剖宫产子宫瘢痕妊娠实用临床分型诊治专家共识

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2023.0988

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

剖宫产子宫瘢痕妊娠(CSP)是妊娠囊着床于剖宫产子宫切口瘢痕处的一种特殊部位的异位妊娠。若CSP未经恰当的诊疗，可导致大出血、子宫破裂等危及生命的并发症，严重影响患者的生育力及身心健康。虽然CSP的治疗方式多样，但临床实践中仍缺乏被临床广泛应用的共识或指南来指导最佳治疗方案的选择。近年来瘢痕妊娠的分型诊治越来越受重视。瘢痕妊娠实用临床分型在山东省已得到较广泛的验证，针对每种类型推荐最佳治疗方案，治疗效果可靠, 具有较高的临床应用价值。因此，本专家组结合近年积累的临床经验及最新的临床研究结果，在实用临床分型诊治策略基础上，制定关于CSP分型诊治的专家共识，以期规范临床诊疗行为，指导临床工作。

关键词: 剖宫产子宫瘢痕妊娠, 异位妊娠, 临床分型, 治疗, 专家共识

Abstract:

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a special type of ectopic pregnancy in which a pregnancy sac is implanted at the scar of a previous caesarean section. Without appropriate diagnosis or treatment, it can lead to severe morbidity such as life-threatening massive hemorrhage, and uterine rupture, with subsequent effect of fertility, physical and mental health of patients. Although many different treatment options have been described, there is still no consensus on the optimal surgical treatment strategy. In recent years, treatment of CSP based on classification has drawn more and more attention. The practical clinical classification system with optimal surgical strategy for CSP has been widely validated in Shandong Province, which shows good application value and reliable therapeutic effects. Based on this classification system, and combined with clinical experience and the latest clinical research results, the expert consensus of clinical classification system and surgical strategy for CSP is formulated, aiming to standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment, and to guide clinical work.

Key words: Cesarean scar pregnancy, Ectopic pregnancy, Clinical classification, Treatment, Expert consensus

中图分类号:

R713.8

执笔专家:班艳丽, 赵颖, 李桦, 刘薇, 荣风年, 赵淑萍, 崔保霞. 剖宫产子宫瘢痕妊娠实用临床分型诊治专家共识[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(11): 1-10.

Yanli BAN, Ying Yanli Writing experts: ZHAO, Hua LI, Wei LIU, Fengnian RONG, Shuping ZHAO, Baoxia CUI. Expert consensus of practical clinical classification system with optimal surgical strategy for cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2023, 61(11): 1-10.

