您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (5): 60-70.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0961

• 重点专题——动脉桥在冠脉旁路移植中的应用 • 上一篇    

急性非ST抬高型心肌梗死行冠状动脉旁路移植手术时机Meta分析

温学龙1,刘安慧1,陈经纬2,吴梦婷2,杨岷2   

  1. 1.江南大学无锡医学院, 江苏 无锡 214122;2.江南大学附属医院心脏大血管外科, 江苏 无锡 214122
  • 发布日期:2025-05-07
  • 通讯作者: 杨岷. E-mail:xlfd103110@163.com

A Meta-analysis of the timing of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery for acute non-ST myocardial infarction

WEN Xuelong1, LIU Anhui1, CHEN Jingwei2, WU Mengting2, YANG Min2   

  1. 1. Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, China;
    2. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, China
  • Published:2025-05-07

摘要: 目的 探讨急性非ST抬高型心肌梗死(non ST elevated myocardial infarction, NSTEMI)患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术(coronary artery bypass grafting, CABG)的时间间隔对患者临床结局的影响。 方法 使用计算机搜索引擎在CNKI、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、PubMed、Google Scholar等中英文数据库进行检索,检索时间为建库至2024年7月。Meta分析采用RevMan 5.4软件进行,根据患者确诊NSTEMI至行CABG的时间间隔分别以1 d、3 d、7 d为时间点分为3个亚组,早期组(<1 d、<3 d、<7 d)和延迟组(>1 d、>3 d、>7 d)。首要结局指标为住院期间全因死亡率,次要结局指标为围术期再发心肌梗死和脑卒中发生率。 结果 共纳入13篇文献,含回顾性研究6个,数据库研究7个,共计657 555例患者。其中10个研究比较了NSTEMI患者1 d内行CABG与1 d后行CABG对患者结局指标的影响,6个研究比较了NSTEMI患者3 d内行CABG与3 d后行CABG对患者结局指标的影响,3个研究比较了NSTEMI患者7 d内行CABG与7 d后行CABG对患者结局指标的影响。Meta分析发现1 d早期组与延迟组相比,全因死亡率较高(OR=1.58, 95%CI:1.09~2.30, P=0.02),差异有统计学意义。围术期再发心梗(OR=0.61, 95%CI:0.28~1.33, P=0.21)和脑卒中(OR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.58~1.55, P=0.82)的风险较低,但差异无统计学意义。3 d早期组与延迟组全因死亡率(OR=1.01,95%CI:0.73~1.41,P=0.95)、围术期再发心梗(OR=0.89,95%CI:0.36~2.18,P=0.79)及脑卒中(OR=1.59,95%CI:0.80~3.17,P=0.19)风险差异无统计学意义。7 d早期组与延迟组全因死亡率差异无统计学意义(OR=1.14, 95%CI:0.63~2.08,P=0.67),未将围术期再发心梗与脑卒中事件列为结局指标。 结论 急性NSTEMI患者1 d内行CABG手术风险较延迟组高,CABG手术应尽可能推迟到1 d后。

