孕期身体感受量表中文版信效度检验

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.1506

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的引进中文版孕期身体感受量表(BUMPs),并对其进行信效度检验。方法遵循Brislin翻译-回译模式对英文版BUMPs进行翻译、回译及文化调适,形成中文版BUMPs。于2020年5月至2021年4月,采用方便抽样法,对946名妊娠期女性进行调查,评价量表信效度。结果中文版BUMPs包括对体型的不满意、对超重的担忧和身体负荷3个维度,共14个条目。探索性因子分析结果显示,3个公因子的累计方差贡献率为58.89%。验证性因子分析支持3因子理论构念。总量表的Cronbachs α系数为0.841, 重测信度为0.605。结论中文版 BUMPs具有良好的信效度,可用于评估我国妊娠期女性对其身体意象的感受。

关键词: 孕期, 身体感受, 量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To sinicize the Body Understanding Measure for Pregnancy Scale(BUMPs)and test its reliability and validity. Methods The English version of BUMPs was translated into Chinese, translated back and culturally adjusted according to the Brislin translation-back translation mode to formulate the Chinese version of BUMPs, which was used to survey 946 pregnant women during May 2020 and April 2021. Results The Chinese version of BUMPs included 3 dimensions of body dissatisfaction, fear of overweight and body load, with a total of 14 items. The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that the cumulative variance contribution rate of the three common factors was 58.89%. The confirmatory factor also supported the three-factor theoretical constructs. The Cronbachs α coefficient of total scale was 0.841. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.605. Conclusion The Chinese version of BUMPs has good reliability and validity, which can be used to evaluate the feelings of pregnant women on their body image.

Key words: Pregnancy, Body understanding, Scale, Reliability, Validity

中图分类号:

R749

张烜,吴柳柳,韩静,陈擎仪,毛芳香,王娟,孙继伟,张国翔,曹丹凤,曹枫林. 孕期身体感受量表中文版信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(10): 87-91.

ZHANG Xuan, WU Liuliu, HAN Jing, CHEN Qingyi, MAO Fangxiang, WANG Juan, SUN Jiwei, ZHANG Guoxiang, CAO Danfeng, CAO Fenglin. Reliability and validity test of the Chinese Body Understanding Measure for Pregnancy Scale[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2022, 60(10): 87-91.

参考文献

[1] Skouteris H, Carr R, Wertheim EH, et al. A prospective study of factors that lead to body dissatisfaction during pregnancy [J]. Body Image, 2005, 2(4): 347-361.
[2] Przybyla-Basista H, Kwiecinska E, Ilska M. Body acceptance by pregnant women and their attitudes toward pregnancy and maternity as predictors of prenatal depression [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(24):9436. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249436.
[3] Smolak L, Cash TF. Body image: a handbook of science, practice, and prevention [M]. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2011: 490.
[4] Dipietro JA, Millet S, Costigan KA, et al. Psychosocial influences on weight gain attitudes and behaviors during pregnancy [J]. J Am Diet Assoc, 2003, 103(10): 1314-1319.
[5] Duncombe D, Wertheim EH, Skouteris H, et al. How well do women adapt to changes in their body size and shape across the course of pregnancy? [J]. J Health Psychol, 2008, 13(4): 503-515.
[6] Downs DS, Dinallo JM, Kirner TL. Determinants of pregnancy and postpartum depression: prospective influences of depressive symptoms, body image satisfaction, and exercise behavior [J]. Ann Behav Med, 2008, 36(1): 54-63.
[7] Chan CY, Lee AM, Koh YW, et al. Associations of body dissatisfaction with anxiety and depression in the pregnancy and postpartum periods: a longitudinal study [J]. J Affect Disord, 2020, 263: 582-592. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.032.
[8] Kirk E, Preston C. Development and validation of the Body Understanding Measure for Pregnancy Scale(BUMPS)and its role in antenatal attachment [J]. Psychol Assess, 2019, 31(9): 1092-1106.
[9] Fox P, Yamaguchi C. Body image change in pregnancy: a comparison of normal weight and overweight primigravidas [J]. Birth, 1997, 24(1): 35-40.
[10] Brown A, Rance J, Warren L. Body image concerns during pregnancy are associated with a shorter breast feeding duration [J]. Midwifery, 2015, 31(1): 80-89.
[11] Watson B, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Broadbent J, et al. Development and validation of a tailored measure of body image for pregnant women [J]. Psychol Assess, 2017, 29(11): 1363-1375.
[12] Kronenfeld L W, Reba-Harrelson L, Von Holle A, et al. Ethnic and racial differences in body size perception and satisfaction [J]. Body Image, 2010, 7(2): 131-136.
[13] Rosenberg TJ, Garbers S, Lipkind H, et al. Maternal obesity and diabetes as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences among 4 racial/ethnic groups [J]. Am J Public Health, 2005, 95(9): 1545-1551.
[14] Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [J]. Br J Psychiatry, 1987, 150: 782-786. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.
[15] Lee DT, Yip SK, Chiu HF, et al. Detecting postnatal depression in Chinese women. Validation of the Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [J]. Br J Psychiatry, 1998, 172: 433-437. doi: 10.1192/bjp.172.5.433.
[16] Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7 [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2006, 166(10): 1092-1097.
[17] 曲姗, 胜利. 广泛性焦虑量表在综合医院心理科门诊筛查广泛性焦虑障碍的诊断试验[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2015, 29(12): 939-944. QU Shan, SHENG Li. Diagnostic test of screening generalized anxiety disorders in general hospital psychological department with GAD-7 [J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2015, 29(12): 939-944.
[18] Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress [J]. J Health Soc Behav, 1983, 24(4): 385-396.
[19] Leung DY, Lam TH, Chan SS. Three versions of Perceived Stress Scale: validation in a sample of Chinese cardiac patients who smoke [J]. BMC Public Health, 2010, 10: 513. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-513.
[20] Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research [J]. Journal for Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1970, 1(3): 185-216.
[21] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[22] Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know whats being reported? Critique and recommendations [J]. Res Nurs Health, 2006, 29(5): 489-497.
[23] Gulec SD, Hazar S. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Body Understanding Measure for Pregnancy scale(BUMPs)[J]. Perspect Psychiatr Care, 2022, 58(2):456-463.
[24] 方鹏骞. 医学社会科学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2010.

