鸿鹄机器人辅助全膝关节置换的早期学习曲线

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.1398

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的回顾性分析鸿鹄骨科机器人辅助人工膝关节置换(TKA)的手术时间和影像学数据,探讨机器人辅助TKA的临床效果和学习曲线。方法对同一手术组开展的25例机器人辅助TKA手术进行分析,将手术时间通过累积和分析法(CUSUM)进行分析,绘制机器人辅助TKA的学习曲线,根据学习曲线分为两个不同阶段,比较两个阶段的手术时间、出血量、住院天数、髋-膝-踝角等影像学数据和临床评分。结果 CUSUM分析结果显示,机器人辅助TKA的学习曲线最大转折点在第13例手术,基于此将学习曲线划分为学习提高阶段和熟练掌握阶段,两个阶段患者的一般资料、术后髋-膝-踝角等影像学数据、美国特种医院(HSS)评分、膝关节活动范围(ROM)和关节置换术后忘记评分(FSJ-12)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但熟练掌握阶段与学习提高阶段相比,整体手术时间减少23 min,空间摆位时间下降4.4 min,光学靶标安装下降5.0 min;在手术操作平均耗时上,定位下肢力线和关节面配准的时间分别降低2.9 min和5.2 min,机械臂截骨操作时间降低14.1 min。结论利用CUSUM方法准确分析了机器人辅助TKA的学习曲线,显示熟练掌握操作此技术须累积的手术例数为13例。机器人辅助TKA学习曲线短,临床效果满意。

关键词: 机器人, 人工膝关节置换, 学习曲线, 临床效果, 影像学测量

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and learning curve of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty(TKA)by retrospectively analyzing the operation time and imaging data of TKA procedures performed with the "Skywalker" robot. Methods A total of 25 robotic-assisted TKA procedures performed by the same surgical group were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time was analyzed using the cumulative sum analysis(CUSUM)method to plot the learning curve, based on which the learning curve was divided into two stages. The operation time, bleeding volume, hospital days, hip-knee-ankle angle and other imaging data, and clinical scores of the two stages were compared. Results The CUSUM analysis revealed the maximum turning point of the learning curve at 13 cases. Based on this, the learning curve was divided into two stages: the learning improvement stage and the mastery stage. There were no significant differences in general data, postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle and other imaging data, HSS scores, knee ROM and FSJ-12 scores between the two stages(P>0.05). However, in the mastery stage, the overall operation time decreased by 23 min, the spatial positioning time decreased by 4.4 min, the optical target installation decreased by 5.0 min; the time to position the lower limb force line and joint surface alignment reduced by 2.9 min and 5.2 min, respectively, and the robotic arm osteotomy operation time reduced by 14.1 min. Conclusion The learning curve of robot-assisted TKA is precisely profiled by CUSUM analysis, indicating that operators need to perform at least 13 surgical cases to master the technique. The learning curve of robot-assisted TKA is short, and the clinical results are satisfactory.

Key words: Robotics, Total knee arthroplasty, Learning curve, Clinical outcome, Imaging measurement

中图分类号:

R687.1

郭永园,孙厚义,张元凯,颜廷宾,刘培来,贾玉华. 鸿鹄机器人辅助全膝关节置换的早期学习曲线[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 115-120.

GUO Yongyuan, SUN Houyi, ZHANG Yuankai, YAN Tingbin, LIU Peilai, JIA Yuhua. Learning curve of domestic “Skywalker” robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2023, 61(3): 115-120.

参考文献

[1] Canovas F, Dagneaux L. Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2018, 104(1s): S41-S46.
[2] Kayani B, Konan S, Ayuob A, et al. Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2019, 4(10): 611-617.
[3] Khlopas A, Sodhi N, Sultan AA,et al. Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018,33(7): 2002-2006.
[4] Zhang J, Ndou WS, Ng N, et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2022, 30(8): 2677-2695.
[5] Sarpong NO, Herndon CL, Held MB, et al. What is the learning curve for new technologies in total joint arthroplasty? A review[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2020, 13(6): 675-679.
[6] 赵宁, 张翊乔, 王鈢, 等. 全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺切除术十步法学习曲线[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(4): 201-206. ZHAO Ning, ZHANG Yiqiao, WANG Xi, et al. Study on the learning curve of the ten-step method of endoscopic thyroidectomy by complete areola approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(4): 201-206.
[7] Clement ND, Al-Zibari M, Afzal I, et al. A systematic review of imageless hand-held robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: learning curve, accuracy, functional outcome and survivorship[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2020, 5(5): 319-326.
[8] 邵小龙, 杜天舒, 闫昭, 等. 机器人辅助全膝关节置换的研究进展[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2022, 11(7): 521-525. SHAO Xiaolong, DU Tianshu, YAN Zhao, et al. Research progress of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint, 2022, 11(7): 521-525.
[9] Kayani B, Konan S, Huq SS, et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(4): 1132-1141.
[10] 何锐, 孙茂淋, 熊然, 等. 机器人辅助膝关节置换的近期疗效与学习曲线[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2022,44(5): 476-483. He R, Sun ML, Xiong R, et al. Short-term efficacy and learning curve of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2022, 44(5): 476-483.
[11] 周宗科, 翁习生, 曲铁兵, 等. 中国髋、膝关节置换术加速康复: 围术期管理策略专家共识[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2016, 9(1): 1-9. ZHOU Zongke, WENG Xisheng, QU Tiebing, et al. Expert consensus in enhanced recovery after total hip and knee arthroplasty in China: perioperative management[J]. Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2016, 9(1): 1-9.
[12] Batailler C, Fernandez A, Swan J, et al. MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2021, 29(11): 3585-3598.
[13] Oussedik S, Abdel MP, Victor J, et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Bone Joint J, 2020, 102-B(3): 276-279. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.102b3.bjj-2019-1729.
[14] Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study[J]. Bone Joint J, 2018, 100-B(7): 930-937.
[15] Deckey DG, Rosenow CS, Verhey JT, et al. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves accuracy and precision compared to conventional techniques[J]. Bone Joint J, 2021, 103-B(6 Supple A): 74-80.
[16] Smith AF, Eccles CJ, Bhimani SJ, et al. Improved patient satisfaction following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Knee Surg, 2021, 34(7): 730-738.
[17] Winnock De Grave P, Kellens J, Tampere T, et al. Clinical outcomes in TKA are enhanced by both robotic assistance and patient specific alignment: a comparative trial in 120 patients[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04636-6.
[18] 刘扬德, 赵宇驰, 王维光, 等. 全膝关节置换中股骨外旋截骨对下肢动态力线的影响[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2015, 35(10): 1048-1054. LIU Yangde, ZHAO Yuchi, WANG Weiguang, et al. Femoral rotation influences dynamic alignment of the lower extremity in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics, 2015, 35(10): 1048-1054.
[19] 钱子煜, 张越文, 马小越, 等. CUSUM预警模型在医院感染性腹泻暴发预警中的应用[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2018, 28(19): 3011-3015. QIAN Ziyu, ZHANG Yuewen, MA Xiaoyue, et al. Applying CUSUM-based methods for detection of outbreaks of acute infectious gastroenteritis in health-care facilities[J]. Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology, 2018, 28(19): 3011-3015.
[20] Novoa NM, Varela G. Monitoring surgical quality: the cumulative sum(CUSUM)approach[J]. Mediastinum, 2020, 4: 4. doi:10.21037/med.2019.10.01.
[21] Nizard RS, Porcher R, Ravaud P, et al. Use of the Cusum technique for evaluation of a CT-based navigation system for total knee replacement[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004(425): 180-188. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000136902.01368.69.
[22] Kayani B, Konan S, Huq SS, et al. The learning curve of robotic-arm assisted acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty[J]. Hip Int, 2021, 31(3): 311-319.
[23] Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, et al. The learning curve associated with robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study[J]. Bone Joint J, 2018, 100-B(8): 1033-1042.
[24] Kaper B. Learning curve and time commitment assessment in the adoption of NAVIO robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthopaedic Proceedings, 2020, 102(Suppl 1): 59-59. doi.org/10.1302/1358-992X.2020.1.059.
[25] 夏润之, 童志成, 张经纬, 等. 国产 “鸿鹄” 膝关节置换手术机器人的早期临床研究[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2021, 27(2): 108-113. XIA Runzhi, TONG Zhicheng, ZHANG Jingwei, et al. Early clinical study of domestic “skywalker” surgical robot for knee arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Practical Orthopaedics, 2021, 27(2): 108-113.
[26] Kim YH, Yoon SH, Park JW. Does robotic-assisted TKA result in better outcome scores or long-term survivorship than conventional TKA? A randomized, controlled trial[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2020, 478(2): 266-275.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘新宇,李冬来,赵文龙,王政,李超,王连雷,原所茂,田永昊. 机器人/导航辅助下椎弓根螺钉植入在脊柱畸形矫正中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 21-28.
[2]	李超,孙小刚,李昊,田永昊,原所茂,刘新宇,王连雷. 机器人联合三维“C”型臂辅助置钉在44例脊柱侧弯矫形术中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 107-114.
[3]	刘亚军,袁强,吴静晔,韩晓光,郎昭,张勇. 130例锥形束CT影像腰椎椎弓根螺钉自动规划的初步分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 80-89.
[4]	杜付鑫,张体冲,李倩倩,宋锐. 脊柱手术机器人研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 46-56.
[5]	刘亚军,郎昭,郭安忆,刘文勇. 骨科冲击波治疗的智能化发展现状及趋势分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 7-13.
[6]	王政,孙小刚,李超,王连雷,李冬来,原所茂,田永昊,刘新宇. 机器人辅助MIS-TLIF与徒手开放TLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:2年随访[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 97-106.
[7]	乔桦,李慧武. 膝关节置换手术机器人应用现状与研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(3): 29-36.
[8]	匡风霞,赵晓虹,韩宝佳,高成杰. 对控制机器人甲状腺癌根治术患者手术应激反应麻醉深度的探讨[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 81-86.
[9]	田辉,易文波,李树海. 达芬奇机器人食管癌切除术之齐鲁实践[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(11): 28-32.
[10]	庄大勇,贺青卿,李小磊,周鹏,岳涛,徐婧. 达芬奇机器人在儿童及青少年甲状腺癌中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 45-48.
[11]	张伟,谭文浩,李贻斌. 基于深度强化学习的四足机器人运动控制发展现状与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 61-66.
[12]	王刚,潘华峰,刘江,王海峰,程伟,江志伟. 达芬奇Xi系统在完全机器人根治性远端胃大部切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(5): 51-55.
[13]	乔宇,崔亮亮,李帅,王峰,阮师漫,景一鸣,刘翀. 智能问答机器人系统研发及应用研究——以济南市新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情处置应对为例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(4): 17-22.
[14]	赵健,韩晓玲,王刚,刘江,周嘉晖,王海锋,江志伟,黎介寿. 多模式止痛对机器人45例远端胃切除术后肠功能的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(9): 43-47.
[15]	荣风年,赵珊. 限制单孔腹腔镜技术发展的因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(12): 26-30.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed