您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (9): 86-92.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.320

• 主动脉疾病基础与临床研究进展专刊—临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

激光原位开窗全腔内修复累及弓部主动脉夹层的临床结果及支架选择标准的单中心经验

杜国栋,仇鹏,刘俊超,杨心蕊,吴小雨,崔超毅,秦金保,赵振,叶开创,刘光,刘晓兵,殷敏毅,王瑞华,陆信武   

  1. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院血管外科 上海交通大学血管病诊治中心, 上海 200011
  • 出版日期:2024-09-10 发布日期:2024-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 王瑞华. E-mail:wangruihua@sjtu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    上海市科技创新行动计划(20Y11909600);国家自然科学基金(82170411);上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院临+计划(JYLJ202010);安徽省卫生健康科研项目(AHWJ2022a031)

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with laser in situ fenestration of aortic dissection involving the arch: a single-center clinical outcomes and criteria of stent selection

DU Guodong, QIU Peng, LIU Junchao, YANG Xinrui, WU Xiaoyu, CUI Chaoyi, QIN Jinbao, ZHAO Zhen, YE Kaichuang, LIU Guang, LIU Xiaobing, YIN Minyi, WANG Ruihua, LU Xinwu   

  1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth Peoples Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine/ Vascular Center of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Online:2024-09-10 Published:2024-10-10

摘要: 目的 报道单中心激光辅助原位开窗技术全腔内修复累及弓部主动脉夹层的临床结果以及支架选择标准的临床经验。 方法 回顾性分析2016年1月至2023年4月在我院330例接受激光原位开窗腔内修复技术治疗的累及弓部主动脉夹层患者的临床资料,包括患者一般情况、手术操作、技术成功率、手术并发症等内容,总结临床治疗结果,分析主动脉支架及弓部分支动脉重建支架选择标准。 结果 所有患者均接受了激光原位开窗辅助腔内修复术,手术时间(176±51)min,开窗技术成功率98.1%。院内死亡10例(3.03%),症状性中风8例(2.68%),内漏41例(12.4%),近端支架源性新发破口2例(0.61%),无远端支架源性新发破口。随访CT血管造影(24±7.9)个月,结果显示分支血管通畅率为96.58%。 结论 激光原位开窗全腔内修复累及弓部主动脉夹层成功率高,并发症发生率低,是安全且有效的方法。

关键词: 主动脉夹层, 主动脉弓部, 激光原位开窗, 腔内修复, 分支重建, 支架

Abstract: Objective To report the clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with laser in situ fenestration of aortic dissection involving the arch in a single center, and to summarize the clinical experience of stent selection criteria. Methods The clinical data of 330 patients with aortic coarctation involving arch branches treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair with laser in situ fenestration in our hospital from January 2016 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including the general information of patients, surgical procedures, technical success rate, and surgical complications. The clinical outcomes were summarized and the selection criteria for aortic stents and branch artery reconstruction stents were analyzed. Results All patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with laser in situ fenestration, with a mean operation time of(176±51)minutes and a fenestration technique success rate of 98.1%. There were 10 in-hospital deaths(3.03%), 8 symptomatic strokes(2.68%), 41 endoleaks(12.4%), 2 proximal stent-induced new entries(0.61%), and no distal stent-induced new entries were observed. Follow-up CT angiography [(24±7.9)months] demonstrated a branch vessel patency rate of 96.58%. Conclusion Laser in situ fenestration with thoracic endovascular repair of aortic dissection involving the arch is a safe and effective technique with a high success rate and a low complication rate.

Key words: Aortic dissection, Aaortic arch, Laser in situ fenestration, Endovascular repair, Reconstruction of branched vessel, Stent

中图分类号: 

