您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (10): 88-94.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2023.0202

• • 上一篇    下一篇

314例戒烟门诊患者戒烟效果及影响因素

仇一帆1,王子涵1,高婷婷2,王西艳2,孙燕2,刘粉2,亓倩2,董亮1,2   

  1. 1.山东大学 山东省千佛山医院呼吸与危重症医学科, 山东 济南 250014;2.山东第一医科大学第一附属医院(山东省千佛山医院)呼吸与危重症医学科 山东省呼吸疾病研究所, 山东 济南 250014
  • 发布日期:2023-11-08
  • 通讯作者: 董亮. E-mail:dl5506@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82270032);山东省重点研发计划(2021SFGC0504);山东省自然科学基金联合基金(ZR2021LSW015);济南市呼吸疾病临床医学研究中心(202132002)

Outcome and influencing factors of 314 outpatient smoking cessation cases

QIU Yifan1, WANG Zihan1, GAO Tingting2, WANG Xiyan2, SUN Yan2, LIU Fen2, QI Qian2, DONG Liang1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Respiratory, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Respiratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
    Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Institute of Respiratory, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
  • Published:2023-11-08

摘要: 目的 比较药物戒烟与心理行为干预戒烟对实际戒烟效果的影响,对比随访真实世界1个月、3个月及6个月后的戒烟效果及影响因素。 方法 自2022年6月1日至2022年12月31日于山东省千佛山医院戒烟门诊登记的314名戒烟受试患者,根据受试者意愿分为使用戒烟药物辅助戒烟及心理行为干预戒烟两组,178名吸烟者选择使用药物辅助戒烟(包括113名患者选择安非他酮戒烟、38名患者选择使用伐尼克兰戒烟及27名患者选择使用尼古丁贴片戒烟),定义为治疗组;136名患者心理行为干预戒烟,定义为对照组。使用SPSS 26.0软件统计随访两组患者1个月、3个月及6个月后的戒烟率,分析使用不同药物干预戒烟及心理行为干预戒烟对戒烟效果的差异,分析影响戒烟成功率的因素。 结果 药物辅助戒烟者成功率为48.3%,心理行为干预辅助戒烟者成功率为13.2%,两组差异有统计学意义(χ2=51.714,P<0.05)。教育程度在大学本科及以上以及每日吸烟量控制在1盒(20支)以内的吸烟者更容易实现戒烟,为戒烟成功的保护性因素。 结论 使用药物辅助戒烟与心理行为干预戒烟都是辅助戒烟的良好方式;相较于心理行为干预,药物辅助戒烟更有助于提高戒烟成功率,尤其在降低复吸率方面很有价值。

关键词: 烟草依赖, 戒烟, 安非他酮, 伐尼克兰, 尼古丁贴片, 心理行为干预, 戒烟成功率

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of drug quitting and psychological behavior intervention on smoking cessation, and to compare the success rate of smoking cessation after 1, 3 and 6 months of follow-up in the real world. Methods During Jun. 1, 2022 and Dec. 31, 2022, 314 smoking cessation patients registered in the Smoking Cessation Clinic of Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital were divided into two groups according to different ways of intervention. The medication-assisted group included 178 smokers who chose to use drugs(113 used Bupropion, 38 used Varenicline and 27 used Nicotine patches), while the control group included 136 patients who accepted the psychological behavioral intervention. The smoking cessation rate of the two groups after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months were analyzed with SPSS 26.0 software to identify the differences in the effects of interventions and the influencing factors. Results The success rate of drug-assisted quitters was 48.3%, the success rate of psychological behavioral quitters was 13.2%, with statistically significant difference between the two groups(χ2=51.714, P<0.05). Smokers with a bachelors degree or above and a daily smoking limit of less than 1 box(20 cigarettes)were more likely to quit smoking, which were protective factors for smoking cessation success. Conclusion Drug-assisted smoking cessation and psychological behavior intervention are both good ways to assist smoking cessation. The former is more helpful, especially in reducing the rate of relapse.

Key words: Tobacco dependence, Smoking cessation, Bupropion, Varenicline, Nicotine patches, Psychological behavior intervention, Success rate of smoking cessation

中图分类号: 

  • R193
[1] Picciotto MR, Kenny PJ. Mechanisms of nicotine addiction[J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2021, 11(5): a039610. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a039610.
[2] Wang M, Luo X, Xu S, et al. Trends in smoking prevalence and implication for chronic diseases in China: serial national cross-sectional surveys from 2003 to 2013[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2019, 7(1): 35-45.
[3] Liu Z, Li YH, Cui ZY, et al. Prevalence of tobacco dependence and associated factors in China: findings from nationwide China Health Literacy Survey during 2018-19[J]. Lancet Reg Health West Pac, 2022, 24: 100464. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100464.
[4] DiFranza JR. Can tobacco dependence provide insights into other drug addictions? [J] BMC Psychiatry, 2016, 16(1): 365. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1074-4.
[5] GBD 2019 Tobacco Collaborators. Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J]. Lancet, 2021, 397(10292): 2337-2360.
[6] Xie L, Yan Y, Yang Y, et al. Evaluation of smoking cessation intervention effectiveness in smoking cessation clinics-China, 2019-2021[J]. China CDC Wkly, 2023, 5(21): 469-474.
[7] Lin B, Xie L, Xie X, et al. Predictors for quitting smoking in smoking cessation clinics among female smokers in China[J]. Tob Induc Dis, 2023, 21: 26. doi: 10.18332/tid/159132.
[8] Chan KH, Wright N, Xiao D, et al. Tobacco smoking and risks of more than 470 diseases in China: a prospective cohort study[J]. Lancet Public Health, 2022, 7(12): e1014-e1026.
[9] GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10159): 1789-1858.
[10] Fallahzadeh A, Sharifnejad Tehrani Y, Sheikhy A, et al. The burden of chronic respiratory disease and attributable risk factors in North Africa and Middle East: findings from global burden of disease study(GBD)2019[J]. Respir Res, 2022, 23(1): 268. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02187-3.
[11] Sun J, Bao J, Shi Y, et al. Effect of simvastatin on MMPs and TIMPs in cigarette smoke-induced rat COPD model[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2017, 12: 717-724. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S110520.
[12] Arreola-Ramírez JL, Vargas MH, Carbajal V, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells attenuate the proinflammatory cytokine pattern in a guinea pig model of chronic cigarette smoke exposure[J]. Cytokine, 2023, 162: 156104. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2022.156104.
[13] Serré J, Mathyssen C, Ajime TT, et al. Airway infection with nontypeable haemophilus influenzae is more rapidly eradicated in vitamin D deficient mice[J]. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 2019, 187: 42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.10.021.
[14] Pournaras N, Andersson A, Kovach MA, et al. Glucose homeostasis in relation to neutrophil mobilization in smokers with COPD[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2022, 17: 1179-1194. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S353753.
[15] Martinez FJ, Han MK, Allinson JP, et al. At the root: defining and halting progression of early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2018, 197(12): 1540-1551.
[16] Chang JT, Anic GM, Rostron BL, et al. Cigarette smoking reduction and health risks: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Nicotine Tob Res, 2021, 23(4): 635-642.
[17] 李文扬,康健.235例戒烟志愿者戒烟成功及失败因素分析[J].贵阳医学院学报, 2015, 40(5): 479-481. LI Wenyang, KANG Jian. Analysis of the failure factors of smoke quitting[J]. Journal of Guiyang Medical College, 2015, 40(5): 479-481.
[18] 葛福婷,张秀,王家豪,等.基于层次分析法的吸烟者戒烟影响因素研究[J].商丘师范学院学报, 2017, 33(6): 5-12. GE Futing, ZHANG Xiu, WANG Jiahao, et al. Research on the influencing factors for smokers to quit smoking from the perspective of analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Shangqiu Normal University, 2017, 33(6): 5-12.
[19] Sharma MK, Suman LN, Srivastava K, et al. Psychometric properties of fagerstrom test of nicotine dependence: a systematic review[J]. Ind Psychiatry J, 2021, 30(2): 207-216.
[20] Cinciripini PM, Minnix JA, Robinson JD, et al. The effects of scheduled smoking reduction and precessation nicotine replacement therapy on smoking cessation: Randomized Controlled Trial With Compliance[J]. JMIR Form Res, 2023, 7: e39487. doi: 10.2196/39487.
[21] Hartmann-Boyce J, Aveyard P. Drugs for smoking cessation[J]. BMJ, 2016, 352: i571. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i571.
[22] 李荣,解世林,张励,等.盐酸安非他酮缓释片联合行为干预真实世界戒烟效果研究[J].中国实用内科杂志, 2019, 39(10): 873-878. LI Rong, XIE Shilin, ZHANG Li, et al. A study on the real world effect of the combination of bupropion hydrochloride sustained release tablets with behavior intervention on smoking cessation[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine, 2019, 39(10): 873-878.
[23] Jordan CJ, Xi ZX. Discovery and development of varenicline for smoking cessation[J]. Expert Opin Drug Discov, 2018, 13(7): 671-683.
[24] Lopes LC, Zhang Y, Ross S, et al. Varenicline for tobacco-dependent adults who are not ready to discontinue use: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2022, 19(12): 2077-2086.
[25] Hernández Zenteno RJ, Lara DF, Venegas AR, et al. Varenicline for long term smoking cessation in patients with COPD[J]. Pulm Pharmacol Ther, 2018, 53: 116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2018.11.001.
[26] Tavares Xda S, Blum AP, Nakamura DT, et al. Variations in binding among several agonists at two stoichiometries of the neuronal, α4β2 nicotinic receptor[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134(28): 11474-11480.
[27] Tonstad S, Arons C, Rollema H, et al. Varenicline: mode of action, efficacy, safety and accumulated experience salient for clinical populations[J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2020, 36(5): 713-730.
[28] Kim JS, Jang JY, Park EH, et al. Seven-day continuous abstinence rate from smoking at 1, 2, or 3 years after the use of varenicline[J]. Tuberc Respir Dis(Seoul), 2015, 78(2): 92-98.
[29] Mao RL, Cécile Tromeur, Paleiron N, et al. Effect of early initiation of varenicline on smoking cessation in COPD patients admitted for exacerbation: the save randomized clinical trial[J]. COPD, 2020, 17(1): 7-14.
[30] 商雪,鄂芬芬,郭康乐,等.伐尼克兰戒烟有效性及安全性的Meta分析和试验序贯分析[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2023, 43(2): 190-200. SHANG Xue, E Fenfen, GUO Kangle, et al. Effectiveness and safety of varenicline on smoking cessation: a Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis[J]. Chinese Jounal of Hospital Pharmacy, 2023, 43(2): 190-200.
[31] Wang Q, Dai R, Zhang H, et al. The efficacy and safety of acupuncture and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2022, 23(1): 465. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06384-9.
[32] Zhang B, Cohen JE, Bondy SJ, et al. Duration of nicotine replacement therapy use and smoking cessation: a population-based longitudinal study[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2015, 181(7): 513-520.
[33] Prochaska JO, Goldstein MG. Process of smoking cessation. Implications for clinicians[J]. Clin Chest Med, 1991, 12(4): 727-735.
[34] 徐鸣丽,金媛. 5A+5R干预联合伐尼克兰对COPD患者戒烟效果及肺功能的影响[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2020, 25(6): 843-846. XU Mingli, JIN Yuan. Effect of 5A + 5R intervention combined with varenicline on smoking cessation and pulmonary function in patients with COPD[J]. Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, 2020, 25(6): 843-846.
[1] 李燕,刘坤,孙晓杰. 山东省3县农村老年人与收入相关的健康不平等状况及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(6): 91-96.
[2] 刘新雨,王权,琚号杰,孙晓杰. 认知功能在老年人社会资本与身体功能健康间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 100-107.
[3] 夏宇,陈任,陈菲,李伯阳,潘新锋,高翔,李程跃,徐凌忠. 2008~2017上海市居民健康素养时序变化与孕产妇及婴幼儿死亡率的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(12): 97-102.
[4] . 农村卫生适宜技术推广影响因素定性分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(7): 133-135.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 索东阳,申飞,郭皓,刘力畅,杨惠敏,杨向东. Tim-3在药物性急性肾损伤动物模型中的表达及作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 1 -6 .
[2] 马青源,蒲沛东,韩飞,王超,朱洲均,王维山,史晨辉. miR-27b-3p调控SMAD1对骨肉瘤细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭作用的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 32 -37 .
[3] 张宝文,雷香丽,李瑾娜,罗湘俊,邹容. miR-21-5p靶向调控TIMP3抑制2型糖尿病肾病小鼠肾脏系膜细胞增殖及细胞外基质堆积[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 7 -14 .
[4] 付洁琦,张曼,张晓璐,李卉,陈红. Toll样受体4抑制过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ加重血脂蓄积的分子机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 24 -31 .
[5] 龙婷婷,谢明,周璐,朱俊德. Noggin蛋白对小鼠脑缺血再灌注损伤后学习和记忆能力与齿状回结构的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 15 -23 .
[6] 李宁,李娟,谢艳,李培龙,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 长链非编码RNA AL109955.1在80例结直肠癌组织中的表达及对细胞增殖与迁移侵袭的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 38 -46 .
[7] 徐玉香,刘煜东,张蓬,段瑞生. 101例脑小血管病患者脑微出血危险因素的回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 67 -71 .
[8] 丁祥云,于清梅,张文芳,庄园,郝晶. 胰岛素样生长因子II在84例多囊卵巢综合征患者颗粒细胞中的表达和促排卵结局的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 60 -66 .
[9] 肖娟,肖强,丛伟,李婷,丁守銮,张媛,邵纯纯,吴梅,刘佳宁,贾红英. 两种甲状腺超声数据报告系统诊断效能的比较[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 53 -59 .
[10] 史爽,李娟,米琦,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 胃癌miRNAs预后风险评分模型的构建与应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 47 -52 .