您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (6): 106-111.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.427

• • 上一篇    

采用应对方式问卷调查留守经历对入学大学生情绪适应的影响

郭冬梅1,王义利1,刘金虎1,刘倩倩2   

  1. 1. 烟台大学大学生心理健康教育指导中心, 山东 烟台 264005;2. 山东大学学生心理健康教育与咨询中心, 山东大学医药卫生管理学院, 山东 济南 250012
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 郭冬梅. E-mail:ytdxgdm@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(14YJC710013)

Using Coping Style Questionnaire to investigate the effects of left-behind experience on emotional adaptation of college students

GUO Dongmei1, WANG Yili1, LIU Jinhu1, LIU Qianqian2   

  1. 1. Students Mental Health Center of Yantai University, Yantai 264005, Shandong, China;
    2. Student Counseling Center ofShandong University;
    School of Health Care Management of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

PDF (PC)

117

摘要： 目的 了解留守经历入学大学生的应对方式与情绪适应状况,分析应对方式与情绪适应的关系。 方法 采用分层随机抽样的方法选取山东、北京、安徽、四川6所高校的1 329名大学生为被试,使用应对方式问卷、自尊量表(SES)、焦虑量表(SAS)、Beck抑郁问卷(BDI)进行测查,采用Mann-WhItney U、Kruskal-Wallis和结构方程模型进行检验。 结果 留守经历入学大学生与入学非留守经历大学生的情绪适应水平在自尊、焦虑和抑郁维度差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.53,P=0.008;Z=-3.21,P=0.001;Z=-2.62,P=0.009);留守经历入学大学生较多采用消极应对方式(自责、合理化),较少采用积极的应对方式(解决问题、求助);结构方程模型结果表明,留守经历入学大学生的应对方式对情绪适应有显著预测作用。 结论 留守经历入学大学生较多采用消极的应对方式,情绪适应水平较低;优化留守经历入学大学生的应对方式,可能是改善其情绪适应水平的一个有效途径。

关键词: 应对方式, 情绪适应, 保护性因素, 留守经历, 大学生

Abstract: Objective To analyze the relationship between coping style and emotional adaptation of college students with left-behind experience. Methods A total of 1 329 college students from six universities in Shandong, Beijing, Anhui and Sichuan were surveyed with Coping Style Questionnaire(CSQ), Self-Esteem Scale(SES), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)and Beck Depression Inventory(BDI). The results were tested with Mann-WhItney U, Kruskal-Wallis and Structural Equation Modeling. Results There were significant differences in self-esteem, anxiety and depression between the undergraduates with and without left-behind experience (Z=-2.53, P=0.008; Z=-3.21, P=0.001; Z=-2.62, P=0.009). Those with left-behind experience tended to choose negative coping styles(self-blame, rationalization)instead of positive ones(solving problems, asking for help). Multiple regression analysis showed the coping style could predict the emotional adaptation level. Conclusion The college students with left-behind experience tend to choose negative coping styles, and their motional adaptation is at a low level. Optimizing the coping style may be an effective way to improve their emotional adaptation level.

Key words: Coping style, Emotional adaptation, Protective factors, Left-behind experience, College students

中图分类号: 