  • R654.3
[1] Harris KM, Nienaber CA, Peterson MD, et al. Early mortality in type A acute aortic dissection: insights from the international registry of acute aortic dissection[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2022, 7(10): 1009-1015.
[2] Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Black JH 3rd, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022, 146(24): e334-e482.
[3] Pape LA, Awais M, Woznicki EM, et al. Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of acute aortic dissection: 17-year trends from the international registry of acute aortic dissection[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015, 66(4): 350-358.
[4] Carrel T, Sundt T, Kodolitsch Y, et al. Acute aortic dissection[J]. Lancet, 2023, 401(10378): 773-788.
[5] Vervoort D, An KR, Deng MX, et al. The call for the “interventional/hybrid” aortic surgeon: open, endovascular, and hybrid therapies of the aortic arch[J]. Can J Cardiol, 2024, 40(3): 478-495.
[6] Evangelista A, Isselbacher EM, Bossone E, et al. Insights from the international registry of acute aortic dissection: a 20-year experience of collaborative clinical research[J]. Circulation, 2018, 137(17): 1846-1860.
[7] Valentine RJ, Boll JM, Hocking KM, et al. Aortic arch involvement worsens the prognosis of type B aortic dissections[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2016, 64(5): 1212-1218.
[8] Liu JT, Yang F, Chen LF, et al. Management and outcomes of non-a non-B aortic dissection[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2022, 64(5): 497-506.
[9] Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S, et al. Editors choice-current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery(EACTS)& the European Society for Vascular Surgery(ESVS)[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2019, 57(2): 165-198.
[10] Leone A, Beckmann E, Martens A, et al. Total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique: results from two European institutes[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 159(4): 1201-1211.
[11] Preventza O, Liao JL, Olive JK, et al. Neurologic complications after the frozen elephant trunk procedure: a meta-analysis of more than 3000 patients[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 160(1): 20-33.
[12] Gombert A, Ketting S, Rückbeil MV, et al. Perioperative and long-term outcome after ascending aortic and arch repair with elephant trunk and open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2022, 75(3): 824-832.
[13] 中华医学会外科学分会血管外科学组. Stanford B型主动脉夹层诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(4): 370-379, 387. Chinese Society for Vascular Surgery, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association. Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of type B aortic dissection(2022 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 2022, 42(4): 370-379, 387.
[14] 舒畅, 施俊哲, 葛建军, 等. 杂交技术治疗累及弓部主动脉病变的中国专家共识[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2020, 35(2): 124-129. SHU Chang, SHI Junzhe, GE Jianjun, et al. Chinese expert consensus on hybrid technique on treating thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch[J]. Chinese Circulation Journal, 2020, 35(2): 124-129.
[15] Ogino H, Kumamaru H, Motomura N, et al. Current status of surgical treatment for acute aortic dissection in Japan: nationwide database analysis[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.11.044.
[16] 张滕, 王世知, 邱结华, 等. 弓部开窗技术保留弓上分支血管的临床疗效[J]. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志, 2021, 7(7): 831-835, 839. ZHANG Teng, WANG Shizhi, QIU Jiehua, et al. Clinical effect of arch fenestration technique for preserving supra-aortic branch[J]. Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2021, 7(7): 831-835, 839.
[17] Basha AM, Moore RD, Rommens KL, et al. A systematic review of total endovascular aortic arch repair: a promising technology[J]. Can J Cardiol, 2023, 39(1): 49-56.
[18] Li XY, Li W, Dai XC, et al. Thoracic endovascular repair for aortic arch pathologies with surgeon modified fenestrated stent grafts: a multicentre retrospective study[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2021, 62(5): 758-766.
[19] 郭宝磊, 符伟国, 郭大乔, 等. 多枚平行支架重建弓上分支全腔内修复主动脉弓部疾病的手术疗效分析[J]. 中国临床医学, 2022, 29(3): 377-382. GUO Baolei, FU Weiguo, GUO Daqiao, et al. Outcomes of endovascular repair of aortic arch disease with multiple parallel stent grafts[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022, 29(3): 377-382.
[20] Tsilimparis N, Law Y, Rohlffs F, et al. Fenestrated endovascular repair for diseases involving the aortic arch[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2020, 71(5): 1464-1471.
[21] Li C, Xu P, Hua ZH, et al. Early and midterm outcomes of in situ laser fenestration during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute and subacute aortic arch diseases and analysis of its complications[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2020, 72(5): 1524-1533.
[22] Qin JB, Zhao Z, Liu G, et al. In situ diode laser fenestration of aortic arch stent grafts during thoracic endovascular aortic repair of Stanford type A aortic dissection[J]. EuroIntervention, 2019, 14(18): e1854-e1860.