相关文章 15

[1]	叶艺,张洁,赵秋阁,范秀珍. 老年服务择业动机量表在毕业学年大学生中的修订及信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 75-80.
[2]	翟一凡,王兆军,白硕鑫,林少倩,王方怡,杜爽,王志萍. 孕期PM₁₀和PM_2.5暴露对新生儿出生体质量的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 99-106.
[3]	张云雪,解子惠,吕高荣,申世玉,厉萍. 中文简版共同反刍问卷在1 354名护生中应用的信效度评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 85-90.
[4]	袁媛,徐翠萍,张吉甜. 腹部闭合伤并发高位肠瘘患儿的营养支持1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(5): 119-121.
[5]	秦艺文,杨晓帆,魏艳欣,刘宝鹏,Bob Lew,贾存显. 大学生生命意义感在心理扭力和自杀行为风险间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 76-83.
[6]	耿玲,张欢欢,张甜甜. 459例试管婴儿备孕期高龄女性膳食蛋白质摄入现状分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 29-34.
[7]	邓清文,刘文彬. 心血管疾病患者健康相关生命质量及其影响因素的多水平模型分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 115-121.
[8]	石飞,潘翔,杨见明. 106例甲状腺乳头状癌患者行甲状腺全切手术后生存质量分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(5): 87-92.
[9]	王余余,高丽,陈少华. 94例2型糖尿病患者急性脑梗死后认知障碍与甲状腺功能的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(5): 56-61.
[10]	高春媛,刘星亮,娄展,刘占矿,岳秉宏. 轻度脑白质疏松症患者认知能力与搏动指数的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(4): 95-99.
[11]	李潘,李月月,李延青. 个体化肠道准备对肠道准备质量的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(3): 113-117.
[12]	池岩娜,刘西瑶,巨艳丽,尹周一,Bob Lew,贾存显. 焦虑抑郁压力量表在医学生中的信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(9): 114-118.
[13]	徐琼琼,郭晓雷,楚洁,景正月,张新益,周成超. 山东省2型糖尿病患者健康相关生命质量及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(3): 96-103.
[14]	王倩,徐凌忠,朱静,张娇,谢苏,于子航. 山东省农村老年高血压患者心理健康状况及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(1): 92-100.
[15]	于鹏鹏,袁璐,王东芳,Bob Lew,平凡,贾存显. 简易应对量表应用于医学生的信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(1): 101-106.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed