您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (7): 118-122.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.1549

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

689例非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床流行病学特征

张玉凤1,2,徐敏3,邢秀丽3,逄曙光3,户克庆4   

  1. 1.山东大学齐鲁医学院, 山东 济南 250012;2.济南市历下区人民医院, 山东 济南 250014;3.山东大学附属济南市中心医院内分泌科, 山东 济南 250013;4.山东大学附属济南市中心医院胸痛中心, 山东 济南 250013
  • 发布日期:2022-07-27
  • 通讯作者: 逄曙光. E-mail:shugoangpang@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重点研发计划(2016GSF201019);济南市医疗卫生科技创新计划(201704116);山东大学横向计划(6020320001);山东省第一医科大学学术提升计划(2019QL205)

Epidemiological characteristics of 689 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

ZHANG Yufeng1,2, XU Min3, XING Xiuli3, PANG Shuguang3, HU Keqing4   

  1. 1. Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Peoples Hospital of Lixia District of Jinan, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
    3. Department of Endocrinology, Jinan Central Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250013, Shandong, China;
    4. Chest Pain Center, Jinan Central Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250013, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-07-27

PDF (PC)

225

摘要： 目的 调查分析济南市某三甲医院胸痛中心就诊患者中非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的流行病学特征,探讨近3年该院胸痛中心就诊的非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的特点及规律。 方法 选取2018年1月至2020年12月到胸痛中心就诊的非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者689例作为研究对象,按患者的性别、年龄、就诊时间及患者的首次医疗接触时间、处理策略等进行频数分析、卡方检验和Logistic回归分析。 结果 非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者人数和构成比随年龄的增长逐渐增加,70岁~年龄组占比最高(53.4%),男性患者构成比高于女性;非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的就诊有明显的季节性,不同季节的患者昼夜就诊率差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.627,P=0.006)。对昼夜就诊有关联的影响因素进行二分类Logistic回归多因素分析显示,就诊季节、首次医疗接触时间及处理策略是患者昼夜就诊差异的独立影响因素(P<0.05)。 结论 该院非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者就诊的高峰年龄、就诊时间段、季节分布有其规律可循,为临床医师识别高危患者、选择最佳诊疗策略提供依据。

关键词: 非ST段抬高型心肌梗死, 流行病学, 季节分布, 预后

Abstract: Objective To investigate the epidemiological characteristics of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI), and to explore the characteristics and regularity of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in chest pain center of the hospital in recent 3 years. Methods A total of 689 NSTEMI patients who visited the chest pain center of a certain hospital during Jan. 2018 and Dec. 2020 were selected as the study subjects. Frequency analysis, Chi-square test and Logistic regression analysis were performed based on patients gender, age, date and time of treatment, time of first medical contact and treatment strategy. Results The number of patients and constituent ratio increased with the increase of age. The 70-year group had the highest proportion, accounting for 53.4% of all cases. The proportion of male patients was higher than that of female patients. Patients in different seasons had statistically significant difference in day and night visit rates(χ2=12.627, P=0.006). Multinomial Logistic regression analysis showed that the season of visit, time of first medical contact and treatment strategy were the independent influencing factors of day and night visits(P<0.05). Conclusion The peak age, time period and seasonal distribution of patients have certain rules to follow, which can provide a basis for clinicians to identify high-risk patients and choose the best diagnosis and treatment strategy.

Key words: Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, Epidemiology, Seasonal prevalence, Prognosis

中图分类号: 

  • R541.4
[1] Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-Elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014, 64(24): 2713-2714.
[2] Park HW, Yoon CH, Kang SH, et al. Early- and late-term clinical outcome and their predictors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [J]. Int J Cardiol, 2013, 169(4): 254-261.
[3] 杨欣, 王岚英. 336例急性心肌梗死流行病学分析[J]. 徐州医学院学报, 2005, 25(2): 163-164.
[4] 中华医学会心血管病学分会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征诊断和治疗指南(2016)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2017, 45(5): 359-376. Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. Guideline and consensus for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome(2016)[J]. Chinese Video Journal of Cardiology, 2017, 45(5): 359-376.
[5] Menotti A, Puddu PE, Kromhout D, et al. Coronary heart disease mortality trends during 50 years as explained by risk factor changes: the European cohorts of the Seven Countries Study [J]. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2020, 27(9): 988-998.
[6] 苏懿, 王磊, 张敏州. 急性心肌梗死的流行病学研究进展[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2012, 10(4): 467-469.
[7] Salpeter SR, Cheng J, Thabane L, et al. Bayesian meta-analysis of hormone therapy and mort- ality in younger postmenopausal women [J]. Am J Med, 2009, 122(11): 1016-1022.
[8] Sivasinprasasn S, Shinlapawittayatorn K, Chattipakorn SC, et al. Estrogenic impact on cardiac ischemic/reperfusion injury [J]. J Cardiovasc Transl Res, 2016, 9(1): 23-39.
[9] Mefford MT, Li BH, Qian L, et al. Sex-specific trends in acute myocardial infarction within an integrated healthcare network, 2000 through 2014 [J]. Circulation, 2020, 141(7): 509-519.
[10] 韦再华, 高燕琳, 苏健婷, 等. 2003—2007年北京市户籍居民急性心肌梗死死亡人群分布特征[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2012, 46(7): 651-652.
[11] Paneni F, Diaz Cañestro C, Libby P, et al. The aging cardiovascular system: understanding it at the cellular and clinical levels [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 69(15): 1952-1967.
[12] Jackson AM, Zhang R, Findlay I, et al. Healthcare disparities for women hospitalized with myocardial infarction and angina [J]. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes, 2020, 6(2): 156-165.
[13] DeFilippis EM, Collins BL, Singh A, et al. Women who experience a myocardial infarction at a young age have worse outcomes compared with men: the Mass General Brigham YOUNG-MI registry [J]. Eur Heart J, 2020, 41(42): 4127-4137.
[14] Jiang SL, Ji XP, Zhao YX, et al. Predictors of in-hospital mortality difference between male and female patients with acute myocardial infarction [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2006, 98(8): 1000-1003.
[15] 李珊珊, 金玮. 气象因子影响急性心肌梗死的研究[J]. 国际心血管病杂志, 2012, 39(5): 295-297.
[16] Li K, Zhao K, Shi L, et al. Daily temperature change in relation to the risk of childhood bacillary dysentery among different age groups and sexes in a temperate city in China [J]. Public Health, 2016, 131(29): 20-26.
[17] Lee JH, Chae SC, Yang DH, et al. Influence of weather on daily hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction(from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry)[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2010, 144(1): 16-21.
[18] 蔡雪黎, 胡开宇, 计光, 等. 青年急性心肌梗死的临床特点[J]. 温州医学院学报, 2009, 39(3): 250-253. CAI Xueli, HU Kaiyu, JI Guang, et al. Clinical characteristics of acute myocardial infarction in the young patients [J]. Journal of Wenzhou Medical College, 2009, 39(3): 250-253.
[19] 国家卫生健康委员会. 2020中国卫生健康统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2020.
[20] 王妮妮, 刘娜, 王汝菲, 等. 55 岁以下急性冠状动脉综合征的影响因素分析[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2020, 20(3): 565-568. WANG Nini, LIU Na, WANG Rufei, et al. Analysis of influencing factors in patients with acute coronary syndrome under 55 years old [J]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 2020, 20(3): 565-568.
[21] 蔡敏, 谢学勤, 吴士勇. 我国老年人口健康状况及卫生服务利用[J]. 中国卫生信息管理杂志, 2021, 18(1): 27-34,49. CAI Min, XIE Xueqin, WU Shiyong. Health status and services utilization of the elderly people [J]. Chinese Journal of Health Informatics and Management, 2021, 18(1): 27-34, 49.
[22] Morici N, De Rosa R, Crimi G, et al. Characteristics and outcome of patients ≥75 years of age with prior coronary artery bypass grafting admitted for an acute coronary syndrome [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2020, 125(12): 1788-1793.
[23] 柏哲, 毛燕, 罗玲, 等. 重庆地区居民对冠心病中西医科普知识认知情况调查[J]. 实用中医药杂志, 2019, 35(4): 431-434. BAI Zhe, MAO Yan, LUO Ling, et al. Investigation on Chongqing Residents Cognition Condition of 20 items Popular Science Knowledge of TCM and Western Medicine on Coronary Heart Disease [J]. Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2019, 35(4): 431-434.
[24] 统计信息中心. 我国城乡居民医疗卫生服务可及性提高——《全国第六次卫生服务统计调查报告》发布[R]. 北京:国家卫生健康委员会统计信息中心, 2021.
[25] 李冬冬, 郭威, 郭轶斌, 等. 居住地距最近医疗机构的距离对居民就医行为的影响[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2020, 37(2): 269-271, 275.
[26] 许雅琼, 张银萍. 乳腺癌术后患者婚姻质量与负性情绪、社会支持的相关性[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2020, 5(1): 49-51. XU Yaqiong, ZHANG Yinping. Relationship between marital quality, negative emotion and social support in patients with breast cancer after operation[J]. Clinical Research and Practice, 2020, 5(1): 49-51.
[1] 李梓绮,魏闫若雪,刘晓晗,刘春铖,赵然,刘玉昆. 长链非编码RNA HEATR3反义RNA 1参与结直肠癌发生发展的功能及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 108-115.
[2] 刘保国,宋翔,赵晓文,毛亚丽. 血清STAT5B、NKAIN1 mRNA检测在乳腺癌中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 68-74.
[3] 王磊,常霄,王梓萌,李娇娇,崔书君,杨飞,朱月香. 瘤内及瘤周DCE-MRI影像组学对宫颈癌患者无进展生存期的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 45-54.
[4] 贾若曦,吕丽,刘涵云,吴寅平,李凤彩,赵泽华,王凯,范玉琛. 血细胞计数相关标志物对慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭患者28天预后的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 89-99.
[5] 杜雪,李春霞,刘云霞,张涛. 基于MFPC-Cox的结直肠癌患者预后动态预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 101-110.
[6] 杨卫芳,徐宏,刘元涛,赵蕙琛. 促甲状腺激素受体抗体在Graves病复发中的作用机制及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 116-121.
[7] 刘文钊,张远,马湘萍,魏峰涛,卜培莉. 内皮活化和应激指数预测值与心力衰竭患者死亡风险的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 27-35.
[8] 陈文亮,王欢欢,郝金锦,弓蕊,赵强,张飞,高磊,董静逊. lncRNA PVT1表达在胃癌预后评估及恶性进展中的作用:基于列线图模型与细胞功能实验的研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(10): 61-71.
[9] 郭姝画,樊扬,田风,王传新,杜鲁涛,李培龙,郭兴,徐硕. 微原纤维相关蛋白3在调控胶质瘤干细胞间充质表型转化中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 9-16.
[10] 魏闫若雪,李梓绮,刘春铖,刘晓晗,赵然,刘玉昆. 结直肠癌中SP1的瘤内异质性表达及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 89-94.
[11] 刘春铖,刘晓晗,魏闫若雪,李梓绮,刘玉昆,赵然. 结直肠癌中含溴结构域蛋白9的亚细胞定位模式及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 24-30.
[12] 杨雪彦,吴寅平,吕丽,赵泽华,马行宇,李凤彩,王凯,范玉琛. 单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值动态变化对慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭预后的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 61-69.
[13] 史清松,马亭亭,李卫华,褚遵华. 2019—2022年德州市食源性疾病病例监测流行病学分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 100-106.
[14] 刁玉洁,林琳,李文瑄,王洲洋,江蓓,胡迎迎,刘广义. NPR预测ANCA相关血管炎不良肾脏预后及其协同多因素优化模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(2): 60-68.
[15] 宋兆录,董正璇,彭传真,黄彩娜,胡克清,黄永胜,阎磊. 肾透明细胞癌中预后相关RNA编辑位点的筛选[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(9): 69-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发