[23] Li Y, Hu ZZ, Wang JC, et al. Endovascular chimney technique for aortic arch pathologies treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2018, 47: 305-315. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2017.09.006.
[24] Wang T, Shu C, Li M, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with single/double chimney technique for aortic arch pathologies[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2017, 24(3): 383-393.
[25] Liu MY, Wu XY, Wu S, et al. Comparison of chimney and fenestrated techniques for supra-aortic branch revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2023, 46(10): 1315-1328.
[26] Canonge J, Jayet J, Heim F, et al. Comprehensive review of physician modified aortic stent grafts: technical and clinical outcomes[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2021, 61(4): 560-569.
[27] Shen Y, Yeung KK, Lu QS. Patient-specific total endovascular aortic arch repair using custom fenestration of an off-the-shelf thoracic endovascular aortic repair aortic-stent[J]. Chin Med J, 2021, 134(12): 1489-1491.
[28] Liu L, Zhang SM, Lu QS, et al. Impact of oversizing on the risk of retrograde dissection after TEVAR for acute and chronic type B dissection[J]. J Endovasc Ther, 2016, 23(4): 620-625.
[29] Li FS, Wu XY, Zhang X, et al. Clinical outcomes of distal tapered restrictive covered stent applied in endovascular treatment of aortic dissection involving zone 0[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2021, 61(3): 413-421.
[30] Canaud L, Gandet T, Sfeir J, et al. Risk factors for distal stent graft-induced new entry tear after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissection[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2019, 69(5): 1610-1614.
[31] Zhao Y, Yin HH, Chen YT, et al. Restrictive bare stent prevents distal stent graft-induced new entry in endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2018, 67(1): 93-103.
[32] Li XW, Zhang YN, Sun ZF, et al. Prevention of distal stent graft-induced new entry after endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2024, 167(1): 28-38.
[33] Dcruz RT, Syn N, Wee I, et al. Risk factors for distal stent graft-induced new entry in type B aortic dissections: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2019, 70(5): 1682-1693.
[1] 陈忠,王盛. 主动脉疾病治疗现状及思考[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 1-6.
[2] 林长泼,符伟国. Stanford B型主动脉夹层的诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 7-12.
[3] 卫任,郭伟. 腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 13-18.
[4] 王伦常,覃淇,舒畅. 创伤性B型主动脉夹层的诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 19-25.
[5] 杨建平,管圣,方青波,慈红波,戈小虎. 钝性胸主动脉损伤的诊治进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 36-41.
[6] 霍正坤,孔祥骞,吴学君. 感染性主动脉瘤诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 42-48.
[7] 范立彬,张鸿坤. 腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后Ⅱ型内漏的预防及治疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 55-60.
[8] 梁博文,陆清声. 机器人辅助主动脉腔内修复术的进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 61-65.
[9] 张志炜,孟庆友,丁庆伟,张晓宇. 外科辅助短距离逆行针刺技术在主动脉弓原位开窗中的早期应用效果[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 93-100.
[10] 赵文鹏,吕凡振,胡义良,陈晒,方华强,王世知,周为民. Stanford B型主动脉壁间血肿单中心治疗经验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 108-114.
[11] 王潇晗,吴学君,董典宁,王茂华,韩宗霖,高培显,孔祥骞. 原发性主动脉血栓形成诊治单中心经验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 115-124.
[12] 甘琦晴,刘现虎,苟园,杨彬. 主动脉夹层合并截瘫诊断与治疗2例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(8): 101-106.
[13] 王瑞霞,苏童,赵淑磊. 内镜逆行性胆胰管造影术罕见并发症-胆道支架无法拔除1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(2): 113-115.
[14] 曲永强,赵泽宇,吴兴原,韩玮,段瑞生,李衍滨,李亨. 颈动脉分叉处支架置入术后严重持续性低血压的危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 78-82.
[15] 宋晗,王振华,韦铎亮,徐凯,李博文,赵鑫. 术前MELD分级对304例急性StandfordA型主动脉夹层患者术后早期结局的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 31-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 丁祥云,于清梅,张文芳,庄园,郝晶. 胰岛素样生长因子II在84例多囊卵巢综合征患者颗粒细胞中的表达和促排卵结局的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 60 -66 .
[2] 冀永娟,项紫霓,匡桂芳. 青岛市两所三甲医院医务人员职业倦怠对生活质量影响的路径分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 102 -107 .
[3] 尹义龙,袭肖明,孟宪静. 阿尔兹海默病的智能诊断方法[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 14 -21 .
[4] 郭志华,赵大庆,邢园,王薇,梁乐平,杨静,赵倩倩. Ⅰ期端端吻合术治疗重度颈段气管狭窄临床分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 72 -76 .
[5] 马青源,蒲沛东,韩飞,王超,朱洲均,王维山,史晨辉. miR-27b-3p调控SMAD1对骨肉瘤细胞增殖、迁移和侵袭作用的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 32 -37 .
[6] 张娟,张璐嘉,肖伟,李顺平. 住院医师规范化培训学员压力知觉与留职意愿及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 108 -114 .
[7] 罗昕,何兵,聂清生,侯震波,董军,李玉花,曾祥芹,刘伟,孔德民,曹金凤. 磁共振扩散加权成像单指数模型与扩散峰度成像模型在61例肾透明细胞癌分级中的对比[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 89 -95 .
[8] 索东阳,申飞,郭皓,刘力畅,杨惠敏,杨向东. Tim-3在药物性急性肾损伤动物模型中的表达及作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 1 -6 .
[9] 吴强,何泽鲲,刘琚,崔晓萌,孙双,石伟. 基于机器学习的脑胶质瘤多模态影像分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 81 -87 .
[10] 刘树伟,娄云霞,汤煜春. 4D数字脑图谱的构建、不对称性及遗传倾向[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 28 -33 .