图/表 3

表1

图1

图2

参考文献 42

1	Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine , Miller R , Gyamfi-Bannerman C , et al. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #63: Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet and Gynecol, 2022, 227 (3): B9- B20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.024
2	Jiao LZ , Zhao J , Wan XR , et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chin Med Sci J, 2008, 23 (1): 10- 15. doi: 10.1016/S1001-9294(09)60002-X
3	Ouyang Y , Li X , Yi Y , et al. First-trimester diagnosis and management of Cesarean scar pregnancies after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective clinical analysis of 12 cases[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2015, 13, 126. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0120-2
4	金力, 陈蔚琳, 周应芳. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2016, 15 (1): 568- 572.
5	Miller R , Timor-Tritsch IE , Gyamfi-Bannerman C . Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: Cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet and Gynecol, 2020, 222 (5): B2- B14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.030
6	Ban Y , Shen J , Wang X , et al. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy clinical classification system with recommended surgical strategy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 141 (5): 927- 936. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005113
7	Qu W , Li H , Zhang T , et al. Comparison of different treatment strategies in the management of endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy: a multicentre retrospective study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022, 22 (1): 404. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04633-y
8	Maymon R , Halperin R , Mendlovic S , et al. Ectopic pregnancies in a caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complication[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2004, 10 (6): 515- 523. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh042
9	Tantbirojn P , Crum CP , Parast MM . Pathophysiology of placenta creta: the role of decidua and extravillous trophoblast[J]. Placenta, 2008, 29 (7): 639- 645. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.04.008
10	Luo L , Ruan X , Li C , et al. Early clinical features and risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2019, 35 (4): 337- 341. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1526276
11	Timor-Tritsch IE , Monteagudo A , Cali G , et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 43 (4): 383- 395. doi: 10.1002/uog.13282
12	Timor-Tritsch IE , Monteagudo A , Cali G , et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 44 (3): 346- 353. doi: 10.1002/uog.13426
13	Rotas MA , Haberman S , Levgur M . Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107 (6): 1373- 1381. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce
14	Zhou X , Li H , Fu X . Identifying possible risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy based on a retrospective study of 291 cases[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2020, 46 (2): 272- 278. doi: 10.1111/jog.14163
15	欧阳振波, 罗凤军, 钟碧婷, 等. 美国母胎医学会关于剖宫产瘢痕妊娠指南的解读[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2021, 30 (1): 54- 57.
16	Stegwee SI , Jordans I , van der Voet LF , et al. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BJOG, 2018, 125 (9): 1097- 1108. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15048
17	Jurkovic D , Knez J , Appiah A , et al. Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suction curettage[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 47 (4): 511- 517. doi: 10.1002/uog.15857
18	Noel L , Thilaganathan B . Caesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis, natural history and treatment[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 34 (5): 279- 286. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000808
19	Wang Q , Ma H , Peng H , et al. Risk factors for intra-operative haemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2015, 195, 141- 145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.023
20	Zhang Y , Zhang Z , Liu X , et al. Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2021, 303 (2): 321- 328. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05877-9
21	Zhang X , Pang Y , Ma Y , et al. A comparison between laparoscopy and hysteroscopy approach in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99 (43): e22845. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022845
22	Timor-Tritsch IE , Monteagudo A , Santos R , et al. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 207 (1): 44. e1- 13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.018
23	Vial Y , Petignat P , Hohlfeld P . Pregnancy in a cesarean scar[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 16 (6): 592- 593. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00300-2.x
24	Jurkovic D , Hillaby K , Woelfer B , et al. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 21 (3): 220- 227. doi: 10.1002/uog.56
25	Timor-Tritsch IE , Khatib N , Monteagudo A , et al. Cesarean scar pregnancies: experience of 60 cases[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2015, 34 (4): 601- 610. doi: 10.7863/ultra.34.4.601
26	Jordans IPM , Verberkt C , De Leeuw RA , et al. Definition and sonographic reporting system for Cesarean scar pregnancy in early gestation: modified Delphi method[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 59 (4): 437- 449. doi: 10.1002/uog.24815
27	Shih JC . Cesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis with three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound and 3D power Doppler[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23 (3): 306- 307. doi: 10.1002/uog.1000
28	向阳. 关于剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的分型与治疗方法的选择[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2012, 13 (6): 401- 404.
29	Hwang JH , Lee JK , Oh MJ , et al. Classification and management of cervical ectopic pregnancies: experience at a single institution[J]. J Reprod Med, 2010, 55 (11-12): 469- 476.
30	Zhang H , Huang J , Wu X , et al. Clinical classification and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2017, 43 (4): 653- 661. doi: 10.1111/jog.13267
31	Lin SY , Hsieh CJ , Tu YA , et al. New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: an observational cohort study[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13 (8): e0202020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202020
32	康彦君, 班艳丽, 张腾, 等. 子宫瘢痕妊娠实用临床分型及应用价值探讨[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2019, 28 (10): 63- 67.
	KANG Yanjun , BAN Yanli , ZHANG Teng , et al. Practical clinical classification and its application in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Progress in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019, 28 (10): 63- 67.
33	Birch Petersen K , Hoffmann E , Rifbjerg Larsen C , et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies[J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 105 (4): 958- 967. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.130
34	Chueh HY , Pai AH , Su YY , et al. Hysteroscopic removal, with or without laparoscopic assistance, of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Fertil Steril, 2022, 117 (3): 643- 645. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.027
35	Liu Y , Yin Q , Xu F , et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) Ⅰ and Ⅱ[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022, 22 (1): 607. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04848-z
36	杨慧, 戴红英, 张晶晶, 等. Ⅱ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠手术方法的临床分析[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2016, 25 (10): 769- 771.
37	张焕晓, 姚书忠. 经阴道剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病灶切除术的应用[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2014, 30 (4): 247- 249.
38	Qiao B , Zhang Z , Li Y . Uterine artery embolization versus methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy in a Chinese population: a meta-analysis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016, 23 (7): 1040- 1048. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.819
39	Gao L , Huang Z , Gao J , et al. Uterine artery embolization followed by dilation and curettage within 24 hours compared with systemic methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2014, 127 (2): 147- 151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.05.005
40	Gonzalez N , Tulandi T . Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24 (5): 731- 738. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.020
41	周潞, 罗莉, 应德美, 等. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠孕妇继续妊娠55例临床结局观察[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2023, 58 (1): 37- 43.
42	Cali G , Timor-Tritsch IE , Palacios-Jaraquemada J , et al. Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 51 (2): 169- 175. doi: 10.1002/uog.17568

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

实用临床分型	前壁肌层厚度	妊娠囊或包块平均直径	推荐的首选手术方式
Ⅰ型	＞3 mm	无论大小	超声监视下负压吸宫术±宫腔镜手术^*
Ⅱ型	≤3 mm且＞1 mm	Ⅱa≤30 mm	超声监视下负压吸宫术+宫腔镜手术^*
Ⅱ型	≤3 mm且＞1 mm	Ⅱb＞30 mm	腹腔镜监视下负压吸宫术+宫腔镜手术^* 必要时腹腔镜下瘢痕缺陷修补术或经阴道前穹隆切开病灶切除术
Ⅲ型	≤1 mm	Ⅲa≤50 mm	腹腔镜下瘢痕妊娠病灶切除+缺陷修补术+负压吸宫术或经阴道前穹隆切开病灶切除术
Ⅲ型	≤1 mm	Ⅲb＞50 mm, 或伴有动静脉畸形	子宫动脉栓塞/子宫动脉暂时性阻断后腹腔镜下瘢痕妊娠病灶切除+缺陷修补+负压吸宫术或开腹瘢痕妊娠病灶切除术+缺陷修补术

[1]	巩性军，吴树明，张供，李守先，庞昕焱. 无顶冠状静脉窦综合征的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 129-.
[2]	宋兆录,董正璇,彭传真,黄彩娜,胡克清,黄永胜,阎磊. 肾透明细胞癌中预后相关RNA编辑位点的筛选[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(9): 69-78.
[3]	王骏仁,李道卫,王星光,姜淑娟. 吸入布地奈德/福莫特罗治疗新型冠状病毒感染后咳嗽的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 50-53.
[4]	丁汉东,钟金彪,王琴,廖贵益. ABO血型不相容亲属肾移植12例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 67-73.
[5]	李军秀,袁莹莹,黄凌燕,赵君利. 子宫内膜CD38表达对胚胎移植前抗炎治疗的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 54-60.
[6]	曹广磊,李季,闫飞,林鹏,侯为开,侯新国,陈丽. 甲状腺激素抵抗综合征伴高泌乳素血症1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 113-116.
[7]	徐荣坤,王连雷,原所茂,田永昊,刘新宇. 腰椎术中腹主动脉损伤1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 121-124.
[8]	蔡强,单悌超,吴晗. 临终病情评估单预测临终患者生存期的效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 79-83.
[9]	殷钏杰,陈国玲,康随芳,张琪晨,曹媛,王晓映,张飞雪. 脉络膜黑色素瘤伴视网膜脱离1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 119-121.
[10]	唐小雨,王云彦,史有奎,王敏. 肉芽肿性多血管炎继发肥厚性硬脑膜炎1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 122-124.
[11]	胡立勇,钟浩,房娟娟,国巍,张雨露,范医东. 基于数据库分析CCR基因对肾透明细胞癌预后的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 49-55.
[12]	李兆辉,李亮,周飞,郑超,周文重,王斐,余之刚. 乳腺炎性肌纤维母细胞瘤1例及文献回顾[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 121-124.
[13]	刘亚军,郎昭,郭安忆,刘文勇. 骨科冲击波治疗的智能化发展现状及趋势分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 7-13.
[14]	黄霖,车圳,李明,李玉希,宁庆. 人工智能在骨科疾病诊治中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 37-45.
[15]	覃川,高如新,王新兴,张振海. 腹膜后门腔间隙单中心性Castleman病1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 133-136.