山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (7): 104-109.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.0819
张艺馨,赵玉立,封丽
ZHANG Yixin, ZHAO Yuli, FENG Li
摘要: 目的 探讨超声特征联合术前血清糖类抗原-125(CA-125)水平对卵巢交界性肿瘤(BOTs)、Ⅰ期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的鉴别诊断价值。 方法 选取2019年6月至2020年6月术后病理证实为卵巢上皮性恶性肿瘤的患者51例(Ⅰ期EOC组27例,BOTs组24例)进行临床资料分析。采用逐步选择变量的多变量二分类Logistic回归分析确定与卵巢侵袭性有关联的独立因素:临床变量(月经状态)、超声特征和CA-125水平,并进行统计分析,以观察超声特征和CA-125在BOTs与Ⅰ期EOC术前鉴别诊断中的应用。 结果 (1)超声表现:边缘不光滑、腹水及血流丰富的肿块(血流评分=4)多提示为Ⅰ期EOC,而存在乳头状突起及分隔多存在于BOTs组中;(2)术前CA-125水平>35 IU/mL或 >100 IU/mL的情况在Ⅰ期EOC组中的比率均远大于BOTs组(81.5% vs 41.7%, P=0.003;40.7% vs 8.3%, P=0.008);(3)血清CA-125水平用于区分BOTs和Ⅰ期EOC的灵敏度和特异度分别是81.5%和58.3%, CA-125对BOTs和Ⅰ期EOC具有一定的诊断参考价值;(4)多变量Logistic回归分析:CA-125水平>100 IU/mL是区别BOTs和Ⅰ期EOC的关键独立因素,CA-125水平>100 IU/mL较CA-125水平≤100 IU/mL的患者最终病理诊断为Ⅰ期EOC的风险将近提升14.67倍(OR=14.67,95%CI:1.32~162.94,P=0.029)。结论 术前CA-125水平>100 IU/mL结合特殊的超声特征,对提高术前卵巢交界性肿瘤和Ⅰ期上皮性卵巢癌的鉴别诊断有一定的参考价值。
中图分类号:
[1] Hauptmann S, Friedrich K, Redline R, et al. Ovarian borderline tumors in the 2014 WHO classification: evolving concepts and diagnostic criteria [J]. Virchows Arch, 2017, 470(2): 125-142. [2] Taylor HC. Malignant and semimalignant tumors of the ovary [J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1929, 48: 204-230. [3] Gershenson DM. Management of borderline ovarian tumours [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2017, 41: 49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.012. [4] Manchul LA, Simm J, Levin W, et al. Borderline epithelial ovarian tumors: a review of 81 cases with an assessment of the impact of treatment [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1992, 22(5): 867-874. [5] Lee EJ, Kim SH, Kim YH, et al. Is CA-125 an additional help to radiologic findings for differentiation borderline ovarian tumor from stage I carcinoma? [J]. Acta Radiol, 2011, 52(4): 458-462. [6] Rosen DG, Wang L, Atkinson JN, et al. Potential markers that complement expression of CA125 in epithelial ovarian cancer [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2005, 99(2): 267-277. [7] Xu Y, Zhong R, He J, et al. Modification of cut-off values for HE4, CA125 and the ROMA algorithm for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer detection: results from 1 021 cases in South China [J]. Clin Biochem, 2016, 49(1-2): 32-40. [8] Araujo KG, Jales RM, Pereira PN, et al. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 49(6): 778-783. [9] Webb PM, Jordan SJ. Epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2017, 41: 3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.08.006. [10] Moufarrij S, Dandapani M, Arthofer E, et al. Epigenetic therapy for ovarian cancer: promise and progress [J]. Clin Epigenetics, 2019, 11(1): 7. [11] Campbell S, Gentry-Maharaj A. The role of transvaginal ultrasound in screening for ovarian cancer [J]. Climacteric, 2018, 21(3): 221-226. [12] 漆玖玲, 陆蓓蕾, 樊韵玲,等. 卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤与卵巢浆液性囊腺瘤超声特征对比分析. [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2020, 36(10): 934-937. [13] Bourdel N, Huchon C, Abdel Wahab C, et al. Borderline ovarian tumors: guidelines from the French national college of obstetricians and gynecologists(CNGOF)[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2021, 256: 492-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.045. [14] 王士琴, 袁伟, 赵进娥. 经阴道超声对卵巢肿瘤的诊断与鉴别诊断的应用价值[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2020, 4(15): 154-156. [15] 杨孝明,李玉宏. 妇科恶性肿瘤保留生育功能的诊治 [J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2021, 29(2): 139-142. YANG Xiaoming, LI Yuhong. Fertility preservation for patients with gynecologic malignancies [J]. Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity, 2021, 29(2): 139-142. [16] Darai E, Fauvet R, Uzan C, et al. Fertility and borderline ovarian tumor: a systematic review of conservative management, risk of recurrence and alternative options [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2013, 19(2): 151-166. [17] Timor-Tritsch IE, Foley CE, Brandon C. New sonographic marker of borderline ovarian tumor: microcystic pattern of papillae and solid components [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 54(3): 395-402. [18] Bent CL, Sahdev A, Rockall AG, et al. MRI appearances of borderline ovarian tumours [J]. Clin Radiol, 2009, 64(4): 430-438. [19] Pascual MA, Tresserra F, Grases PJ, et al. Borderline cystic tumors of the ovary: gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic findings [J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2002, 30(2): 76-82. [20] Dochez V, Caillon H, Vaucel E, et al. Biomarkers and algorithms for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: CA125, HE4, RMI and ROMA, a review [J]. J Ovarian Res, 2019, 12(1): 28. [21] Valentin L, Jurkovic D, Van Calster B, et al. Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 34(3): 345-354. [22] deSouza NM, ONeill R, McIndoe GA, et al. Borderline tumors of the ovary: CT and MRI features and tumor markers in differentiation from stage I disease [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 184(3): 999-1003. [23] Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T, et al. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125 [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2007, 99(22): 1706-1714. [24] 段丽, 李菊香, 王亚敏,等. 经阴道超声、MSCT联合血清CA125、CA724诊断卵巢肿瘤的应用价值探讨[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2021, 19(6): 128-130. DUAN Li, LI Juxiang, WANG Yamin, et al. Application value of transvaginal ultrasound and MSCT conbined with serum CA125 and CA724 in diagnosis of ovarian tumors [J]. Chinese Journal of CT and MRI, 2021, 19(6): 128-130. [25] 王建伟, 谢海花, 孙嘉峰,等. 血清癌胚抗原人附睾蛋白4 糖类抗原125糖类抗原199单独和联合检测在卵巢癌中的诊断价值[J]. 实用医技杂志, 2021, 28(6): 723-725. WANG Jianwei, XIE Haihua, SUN Jiafeng, et al. The diagnostic value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen,human epididymal protein 4,carbohydrate antigen 125,carbohydrate antigen 199 alone and four combined tests in ovarian cancer [J]. Journal of Practical Medical Techniques, 2021, 28(6): 723-725. |
[1] | 徐平 于国放 李霞. 不同类型甲状腺上动脉PSV对Graves病与桥本氏甲状腺炎鉴别诊断的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 62-64. |
[2] | 任大壮,周玮琰,赵博军. 角巩膜铁屑样异物1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 129-132. |
[3] | 艾星子·艾里,郭铮宇,张晓霏. 子宫腺肌病高强度聚焦超声消融治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 36-42. |
[4] | 陶国伟,王芳,董向毅,徐亚瑄,赵琳丽,胡蓓蓓. 子宫腺肌病的超声与MRI诊断及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 56-65. |
[5] | 董亮,崔文超,周青,张龙云,周炜,张欣,赵超. 比较超声与增强CT经皮穿刺混杂密度胸部病变[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 98-103. |
[6] | 张雪,白改改,陶国伟,吴海芳,罗霞,刘培淑. 脐尿管未闭导致膀胱脱垂同时合并脐膨出的罕见病例1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 115-117. |
[7] | 夏术阶,管延杰. 低强度脉冲式超声波机械力生物链内源性干细胞激活与功能修复的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 37-42. |
[8] | 陈刚,张焰平,叶乐平,付冲,周春燕,张世栋. 造影增强超声内镜联合超声内镜引导下细针抽吸术对胰腺占位的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 68-73. |
[9] | 刘晓,郭新元,张德健,李琦,李宁,薛江. 床旁肺脏超声及评分对70例新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的诊治效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 50-56. |
[10] | 孙鼎琪,傅强,张辉,刘帅,刁统祥,曹庆伟,张克勤. 多参数磁共振与经直肠超声融合前列腺靶向穿刺活检在检测PI-RADS≥3前列腺癌中的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 108-113. |
[11] | 王艺璇,李菲,胡蓉,王蓓. 卵巢-附件影像报告和数据系统鉴别101例卵巢附件良恶性肿物的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 87-92. |
[12] | 李宁,王翠兰,张玉荣. 帕金森病患者脑动脉多普勒测定指数及血清表皮生长因子与动脉硬化和认知障碍的关联分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(3): 61-66. |
[13] | 王纬,王凤琴,韩艳丽. 腹腔镜下右附件囊肿剥除术后发生心脏骤停1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 123-124. |
[14] | 吴梦涛,吴鹏,杨燕菲,唐佃俊,苗祥岭,李凡东. CT静脉造影在诊治复发性下肢静脉曲张的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(9): 21-26. |
[15] | 张传备,李方,翟春晓,余永明,舒明雷,王艺丹,徐良栋,郝恩魁. 高斯过程模型对慢性心衰患者1年内再入院的风险评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(6): 28-33. |
|