彩色多普勒闪烁伪像相关物理因素的评估分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.1358

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评估超声波声学特性、结石表面形貌及机器设置条件在闪烁伪像形成中的价值。方法应用砂纸及泌尿系结石分别构建体外实验模型,砂纸模型中通过调节IU22声学功率参数(包括机械指数及声波入射角度)改变超声波特性,结石模型分别按照表面粗糙度差异进行结石分组(包括粗糙组,中度粗糙组与光滑组),然后选取两种不同机器设置条件(默认设置与优化设置)进行闪烁伪像成像,应用配对t检验分析比较砂纸模型中垂直辐射组与斜方辐射组闪烁伪像差异;应用重复测量设计的方差分析比较结石模型中不同机器设置条件下不同表面粗糙度结石组间闪烁伪像强度差异;通过线性回归分析分别对砂纸模型中机械指数、结石模型中不同结石粗糙度与闪烁伪像强度之间进行相关性分析。结果在砂纸模型中,机械指数与闪烁伪像强度存在显著正相关(r=0.938, P<0.001),斜方辐射组闪烁伪像强度较垂直辐射组明显减弱(P<0.05);泌尿系结石模型中,不同表面粗糙度泌尿系结石的闪烁伪像强度组间差异有统计学意义且其两个影响因素(表面粗糙度与机器设置条件)存在交互作用(P<0.001),相同表面粗糙度的泌尿系结石中的闪烁伪像强度在机器优化设置条件下均明显强于默认设置条件(P<0.001),而在相同机器设置条件下不同组间结石闪烁伪像强度与其表面粗糙程度呈明显正相关(r默认设置条件=0.80, r优化设置条件=0.83, P<0.001)。结论砂纸模型及泌尿系结石模型均显示闪烁伪像形成受超声波声学特性、结石表面粗糙度及机器设置条件的共同影响,了解各种相关因素的作用可提升其临床应用价值。

关键词: 闪烁伪像, 评估, 物理因素, 模型

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the value of ultrasonic characteristics, the roughness of the urinary stones and machine settings in the formation of the twinkling artifact. Methods Constructing the experimental model by the sandpaper and the urinary stones respectively. In the sandpaper model part, ultrasonic output characteristics were changed by regulating the mechanical index in the IU 22 machine and the ultrasonic angle; the intensity of the twinkling artifact were compared and evaluated seperately by the correlation analysis and paired t test respectively. In the urinary stone model part, the stones were divided into the rough group, the mid-rough group and the smooth group according to the difference of the surface roughness. The display of the twinkling artifact in different groups were compared under the diverse conditions including the default and optimized settings by repeated measures ANOVA, and the correlation analysis was performed between the twinkling artifact intensity and the roughness. Results In the sandpaper model part, the intensity of the color Doppler twinkling artifact was in obvious proportion with the mechanical index(r=0.938, P<0.001). And when the Doppler angle of the color box was tilted, the number of the color pixels in the scanning 山东大学学报 (医学版)55卷7期 -王蒙,等.彩色多普勒闪烁伪像相关物理因素的评估分析 \=-condition decreased significantly(P<0.05). In the urinary stone model part, there existed significant difference among different groups and obvious interaction between the urinary stone roughness and the machine settings on the twinkling artifact intensity(P<0.001). The twinkling artifact intensity was improved under the optimized machine settings compared with that of the default conditions in the urinary stones with the same roughness. However, under the same machine settings, a direct proportion relationship was found between the twinkling artifact intensity and the urinary stone roughness with the coefficient being 0.80 and 0.83 respectively(P<0.001). Conclusion Both the sandpaper phantom and urinary stone phantom showed that the formation of the twinkling artifact are affected by the ultrasonic charateristic index, the surface roughness of the urinary stones and the machine settings. Grasping the related factors on the intensity of the twinkling artifact was useful for its clinical applications.

Key words: Twinkling artifact, Model, Physical factors, Evaluation

中图分类号:

R574

王蒙,王澂,张迎春,李杰, 孙霄,时丹丹,商蒙蒙,宁松. 彩色多普勒闪烁伪像相关物理因素的评估分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(7): 110-114.

WANG Meng, WANG Cheng, ZHANG Yingchun, LI Jie, SUN Xiao, SHI Dandan, SHANG Mengmeng, NING Song. Evaluation and analysis of the physical factors for the twinkling artifact: a preliminary study[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2017, 55(7): 110-114.

参考文献

[1] Rahmouni A, Bargoin R, Herment A, et al. Color Doppler twinkling artifact in hyperechoic regions[J]. Radiology, 1996, 199(1): 269-271.
[2] Kielar AZ, Shabana W, Vakili M, et al. Prospective evaluation of Doppler sonography to detect the twinkling artifact versus unenhanced computed tomography for identifying urinary tract calculi[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2012, 31(10): 1619-1625.
[3] Sharma G, Sharma A. Clinical implications and applications of the twinkling sign in ureteral calculus: a preliminary study[J]. J Urol, 2012, 189(6): 2132-2135.
[4] Abdel-Gawad M, Kadasne R, Elsobky E. Correlation between twinkling artifact of color doppler ultrasound and helical CT in diagnosis of ureteral stones[J]. J Urol, 2014, 191(4): e52.
[5] Sen V, Imamoglu C, Kucukturkmen I, et al. Can Doppler ultrasonography twinkling artifact be used as an alternative imaging modality to non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography in patients with ureteral stones? A prospective clinical study[J]. Urolithiasis, 2016[Epub ahead of print] , doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0891-8.
[6] Masch WR, Cohan RH, Ellis JH, et al. Clinical Effectiveness of prospectively reported sonographic twinkling artifact for the diagnosis of renal calculus in patients without known urolithiasis[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2016, 206(2): 326-331.
[7] Hammad AY, Miura JT, Turaga KK, et al. A literature review of radiological findings to guide the diagnosis of gallbladder adenomyomatosis[J]. HPB, 2016, 189(2): 129-135.
[8] Joo I, Lee JY, Kim JH, et al. Differentiation of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder from early-stage, wall-thickening-type gallbladder cancer using high-resolution ultrasound[J]. Euro Radio, 2013, 23(3): 730-738.
[9] Reuben CM, Jeun B, Juluru K. Sonographic twinkling artifact in a renal graft with prolene mesh[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2010, 29(6): 1011-1013.
[10] Girish G, Caoili EM, Pandya A, et al. Usefulness of the twinkling artifact in identifying implanted mesh after inguinal hernia repair[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2011, 30(8): 1059-1065.
[11] Wang M, Li J, Xiao J, et al. Systematic analysis of factors related to display of the twinkling artifact by a phantom: an optimized investigation[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2011, 30(11): 1449-1457.
[12] Kamaya A, Abate S, Nan B, et al. Characterization of a linear streak artifact with pulse inversion tissue harmonics in musculoskeletal sonography[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2004, 23(12): 1597-1605.
[13] Aytac SK, Ozcan H. Effect of color Doppler system on the twinkling sign associated with urinary tract calculi[J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 1999, 27(8): 433-439.
[14] Zelesco M. The impact of scanning factors on the twinkle artifact in colour Doppler[J]. J Med Imag Radiat Oncol, 2009, 53: A5.
[15] Gao J, Hentel K, Rubin JM. Correlation between twinkling artifact and color doppler carrier frequency: preliminary observations in renal calculi[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2012, 38(9): 1534-1539
[16] Cunitz B, Dunmire B, Paun M. Improved detection of kidney stones using an optimized doppler imaging sequence[J]. IEEE Int Ultrason Symp, 2014, 2014: 452-455
[17] Dillman JR, Kappil M, Weadock WJ, et al. Sonographic twinkling artifact for renal calculus detection: correlation with CT[J]. Radiology, 2011, 259(3): 911-916.
[18] Yanik B, Conkbayir I, Cakmakci E, et al. Color Doppler twinkling artifact in a calcified liver mass[J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2005, 33(9): 474-476.
[19] Zhao BW, Yang Y, Pan M, et al. Color Doppler twinkling artifact in fetuses with echogenic intracardiac foci: echocardiographic observation and clinical significance[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 35(5): 548-551.
[20] Tsujimoto F. Microcalcifications in the breast detected by a color Doppler method using twinkling artifacts: some important discussions based on clinical cases and experiments with a new ultrasound modality called multidetector-ultrasonography(MD-US)[J]. J Med Ultrason, 2014, 41(1): 99-108.
[21] OFlynn EA,Sidhu PS. The sonographic twinkling artifact in testicular calcification[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2009, 28(4): 515-517.
[22] Serter S, Orguc S, Gumus B, et al. Doppler sonographic findings in testicular microlithiasis[J]. International Braz J Urol, 2008, 34(4): 477-482.
[23] Chelfouh N, Grenier N, Higueret D, et al. Characterization of urinary calculi: in vitro study of “twinkling artifact” revealed by color-flow sonography[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 1998, 171(4): 1055-1060.
[24] 刘青,李杰,孙霄,等.彩色多普勒闪烁伪像对泌尿系含钙结石诊断价值的实验研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2015, 24(1): 70-73. LIU Qing, LI Jie, SUN Xiao, et al. Diagnostic value of color Doppler twinkling artifact and in urinary calcium stones:an in vitro experiment[J]. Chin J Ultrasonogr, 2015, 24(1): 70-73.
[25] 孙霄,李杰,商蒙蒙,等.应用彩色多普勒闪烁伪像和CT分析尿酸结石和胱氨酸结石成分的实验研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志, 2015, 24(2): 164-167. SUN Xiao, LI Jie, SHANG Mengmeng, et al. Value of color Doppler twinkling artifact and CT in distinguishing uric acid stones from cystine stones:an experimental study[J]. 2015, 24(2): 164-167.
[26] Kim HJ, Lee JY, Jang JY, et al. Color Doppler twinkling artifacts from gallstones: in vitro analysis regarding their compositions and architectures[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2010, 36(12): 2117-2122.
[27] Tsao TF, Tyan YS, Kang RJ, et al. Correlation study of the strength of the color Doppler twinkling artifact with the roughness of the reflecting surface and the Doppler angles[J]. J Med Ultrasound, 2004, 12(4): 119-124.

