您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 39-46.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2023.0666

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

左胸廓内动脉联合桡动脉行冠状动脉旁路移植术早期临床疗效

张熙伟1,任琳玮2,张辉3,张歆杰3,刘伟国4,王东1,3   

  1. 1.山东省千佛山医院心血管外科学, 山东大学齐鲁医学院, 山东 济南 250012;2.潍坊医学院临床医学院, 山东 潍坊261053;3.山东第一医科大学第一附属医院(山东省千佛山医院)心血管外科学, 山东省心脏移植与材料工程科技研究中心, 山东 济南250014;4. 山东第一医科大学第一附属医院(山东省千佛山医院)临床药学, 山东省儿童药物临床评价与研发工程技术中心, 山东省医药卫生临床药学重点实验室, 山东 济南 250014
  • 发布日期:2024-05-06
  • 通讯作者: 王东. E-mail:wangdong9859@sina.com刘伟国. E-mail:liuweiguoqy@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省科技发展计划(2014GSF118090)

Early clinical efficacy of left internal thoracic artery plus radial artery in total arterialized coronary artery bypass grafting

ZHANG Xiwei1, REN Linwei2, ZHANG Hui3, ZHANG Xinjie3, LIU Weiguo4, WANG Dong1,3   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. Clinical Medical College Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, Shandong, China;
    3. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
    Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Engineering Research Center for Health Transplant and Material, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
    4. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
    Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Engineering and Technology Research Center for Pediatric Drug Development, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
  • Published:2024-05-06

PDF (PC)

14

摘要： 目的 探讨体外循环与非体外循环下左胸廓内动脉(left internal thoracic artery, LITA)联合桡动脉(radial artery, RA)行全动脉化冠状动脉旁路移植术(total arterialized coronary artery bypass grafting, TA-CABG)的早期临床效果。 方法 回顾性分析山东省千佛山医院心脏外科2020年1月至2022年6月接受全动脉化冠状动脉搭桥术105例患者临床资料,其中不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术(off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, OPCAB)患者59例,为OPCAB组,体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, ONCAB)患者46例,为ONCAB组。分析包括术前资料、术中桥血管获取及吻合方式、术后并发症及处理措施,所有患者术后12个月复查冠状动脉CT血管造影(computed tomography angiography, CTA),并评估桥血管通畅率及不良心血管事件发生率。 结果 ONCAB组手术时间高于OPCAB组,术后住院时间小于OPCAB组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.006),两组术中吻合口个数、桥血管流量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后机械通气时间、术后24 h引流量、心律失常、围术期心肌梗死、切口感染及前臂并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组患者均无院内死亡及术后脑血管事件发生。 结论 体外循环与非体外循环下LITA联合RA行冠状动脉旁路移植术近期临床效果满意;ONCAB组术后住院时间少于OPCAB组;RA获取时应注意桡神经分支保护;术中及术后抗痉挛治疗十分重要。

关键词: 冠状动脉旁路移植术, 全动脉化, 桡动脉, 通畅率, 早期

Abstract: Objective To investigate the early clinical efficacy of left internal thoracic artery(LITA)plus radial artery(RA)in total arterialized coronary artery bypass grafting(TA-CABG). Methods The clinical data of 105 patients who underwent total TA-CABG during Jan. 2020 and Jun. 2022 in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, including 59 who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting(OPCAB)and 46 who underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting(ONCAB). Preoperative data, intraoperative graft acquisition and anastomosis methods, postoperative complications and management measures were included. Computed tomography angiography(CTA)was conducted in all patients 12 months after surgery to evaluate the graft patency rate and incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. Results The operation time of ONCAB group was longer than that of OPCAB group, while the postoperative hospital stay was shorter, with statistically significant difference(P=0.006). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the number of anastomosis, flow in grafts, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, 24 h postoperative drainage, arrhythmia, perioperative myocardial infarction, incision infection and forearm complications(P>0.05). No death or postoperative cerebrovascular events occurred in either groups. Conclusion LITA plus RA yields satisfactory early clinical outcomes in TA-CABG. ONCAB group needs shorter hospital stay than OPCAB group. Protection of radial nerve branch is important when RA is obtained. Intraoperative and postoperative antispasmodic therapy is essential.

Key words: Coronary artery bypass grafting, Total arterialization, Radial artery, Patency rate, Early phase

中图分类号: 

  • R654.2
[1] Safiri S, Karamzad N, Singh K, et al. Burden of ischemic heart disease and its attributable risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019[J]. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2022, 29(2): 420-431.
[2] 中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组.中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2022, 37(6): 553-578.
[3] Loof D, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events[J]. N Engl J Med, 1986, 314(1): 1-6.
[4] Rayol S, Van den Eynde J, Cavalcanti L,et al. Total arterial coronary bypass graft surgery is associated with better long-term survival in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 36(1): 78-85.
[5] Royse A, Ren J, Royse C, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery without saphenous vein grafting: JACC review topic of the week[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2022, 80(19): 1833-1843.
[6] 韩家炜, 张恒, 郑哲. 全动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床应用现状与策略[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2024, 31(2): 304-310.
[7] Lawton J, Tamis-Holland J, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(3): e4-e17.
[8] Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(22): 2069-2077.
[9] Shapira O. Radial artery as the preferred second conduit for coronary bypass[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(22): 2134-2135.
[10] Notenboom M, Khamooshian A, Sjatskig J, et al. Conventional open harvesting of the radial artery as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg, 2021. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2021.042.
[11] Aguirre V, Marchand K, Viana F, et al. The radial artery: open harvesting technique[J]. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg, 2021, 10:2021. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2021.048.
[12] Neumann F, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40(2): 87-165.
[13] Ogawa S, Tsunekawa T, Hosoba S, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: propensity analysis of the left internal thoracic artery versus the right internal thoracic artery as a bypass graft to the left anterior descending artery[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2020, 57(4): 701-708.
[14] Kando Y, Shiiya N, Tsuda K, et al. Radial artery vs saphenous vein grafts for sequential coronary bypass grafting as a second conduit for the left coronary territory[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2022, 70(10): 862-870.
[15] Nappi F, Bellomo F, Nappi P, et al. The use of radial artery for CABG: an update[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2021, 2021: 5528006. doi: 10.1155/2021/5528006.
[16] Taggart D, Gerry S, Gray A. Radial artery versus saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: different conduits or different trials?[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2022, 63(1): ezac562. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac562.
[17] Khan M, Patel K, Franklin S, et al. Radial artery spasm: reviews and updates[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2020, 189(4): 1253-1258.
[18] Gaudino M, Kurlansky P, Fremes S. The use of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting improves long-term outcomes: And now what?[J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 162(5): 1548-1552.
[19] Chen XJ, Zheng BS, Xing WH, et al. Hotspot issue of clinical practice of multiple arterial grafting in coronary artery bypass surgery in China[J]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2019, 99(14): 1048-1052.
[20] 陈新忠, 陈绪军, 李伟栋, 等. 桡动脉桥在中国冠状动脉旁路移植术中地位的重新认识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(42): 3284-3287. CHEN Xinzhong, CHEN Xujun, LI Weidong, et al. Reunderstanding of the role of radial artery bridge in coronary artery bypass grafting in China[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2019, 99(42): 3284-3287.
[21] Maestri F, Formica F, Gallingani A, et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein as third conduit in coronary artery bypass graft surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: a ten-year literature review[J]. Acta Biomed, 2022, 93(2): e2022049. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i2.11370.
[22] Tinica G, Chistol RO, Bulgaru ID, et al. Long-term graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting: effects of surgical technique[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 17(1): 359-367.
[23] 吴立松, 董然, 党海明, 等. 桡动脉序贯吻合的冠状动脉旁路移植术近期临床疗效分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(42): 3308-3312. WU Lisong, DONG Ran, DANG Haiming, et al. Recent clinical effect analysis of coronary artery bypass grafting with sequential radial artery anastomosis[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2019, 99(42): 3308-3312.
[24] Kasahara H, Shin H, Takahashi T, et al. Comparison of patency of single and sequential radial artery grafting in coronary artery bypass[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2022, 34(4): 515-522.
[25] Dimagli A, Soletti GJ, Harik L, et al. Angiographic outcomes for arterial and venous conduits used in CABG[J]. Clin Med, 2023, 12(5): 2022.
[26] Gaudino MF, Leonard JR, Taggart DP. Lessons learned from Radial Artery Database International ALliance(RADIAL)[J]. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 2018, 7(5): 598-603.
[27] Tranbaugh RF, Schwann TA, Swistel DG, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery using the radial artery, right internal thoracic artery, or saphenous vein as the second conduit[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 104(2): 553-559.
[28] Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. Association of radial artery graft vs saphenous vein graft with long-term cardiovascular outcomes among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 2020, 324(2): 179-187.
[29] Garatti A, Parolari A, Canziani A, et al. Is female sex an independent risk factor for early mortality in isolated coronary artery bypass graft? A propensity-matched analysis[J]. J Cardiovasc Med(Hagerstown), 2018, 19(9): 497-502.
[30] Harky A, Sankaranarayanan V, Kong QG. Internal mammary artery: the primary conduit for surgical revascularization[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2021, 32(1): 64-72.
[31] Miwa S, Desai N, Koyama T, et al. Radial artery patency study investigators. radial artery angiographic string sign: clinical consequences and the role of pharmacologic therapy[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006, 81(1): 112-118.
[32] Xie Q, Huang J, Zhu K, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Cumulative meta-analysis[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2021, 44(7): 899-906.
[33] Kasahara H, Shin H, Takahashi T, et al. Comparison of patency of single and sequential radial artery grafting in coronary artery bypass[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2022, 34(4): 515-522.
[1] 刘士标,张淑君,李培龙,杜鲁涛,王传新. cg20657709位点甲基化对肺腺癌早期诊断的初步探讨[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 18-25.
[2] 王振华,宋晗,韦铎亮,李博文,徐凯,房长存,赵鑫. 急性B型主动脉夹层Castor单分支支架置入术后近端主动脉的早期重塑[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 36-42.
[3] 付佳,王路路,胡帅,陈哲平,刘东义,李青松,卢国栋,张贺,赵鑫,冯昌. 不同入路腰方肌阻滞对胃癌根治患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 50-57.
[4] 王景,谢艳,李培龙,杜鲁涛,王传新. GZMB基因cg16212145位点的异常甲基化芯片测定对胃癌早筛的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 26-34.
[5] 左立平,蒋丰洋,周斌彬,范金蕾,梁永锋,邓展昊,于德新. 术前MRI在预测169例肝细胞肝癌微血管侵犯及早期复发的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 89-95.
[6] 徐小明,孔裔婷,刘川,明英,况利. 青少年和年轻成人自杀预警系统研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 69-74.
[7] 董亚琳,巩武贤,胡锦卓,李亚妮,王锡明. 紧张部内陷袋胆脂瘤高分辨率CT征象分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(12): 82-87.
[8] 苗壮,刘培来,卢群山,姚天笑,李松林,罗德素. 双柱活动型单髁假体治疗膝关节内侧骨关节炎的早期疗效分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(5): 90-95.
[9] 黄存瑞,邓诗舟. 气候变化下的新发传染病风险[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(10): 7-12.
[10] 黄玉婷,刘慧颖,郑俊奕. 罗哌卡因蛛网膜下腔阻滞在30例肛肠日间手术最低有效浓度[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(4): 72-76.
[11] 郝小蕊,赵昌盛. 肠内和肠外营养支持对早期重症脑卒中患者血清ALT、SCr浓度变化及并发症的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(3): 80-84.
[12] 邢念增. 腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中“三明治”尿道重建技术的理论基础与技术技巧[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(1): 16-20.
[13] 王红阳. 精准医疗时代的肿瘤生物标志物发展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(10): 1-2.
[14] 王殊,彭媛. 从2017年美国临床肿瘤学会大会报告看早期乳腺癌治疗加减法[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(1): 17-21.
[15] 王丽丽,霍彬,王磊,汪浩,侯定坤,霍小东,王金焕,臧立,曹强,柴树德,王海涛. 亚肺叶切除联合125I粒子植入治疗早期肺癌有效性的Meta分析与系统评价[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(10): 76-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 罗昕,何兵,聂清生,侯震波,董军,李玉花,曾祥芹,刘伟,孔德民,曹金凤. 磁共振扩散加权成像单指数模型与扩散峰度成像模型在61例肾透明细胞癌分级中的对比[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 89 -95 .
[2] 张迪,于猛,刘霞. 神经调控技术简述[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 50 -60 .
[3] 王稳,董绍华,田翔宇,崔秀娟. 盆腹腔多发脾种植误诊为妇科肿瘤1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(9): 116 -118 .
[4] 汤树海,潘晓军. 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者体内氧自由基代谢的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(5): 475 -477 .
[5] 都勇,李玉,姜鹏. 探讨血红素加氧酶1基因多态性与慢性阻塞性肺疾病的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(5): 519 -523 .
[6] 敏,李延青,刘传勇,谢冬萍,郭玉婷,左秀丽,曾娟. 肠易激综合征大鼠模型外周血免疫调节性T细胞的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(5): 514 -518 .
[7] 王皓1，李霞2，王超3，李国盛1，郭春1，朱法良1，张利宁1，石永玉1. 肿瘤相关巨噬细胞在肝癌上皮细胞间质转型中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(4): 8 -12 .
[8] 杨洪超, 王健, 张文同, 李爱武. 先天性巨结肠症中Neuroligin2基因的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(9): 15 -19 .
[9] 杨涛,刘真,王丽红,邢子英,王怀经,李振中. 胶质细胞源性神经营养因子促进培养的背根神经节神经元中P物质的释放[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(1): 1 -4 .
[10] 张孝国,王敏,陈建 . 丙型肝炎病毒RNA高变区准种复杂性与干扰素疗效关系的初步探讨[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(2): 171 -173 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发