您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 65-70.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.120

• • 上一篇    

新型冠状病毒肺炎51例临床特征

雷宇,陆婧,顾佳颖,周登峰,李园园,卢桥发   

  1. 武汉市第四医院 华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉普爱医院呼吸内科,湖北 武汉 430033
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 卢桥发. E-mail:luqiaofa@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    武汉市卫健委临床科研项目(82016121280055)

Clinical features of 51 patients with corona virus disease 2019

LEI Yu, LU Jing, GU Jiaying, ZHOU Dengfeng, LI Yuanyuan, LU Qiaofa   

  1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wuhan Fourth Hospital &
    Wuhan Puai Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430033, Hubei, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

摘要: 目的 探讨武汉市新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的临床特征,研究患者血清中炎症因子与病情轻重程度的相关性。 方法 回顾性分析51例患者的临床资料,包括临床症状、血液检验及胸部CT,根据新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第5版)分为3组:普通型32例、重型9例、危重型10例。比较3组患者入院时的外周血白细胞计数、淋巴细胞计数、C反应蛋白(CRP)、肝肾功能等指标。 结果 (1)患者就诊时的主要症状为发热(42例,82.35%),咳嗽、咳痰(39例,76.47%)、胸闷、气短(24例,47.06%),个别患者以腹泻、头痛为主诉入院;伴随症状包括乏力、肌肉酸痛、头痛、恶心、呕吐、腹泻,住院前发病时间1~21 d,中位数7 d;住院时间3~30 d,中位数12 d;(2)外周血结果一般表现为CRP升高(80.39%)、淋巴细胞计数降低(68.63%)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高(52.94%);白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数、谷氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、γ谷氨酰转肽酶(γ-GT)、总胆红素(TBIL)、直接胆红素(DBIL)、尿素氮(BUN)、肌酐(Cr)一般正常。(3)胸部CT特点为:双肺多发、肺野外带多见;以毛玻璃样结节、斑片影为主、呈间质性肺炎改变;病程中病灶可增多、扩大、密度增高;病灶不形成空洞;无胸腔积液改变,病灶不易致气管、支气管堵塞。(4)普通型淋巴细胞计数表达水平高于重型、危重型,差异有统计学意义(H=3.656,P=0.001;H=5.572,P<0.001);重型与危重型淋巴细胞计数表达水平差异无统计学意义(H=1.391,P=0.493)。3组患者CRP表达水平差异有统计学意义(F=5.220,P=0.009);危重型CRP表达水平高于重型、普通型,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);重型与普通型CRP表达水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。危重型LDH表达水平高于普通型,差异有统计学意义(H=-2.961,P=0.009);危重型与重型、普通型与重型差异无统计学意义(H=-1.051,P=0.879;H=-1.484,P=0.414)。3组患者两两比较,白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数、ALT、AST、γ-GT、TBIL、DBIL、BUN、Cr表达水平差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 (1)多数新型冠状病毒肺炎患者起病初期症状不严重,主要症状为发热、咳嗽,部分患者同时伴随消化道系统或其他系统症状。(2)危重型患者淋巴细胞计数、CRP及LDH均出现异常,上述指标有助于判断病情严重程度。