  • R574
[1] 张文新, 陈亮, 纪林芹, 等. 童年中期身体侵害、关系侵害与儿童的情绪适应[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(5): 433-443. ZHANG Wenxin, CHEN Liang, JI Linqin, et al. Physical and relational victimization, and children's emotional adjustment in middle childhood[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2009, 41(5): 433-443.
[2] 董会芹, 张文新. 童年中晚期同伴侵害与情绪适应: 归因的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 654-662. DONG Huiqin, ZHANG Wenxin. Peer victimization and emotion adjustment during middle and late childhood: the mediating roles of attributions[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(5): 654-662.
[3] 臧宏运, 郑德伟, 郎芳. 有留守经历大学生自我效能感自尊在领悟社会支持和心理健康间的中介作用[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018(9): 1332 -1335. ZANG Hongyun, ZHENG Dewei, LANG Fang, et al. Mediation effects of self efficacy and Self esteem in the relationship between perceived social support and mental health in college students with left-behind experience[J]. Chinese Journal of School Health, 2018(9): 1332-1335.
[4] 韩黎, 王洲林, 张继华, 等. 留守经历大学生负性生活事件与抑郁的关系[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2017, 31(4): 326-332. HAN Li, WANG Zhoulin, ZHANG Jihua, et al. Relationship between negative life events and depression in college students with left-behind experience[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2017, 31(4): 326-332.
[5] 张艳敏, 胡成洋, 李凤丽. 合肥市留守经历大学生学校适应现状分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2018, 39(1): 83-88. ZHANG Yanmin, HU Chengyang, LI Fengli, School adjustment among college students with left-behind experience[J]. Chinese Journal of School Health, 2018, 39(1): 83-88.
[6] Farrell LJ, Barrett PM. Prevention of childhood emotional disorders: Reducing the burden of suffering associated with anxiety and depression[J]. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2007, 12: 58-65.
[7] Folkman S, Lazarus RS. Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50(3): 571-579.
[8] Runtz MG, Schallow JR. Social support and coping strategies as mediators of adult adjustment following childhood maltreatment[J]. Child Abuse Negl, 1997, 21(2): 211-226.
[9] 周永红. 童年创伤经历与研究生主观幸福感的关系: 应对方式的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(3): 509-513. ZHOU Yonghong. Childhood Trauma and subjective well-being in postgraduates: the mediating of coping style[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2016, 24(3): 509-513.
[10] 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册[M]. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999: 97-102, 194-197, 235-238, 279-280.
[11] Shi JZ, Chen F, Yin J, et al. Resilience as moderator of the relationship between left-behind experience and mental health of chinese adolescents[J]. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2016, 62(4): 386-393.
[12] 姚远, 张顺. 持久的“心灵烙印”: 留守时间如何影响青年早期的主观福祉[J]. 青年研究, 2018, 3: 23-33. YAO Yuan, ZHANG Shun. The Last “Soul Imprint”: How the Left-behind Duration Influence the Youths Early Subjective Well-being[J]. Youth Studies, 2018, 3: 23-33.
[13] 詹启生, 武艺. 留守经历大学生家庭教养方式对情绪调节策略的影响: 亲子沟通的中介作用[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2016, 10: 40-46. ZHAN Qisheng, WU Yi. The effect of parenting styles on emotion regulation strategies from college students once left at home by their parents working in cities: the mediating effect of parent-child communication[J]. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 2016, 10: 40-46.
[14] 范兴华, 方晓义, 黄月胜, 等. 父母关爱对农村留守儿童抑郁的影响机制: 追踪研究[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1029-1040. FAN Xinghua, FANG Xiaoyi, HUANG Yuesheng, et al. The influence mechanism of parental care on depression among left-behind rural children in China: a longitudinal study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 1029-1040.
[15] 刘红升, 靳小怡. 教养方式与留守儿童心理弹性: 特征和关系—来自河南省叶县的调查证据[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018,39(1): 222-229.
[16] 李晓敏, 代嘉幸, 魏翠娟, 等. 河北高校农村留守经历大学生的生活事件与抑郁的关系[J]. 卫生研究, 2017, 46(1): 57-61, 69. LI Xiaomin, DAI Jiaxing, WEI Cuijuan, et al. Research on life events and depression of college students with lift-behind experience in Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Hygiene Research, 2017, 46(1): 57-61, 69.
[17] 李艳兰, 刘丽娟, 杨军, 等. 有留守经历大学生问题行为与消极情绪和积极人格品质的关系[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2019, 33(4): 318-320.
[18] 范兴华, 简晶萍, 陈锋菊, 等. 家庭处境不利与留守儿童心理适应: 心理资本的中介[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(2): 353-357. FAN Xinghua, JIAN Jingping, CHEN Fengju, et al. Family adversity and psychological adaptation among the left-behind children[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2018, 26(2): 353-357.
[19] 范兴华, 余思, 彭佳, 等. 留守儿童生活压力与孤独感、幸福感的关系:心理资本的中介与调节作用[J]. 心理科学, 2017, 40(2): 388-394. FAN Xinghua, YU Si, PENG Jia, et al. The relationship between perceived life stress, loneliness and general well-being among theleft-behind rural children: psychological capital as amediator and moderator[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2017, 40(2): 388-394.
[20] 孟斌, 孙宏伟, 秦浩, 等. 六安市某乡村留守初中生自杀意念现状及相关因素的研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志, 2018, 26(6): 822-825. MENG Bin, SUN Hongwei, QIN Hao, et al. Situation and related factors of suicide ideation among left behind junior high school students in luan[J]. China Journal of Health Psychology, 2018, 26(6): 822-825.
[21] 沈宏艳. 留守经历大学生压力源、应对方式与人际和谐的关系及干预[D]. 芜湖: 安徽师范大学, 2017.
[22] 李晓敏, 罗静, 高文斌, 等. 有留守经历大学生的负性情绪、应对方式、自尊水平及人际关系研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(5): 620-622. LI Xiaomin, LUO Jing, GAO Wenbin, et al. Research on negative emotions, coping style, self-esteem and interpersonal relationship of college students with left-behind experience[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2009, 17(5): 620-622.
[23] 贾晓督, 李智勇. 不同应对倾向大学生在正负性情绪状态下的注意特点[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2017, 38(11): 1657-1660. JIA Xiaodu, LI ZHiyong. Attentional traits towards positive or negative emotional stimuli among students with different dispositional coping[J]. Chinese Journal of School Health, 2017, 38(11): 1657-1660.
[24] 杨蓓, 张会会, 郭春红, 等. 儿童期创伤与其后大学生应对方式、负性情绪的观察分析[J].山东大学学报(医学版), 2018, 56(2): 68-73. YANG Bei, ZHANG Huihui, GUO Chunhong et al. Association among child abuse, coping styles and negative emotions in college students: an observational analysis[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2018, 56(2): 68-73.
[25] 沈友田, 胡笑羽, 叶宝娟. 压力对大学生抑郁的影响机制: 领悟社会支持与应对方式的中介作用[J]. 心理学探新, 2018, 38(3): 267-272. Shen Youtian, Hu Xiaoyu, Ye Baojuan. The effect of stress on college students’ depression: the mediating effect of perceived social support and coping style[J]. Psychological Exploration, 2018, 38(3): 267-272.
[1] 叶艺,张洁,赵秋阁,范秀珍. 老年服务择业动机量表在毕业学年大学生中的修订及信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 75-80.
[2] 任敏敏,王广梅,张丽,杨瑶瑶,封丹珺. 335名抗疫一线护理人员心理弹性对共情疲劳的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(2): 88-94.
[3] 秦艺文,杨晓帆,魏艳欣,刘宝鹏,Bob Lew,贾存显. 大学生生命意义感在心理扭力和自杀行为风险间的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 76-83.
[4] 徐小明, 曾琪, 操军, 陈小容, 吕臻, 王我, 艾明, 孔裔婷, 况利. 大一女生自伤行为与心理-社会-基因多态性的关联分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 84-92.
[5] 于鹏鹏,袁璐,王东芳,Bob Lew,平凡,贾存显. 简易应对量表应用于医学生的信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(1): 101-106.
[6] 刘倩倩, 肖宏, 尹爱田, 孙晓杰. 济南市社区卫生服务人员心理健康状况及相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(9): 104-108.
[7] 王端卫1，2，张敬悬2. 简易应对方式问卷的因子分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(3): 96-100.
[8] 江虹, 谢经汤, 丁娟, 雷震, 潘芳. 亲职压力对心理健康的影响:应对方式和家庭功能的中介和调节作用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(11): 81-85.
[9] 张伯华，胡霜，盛洁. 中医院校大学生网络成瘾与五态人格的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(9): 105-108.
[10] 史梁1，唐茂芹2，胡蕾2，何旭3，赵鸿雁4. 女性服刑人员心理健康状况与应对方式的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(2): 108-112.
[11] 石海英1，刘倩倩2，吴少怡2. 某高校医学生人格特征与学业拖延的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(12): 103-106.
[12] 李楠，张伯华. 中医院校大学生人际信任、应对方式和羞怯的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(7): 117-119.
[13] 罗艳. 大学生伤害与睡眠质量的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(6): 130-132.
[14] 李馨1,张敬悬2,唐济生2. 重性抑郁障碍患者与正常人应对方式的对照研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(2): 135-140.
[15] 吕丽1，江虹1，李文杰1，陈翠2，张红静1. 突发性耳聋患者的情绪特征及应对方式[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(7): 155-158.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发