您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1): 101-106.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2018.795

• • 上一篇    

简易应对量表应用于医学生的信效度检验

于鹏鹏1,袁璐1,王东芳2,Bob Lew3,平凡4,贾存显1   

  1. 1. 山东大学公共卫生学院流行病学系 &山东大学自杀预防研究中心, 山东 济南 250012;2. 山东中医药大学健康学院, 预防医学教研室, 山东 济南 250012;3. 普特拉大学社会心理学系, 马来西亚 雪兰莪州 沙垱 43400;4.山东大学齐鲁医院网络信息中心, 山东 济南 250012
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 贾存显. E-mail:jiacunxian@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    山东大学国际合作项目“文化(宗教)与自杀行为”(21320005281601)

Reliability and validity of Brief COPE Scale in medical college students

YU Pengpeng1, YUAN Lu1, WANG Dongfang2, Bob Lew3, PING Fan4, JIA Cunxian1   

  1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shandong University &
    Shandong University Center for Suicide Prevention Research, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Health, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    3. Department of Social Psychology, Putra University of Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia;
    4. Information Network Center, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

PDF (PC)

176

摘要： 目的 分析中文版简易应对量表应用于医学生群体中的因子结构,检验简易应对量表的信度及效度。 方法 选取济南市两所大学的医学生实施一般资料的问卷调查和简易应对量表评定。采用SPSS 24.0软件进行信度检验、探索性因子分析及对量表在应对得分上的区分效度检验,信度上采用克朗巴赫α系数检验量表的内部一致性。采用Amos 24.0软件对量表的结构效度进行检验。 结果 共收集了2 074名大学生的信息,探索性因子分析提示该量表可提取为五因子结构。简易应对量表克朗巴赫α系数为0.83,验证性因子分析结果表明量表具有较好的结构效度。简易应对量表对男、女大学生在应对得分上有显著的区分效度。 结论 简易应对量表具有较好的信度和效度,在医学大学生群体中被证实是有效、可行的。

关键词: 简易应对, 医学大学生, 探索性因子分析, 验证性因子分析, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To explore the potential factor structure of the Chinese version of Brief COPE Scale(CV-BCS)and to examine its reliability and validity. Methods A questionnaire was used to carry out a cross-sectional study in medical university students in Jinan City. The statistical software, SPSS 24.0, was used to examine the reliability and conduct exploratory factor analysis and the discriminant validity of the scale in coping scores. Cronbach α coefficient was used to test the internal consistency of the scale. The structural validity of the scale was tested with Amos 24.0 software. Results The sample consisted of 2 074 medical students in two universities. As a result, five factors were extracted through exploratory factor analysis, with a total reliability of 0.83. The results drawn from factor analysis suggested that the CV-BCS held good construct validity. The CV-BCS had significant discriminant validity for male and female college students in coping score. Conclusion The five-factor structure of CV-BCS is validated to be effective and practical in Chinese medical college students and can be used under the background of China.

Key words: Brief COPE, Medical university students, Exploratory factor analysis, Confirmatory factor analysis, Reliability, Validity

中图分类号: 

  • R181.2+1
[1] Ito M, Matsushima E. Presentation of coping strategies associated with physical and mental health during health check-ups[J]. Community Ment Health J, 2017, 53(3): 297-305.
[2] Doron J, Trouillet R, Gana K, et al. Examination of the hierarchical structure of the brief COPE in a French sample: empirical and theoretical convergences[J]. J Pers Assess, 2014, 96(5): 567-575.
[3] 张雨新,方新.大学生应付策略的适应性和身心症状[J].心理学报, 1990, 22(2): 217-123. ZHANG Yuxin, FANG Xin. The adaptability of coping strategies and psychological symptoms[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 1990, 22(2): 217-223.
[4] Andrews G, Tennant C, Hewson DM, et al. Life event stress, social support, coping style, and risk of psychological impairment[J]. J Nerv Ment Dis, 1978, 166(5): 307-316.
[5] Lazarus RS. Psychological stress and the coping process[M]. New York, US: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
[6] Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1989, 56(2): 267-283.
[7] Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample[J]. J Health Soc Behav, 1980, 21(3): 219-239.
[8] Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: consider the brief COPE[J]. Int J Behav Med, 1997, 4(1): 92-100.
[9] Li L, Lin C, Liang LJ, et al. Exploring coping and social support with gender and education among people living with HIV in China[J]. Aids Behav, 2016, 20(2): 317-324.
[10] Brasileiro SV, Orsini MR, Cavalcante JA, et al. Controversies regarding the psychometric properties of the Brief COPE: The case of the Brazilian-Portuguese version “COPE Breve”[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(3): e0152233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152233
[11] Muller L, Spitz E. Multidimensional assessment of coping: validating of the Brief COPE among French population[J]. L Encéphale, 2003, 29(6): 507-518.
[12] 朱云芳, 张建萍, 倪红芬, 等. 230例人流女性简易应对方式量表测评分析[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2014, 35(12): 42-45. ZHU Yunfang, ZHANG Jianping, NI Hongfen, et al. Evaluating the status of 230 abortion women with simple coping style questionnaire[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2014, 35(12): 42-45.
[13] 韩梅, 贾存显, 邱惠敏, 等. 简易应对方式量表评价及其与农村自杀死亡关系研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(10): 160-164. HAN Mei, JIA Cunxian, QIU Huimin, et al. Psychometric characteristics of the simplified coping style questionnaire and association between coping style and rural suicide[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2011, 49(10): 160-164.
[14] 杨杰文. 不同年级和专业大学生心理压力现况调查与对策分析[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2011, 25(1): 50-51. YANG Jiewen. Comparison and analysis on grades of medical licensing examination[J]. China Higher Medical Education, 2011, 25(1): 50-51.
[15] 袁璐, 刘阳洋, 谷灵犀,等. 幸福取向与医学生自杀风险的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2018, 56(6): 63-68. YUAN Lu, LIU Yangyang, GU Lingxi, et al. Orientation to happiness in relation to suicide risk among medical students[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2018, 56(6): 63-68.
[16] Tang KNS, Chan CS, Ng J, et al. Action type-based factorial structure of Brief COPE among Hong Kong Chinese[J]. J Psychopathol Behav Assess, 2016, 38(4): 631-644.
[17] 朱健民. 德永竞技特质焦虑量表的信度与区分效度检验[J]. 天津体育学院学报, 2005, 20(4): 52-54. ZHU Jianmin. Testing on realibility and discrimination validity of togunaga competitive trait anxiety scale[J]. Journal of Tianjin University of Sport, 2005, 20(4): 52-54.
[18] Kaiser HF, Caffrey J. Alpha factor analysis[J]. Psychometrika, 1965, 30(1): 1-14.
[19] Zwick WR, Velicer WF. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain[J]. Psychol Bull, 1986, 99(3): 432-442.
[20] Alosaimi FD, Almufleh A, Kazim S, et al. Stress-coping strategies among medical residents in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional national study[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2015, 31(3): 504-509.
[21] Su X, Lau JT, Mak WW, et al. A preliminary validation of the Brief COPE instrument for assessing coping strategies among people living with HIV in China[J]. Infect Dis Poverty, 2015, 4(1): 1-10.
[22] Kimemia M, Asnerself KK, Daire AP. An exploratory factor analysis of the Brief COPE with a sample of Kenyan caregivers[J]. Int J Adv Counselling, 2011, 33(3): 149-160.
[23] Hagan TL, Fishbein JN, Nipp RD, et al. Coping in patients with incurable lung and gastrointestinal cancers: a validation study of the Brief COPE[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2017, 53(1):131-138.
[24] Hur YM, Macgregor AJ, Cherkas L, et al. Age differences in genetic and environmental variations in stress-coping during adulthood: a study of female twins[J]. Behav Genet, 2012, 42(4): 541-548.
[25] Amoyal NR, Mason ST, Gould NF, et al. Measuring coping behavior in patients with major burn injuries: a psychometric evaluation of the BCOPE[J]. J Burn Care Res, 2011, 32(3): 392-398.
[26] Kapsou M, Panayiotou G, Kokkinos CM, et al. Dimensionality of coping: an empirical contribution to the construct validation of the brief-COPE with a Greek-speaking sample[J]. J Health Psychol, 2010, 15(2): 215-229.
[27] Lam AG, Zane NWS. Ethnic differences in coping with interpersonal stressors: a test of self-construals as cultural mediators[J]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2004, 35(4): 446-459.
[28] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M]. 2版. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[29] Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure anaysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives[J]. Struct Equ Modeling, 1999, 6(1): 1-55.
[30] Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research[M]. New York: Guilford, 2006.
[31] 薛朝霞, 梁执群, 卢莉. 大学生应对方式研究[J]. 护理研究, 2005, 19(17): 1511-1513. XUE Zhaoxia, LIANG Zhiqun, LU Li. A survey of coping modes of college students[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2005, 19(17): 1511-1513.
[32] 肖计划, 许秀峰. “应付方式问卷”效度与信度研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1996, 20(4): 164-168.
[33] 佟月华. 大学生应对方式与心理健康的关系研究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2004, 13(1): 94.
[1] 叶艺,张洁,赵秋阁,范秀珍. 老年服务择业动机量表在毕业学年大学生中的修订及信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 75-80.
[2] 张云雪,解子惠,吕高荣,申世玉,厉萍. 中文简版共同反刍问卷在1 354名护生中应用的信效度评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 85-90.
[3] 袁华财,张甜甜,郭冬梅,张欢欢,沈德嫱,陈立勇,蔺新英. 微型营养评价量表在社区老年人群中的信效度评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(9): 77-82.
[4] 张灿灿, 苏永刚, 张红静. 文化适应压力量表中文版的修订[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(11): 89-94.
[5] 王欣欣1， 贾存显1，2，庄茂强1 ，高琦1，刘丽媛1，刘慧1，韩梅1. 在农村自尊量表评价以及自尊与自杀死亡的病例对照研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(7): 159-162.
[6] 成媛媛1，唐茂芹2. 简明幸福与生活质量满意度问卷在焦虑障碍患者中的信效度[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(7): 147-150.
[7] 韩梅1，贾存显1,2，邱惠敏3，马吉祥4，路长飞1，刘慧1. 简易应对方式量表评价及其与农村自杀死亡关系研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(10): 160-164.
[8] 王东芳1，贾存显1，徐爱强2，张吉玉2，路长飞1，王欣欣1. 特质焦虑量表在农村自杀死亡及其对照组中的信度和效度评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(1): 111-.
[9] 刘保锋1，袁长海1，于敬敏2，秦敬柱1，郭丽1，耿文革3. SF-36量表在三峡移民生命质量测定中的信度和效度评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(7): 129-132.
[10] 陈翠，张红静，江虹，李文杰，吕丽. 一般健康问卷（GHQ-28）应用于大学生心理健康研究的信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(3): 159-162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发