2010, 15(1): 48-50.
[21] 杨毅,刘楠,侯晓彤,等. 无创正压通气不同界面在改善冠状动脉旁路移植术后低氧血症的研究[J]. 心肺血管病杂志, 2016, 35(2): 110-115. YANG Yi, LIU Nan, HOU Xiaotong, et al. Effects of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with different interfaces on hypoxemic patients after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery[J]. Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, 2016, 35(2): 110-115.
[22] Xu XP, Zhang XC, Hu SL, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in acute hypoxemic nonhypercapnic respiratory failure: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care Med, 2017, 45(7): e727-e733. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002361.
[23] Chidini G, Piastra M, Marchesi T, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure with helmet versus mask in infants with bronchiolitis: an RCT[J]. Pediatrics, 2015, 135(4): e868-e875. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1142.
[24] 李佳,曾茂妮,梁宗安. 头罩和面罩无创通气对急性呼吸衰竭患者疗效的荟萃分析[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2017, 16(2): 165-174. LI Jia, ZENG Maoni, LIANG Zongan. Efficacy of ventilation with a helmet versus face mask in patients with acute respiratory failure: a meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2017, 16(2): 165-174.
[25] Taccone P, Hess D, Caironi P, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure delivered with a "helmet": effects on carbon dioxide rebreathing[J]. Crit Care Med, 2004, 32(10): 2090-2096.
[26] Vargas F, Thille A, Lyazidi A, et al. Helmet with specific settings versus facemask for noninvasive ventilation[J]. Crit Care Med, 2009, 37(6): 1921-1928.
[27] Patel BK, Wolfe KS, Mackenzie EL, et al. One-year outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of helmet versus facemask noninvasive ventilation[J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(7): 1078-1084.
[28] Kyeremanteng K, Gagnon LP, Robidoux R, et al. Cost analysis of noninvasive helmet ventilation compared with use of Nnoninvasive face mask in ARDS[J]. Can Respir J, 2018, 2018: 6518572. doi: 10.1155/2018/6518572.
[29] Liu Q, Gao Y, Chen R, et al. Noninvasive ventilation with helmet versus control strategy in patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies[J]. Crit Care, 2016, 20: 265. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1449-4.

相关文章 15

[1]	秦静,杨飞,陈谦,夏涵岱,刘延国,王秀问. 晚期驱动基因阴性、PD-L1表达阴性非鳞非小细胞肺癌一线治疗方案的网状Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 74-82.
[2]	潘鹏飞,徐立升,纪坤乾,王得翔,李玉. 以呼吸衰竭起病的线粒体肌病1例及文献回顾[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 54-59.
[3]	陈红艳,马园园,孙虎魁. 肺癌患者¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax与程序性死亡受体-配体1表达相关性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(6): 81-86.
[4]	殷晓霖,杨孝荣,张同超,满金宇,吕明. 儿茶酚氧位甲基转移酶基因G1947A多态性与吸烟行为相关性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(2): 110-116.
[5]	齐萌,黄燕,吴珊珊,刘波,张思伟. 单能量去金属伪影算法重建效果的系统评价及Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(9): 59-64.
[6]	倪迎春,杨孝荣,杜金阁,吕明. 豆制品摄入量与胃癌发病风险关系的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(10): 93-102.
[7]	林萍珍,薛娇美,杨蓓,李萌,周麦琳,曹枫林. 基于Pearson相关系数的癌症患者创伤后成长与心理适应相关性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(9): 110-121.
[8]	杜金阁,陈慧,杨孝荣,吕明. STAT4 rs7574865位点单核苷酸多态性与系统性红斑狼疮易感性Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(5): 95-102.
[9]	王丽丽,霍彬,王磊,汪浩,侯定坤,霍小东,王金焕,臧立,曹强,柴树德,王海涛. 亚肺叶切除联合¹²⁵I粒子植入治疗早期肺癌有效性的Meta分析与系统评价[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(10): 76-83.
[10]	徐闯,戚大春,李贤让,祖萌,李健,刘明廷. 初次髋关节置换术后引流与否的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(6): 43-49.
[11]	木哈达斯·吐尔逊依明,帕它木·莫合买提,托兰古丽·买买提库尔班. CDKAL1(rs10946398 C/A)基因多态性与2型糖尿病易感性关系Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(2): 75-85.
[12]	陈春艳,刘小军,祁绍艳,王文涛. 体外膜肺氧合在重症患者中的应用36例回顾分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(11): 40-43.
[13]	孙祥耀,海涌,张希诺. 经皮内固定术与传统后路开放内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折不良事件比较的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(11): 56-63.
[14]	苏静, 薛娇美, 孙菲菲, 郭兆新, 程翔宇, 孟力维, 刘照旭. 肾单位保留术和肾癌根治术治疗T1b期肾癌的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(9): 65-70.
[15]	刘京生, 刘桂华, 杜昆, 赵倩, 翁韶波, 赵学英, 张喜庄, 金讯波. 中国人群中血清TK1对不同恶性肿瘤诊断价值的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(9): 71-79.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed