您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (9): 59-64.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2018.207

• • 上一篇    

单能量去金属伪影算法重建效果的系统评价及Meta分析

齐萌,黄燕,吴珊珊,刘波,张思伟   

  1. 广东省中医院影像科, 广东 广州 510000
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 张思伟. E-mail:z_siwei@163.com

Effects of single-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

QI Meng, HUANG Yan, WU Shanshan, LIU Bo, ZHANG Siwei   

  1. Department of Imaging, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

摘要: 目的 通过系统评价和Meta分析评估基于单能量去金属伪影算法的CT后处理技术(SEMAR)对金属伪影的去除效果。 方法 检索2009年1月至2018年1月美国生物医学数据库PubMed、荷兰医学文摘Embase、Web of science、Cochrane图书馆和中国期刊全文数据库等发表的相关中英文文献,通过纳入及排除标准进行筛选,对纳入文献采用Cochrane风险偏移评估工具进行质量评估,提取文献中使用的评估标准及相关数据,并对相应数据进行合并。采用Review Manager 5.0对纳入文献汇总分析,根据文献异质性进行亚组分析及敏感性分析。 结果 符合纳入标准文献9篇,其中英文8篇,中文1篇。Meta分析显示,SEMAR技术可明显提升金属伪影和周围结构的评分,对金属伪影CT值、周围软组织噪声(SD值)具有良好的校正作用,MD伪影评分=1.19(95%CI:0.99~1.39)、MD前列腺/子宫图像质量评分=1.87(95%CI:0.69~3.05)、MD膀胱图像质量评分=2.31(95%CI:1.28~3.34)、MD伪影CT值=118.7 HU(95%CI:50.48~186.93)、MD周围软组织噪声=298.05(95%CI:61.66~534.43);明显提高周围病变的检出率RD=0.07(0.02~0.13),但对周围组织的CT值[MD=-21.35(95%CI:-44.0~1.31)]及伪影指数[MD=3.11(95%CI:-0.97~7.15)]的影响无统计学意义。 结论 SEMAR具有良好的去除金属伪影及提升周围病变检出效果,且在去除金属伪影的同时,对周围软组织的CT值无明显影响。

关键词: 金属伪影, 单能量, 电子计算机断层扫描, 系统评价, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effects of single-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm(SEMAR)by systematic review and Meta-analysis. Methods Studies on SEMAR and non-SEMAR technique published during Jan. 2009 to Jan. 2018 were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of science, the Cochrane Library and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI). Articles were reviewed and screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality was evaluated with Cochrane collaborations tool for assessing risk of bias. Data were extracted and then analyzed with Review Manager 5.0 software. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed according to the heterogeneity of the literature. Results A total of 9 articles were enrolled, including 8 English articles and 1 Chinese article. Meta-analysis indicated that SEMAR could significantly improve the scores of the metal artifacts and surrounding organs, and correct the CT value and image noise: MD(metal artifact score)=1.19(95%CI: 0.99-1.39), MD(prostate/uterus image quality score)=1.87(95%CI: 0.69-3.05), MD(bladder image quality score)=2.31(95%CI: 1.28-3.340), MD(metal artifact CT)=118.7 Hu(95%CI: 50.48-186.93), MD(surrounding soft tissue noise)=298.05(95%CI: 61.66-534.43). It could also increase the detection rate of nearby lesions RD=0.07(0.02-0.13), but did not affect the CT 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)56卷9期 -齐萌,等.单能量去金属伪影算法重建效果的系统评价及Meta分析 \=-values of nearby structures[MD=-21.35(95%CI:-44.0-1.31)] and artifact index[MD=3.11(95%CI: -0.97-7.15)]. Conclusion SEMAR has a good effect on the removal of metal artifacts and the detection of peripheral lesions, without affecting the CT values of surrounding soft tissues.

Key words: Metal artifact, single-energy, Computed Tomography, Systematic review, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R811.1
[1] Blum A, Meyer JB, Raymond A, et al. CT of hip prosthesis: New techniques and new paradigms[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2016, 97(7-8): 725-733.
[2] 赵宾, 王继红. 宝石能谱CT在骨科患者术后检查中的应用效果分析[J]. 临床影像技术, 2016, 31(3): 74-75. ZHAO Bin, WANG Jihong. An analysis of the application effect of gemstone spectral CT scan in orthopedic postoperative examination[J]. Clinical imaging technology, 2016, 31(3): 74-75.
[3] Gupta A, Subhas N, Primak AN, et al. Metal artifact reduction: standard and advanced magnetic resonance and computed tomography techniques[J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2015, 53(3): 531-547.
[4] Bamberg F, Dierks A, Nikolaou K, et al. Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation[J]. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(7): 1424-1429.
[5] Boas FE, Fleischmann D. Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography[J]. Radiology, 2011, 259(3): 894-902.
[6] 弓婷婷, 韩雪立, 韩津梁, 等. iDose4迭代重建技术和滤波反投影技术在冠状动脉CT成像中的应用[J].吉林大学学报(医学版), 2017, 41(6): 159-163. GONG Tingting, HAN Xueli, HAN Jinliang, et al. Application of iDose4 iterative reconstruction technique and filtered back projection technique in CT imaging of coronary artery[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Medicine Edition), 2017, 41(6): 159-163.
[7] 曾宪涛, 包翠萍, 曹世义, 等. Meta分析系列之三: 随机对照试验的质量评价工具[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2012, 4(3): 183-185.
[8] Gondim Teixeira PA, Meyer JB, Baumann C, et al. Total hip prosthesis CT with single-energy projection-based metallic artifact reduction: Impact on the visualization of specific periprosthetic soft tissue structures[J]. Skeletal Radiology, 2014, 43(9): 1237-1246.
[9] Hirata K, Utsunomiya D, Oda S, et al. Added value of a single-energy projection-based metal-artifact reduction algorithm for the computed tomography evaluation of oral cavity cancers[J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2015, 33(10): 650-656.
[10] Kidoh M, Utsunomiya D, Ikeda O, et al. Reduction of metallic coil artefacts in computed tomography body imaging: effects of a new single-energy metal artefact reduction algorithm[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(5): 1378-1386.
[11] Sofue K, Yoshikawa T, Ohno Y, et al. Improved image quality in abdominal CT in patients who underwent treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with small metal implants using a raw data-based metal artifact reduction algorithm[J]. European Radiology, 2016, 12(2): 1-11.
[12] Sonoda A,Nitta N, Ushio N, et al.Evaluation of the quality of CT images acquired with the single energy metal artifact reduction(SEMAR)algorithm in patients with hip and dental prostheses and aneurysm embolization coils[J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2015, 33(11): 710-716.
[13] Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Sakane H, et al. Coronary CT angiography in patients with implanted cardiac devices: initial experience with the metal artefact reduction technique[J]. Br J Radiol, 2016, 89(1067): 20160493.
[14] Yasaka K, Kamiya K, Irie R, et al. Metal artefact reduction for patients with metallic dental fillings in helical neck computed tomography: comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D(AIDR 3D), forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution(FIRST)and AIDR 3D with single-energy metal artefact reduction(SEMAR)[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2016, 45(7): 20160114.
[15] Yasaka K, Maeda E, Hanaoka S, et al. Single-energy metal artifact reduction for helical computed tomography of the pelvis in patients with metal hip prostheses[J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2016, 34(9): 625-632.
[16] 唐启瑛, 阎作勤, 陆秀良, 等. 320排CT去金属伪影在评价腰椎内固定术后情况的临床价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2015, 31(11): 1824-1827. TANG Qiying, YAN Zuoqin, LU Xiuliang, et al. The clinical value of 320-row CT metal artifact reduction in patients with postoperative lumbar fixation[J]. Journal of Practical Radiol, 2015, 31(11): 1824-1827.
[17] Malhotra A, Kalra VB, Wu X, et al. Imaging of lumbar spinal surgery complications[J]. Insights Imaging, 2015, 6(6): 579-590.
[18] Fang J, Zhang D, Wilcox C, et al. Metal implants on CT: comparison of iterative reconstruction algorithms for reduction of metal artifacts with single energy and spectral CT scanning in a phantom model[J]. Abdom Radiol(NY), 2017, 42(3): 742-748.
[19] Fraga-Manteiga E, Shaw DJ, Dennison S, et al. An optimized computed tomography protocol for metallic gunshot head trauma in a seal model[J]. Vet Radiol Ultrasound, 2014, 55(4): 393-398.
[20] Agten CA, Sutter R, Pfirrmann CW. CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty[J]. Radiologe, 2014, 54(7): 715-725.
[21] 颜森森, 罗敏, 汪奇慧, 等. 单源能谱CT在消除金属内固定伪影中的应用[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2016, 26(1): 94-98. YAN Sensen, LUO Min, WANG Qihui, et al. Application of single-source energy CT in the elimination of the fixed metal artifacts[J]. Journal of Medical Imaging, 2016, 26(1): 94-98.
[22] Omoumi P, Verdun FR, Guggenberger R, et al. Dual-energy CT: basic principles, technical approaches, and applications in musculoskeletal imaging(Part 2)[J]. Semin Musculoskelet R, 2015, 19(5): 438-445.
[23] Mallinson PI, Coupal TM, McLaughlin PD, et al. Dual-Energy CT for the Musculoskeletal System[J]. Radiology, 2016, 281(3): 690-707.
[24] 林晓珠, 沈云, 陈克敏. CT能谱成像的基本原理与临床应用研究进展[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2011, 45(8): 798-800. LIN Xiaozhu, SHEN Yun, CHEN Kemin. Spectral CT imaging:principle, clinical application and research[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiology, 2011, 45(8): 798-800.
[25] Kidoh M, Utsunomiya D, Oda S, et al. CT venography after knee replacement surgery: comparison of dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging and single-energy metal artifact reduction techniques on a 320-row CT scanner[J]. Acta Radiol Open, 2017, 6(2): 1-8.
[1] 秦静,杨飞,陈谦,夏涵岱,刘延国,王秀问. 晚期驱动基因阴性、PD-L1表达阴性非鳞非小细胞肺癌一线治疗方案的网状Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 74-82.
[2] 林萍珍,薛娇美,杨蓓,李萌,周麦琳,曹枫林. 基于Pearson相关系数的癌症患者创伤后成长与心理适应相关性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 110-121.
[3] 王维军,周宁全,王超. CT定位微创徒手穿刺软通道技术治疗中等量高血压脑出血68例[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(5): 61-65.
[4] 杜金阁,陈慧,杨孝荣,吕明. STAT4 rs7574865位点单核苷酸多态性与系统性红斑狼疮易感性Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(5): 95-102.
[5] 王丽丽,霍彬,王磊,汪浩,侯定坤,霍小东,王金焕,臧立,曹强,柴树德,王海涛. 亚肺叶切除联合125I粒子植入治疗早期肺癌有效性的Meta分析与系统评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(10): 76-83.
[6] 徐闯,戚大春,李贤让,祖萌,李健,刘明廷. 初次髋关节置换术后引流与否的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(6): 43-49.
[7] 木哈达斯·吐尔逊依明,帕它木·莫合买提,托兰古丽·买买提库尔班. CDKAL1(rs10946398 C/A)基因多态性与2型糖尿病易感性关系Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(2): 75-85.
[8] 孙祥耀,海涌,张希诺. 经皮内固定术与传统后路开放内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折不良事件比较的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(11): 56-63.
[9] 刘青, 商蒙蒙, 孙霄, 李杰, 杨杰, 时丹丹, 宁松. 泌尿系结石化学成分对超声声影强弱的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(9): 19-23.
[10] 苏静, 薛娇美, 孙菲菲, 郭兆新, 程翔宇, 孟力维, 刘照旭. 肾单位保留术和肾癌根治术治疗T1b期肾癌的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(9): 65-70.
[11] 刘京生, 刘桂华, 杜昆, 赵倩, 翁韶波, 赵学英, 张喜庄, 金讯波. 中国人群中血清TK1对不同恶性肿瘤诊断价值的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(9): 71-79.
[12] 吴珍, 宋国栋, 王伟. 他汀类药物对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺病治疗效果的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(2): 12-18.
[13] 王音, 马喆, 陶国伟, 刘韶平, 丁婷婷, 石琳琳. 关于产前诊断胼胝体发育不全患儿预后的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(10): 66-72.
[14] 孙媛媛, 高伟, 崔英, 张红, 焦建芬, 李衎, 徐瑞彩. 肿瘤化疗患者应用植入式静脉输液港与PICC效果比较的系统评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(10): 73-81.
[15] 许月芳, 刘皈阳, 张鑫. 氨曲南治疗下呼吸道感染疗效及 安全性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(Z2): 198-200.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!