关键词: 急性非ST抬高型心肌梗死, 冠状动脉旁路移植术, 早期手术, 延迟手术, 系统评价, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To investigate the influence of the time interval of coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG)on the clinical outcomes of patients who suffered from acute non-ST elevated myocardial infarction(NSTEMI). Methods CNKI, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched. The search time of the databases was from the establishment of the database to July 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software and patients were divided into 3 subgroups according to the time interval from diagnosis of NSTEMI to CABG at 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days, respectively, namely the early group(<1 d,<3 d,<7 d)and the delayed group(>1 d,>3 d,>7 d). The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality during hospitalization, and the secondary outcome measure was the incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction and stroke during perioperative period. Results A total of 13 studies were included, containing 6 retrospective studies and 7 database studies, involving 657 555 patients. Among them, 10 studies compared the impact of CABG within 1 day and after 1 day in NSTEMI patients on patient outcome indicators, 6 studies sorted out the effects of CABG within 3 days and CABG after 3 days in NSTEMI patients on patient outcome indicators, 3 studies examined the effects of CABG within 7 days and CABG after 7 days on outcomes in NSTEMI patients. Meta analysis showed that compared with the delayed group, the all-cause mortality rate was higher in the early 1-day group(OR=1.58, 95%CI:1.09-2.30, P=0.02),and the difference was statistically significant. The risk of perioperative recurrence of myocardial infarction(OR=0.61, 95%CI:0.28-1.33, P=0.21)and stroke(OR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.58-1.55, P=0.82)were lower, but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the all-cause mortality(OR=1.01, 95%CI:0.73-1.41, P=0.95), perioperative recurrence of myocardial infarction(OR=0.89, 95%CI:0.36-2.18, P=0.79)and stroke(OR=1.59, 95%CI:0.80-3.17, P=0.19)risks between the early 3-day group and the delayed group. There was no statistically significant difference in the all-cause mortality rate between the early 7-day group and the delayed group(OR=1.14, 95%CI: 0.63-2.08, P=0.67), and perioperative recurrence of myocardial infarction and stroke were not included as outcome indicators. Conclusion The risk of CABG operation within 1 day in acute NSTEMI patients was higher than that in the delayed group. CABG for NSTEMI patients should be postponed after 1 day if possible.

Key words: Acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, Coronary artery bypass grafting, Early surgery, Delayed operation, Systematic review, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R654
[1] 刘明波, 何新叶, 杨晓红, 等. 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2023》要点解读[J]. 中国全科医学, 2025, 28(1): 20-38. LIU Mingbo,HE Xinye,YANG Xiaohong, et al. Interpretation of report on cardiovascular health and diseases in china 2023[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(1): 20-38.
[2] Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40(2): 87-165.
[3] 韩雅玲,杨跃进,陈绍良,等. 非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征诊断和治疗指南(2024)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2024, 52(6): 615-646. HAN Yaling, YANG Yuejin, CHEN Shaoliang, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndrome with non-ST segment elevation(2024)[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 2024, 52(6): 615-646.
[4] Yeh RW, Sidney S, Chandra M, et al. Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(23): 2155-2165.
[5] Shah ASV, Anand A, Strachan FE, et al. High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10151): 919-928.
[6] Barbarawi M, Zayed Y, Kheiri B, et al. Optimal timing of coronary intervention in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI): a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Resuscitation, 2019, 144: 137-144. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.06.279
[7] Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2010, 25(9): 603-605.
[8] Nichols EL, McCullough JN, Ross CS, et al. Optimal timing from myocardial infarction to coronary artery bypass grafting on hospital mortality[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 103(1): 162-171
[9] Bianco V, Kilic A, Gleason TG, et al. Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction may not influence mortality and readmissions[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 161(6): 2056-2064.
[10] Park DY, Singireddy S, Mangalesh S, et al. The associa-tion of timing of coronary artery bypass grafting for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and clinical outcomes in the contemporary United States[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2024, 35(4): 261-269.
[11] Shin MA, Oh S, Kim MC, et al. Time to presentation and mortality outcomes among patients with diabetes and acute myocardial infarction[J]. Korean J Intern Med, 2024, 39(1): 110-122.
[12] Davierwala PM, Verevkin A, Leontyev S, et al. Does timing of coronary artery bypass surgery affect early and long-term outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction?[J]. Circulation, 2015, 132(8): 731-740.
[13] Case BC, Yerasi C, Wang Y, et al. Admissions rate and timing of revascularization in the United States in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2020, 134: 24-31. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.08.010
[14] Lee DC, Oz MC, Weinberg AD, et al. Optimal timing of revascularization: transmural versus nontransmural acute myocardial infarction[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001, 71(4): 1197-202.
[15] Hadaya J, Sanaiha Y, Tran Z, et al. Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndrome: a national analysis[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2022, 113(5): 1482-1490.
[16] Kemberi M, Urgesi E, Ng JY, et al. Outcomes of patients presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction who underwent surgical revascularization[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2024, 223: 165-173. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.05.022
[17] Liakopoulos OJ, Slottosch I, Wendt D, et al. Surgical revascularization for acute coronary syndromes: a report from the North Rhine-Westphalia surgical myocardial infarction registry[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2020, 58(6): 1137-1144.
[18] Rojas SV, Trinh-Adams ML, Uribarri A, et al. Early surgical myocardial revascularization in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(11): 4444-4452.
[19] 武凌宁, 徐承义, 熊晡, 等. 早期冠状动脉旁路移植术对高危急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者12个月临床结果的影响[J]. 中国心血管病研究, 2021, 19(6): 516-520. WU Lingning, XU Chengyi, XIONG Bu, et al. Effect of early coronary artery bypass grafting on 12 months clinical outcomes in patients with high risk acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Research, 2021, 19(6): 516-520.
[20] Deyell MW, Ghali WA, Ross DB, et al. Timing of nonemergent coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality after non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome[J]. Am Heart J, 2010, 159(3): 490-196.
[21] Coleman WS, DeWood MA, Berg R Jr, et al. Surgical intervention in acute myocardial infarction: an historical perspective[J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1995, 7(4): 176-183.
[22] Hill JD, Kerth WJ, Kelly JJ, et al. Emergency aortocoronary bypass for impending or extending myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation, 1971, 43(5 Suppl): I105-I110.
[23] Dawson JT, Hall RJ, Hallman GL, et al. Mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery after myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1974, 33(4): 483-486.
[24] Weiss ES, Chang DD, Joyce DL, et al. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008, 135(3): 503-511.
[25] Khaladj N, Bobylev D, Peterss S, et al. Immediate surgical coronary revascularisation in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2013, 8: 167. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-8-167
[26] Parikh SV, de Lemos JA, Jessen ME, et al. Timing of in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION Registry-GWTG(Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines)[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 3(4): 419-427.
[27] Kolh P, Wijns W, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg, 2010, 38: S1-S52. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.019
[28] Raghavan R, Benzaquen BS, Rudski L. Timing of bypass surgery in stable patients after acute myocardial infarction[J]. Can J Cardiol, 2007, 23(12): 976-982.
[29] Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(3): 18-114.
[30] Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making[J]. JAMA, 2000, 284(7): 835-842.
[31] Chu D, Anastacio MM, Mulukutla SR, et al. Safety and efficacy of implementing a multidisciplinary heart team approach for revascularization in patients with complex coronary artery disease: an observational cohort pilot study[J]. JAMA Surg, 2014, 149(11): 1109-1112.
[32] Axelsson TA, Mennander A, Malmberg M, et al. Is emergency and salvage coronary artery bypass grafting justified? The Nordic Emergency/Salvage coronary artery bypass grafting study[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 49(5): 1451-1456.
[33] Kolte D, Khera S, Dabhadkar KC, et al. Trends in coronary angiography, revascularization, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2016, 117(1): 1-9.
[34] Davierwala PM, Verevkin A, Leontyev S, et al. Does timing of coronary artery bypass surgery affect early and long-term outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction?[J]. Circulation, 2015, 132(8): 731-740.
[35] Rojas SV, Trinh-Adams ML, Uribarri A, et al. Early surgical myocardial revascularization in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(11): 4444-4452.
[36] Navarese EP, Gurbel PA, Andreotti F, et al. Optimal timing of coronary invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2013, 158(4): 261-270.
[37] Bianco V, Kilic A, Gleason TG, et al. Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction may not influence mortality and readmissions[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 161(6): 2056-2064.
[38] Bhatt DL, Lopes RD, Harrington RA. Diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes: a review[J]. JAMA, 2022, 327(7): 662-675.
[39] Biancari F, Vasques F, Mikkola R, et al. Validation of EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2012, 93(6): 1930-1935.
[40] Ad N, Holmes SD, Patel J, et al. Comparison of EuroSCORE II, original EuroSCORE, and the society of thoracic surgeons risk score in cardiac surgery patients[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016, 102(2): 573-579.
[41] Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events(GRACE). The GRACE ACS Risk Score Calculator 2.0 [DS/OL].(2021-01-01)[2024-07-01]. https:// www.outcomes-umassmed.org/grace/acs_risk2/index.html
[42] Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014, 64(24): e139-e228.
[43] Patlolla SH, Crestanello JA, Schaff HV, et al. Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after myocardial infarction influences late survival[J]. JTCVS Open, 2024, 20: 40-48. doi:10.1016/j.xjon.2024.05.008
[1] 莫绪明,王庆峰. 冠状动脉旁路移植术在儿童心血管疾病中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 40-46.
[2] 王智琪,戚继荣,扈元利,陈绪军,王庆峰,莫绪明. 全动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗儿童川崎病后冠状动脉瘤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 47-53.
[3] 陈绪军,申林,陈军,于涛,曹广庆,肖飞. 解剖完全再血管化是冠心病外科治疗的新策略[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 12-17.
[4] 国科,陈绪军,郑宝石,黄克力,王晓武,陈景伟,林宇,罗俊辉,王海晨,王振东,廖成全,李有金,陈文生. 解剖完全再血管化全动脉冠脉旁路移植术多中心应用中期结果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 18-25.
[5] 国科,陈绪军,郑宝石,施超,黄克力,曹勇,陈军,吴东凯,张晓慎,罗俊辉,申林,莫绪明,杨岷,王晓武,雷印胜,田茂州,王振东,孟自力,孙忠东,李有金,陆辉辉,孟春营,高峰,陈黔苏,郭能瑞,柳德斌,张楠,林宇,陈文生,宋保国,方智,王海晨,廖晓波,徐朝军. 快通道拔管在全动脉冠脉旁路移植术的多中心临床效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 26-32.
[6] 卢圣勋,邢亚闯,罗俊辉,刘杰,何厚乐,王志强,张娜. 糖尿病患者冠脉旁路移植手术中动脉桥的研究现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 33-39.
[7] 刘向荣,张新胜,杨荩冉,杨雪艳,刘钊,刘英华. ω-6/ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸比值对不同肿瘤发病风险的系统综述和Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 34-48.
[8] 张熙伟,任琳玮,张辉,张歆杰,刘伟国,王东. 左胸廓内动脉联合桡动脉行冠状动脉旁路移植术早期临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 39-46.
[9] 秦静,杨飞,陈谦,夏涵岱,刘延国,王秀问. 晚期驱动基因阴性、PD-L1表达阴性非鳞非小细胞肺癌一线治疗方案的网状Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 74-82.
[10] 洪树坤,田勇刚,李亚红,乔鲁军. 头罩与面罩无创通气对呼吸衰竭患者临床疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(7): 92-101.
[11] 陈红艳,马园园,孙虎魁. 肺癌患者18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax与程序性死亡受体-配体1表达相关性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(6): 81-86.
[12] 殷晓霖,杨孝荣,张同超,满金宇,吕明. 儿茶酚氧位甲基转移酶基因G1947A多态性与吸烟行为相关性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(2): 110-116.
[13] 王海霞,李一章,白晨晓,姜迪,王丽雯,陈欧. 克拉霉素辅助治疗哮喘疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(11): 27-33.
[14] 齐萌,黄燕,吴珊珊,刘波,张思伟. 单能量去金属伪影算法重建效果的系统评价及Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(9): 59-64.
[15] 倪迎春,杨孝荣,杜金阁,吕明. 豆制品摄入量与胃癌发病风险关系的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(10): 93-102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!