关键词: 新型冠状病毒肺炎, 淋巴细胞, C反应蛋白, 乳酸脱氢酶, 临床特征

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics of corona virus disease 2019(COVID-19)patients in Wuhan City, and the correlation between inflammatory factors and severity. Methods According to the COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment plan(trial version fifth), the clinical data, including clinical symptoms, blood tests and chest CT, of 51 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 3 groups: 32 cases of general type, 9 cases of severe type and 10 cases of critical type. Results (1) The main symptoms were fever(42 cases, 82.35%), cough, expectoration(39 cases, 76.47%), chest distress, shortness of breath(24 cases, 47.06%), diarrhea and headache(few cases); the accompanying symptoms included fatigue, muscle ache, headache, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. The number of days before hospitalization was 1-21, with a median of 7; the number of days of hospitalization was 3-30, with a median of 12. (2) The results of peripheral blood generally showed that, CRP was increased(80.39%), lymphocyte count was decreased(68.63%), lactate dehydrogenase(LDH)was increased(52.94%), and the leukocyte count, neutrophil count, alanine transaminase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase(γ-GT), total bilirubin(TBIL), direct bilirubin(DBIL), blood urea nitrogen(BUN)and creatinine(Cr)were normal. (3) The characteristics of chest CT showed that the foci were multiple in double lung and field lung, with mainly ground-glass opacity and patchy shadow, showing interstitial pneumonia change. During the course of the disease, the focus could increase, expand and increase in density, and did not form cavity. There was no pleural effusion change, and the focus was not easy to cause blockage of trachea and bronchi. (4) The lymphocyte count in general type was higher than those in severe type and critical type(H=3.656, P=0.001; H=5.572, P<0.001); the lymphocyte count showed no statistical difference between severe type and critical type(H=1.391, P=0.493). The CRP levels among the three groups were statistically different as a whole(F=5.220,P=0.009); The CRP level in critical type was higher than those in general type and severe type(both P<0.05), while that between general type and severe type exhibited no statistical difference(P>0.05). The LDH level in critical type was higher than that in general type(H=-2.961, P=0.009); Compared with the severe type, the LDH levels in general type and critical type exhibited no statistical difference(H=-1.051, P=0.879; H=-1.484, P=0.414). For leukocyte count, neutrophil count, ALT, AST, γ-GT, TBIL, DBIL, BUM, Cr expression levels, there existed no statistical difference after pairwise comparisons(P>0.05). Conclusion (1) Most of the COVID-19 patients are not severe at the initial stage of onset; the main symptoms are fever and cough, accompanied by gastrointestinal system or other systemic symptoms. (2) The levels of lymphocyte count, CRP and LDH are abnormal in severe patients, which may help to judge the severity of the disease.

