您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (12): 26-34.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2025.0359

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

超声支气管镜引导下碘-125粒子植入治疗肺癌中央区淋巴结转移

李懿原,马珊,李爱华,龙飞   

  1. 山东第一医科大学第三附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科, 山东 济南 250031
  • 发布日期:2025-12-19
  • 通讯作者: 龙飞. E-mail:longfei@sdfmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    山东省医药卫生科技发展计划(202403020996)

EBUS-guided iodine-125 seed implantation for the treatment of central lymph node metastases in lung cancer

LI Yiyuan, MA Shan, LI Aihua, LONG Fei   

  1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250031, Shandong, China
  • Published:2025-12-19

摘要: 目的 探讨超声支气管镜(endobronchial ultrasound, EBUS)引导下碘-125(iodine-125, 125Ι)粒子植入治疗肺癌中央区淋巴结转移患者的临床疗效、安全性以及对生存的影响。 方法 选取2021年1月1日至2024年11月1日接受EBUS引导下125I粒子植入的中央区淋巴结转移的肺癌患者39例。术后1、3个月对目标病灶进行疗效评价,并对治疗前后3个月目标病灶直径、卡氏功能状态评分(karnofsky performance status, KPS)、癌胚抗原、神经元特异烯醇化酶、细胞角蛋白19片段等指标比较分析。根据术后3个月胸部计算机断层扫描(computed tomography, CT)复查结果进行疗效分组:将疾病稳定(stable disease, SD)纳入稳定组,部分缓解(partial response, PR)和完全缓解(complete response, CR)纳入缓解组。随访患者疾病进展、生存及死亡时间。Log-rank检验比较近期疗效稳定组与缓解组的生存差异。多因素Logistic分析近期疗效与术后90%靶体积接受的剂量(90% of target volume receiving dose, D90)的相关性,多因素Cox回归模型分析患者生存的独立影响因素。收集患者术前术后症状、术中不良反应及术后并发症的资料进行统计分析。 结果 患者粒子植入术后3个月的局部疗效评价为CR 7例(17.95%),PR 13例(33.33%),SD 19例(48.72%),无疾病进展(progressive disease, PD)患者客观缓解率(objective response rate, ORR)为51.28%,局部控制率(local control rate, LCR)为100%。且目标病灶处未发生气道再狭窄。治疗前后3个月肿瘤直径和KPS评分差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。随访时间范围6~12个月,中位随访时间为11个月,无进展生存期(progression-free survival, PFS)为3~12个月,总生存期(overall survival, OS)为3~12个月,生存率为69.23%。Log-rank分析示,近期疗效评估为缓解组患者的生存率高于稳定组患者,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.081)。多因素Logistic回归结果显示缓解组的术后D90高于稳定组(OR=1.115,95%CI:1.002~1.241,P=0.046),是近期疗效的独立影响因素。多因素Cox生存分析结果表明治疗线数(HR=0.181,95%CI:0.037~0.878,P=0.034)是患者生存的独立影响因素。观察术中有6例(15.38%)患者穿刺部位出血,经止血治疗后均缓解。术后3例(7.69%)患者出现少量痰中带血。所有患者随访过程中均无放射性食管炎、放射性肺损伤、心包炎等严重并发症。 结论 EBUS引导下行125I粒子植入治疗肺癌中央区淋巴结转移的患者,近期疗效好,并发症少。术后D90为近期疗效的独立影响因素。近期疗效评估为CR及PR的患者预后好于疗效评估为SD的患者。治疗线数是患者生存的独立影响因素。

关键词: 碘-125粒子, 超声支气管镜引导, 术中植入, 肺癌, 淋巴结

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy, safety, and impact on survival of endobronchial ultrasound(EBUS)-guided iodine-125(125I)seed implantation in patients with central lymph node metastases from lung cancer. Methods A total of 39 patients with central lymph node metastasis of lung cancer who underwent 125I particle implantation guided by EBUS between 1, January 2021 and 1, November 2024 were selected for this study. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated at one and three months after treatment on the target lesions. The diameters of the target lesions, karnofsky performance status(KPS)scores, carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA), neuron-specific enolase(NSE), and cytokeratin 19 fragments were compared before and three months after treatment. Subsequent chest CT reexamination at 3 months post-surgery resulted in the division of patients into two groups: stable disease(SD)cases were included in the stable group, while partial response(PR)and complete response(CR)cases were included in the remission group. The progression of the disease, survival rates, and mortality were the primary focus of the study. The survival differences between the stable group and the remission group were compared using the Log-rank test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the correlation between recent efficacy and the dose delivered to 90% of the target volume(D90)post-surgery. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis was employed to identify independent factors affecting patient survival. Preoperative and postoperative symptoms, intraoperative adverse reactions, and postoperative complications were collated for the purpose of statistical analysis. Results Three months after the seed implantation procedure, local efficacy evaluations revealed a complete response(CR)in 7 patients(17.95%), a partial response(PR)in 13 patients(33.33%), stable disease(SD)in 19 patients(48.72%), and no progressive disease(PD), yielding an overall response rate(ORR)of 51.28% and a local control rate(LCR)of 100%. No occurrence of airway restenosis was observed at the target lesion site. Statistically significant differences were observed between baseline and 3-month post-treatment in tumor diameter(P<0.001)and KPS score(P<0.001). The follow-up period ranged from six to 12 months, with a median of 11 months. The progression-free survival(PFS)ranged from 3 to 12 months, the overall survival(OS)ranged from 3 to 12 months, and the survival rate was 69.23%. Log-rank analysis indicated higher survival in the response group than in the stable group, although the difference was not statistically significant(P=0.081). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that postoperative D90 was higher in the response group than in the stable group(OR=1.115, 95%CI: 1.002-1.241, P=0.046), thereby identifying D90 as an independent factor influencing recent efficacy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the number of prior treatment lines was an independent predictor of patient survival [hazard ratio(HR)=0.181, 95%CI: 0.037-0.878, P=0.034]. During the procedure, 6 patients(15.38%)experienced puncture-site bleeding, which resolved after hemostatic treatment, and postoperative minor hemoptysis occurred in 3 patients(7.69%). No severe complications, such as radiation esophagitis, radiation-induced lung injury, or pericarditis, were observed during the follow-up period. Conclusion Patients with central lymph node metastases from lung cancer who undego EBUS-guided 125I seed implantation achieves favourable short-term efficacy with minimal complications. Postoperative D90 is identified as an independent predictor of short-term efficacy and patients who attain complete or partial response have a better prognosis than those with stable disease. The number of treatment lines is an independent determinant of patient survival.

Key words: Iodine-125 seed, Endobronchial ultrasound-guided, Intraoperative implantation, Lung cancer, Lymph nodes

中图分类号: 

  • R734.2
[1] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023[J]. CA A Cancer J Clinicians, 2023, 73(1): 17-48.
[2] 高会江, 魏煜程. 微创袖式肺叶切除手术:免疫治疗时代的机遇和挑战[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2022, 60(11): 23-27. GAO Huijiang, WEI Yucheng. Minimally invasive sleeve lobectomy: opportunities and challenges in the era of immunotherapy[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2022, 60(11): 23-27.
[3] Shimada Y, Kudo Y, Maehara S, et al. Artificial intelligence-based radiomics for the prediction of nodal metastasis in early-stage lung cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 1028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28242-7
[4] Lee TH, Shin H, Ahn YC, et al. Regional lymph node recurrence after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer: Patterns of recurrence, treatment approaches, and clinical outcomes(KROG 21-09)[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2023, 183: 109572.
[5] 王超, 孙柏, 王浩, 等. 125Ⅰ粒子治疗恶性肿瘤的分子生物学机制研究进展[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2023, 32(12): 1263-1268. WANG Chao, SUN Bai, WANG Hao, et al. Research progress in the molecular biological mechanism of 125Ⅰ seed in the treatment of malignant tumors[J]. Journal of Interventional Radiology, 2023, 32(12): 1263-1268.
[6] Dai FH, Wang JY, An HS, et al. Therapy of 125I particles implantation inhibited the local growth of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective clinical study[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2019, 11(6): 3737-3749.
[7] Murthi M, Donna E, Arias S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration(EBUS-TBNA)in real life[J]. Front Med(Lausanne), 2020, 7: 118. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00118
[8] Zhang ZM, Li SP, Bao Y. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy versus endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal disorders: a meta-analysis[J]. Respiration, 2024, 103(7): 359-367.
[9] Ho ATN, Gorthi R, Lee R, et al. Solitary lung nodule: CT-guided transthoracic biopsy vs transbronchial biopsy with endobronchial ultrasound and flexible bronchoscope, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Lung, 2023, 201(1): 85-93.
[10] Xu T, Peng WD, Gu X, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided iodine-125 radioactive seed implantation as a novel therapy for mediastinal tumors[J]. Cancer Biother Radiopharm, 2019, 34(9): 547-550.
[11] 王诗彤, 王永槐, 王若雨, 等. 125Ⅰ粒子植入在原发性肺癌治疗后复发患者中的近期和远期疗效及影响因素[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2023, 52(12): 1087-1091. WANG Shitong, WANG Yonghuai, WANG Ruoyu, et al. Short-and long-term efficacy and influencing factors of 125Ⅰ seed implantation for relapsed primary lung cancer[J]. Journal of China Medical University, 2023, 52(12): 1087-1091.
[12] Wu LR, Zhao XX, Tian SQ, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of Iodine-125 seed implantation for lymph node recurrence secondary to esophageal cancer after radiotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2023, 18(1): 18. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02196-y
[13] Wang H, Lu J, Zheng XT, et al. Oligorecurrence non-small cell lung cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy: computed tomography-guided 125I seed implantation vs. second-line chemotherapy[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10: 470. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00470
[14] Shahi J, Poon I, Ung YC, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for mediastinal and hilar lymph node metastases[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2021, 109(3): 764-774.
[15] Heinzerling JH, Mileham KF, Robinson MM, et al. Primary lung tumour stereotactic body radiotherapy followed by concurrent mediastinal chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2025, 26(1): 85-97.
[16] Hasan N, Yazdanpanah O, Harris JP, et al. Consolidative radiotherapy in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive NSCLC: a systematic review[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2025, 210: 104676. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104676
[17] Ni QT, Pan C, Guo Q, et al. A case of iodine 125 seeds(I-125)responding to lung squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Dose Response, 2022, 20(2): 15593258221103373. doi: 10.1177/15593258221103373
[18] 高福磊, 黄祥忠, 王浩, 等. 125I粒子植入治疗寡转移非小细胞肺癌106例分析[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2021, 30(12): 1250-1255. GAO Fulei, HUANG Xiangzhong, WANG Hao, et al. 125I seed implantation for the treatment of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of 106 cases[J]. Journal of Interventional Radiology, 2021, 30(12): 1250-1255.
[19] Sun X, Xin YL, Liu DH, et al. Detection of metastasis of mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer patients with an artificial intelligence model[J]. Chin Med J(Engl), 2023, 136(9): 1117-1119.
[20] Ohtaki Y, Nagashima T, Okano N, et al. Prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer with postoperative regional lymph node recurrence[J]. Thorac Cancer, 2024, 15(11): 859-866.
[21] Wright K, Digby GC, Gyawali B, et al. Malignant superior vena Cava syndrome: a scoping review[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2023, 18(10): 1268-1276.
[22] 王一青, 朱林海, 林旭, 等. CT引导下125I粒子植入术对晚期肺癌及肺转移癌的治疗作用[J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2020, 23(6): 424-428. WANG Yiqing, ZHU Linhai, LIN Xu, et al. Therapeutic Effect of CT-guided 125I Seed Implantation on Advanced Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Metastatic Carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer, 2020, 23(6): 424-428.
[23] Zhang JX, Sun QY, Gao L, et al. A multicenter prospective study on quality of life and pain relief for cancer patient after 125I seed implantation[J]. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs, 2022, 9(8): 100065. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.04.004
[24] 曾奕明, 林燕萍. 放射性125I粒子植入局部治疗支气管肺癌[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(4): 1-6. ZENG Yiming, LIN Yanping. Implantation of 125I seeds for treatment of local bronchogenic carcinoma[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2017, 55(4): 1-6.
[25] Sur R, Pond G, Falkson C, et al. BRACHY: a randomized trial to evaluate symptom improvement in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with external beam radiation with or without high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2023, 116(3): 601-610.
[26] Ji Z, Jiang YL, Guo FX, et al. Safety and efficacy of CT-guided radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation assisted by a 3D printing template for the treatment of thoracic malignancies[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2020, 146(1): 229-236.
[27] 曹国辉, 王娟, 王泽阳, 等. 125I粒子植入治疗放化疗后进展肺癌患者的临床疗效及影响因素分析[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2023, 43(1): 16-19. CAO Guohui, WANG Juan, WANG Zeyang, et al. Clinical efficacy and influencing factors of 125I seeds implantation in the treatment of patients with advanced lung cancer after radiotherapy and chemotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2023, 43(1): 16-19.
[28] 韩红梅, 赵新新, 石路佳, 等. 125I粒子植入治疗肺癌纵隔淋巴结转移的临床疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2023, 103(23): 1781-1786. HAN Hongmei, ZHAO Xinxin, SHI Lujia, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of 125I seed implantation in the treatment of mediastinal lymph node metastasis of lung cancer[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2023, 103(23): 1781-1786.
[29] 李虎子, 赵成, 贺斌, 等. 125I放射性粒子植入联合化疗治疗ⅢB期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效及预后因素分析[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2021, 30(7): 687-692. LI Huzi, ZHAO Cheng, HE Bin, et al. 125I seeds implantation combined with chemotherapy for stage ⅢB non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of clinical efficacy and prognostic factors[J]. Journal of Interventional Radiology, 2021, 30(7): 687-692.
[1] 赵汉卿,周新睿,李子建,唐兴. 循环肿瘤细胞联合血清学检测在非小细胞肺癌中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 79-85.
[2] 张洁,赵颖慧,董雅琪,李娟,李培龙,杜鲁涛. GPR133基因甲基化在早期胃癌淋巴结转移预测中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 76-84.
[3] 徐年兴,魏东,乔俊杰,战炳炎. CD8+、IL-6和PaO2对不可切除ⅢB/C和Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗触发放射召回性肺炎的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 29-35.
[4] 山东省腔镜外科质量控制中心胸腔镜委员会. 山东省VATS/RATS非小细胞肺癌围术期质量控制指标专家共识(2025版)[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(12): 1-5.
[5] 刘振昆,吕纪玲,徐伟伟,马力天,张才擎. BALF tNGS检测及培养对NSCLC合并IPFD的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 36-45.
[6] 孙婧,杨瑞敏,王聪,张月,罗兵. 基于术前超声、炎症指标及超声影像组学联合模型预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(1): 73-80.
[7] 林雨洋,王蓓,李菲. 大于10 mm甲状腺乳头状癌侧颈区淋巴结转移预测[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 54-64.
[8] 张荣雨,赵文,李洪欣,杨闯,王健,韩春燕,李际盛. 奥西替尼联合化疗一线治疗EGFR-RAD51融合突变转移性肺腺癌1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 116-120.
[9] 王亚楠,梁传杰,贾梦琪,苑辉卿. 二硫键异构酶TMX1促进肺癌化疗耐药[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(8): 31-39.
[10] 王蕾,向淇,刘学伍. 伴系统性硬化症、类风湿关节炎的副肿瘤神经综合征1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 118-120.
[11] 程传龙,韩闯,房启迪,刘盈,杨淑霞,崔峰,刘靖靖,李秀君. 基于时空地理加权回归模型探索肺癌发病的环境影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 95-102.
[12] 钟璐,薛付忠. 基于贝叶斯网络不确定性推理的肺癌风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 86-94.
[13] 杨咏青,赵鹏,汪玉,马文静,田迷迷,程亚旎,祖璐,林祥涛. 细胞外容积分数对62例不同病理类型肺癌的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 88-94.
[14] 邵长秀,贺青卿,庄晓璇,李小磊,周鹏,岳涛,高远,徐婧,李陈钰,郭浩男,庄大勇. 934例甲状腺微小乳头状癌颈淋巴结部位转移及危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 57-64.
[15] 覃川,高如新,王新兴,张振海. 腹膜后门腔间隙单中心性Castleman病1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(2): 133-136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!