您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 86-93.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.0253

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同精子来源质量冷冻方式与妊娠结局的关联性分析

朱序理,周亮,王跃,孙庆云,曹明雅,杜元杰,曹金凤,赵志明,郝桂敏   

  1. 河北医科大学第二医院生殖医学科, 河北 石家庄 050000
  • 发布日期:2021-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 赵志明. E-mail:zhaozhiming73@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    2020年河北省医学适用技术跟踪项目(GZ2020034)

Correlation analysis of freezing methods with different sperm sources and pregnancy outcomes

ZHU Xuli, ZHOU Liang, WANG Yue, SUN Qingyun, CAO Mingya, DU Yuanjie, CAO Jinfeng, ZHAO Zhiming, HAO Guimin   

  1. Department of Reproductive Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, China
  • Published:2021-06-10

摘要: 目的 探讨冷冻微量精子相关参数与体外受精周期实验室及临床结局的关系。 方法 回顾性分析2016年1月至2020年12月在生殖医学科行稀少精子冷冻复苏后卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)的118个周期相关资料。根据冷冻精子的冷冻方法分为微量冷冻组、传统常规冷冻组;按精子来源分为丈夫射精组、附睾穿刺组、睾丸穿刺组;根据精子质量分为Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型严重少弱组。分别比较各组之间一般资料、实验室及临床结局等;采用多因素二元Logistic回归分析冷冻精子相关参数对临床结局的影响。 结果 (1)一般资料:按冷冻精子的冷冻方法、精子来源和精子质量分组,女方的年龄、体质量指数、不孕年限、基础促卵泡素(FSH)、抗苗勒氏管激素(AMH)、Gn天数、Gn总量、人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)日雌二醇(E2)水平、获卵数、MⅡ卵数各组之间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);(2)实验室指标及临床结局:微量冷冻组与传统常规冷冻组两组组间胚胎利用率、临床妊娠率之间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05), 2PN率(P=0.002)、2PN卵裂率(P=0.036)、优胚率(P=0.002)差异均有统计学意义。丈夫射精组、附睾穿刺组和睾丸穿刺组组间比较,2PN率、临床妊娠率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05); 2PN卵裂率(P<0.001)、胚胎利用率(P=0.048)、优胚率(P=0.002)差异均有统计学意义。Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型严重少弱组3组间比较, 2PN率、胚胎利用率、优胚率之间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05); 2PN卵裂率(P<0.001)、种植率(P=0.005)、临床妊娠率(P=0.048)差异均有统计学意义;(3)多因素二元Logistic回归分析结果显示,Ⅲ型严重少弱精组相对Ⅰ型严重少弱精组是低临床妊娠率危险因素[OR:0.259,95%CI、0.075~0.887]。 结论 微量冷冻和常规冷冻可获得相似临床妊娠率,精子来源不影响临床妊娠率,极严重少弱精可能降低临床妊娠率,但还需要扩大样本量进一步证实。

关键词: 冷冻精子, 稀少精子, 男性生育力保存, 临床结局, 辅助生殖技术, 微量玻璃化冷冻

Abstract: Objective To investigate the relationship between the technical parameters of frozen micro-sperm and the clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization(IVF)cycle. Methods A total of 118 cycles related to intracytoplasmic sperm microinjection(ICSI)after cryoresuscitation of rare spermatozoa during Jan. 2016 and Dec. 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The cycles were divided into micro freezing group and conventional freezing group according to the method of freezing; husband ejaculation group, epididymal puncture group and testicular puncture group according to the source of sperm; types Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ severe asthenia groups according to the quality of sperm. The general data, laboratory and clinical outcomes were compared. The effects of related parameters on the clinical outcomes were analyzed with multivariate binary Logistic regression. Results (1) General data: there were no significant differences in the age, body mass index(BMI), years of infertility, basal follicle stimulating hormone(FSH), anti-Mullerian hormone(AMH), Gn days, total dosage of Gn, E2 level on hCG day, number of oocytes retrieved, and number of MⅡ eggs among the groups when the cycles were grouped according to freezing method, sperm source and sperm quality. (2) Laboratory parameters and clinical outcomes: there were no significant differences in the transferable embryo rate or clinical pregnancy rate between the micro freezing and conventional freezing groups, but there were differences in the 2PN rate(P=0.002), 2PN cleavage rate(P=0.036), and the high quality embryo rate(P=0.002)(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in 2PN rate or clinical pregnancy rate among husband ejaculation, epididymal puncture and testicular puncture groups, but there were differences in 2PN cleavage rate(P<0.001), transferable embryo rate(P=0.048)and high quality embryo rate(P=0.002). There were no significant differences in 2PN rate, transferable embryo rate, and high quality embryo rate among the severe oligoasthenia types Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ, but there were significant differences in 2PN cleavage rate(P<0.001), implantation rate(P=0.005), and clinical pregnancy rate(P=0.048)among the three groups. (3) The multivariate binary Logistic regression analysis showed that the relative risk of a poor outcome was 0.287 in type Ⅲ versus type Ⅰ severe oligoasthenospermia groups(OR=0.259, 95%CI: 0.075-0.887, P<0.05). Conclusion Similar clinical pregnancy rates can be obtained by micro freezing and conventional freezing. The source of sperm does not affect the clinical pregnancy rate. A lower clinical pregnancy rate may be caused by very severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia, and further confirmation with an expanded sample size is needed.

Key words: Frozen sperm, Scarce sperm, Male fertility preservation, Clinical outcomes, Assisted reproductive technology, Micro vitrification freezing

中图分类号: 

  • R714.23
[1] Bernie AM, Mata DA, Ramasamy R, et al. Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Fertil Steril, 2015, 104(5): 1099-103.e1-3.
[2] Valli-Pulaski H, Peters KA, Gassei K, et al. Testicular tissue cryopreservation: 8 years of experience from a coordinated network of academic centers [J]. Human Reproduction, 2019, 34(6): 966-977.
[3] 周亮. 玻璃化冷冻对人微量精子冷冻复苏效果、DNA完整性和线粒体膜电位的影响[D].石家庄: 河北医科大学, 2016. 1-10.
[4] 朱序理, 曹金凤, 孙庆云, 等. 卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻对临床妊娠结局的影响[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2020,29(9): 1143-1147. ZHU Xuli, CAO Jinfeng, SUN Qingyun, et al. Effect of oocyte vitrification on clinical pregnancy outcome [J]. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2020, 29(9): 1143-1147
[5] 董俏言, 石慧. 人类精子冷冻损伤与保护的相关研究[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2019, 27(9): 1259-1263. DONG Qiaoyan, SHI Hui. Cryopreservation of human sperm [J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 2019, 27(9): 1259-1263.
[6] 王荣祥, 喻乔, 彭秋平, 等. 自制冷冻片微型载体(Strawtop)微量精液冻存效果的实验研究[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2020, 40(12): 1006-1012. WANG Rongxiang, YU Qiao, PENG Qiuping, et al. Experimental study on the cryopreservation effect of micro semen with homemade strawtop [J]. Chinese Journal of Reproduction and Contraception, 2020, 40(12): 1006-1012.
[7] Romero-Aguirregomezcorta J, Laguna-Barraza R, Fernández-González R, et al. Sperm selection by rheotaxis improves sperm quality and early embryo development [J]. Reproduction, 2021, 161(3): 343-352.
[8] Coria-Gómez CR, Torres-Rodríguez P, Villar-Muñoz LG, et al. Comparative study of fertility parameters in vitrified human spermatozoa in the presence or absence of EmbryORP®: a novel antioxidant [J]. Andrologia, 2021, 53(4): e13886. doi: 10.1111/and.13886.
[9] Pennings G, Couture V, Ombelet W. Social sperm freezing [J]. Human Reproduction, 2021, 36(4): 833-839.
[10] Prell MJ, McCue PM, Moffett PD, et al. Motility and fertility evaluation of thawed frozen stallion semen after 24 hours of cooled storage [J]. J Equine Vet Sci, 2020, 90: 102983. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102983.
[11] 中国男性生育力保存专家共识编写组.中国男性生育力保存专家共识[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2021, 41(3): 191-198.
[12] 靳镭, 郑家凤, 刘群, 等. 微滴无保护剂玻璃化法冷冻附睾微量精子的研究[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2010, 16(12): 1089-1094. JIN Lei, ZHENG Jiafeng, LIU Qun, et al. Cryopreservation of epididymal sperm by microdrop vitrification without protective agent [J]. Chinese Journal of andrology, 2010, 16(12): 1089-1094.
[13] 朱杰. 不同浓度的蔗糖溶液玻璃化冷冻人类精子的研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2013. 1-7.
[14] Li YX, Zhou L, Lv MQ, et al. Vitrification and conventional freezing methods in sperm cryopreservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2019, 233: 84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.
[15] Berkovitz A, Miller N, Silberman M, et al. A novel solutionfor freezing small numbers of spermatozoa using a sperm vitrification device[J]. Hum Reprod, 2018, 33(11):1975-1983.
[16] 曹晓敏, 刘丽, 方祺, 等. 非梗阻性无精子症患者显微取精术联合单精子冷冻技术助孕1例报告[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2019, 27(10): 1408-1410. CAO Xiaomin, LIU Li, FANG Qi, et al. A case report of assisted pregnancy by microsection and single sperm cryotherapy in patients with non obstructive azoospermia [J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 2019, 27(10): 1408-1410.
[17] 汤友苗, 王兴玲, 娄华, 等. 不同来源精子应用于ICSI治疗的早期临床结局[J]. 中国医学创新, 2018, 15(5): 22-25. TANG Youmiao, WANG Xingling, LOU Hua, et al. Early clinical outcomes of ICSI treatment with sperm from different sources [J]. China Medical Innovation, 2018, 15(5): 22-25.
[18] 管群, 于艳, 张琪瑶,等. 不同来源精子对卵胞浆内单精子注射治疗结局的影响[J]. 中国男科学杂志, 2011, 25(6): 22-25. GUAN Qun, YU Yan, ZHANG Qiyao, et al. Effect of sperm from different sources on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection [J]. Chinese Journal of Andrology, 2011, 25(6): 22-25.
[19] ONeill CL, Chow S, Rosenwaks Z, et al. Development of ICSI [J]. Reproduction, 2018, 156(1): F51-F58.
[20] 孙庆云, 曹金凤, 杜元杰,等. 不同来源精子行ICSI助孕临床结局分析[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2020, 29(9): 1224-1227. SUN Qingyun, CAO Jinfeng, DU Yuanjie, et al. Analysis of clinical outcomes of ICSI assisted pregnancy with sperm from different sources [J]. Journal of reproductive medicine, 2020, 29(9): 1224-1227.
[21] Caroppo E, Campagna C, Colpi EM, et al. Sperm source does not affect the ICSI outcome of patients with severely compromised spermatogenesis [J]. Andrologia, 2020, 52(11): e13884.
[22] 倪晓蓓, 王珊珊, 徐志鹏, 等. 父方年龄及精子来源对ICSI周期临床结局的影响[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2017, 26(1): 29-33. NI Xiaobei, WANG Shanshan, XU Zhipeng, et al. Effect of fathers age and sperm source on clinical outcome of ICSI cycle [J]. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2017, 26(1): 29-33.
[23] 董瑞娜, 郭艺红, 苏迎春, 等. 精子来源对卵胞浆内单精子注射临床结局及子代出生缺陷的影响[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2013, 22(5): 388-392. DONG Ruina, GUO Yihong, SU Yingchun, et al. Effect of sperm source on clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and birth defects of offspring [J]. Progress in Modern Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013, 22(5): 388-392.
[24] 钟惠娴, 陈培林, 熊风, 等. 不同来源冷冻复苏精子ICSI后对囊胚培养结局的影响[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2020, 29(7): 887-892. ZHONG Huixian, CHEN Peilin, XIONG Feng, et al. Effect of ICSI on blastocyst culture outcome of cryopreserved sperm from different sources [J]. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2020, 29(7): 887-892.
[25] 李定明, 刘博, 鲜泱, 等. 不同浓度稀少精子冷冻技术效果的观察[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2018, 24(8): 705-707. LI Dingming, LIU Bo, XIAN Yang, et al. Observation on the effect of different concentrations of sparsely frozen sperm [J]. Chinese Journal of andrology, 2018, 24(8): 705-707.
[1] 郝桂敏,罗卓野,王奕卓. 生育力保存的伦理问题及思考[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 47-52.
[2] 石玉华,潘烨,谢燕秋. 胚胎冷冻保存技术及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 12-18.
[3] 颜磊,岳彩欣,刘懿淳. 子宫内膜异位症的生育力保护[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(9): 31-34.
[4] 石玉华,王秋敏,戚丹. 辅助生殖技术前沿研究热点及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 97-102.
[5] 赵冰清,高选,李江夏. 基于辅助生殖人群的复发性流产夫妇染色体核型回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 26-31.
[6] 曹明雅,赵晗洁,冯腾飞,贾蕊,赵志明,郝桂敏. 孕早期行减胎术对胚胎移植助孕患者围产期母婴的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(11): 65-70.
[7] 黄薇,刘冬. 子宫内膜异位症相关不孕的助孕策略[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(6): 23-26.
[8] 韩婷,陈红蕾. 辅助生殖治疗中腹腔镜手术应用及注意问题[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 45-51.
[9] 张迎春. 人类辅助生殖技术子代安全性问题[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 52-59.
[10] 伍琼芳. 辅助生殖治疗中取卵后出血的可能原因及处理[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 33-37.
[11] 赵君利, 袁莹莹. 辅助生殖治疗中多胎妊娠的防治[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 20-26.
[12] 石玉华,蒋琪. 辅助生殖治疗中卵巢过度刺激综合征的防治[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 13-19.
[13] 郝桂敏,罗卓野,崔娜. 辅助生殖技术治疗中常见并发症的危害[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 7-12.
[14] 师娟子,陈丽娟. 辅助生殖技术进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 1-6.
[15] 谭季春,董萌,李萍萍. 辅助生殖技术常见的伦理问题及管理[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(10): 60-66.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 史爽,李娟,米琦,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 胃癌miRNAs预后风险评分模型的构建与应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 47 -52 .
[2] 黄飞,王怀经,邢毅,高薇,李永刚,邢子英,李振中. NGF和GM1联合应用对坐骨神经损伤大鼠初级传入神经元的保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(4): 332 -335 .
[3] 吕龙飞,李林,李树海,亓磊,鲁铭,程传乐,田辉. 腔镜下细针导管空肠造瘘在微创McKeown食管癌切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 77 -81 .
[4] 邵海港, 王璇, 王青. 山东地区人下颌第一前磨牙根管系统解剖研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(9): 85 -89 .
[5] 姜保东,马祥兴,王青,王茜,冯晓源,李克,于富华 . 脑CT静脉造影扫描时相及重建层厚的选择[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(11): 1084 -1086 .
[6] 李洧,李道卫,叶茜,高顺翠,姜淑娟. 经支气管镜针吸活检在纵隔疾病诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(11): 1063 -1065 .
[7] 唐芳1,2 ,张颖倩3 ,王志强4 ,康殿民4 ,王洁贞1 ,薛付忠1 . 自然疫源性疾病疫源地空间结构的二维
最小生成树模型及其应用
[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(01): 106 -110 .
[8] 王旭平,赵玲,冯玉新,商林珊,刘金成,曹伟朋,朱晓音,辛华. 绞股蓝总苷对谷氨酸诱导的胎鼠大脑皮层神经元氧化性损伤保护机制的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(6): 564 -567 .
[9] 王学萍,杨洪玲. 洛汀新治疗高血压50例报告[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, (2): 213 .
[10] 李玉亮,王永正,王晓华,张福君,朱立东,张万明,李 征,李振家,张开贤 . 动脉灌注吉西他滨联合125I粒子胰腺内植入治疗进展期胰腺癌[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(4): 393 -396 .