Key words: Corona virus disease 2019, Lymphocyte, C-reactive protein, Lactate dehydrogenase, Clinical characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • R563.1
[1] 张文福, 何俊美, 帖金凤, 等. 冠状病毒的抵抗力与消毒[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2020,37(1): 63-67.
[2] Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China[J]. Nature, 2020, 579(7798): 265-269.
[3] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第6版)[EB/OL].(2020-02-19)[2020-02-23]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7653p/202002/8334a8326dd94d329df351d7da8aefc2. shtml.
[4] Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019 [J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(8): 727-733.
[5] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第5版)[EB/OL].(2020-02-04)[2020-02-06]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-02/05/content_5474791.htm.
[6] Lu H, Stratton CW, Tang YW. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: the mystery and the miracle[J]. J Med Virol, 2020, 92(4): 401-402.
[7] Hui DS, I Azhar E, Madani TA, et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health-the latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China[J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2020, 91: 264-266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009.
[8] World Health Organization. WHO Director-Generals remarks at the media briefing on 2019-nCoV on 11 February 2020[EB/OL].(2020-02-11)[2020-02-12]. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-2019-ncov-on-11-february-2020.
[9] Tao Y, Shi M, Chommanard C, et al. Surveillance of bat coronaviruses in Kenya identifies relatives of human coronaviruses NL63 and 229E and their recombination history[J]. J Virol, 2017, 91(5). pii: e01953-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01953-16.
[10] Cui J, Li F, Shi ZL. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2019, 17(3): 181-192.
[11] Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(13): 1199-1207.
[12] 国家卫生健康委办公厅,国家中医药管理局办公室. 新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第5版 修正版)[EB/OL].(2020-02-09)[2020-02-10]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-02/09/contene_5376406.htm.
[13] 靳英辉, 蔡林, 程真顺, 等. 新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)感染的肺炎诊疗快速建议指南(标准版)[J]. 解放军医学杂志, 2020, 45(1): 1-20. JIN Yinghui, CAI Lin, CHENG Zhenshun, et al. A rapid advice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV)infected pneumonia(standard version)[J]. Medical Journal of Chinese Peoples Liberation Army, 2020, 45(1): 1-20.
[14] 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院救治医疗专家组. 新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎诊疗快速指南(第3版)[J]. 医药导报, 2020: 1-9. doi:10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2020.03.001.
[15] 史河水,韩小雨,樊艳青,等.新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)感染的肺炎临床特征及影像学表现[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2020. doi:10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.20200206.002. SHI Heshui, HAN Xiaoyu, FAN Yanqing, et al. Radiologic features of patients with 2019-nCoV infection[J]. Journal of Clinical Radiology, 2020. doi:10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.20200206.002.
[16] 雷子乔,史河水,梁波,等.新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)感染的肺炎的影像学检查与感染防控的工作方案[J].临床放射杂志, 2020. doi:10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.20200206.001.
[17] Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 497-506.
[18] Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 507-513.
[19] Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China[J]. JAMA,2020. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585.
[20] Wong KT, Antonio GE, Hui DS, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome: radiographic appearances and pattern of progression in 138 patients[J]. Radiology, 2003, 228(2): 401-406.
[21] Jeffrey PK. Chest CT findings in 2019 novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV)infections from Wuhan, China: key points for the radiologist[J]. Radiology, 2020, 295(1): 16-17.
[22] 陈蕾,刘辉国,刘威,等.2019新型冠状病毒肺炎29例临床特征分析[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2020, 43(2): E005.
[23] Guo L, Wei D, Zhang X, et al. Clinical features predicting mortality risk in patients with viral pneumonia: the MuLBSTA score[J]. Front Microbiol, 2019, 10: 2752. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02752.
[1] 巩雨,高震,王虎清,杨晶雯,张桂莲,展淑琴,张茹,吴海琴. 4例继发性肥大性下橄榄核变性的临床及影像学特点[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 37-42.
[2] 亓梦雨,周敏然,孙洺山,李世洁,陈春燕. T大颗粒淋巴细胞白血病合并原发性骨髓纤维化1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 118-120.
[3] 曹义海. 血管生成在疾病治疗中的应用与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 9-14.
[4] 杨璇,李岩志,马伟,贾崇奇. 基于两样本孟德尔随机化的肺功能与新型冠状病毒肺炎病死风险的因果关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 104-111.
[5] 周溪,黄霂晗,任玉洁,邱洋. 新型冠状病毒感染与天然免疫及炎症反应[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(5): 15-21.
[6] 于莹,张功,刘晶,颜世童,韩涛,黄海量. 基于网络药理学和分子对接方法探析黄芪预防新型冠状病毒肺炎的潜在作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 6-16.
[7] 任敏敏,王广梅,张丽,杨瑶瑶,封丹珺. 335名抗疫一线护理人员心理弹性对共情疲劳的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(2): 88-94.
[8] 曾睿,胡欣婷,云晓雅,田筝,李青,刘杰,张娅,王欣. 荧光原位杂交对197例慢性淋巴细胞白血病的诊断[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 35-40.
[9] 游雪婷,田兴松. 3 514例乳腺癌9年间临床及病理学特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 49-54.
[10] 徐玉香,刘煜东,张蓬,段瑞生. 101例脑小血管病患者脑微出血危险因素的回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 67-71.
[11] 袁勇贵,李磊,沈仲夏,陈刚,吴义高,岳莹莹. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下精神障碍诊疗的防控策略[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(4): 1-6.
[12] 常彩云,于秋燕,赵小冬,王芳,李伟,阮师漫,耿兴义. 济南市首例新型冠状病毒肺炎病例及其相关家庭聚集性疫情分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(4): 7-11.
[13] 杨丽,李战,刘晓雪,焦海涛,周林,刘庆皆,刘铁诚,耿兴义. 济南市新型冠状病毒肺炎密切接触者隔离医学观察情况分析与评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(4): 12-16.
[14] 乔宇,崔亮亮,李帅,王峰,阮师漫,景一鸣,刘翀. 智能问答机器人系统研发及应用研究——以济南市新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情处置应对为例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(4): 17-22.
[15] 李新蕊,耿兴义,赵小冬,刘岚铮,王蔚茹,崔亮亮,李战,常彩云,阮师漫. 济南市47例新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情流行综合分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(4): 23-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!