山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (5): 60-70.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0961
• 重点专题——动脉桥在冠脉旁路移植中的应用 • 上一篇
温学龙1,刘安慧1,陈经纬2,吴梦婷2,杨岷2
WEN Xuelong1, LIU Anhui1, CHEN Jingwei2, WU Mengting2, YANG Min2
摘要: 目的 探讨急性非ST抬高型心肌梗死(non ST elevated myocardial infarction, NSTEMI)患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术(coronary artery bypass grafting, CABG)的时间间隔对患者临床结局的影响。 方法 使用计算机搜索引擎在CNKI、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、PubMed、Google Scholar等中英文数据库进行检索,检索时间为建库至2024年7月。Meta分析采用RevMan 5.4软件进行,根据患者确诊NSTEMI至行CABG的时间间隔分别以1 d、3 d、7 d为时间点分为3个亚组,早期组(<1 d、<3 d、<7 d)和延迟组(>1 d、>3 d、>7 d)。首要结局指标为住院期间全因死亡率,次要结局指标为围术期再发心肌梗死和脑卒中发生率。 结果 共纳入13篇文献,含回顾性研究6个,数据库研究7个,共计657 555例患者。其中10个研究比较了NSTEMI患者1 d内行CABG与1 d后行CABG对患者结局指标的影响,6个研究比较了NSTEMI患者3 d内行CABG与3 d后行CABG对患者结局指标的影响,3个研究比较了NSTEMI患者7 d内行CABG与7 d后行CABG对患者结局指标的影响。Meta分析发现1 d早期组与延迟组相比,全因死亡率较高(OR=1.58, 95%CI:1.09~2.30, P=0.02),差异有统计学意义。围术期再发心梗(OR=0.61, 95%CI:0.28~1.33, P=0.21)和脑卒中(OR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.58~1.55, P=0.82)的风险较低,但差异无统计学意义。3 d早期组与延迟组全因死亡率(OR=1.01,95%CI:0.73~1.41,P=0.95)、围术期再发心梗(OR=0.89,95%CI:0.36~2.18,P=0.79)及脑卒中(OR=1.59,95%CI:0.80~3.17,P=0.19)风险差异无统计学意义。7 d早期组与延迟组全因死亡率差异无统计学意义(OR=1.14, 95%CI:0.63~2.08,P=0.67),未将围术期再发心梗与脑卒中事件列为结局指标。 结论 急性NSTEMI患者1 d内行CABG手术风险较延迟组高,CABG手术应尽可能推迟到1 d后。
中图分类号:
| [1] 刘明波, 何新叶, 杨晓红, 等. 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2023》要点解读[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(1): 20-38. LIU Mingbo,HE Xinye,YANG Xiaohong, et al. Interpretation of report on cardiovascular health and diseases in china 2023[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(1): 20-38. [2] Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40(2): 87-165. [3] 韩雅玲,杨跃进,陈绍良,等. 非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征诊断和治疗指南(2024)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2024, 52(6): 615-646. HAN Yaling, YANG Yuejin, CHEN Shaoliang, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndrome with non-ST segment elevation(2024)[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 2024, 52(6): 615-646. [4] Yeh RW, Sidney S, Chandra M, et al. Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(23): 2155-2165. [5] Shah ASV, Anand A, Strachan FE, et al. High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10151): 919-928. [6] Barbarawi M, Zayed Y, Kheiri B, et al. Optimal timing of coronary intervention in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI): a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Resuscitation, 2019, 144: 137-144. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.06.279 [7] Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2010, 25(9): 603-605. [8] Nichols EL, McCullough JN, Ross CS, et al. Optimal timing from myocardial infarction to coronary artery bypass grafting on hospital mortality[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 103(1): 162-171 [9] Bianco V, Kilic A, Gleason TG, et al. Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction may not influence mortality and readmissions[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 161(6): 2056-2064. [10] Park DY, Singireddy S, Mangalesh S, et al. The associa-tion of timing of coronary artery bypass grafting for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and clinical outcomes in the contemporary United States[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2024, 35(4): 261-269. [11] Shin MA, Oh S, Kim MC, et al. Time to presentation and mortality outcomes among patients with diabetes and acute myocardial infarction[J]. Korean J Intern Med, 2024, 39(1): 110-122. [12] Davierwala PM, Verevkin A, Leontyev S, et al. Does timing of coronary artery bypass surgery affect early and long-term outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction?[J]. Circulation, 2015, 132(8): 731-740. [13] Case BC, Yerasi C, Wang Y, et al. Admissions rate and timing of revascularization in the United States in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2020, 134: 24-31. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.08.010 [14] Lee DC, Oz MC, Weinberg AD, et al. Optimal timing of revascularization: transmural versus nontransmural acute myocardial infarction[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001, 71(4): 1197-202. [15] Hadaya J, Sanaiha Y, Tran Z, et al. Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndrome: a national analysis[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2022, 113(5): 1482-1490. [16] Kemberi M, Urgesi E, Ng JY, et al. Outcomes of patients presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction who underwent surgical revascularization[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2024, 223: 165-173. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.05.022 [17] Liakopoulos OJ, Slottosch I, Wendt D, et al. Surgical revascularization for acute coronary syndromes: a report from the North Rhine-Westphalia surgical myocardial infarction registry[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2020, 58(6): 1137-1144. [18] Rojas SV, Trinh-Adams ML, Uribarri A, et al. Early surgical myocardial revascularization in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(11): 4444-4452. [19] 武凌宁, 徐承义, 熊晡, 等. 早期冠状动脉旁路移植术对高危急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者12个月临床结果的影响[J]. 中国心血管病研究, 2021, 19(6): 516-520. WU Lingning, XU Chengyi, XIONG Bu, et al. Effect of early coronary artery bypass grafting on 12 months clinical outcomes in patients with high risk acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Research, 2021, 19(6): 516-520. [20] Deyell MW, Ghali WA, Ross DB, et al. Timing of nonemergent coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality after non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome[J]. Am Heart J, 2010, 159(3): 490-196. [21] Coleman WS, DeWood MA, Berg R Jr, et al. Surgical intervention in acute myocardial infarction: an historical perspective[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1995, 7(4): 176-183. [22] Hill JD, Kerth WJ, Kelly JJ, et al. Emergency aortocoronary bypass for impending or extending myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation, 1971, 43(5 Suppl): I105-I110. [23] Dawson JT, Hall RJ, Hallman GL, et al. Mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery after myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1974, 33(4): 483-486. [24] Weiss ES, Chang DD, Joyce DL, et al. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008, 135(3): 503-511. [25] Khaladj N, Bobylev D, Peterss S, et al. Immediate surgical coronary revascularisation in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2013, 8: 167. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-8-167 [26] Parikh SV, de Lemos JA, Jessen ME, et al. Timing of in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION Registry-GWTG(Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines)[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 3(4): 419-427. [27] Kolh P, Wijns W, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg, 2010, 38: S1-S52. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.019 [28] Raghavan R, Benzaquen BS, Rudski L. Timing of bypass surgery in stable patients after acute myocardial infarction[J]. Can J Cardiol, 2007, 23(12): 976-982. [29] Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(3): 18-114. [30] Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making[J]. JAMA, 2000, 284(7): 835-842. [31] Chu D, Anastacio MM, Mulukutla SR, et al. Safety and efficacy of implementing a multidisciplinary heart team approach for revascularization in patients with complex coronary artery disease: an observational cohort pilot study[J]. JAMA Surg, 2014, 149(11): 1109-1112. [32] Axelsson TA, Mennander A, Malmberg M, et al. Is emergency and salvage coronary artery bypass grafting justified? The Nordic Emergency/Salvage coronary artery bypass grafting study[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 49(5): 1451-1456. [33] Kolte D, Khera S, Dabhadkar KC, et al. Trends in coronary angiography, revascularization, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2016, 117(1): 1-9. [34] Davierwala PM, Verevkin A, Leontyev S, et al. Does timing of coronary artery bypass surgery affect early and long-term outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction?[J]. Circulation, 2015, 132(8): 731-740. [35] Rojas SV, Trinh-Adams ML, Uribarri A, et al. Early surgical myocardial revascularization in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(11): 4444-4452. [36] Navarese EP, Gurbel PA, Andreotti F, et al. Optimal timing of coronary invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2013, 158(4): 261-270. [37] Bianco V, Kilic A, Gleason TG, et al. Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction may not influence mortality and readmissions[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 161(6): 2056-2064. [38] Bhatt DL, Lopes RD, Harrington RA. Diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes: a review[J]. JAMA, 2022, 327(7): 662-675. [39] Biancari F, Vasques F, Mikkola R, et al. Validation of EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2012, 93(6): 1930-1935. [40] Ad N, Holmes SD, Patel J, et al. Comparison of EuroSCORE II, original EuroSCORE, and the society of thoracic surgeons risk score in cardiac surgery patients[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016, 102(2): 573-579. [41] Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events(GRACE). The GRACE ACS Risk Score Calculator 2.0 [DS/OL].(2021-01-01)[2024-07-01]. https:// www.outcomes-umassmed.org/grace/acs_risk2/index.html [42] Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014, 64(24): e139-e228. [43] Patlolla SH, Crestanello JA, Schaff HV, et al. Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after myocardial infarction influences late survival[J]. JTCVS Open, 2024, 20: 40-48. doi:10.1016/j.xjon.2024.05.008 |
| [1] | 莫绪明,王庆峰. 冠状动脉旁路移植术在儿童心血管疾病中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 40-46. |
| [2] | 王智琪,戚继荣,扈元利,陈绪军,王庆峰,莫绪明. 全动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗儿童川崎病后冠状动脉瘤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 47-53. |
| [3] | 陈绪军,申林,陈军,于涛,曹广庆,肖飞. 解剖完全再血管化是冠心病外科治疗的新策略[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 12-17. |
| [4] | 国科,陈绪军,郑宝石,黄克力,王晓武,陈景伟,林宇,罗俊辉,王海晨,王振东,廖成全,李有金,陈文生. 解剖完全再血管化全动脉冠脉旁路移植术多中心应用中期结果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 18-25. |
| [5] | 国科,陈绪军,郑宝石,施超,黄克力,曹勇,陈军,吴东凯,张晓慎,罗俊辉,申林,莫绪明,杨岷,王晓武,雷印胜,田茂州,王振东,孟自力,孙忠东,李有金,陆辉辉,孟春营,高峰,陈黔苏,郭能瑞,柳德斌,张楠,林宇,陈文生,宋保国,方智,王海晨,廖晓波,徐朝军. 快通道拔管在全动脉冠脉旁路移植术的多中心临床效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 26-32. |
| [6] | 卢圣勋,邢亚闯,罗俊辉,刘杰,何厚乐,王志强,张娜. 糖尿病患者冠脉旁路移植手术中动脉桥的研究现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 33-39. |
| [7] | 刘向荣,张新胜,杨荩冉,杨雪艳,刘钊,刘英华. ω-6/ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸比值对不同肿瘤发病风险的系统综述和Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 34-48. |
| [8] | 张熙伟,任琳玮,张辉,张歆杰,刘伟国,王东. 左胸廓内动脉联合桡动脉行冠状动脉旁路移植术早期临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 39-46. |
| [9] | 秦静,杨飞,陈谦,夏涵岱,刘延国,王秀问. 晚期驱动基因阴性、PD-L1表达阴性非鳞非小细胞肺癌一线治疗方案的网状Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 74-82. |
| [10] | 洪树坤,田勇刚,李亚红,乔鲁军. 头罩与面罩无创通气对呼吸衰竭患者临床疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(7): 92-101. |
| [11] | 陈红艳,马园园,孙虎魁. 肺癌患者18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax与程序性死亡受体-配体1表达相关性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(6): 81-86. |
| [12] | 殷晓霖,杨孝荣,张同超,满金宇,吕明. 儿茶酚氧位甲基转移酶基因G1947A多态性与吸烟行为相关性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(2): 110-116. |
| [13] | 王海霞,李一章,白晨晓,姜迪,王丽雯,陈欧. 克拉霉素辅助治疗哮喘疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(11): 27-33. |
| [14] | 齐萌,黄燕,吴珊珊,刘波,张思伟. 单能量去金属伪影算法重建效果的系统评价及Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(9): 59-64. |
| [15] | 倪迎春,杨孝荣,杜金阁,吕明. 豆制品摄入量与胃癌发病风险关系的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(10): 93-102. |
|
||