相关文章 15

[1]	赵立星宋代辉魏魁杰殷恺. 颞下颌关节骨关节病动物模型的建立[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 25-27.
[2]	肖宇飞,冯佳宁,王晓璇,毛倩,石福艳,王素珍. 利用数据库数据采用联合模型动态预测312例肝硬化患者预后的观察分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(9): 71-76.
[3]	鹿子龙, 付振涛,杜恩情,徐春晓,张吉玉,楚洁,张丙银,吴炳义,郭晓雷. 2018年山东省成人自报健康预期寿命测算研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(9): 83-88.
[4]	王剑,周文婧,薛知易,刘晓菲. 脑胶质母细胞瘤模型研究概况及类脑模型的研发应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 74-80.
[5]	史爽,李娟,米琦,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 胃癌miRNAs预后风险评分模型的构建与应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 47-52.
[6]	罗昕,何兵,聂清生,侯震波,董军,李玉花,曾祥芹,刘伟,孔德民,曹金凤. 磁共振扩散加权成像单指数模型与扩散峰度成像模型在61例肾透明细胞癌分级中的对比[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 89-95.
[7]	邓清文,刘文彬. 心血管疾病患者健康相关生命质量及其影响因素的多水平模型分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 115-121.
[8]	潘芳. 基于不同理论模式的老年人心理健康评估的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(9): 1-5.
[9]	胡玉敬,吴大勇,张文艳,边艳珠,魏强,田丛娜,常胜利. 放疗后肿瘤⁹⁹Tc^m-MNLS乏氧显像变化与乏氧诱导因子-1α表达的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(8): 30-34.
[10]	尹妮,杨关林,姜钧文,王春田,王凤耀,贾连群,高晓宇,潘嘉祥,李芹,李佳,冯元洁,高玉竹,周鹤,张哲. 巴马小型猪冠状动脉粥样硬化模型的评价方法[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(7): 1-5.
[11]	曾海燕,李睿,孙新东,谢鹏,孟雪,范秉杰,李万龙,袁双虎. 局限期小细胞肺癌患者预防性脑照射后脑转移的关联分析:双中心研究[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(7): 61-66.
[12]	薛付忠. 健康医疗大数据驱动的健康管理学理论方法体系[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(6): 1-29.
[13]	王金涛,苏萍,袁中尚,薛付忠. 部分分布竞争风险模型及其在健康风险评估中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(6): 37-41.
[14]	王停停,王金涛,袁中尚,苏萍,薛付忠. 原因别竞争风险模型及其在健康风险评估中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(6): 42-46.
[15]	李吉庆,赵焕宗,宋炳红,张理纯,李向一,陈亚飞,王萍,薛付忠. 基于健康管理队列的心血管事件风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(6): 56-60.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed