山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (5): 101-110.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0531
• 公共卫生与预防医学 • 上一篇
杜雪1,2,李春霞1,2,刘云霞1,2,张涛1,2
DU Xue1,2, LI Chunxia1,2, LIU Yunxia1,2, ZHANG Tao1,2
摘要: 目的 评估重复测量癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen, CEA)和糖类抗原19-9(carbohydrate antigen 19-9, CA19-9)对改善结直肠癌(colorectal cancer, CRC)患者预后的应用价值,动态预测患者未来CEA和CA19-9变化趋势及生存概率。 方法 选取2011年1月至2018年12月在云南省肿瘤医院接受根治性切除术治疗的CRC患者为研究对象,基于患者的临床资料及围手术期CEA和CA19-9纵向测量信息,使用多元函数型主成分分析(multivariate functional principal components analysis, MFPCA)提取患者术后12个月内纵向CEA和CA19-9的轨迹特征,将相应的多元函数型主成分得分作为协变量,纳入Cox比例风险模型,构建MFPC-Cox预后动态预测模型。通过随时间变化的曲线下面积(area under curve, AUC)和Brier评分(Brier score, BS)定量评价模型的预测性能,并与仅考虑基线信息的静态预测模型进行比较。 结果 对于CEA和CA19-9的MFPCA,选择前7个主成分描述其纵向特征。与静态模型相比,动态预测模型术后60个月生存率的AUC由0.727增加到0.787,BS由0.077下降至0.072。考虑上述标志物的纵向测量信息后,动态模型预测的准确性明显上升。 结论 考虑CEA和CA19-9围手术期纵向测量信息后,基于MFPC-Cox的CRC预后模型具有较高的准确性,并能够在每一次随访时更新风险,实现动态预测。推荐在CRC患者术后随访过程中重复测量CEA和CA19-9。
中图分类号:
| [1] Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263. [2] Benson AB, Venook AP, Adam M, et al. Colon cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2024, 22(2D): e240029. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2024.0029 [3] Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Rectal cancer, version 2.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2022, 20(10): 1139-1167. [4] 谢雅, 闫文锋, 夏晓博. 基于列线图模型预测结直肠癌淋巴结转移率与临床特征及预后的关系[J]. 癌症进展, 2023, 21(17): 1877-1880. XIE Ya, YAN Wenfeng, XIA Xiaobo. Correlation of metastatic lymph node ratio with clinical characteristics and prognosis in colorectal cancer predicted by nomogram model[J]. Oncology Progress, 2023, 21(17): 1877-1880. [5] 王廉源, 杨毅, 丛慧文, 等. 基于竞争风险模型的早发性结直肠癌患者预后影响因素分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2023, 52(3): 199-205. WANG Lianyuan, YANG Yi, CONG Huiwen, et al. Ana-lysis of prognostic factors in patients with early-onset colo-rectal cancer based on a competitive risk model[J]. Journal of China Medical University, 2023, 52(3): 199-205. [6] 翟雅娜, 张敬东. 结直肠癌伴同时肝转移患者同期切除术后预后风险模型的创建及应用[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2020, 28(16): 2826-2832. ZHAI Yana, ZHANG Jingdong. Creation and application of prognostic risk model after simultaneous liver and colorectal resection for patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis[J]. Journal of Modern Oncology, 2020, 28(16): 2826-2832. [7] Zhang Q, Wang L, Sun RR, et al. Implications of pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels and perineural invasion with staging, prognosis, and management in stage I-III colon cancer after surgery: a retrospective cohort study in the SEER database[J]. Ann Ital Chir, 2024, 95(2): 144-154. [8] Davis SE, Lasko TA, Chen GH, et al. Calibration drift in regression and machine learning models for acute kidney injury[J]. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2017, 24(6): 1052-1061. [9] Kamada T, Ohdaira H, Takahashi J, et al. Novel tumor marker index using carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a significant prognostic factor for resectable colorectal cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 4192. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54917-w [10] Ren GM, Li RK, Zheng GZ, et al. Prognostic value of normal levels of preoperative tumor markers in colorectal cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 22830. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-49832-5 [11] Li ZH, Li CX, Pu HJ, et al. Trajectories of perioperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen and colorectal cancer outcome: a retrospective, multicenter longitudinal cohort study[J]. Clin Transl Med, 2021, 11(2): e293. doi:10.1002/ctm2.293 [12] You WQ, Yan L, Cai ZR, et al. Clinical significances of positive postoperative serum CEA and post-preoperative CEA increment in stage II and III colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10: 671. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.00671 [13] Li ZH, Zhu HB, Pang XL, et al. Preoperative serum CA19-9 should be routinely measured in the colorectal patients with preoperative normal serum CEA: a multicenter retrospective cohort study[J].BMC Cancer, 2022, 22(1): 962. doi:10.1186/s12885-022-10051-2 [14] Zhu J, Hao J, Ma Q, et al.A novel prognostic model and practical nomogram for predicting the outcomes of colorectal cancer: based on tumor biomarkers and log odds of positive lymph node scheme[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 661040. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.661040 [15] Kinnier CV, Asare EA, Mohanty S, et al. Risk prediction tools in surgical oncology[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2014, 110(5): 500-508. [16] Chang GJ, Hu CY, Eng C, et al. Practical application of a calculator for conditional survival in colon cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(35): 5938-5943. [17] Parr H, Porta N, Tree AC, et al. A personalized clinical dynamic prediction model to characterize prognosis for patients with localized prostate cancer: analysis of the CHHiP phase 3 trial[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2023, 116(5): 1055-1068. [18] Wijnands AM, Penning de Vries BBL, Lutgens MWMD, et al. Dynamic prediction of advanced colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024, 22(8): 1697-1708. [19] Li K, Luo S. Dynamic prediction of Alzheimers disease progression using features of multiple longitudinal outcomes and time-to-event data[J]. Stat Med, 2019, 38(24): 4804-4818. [20] Ren XH, Lin J, Stebbins GT, et al. Prognostic modeling of Parkinsons disease progression using early longitudinal patterns of change[J]. Mov Disord, 2021, 36(12): 2853-2861. [21] Happ C, Greven S. Multivariate functional principal component analysis for data observed on different(dimensional)domains[J]. J Am Stat Assoc, 2018, 113(522): 649-659. [22] Wichitaksorn N, Boris Choy ST, Gerlach R. A genera-lized class of skew distributions and associated robust quantile regression models[J]. Can J Statistics, 2014, 42(4): 579-596. [23] Sène M, Taylor JM, Dignam JJ, et al. Individualized dynamic prediction of prostate cancer recurrence with and without the initiation of a second treatment: development and validation[J]. Stat Methods Med Res, 2016, 25(6): 2972-2991. [24] 李春霞. 结直肠癌围手术期血清肿瘤标志物轨迹分析及动态预测研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2022. [25] Yao F, Müller HG, Wang JL. Functional data analysis for sparse longitudinal data[J]. J Am Stat Assoc, 2005, 100(470): 577-590. [26] Lyu Y, Liu Y, Xiao X, et al. High level of intraoperative lactate might predict acute kidney injury in aortic arch surgery via minimally invasive approach in patients with type A dissection[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2023, 10: 1188393. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1188393 [27] Alba AC, Agoritsas T, Walsh M, et al. Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: users guides to the medical literature[J]. JAMA, 2017, 318(14): 1377-1384. [28] Happ C, Greven S. Multivariate functional principal component analysis for data observed on different(dimensional)domains[J]. J Am Stat Assoc, 2018, 113(522): 649-659. [29] Therneau TM. A package for survival analysis in R[EB/OL].(2023-03-12)[2024-05-01]. R package version 3.5-5, 2023. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/vignettes/survival.pdf [30] Ushigome M, Shimada H, Miura Y, et al. Changing pattern of tumor markers in recurrent colorectal cancer patients before surgery to recurrence: serum p53 antibodies, CA19-9 and CEA[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2020, 25(4): 622-632. [31] Sonoda H, Yamada T, Matsuda A, et al. Elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen level after curative surgery is a prognostic biomarker of stage II-III colorectal cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2021, 47(11): 2880-2887. [32] Zhou SY, Sheng NQ, Ren JZ, et al. Clinical significance of and predictive risk factors for the postoperative elevation of carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 741309. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.741309 [33] Lee JO, Kim M, Lee JH, et al. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 plus carcinoembryonic antigen for prognosis in colorectal cancer: an observational study[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2023, 25(2): 272-281. [34] Proust-Lima C, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Joint modeling of repeated multivariate cognitive measures and competing risks of dementia and death: a latent process and latent class approach[J]. Stat Med, 2016, 35(3): 382-398. [35] Elashoff RM, Li G, Li N. A joint model for longitudinal measurements and survival data in the presence of multiple failure types[J]. Biometrics, 2008, 64(3): 762-771. |
| [1] | 杨卫芳,徐宏,刘元涛,赵蕙琛. 促甲状腺激素受体抗体在Graves病复发中的作用机制及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 116-121. |
| [2] | 王刚,徐鹏演,赵旭安,王海锋,葛苗苗,潘华峰,江志伟. ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸对腹腔镜结直肠癌术后迷走神经和肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 36-42. |
| [3] | 崔倩倩,李金鹏,吴豫丹,侯志平,孙玮螺,崔盼盼,何培元. 粪便miRNA对结直肠进展期腺瘤无创筛查的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 43-50. |
| [4] | 常宇,胡云峰,王会丰,郭静,张跳,郝雅琴,刘雨. 阑尾切除术与结直肠癌发病风险关联的孟德尔随机化研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(2): 77-83. |
| [5] | 郭姝画,樊扬,田风,王传新,杜鲁涛,李培龙,郭兴,徐硕. 微原纤维相关蛋白3在调控胶质瘤干细胞间充质表型转化中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 9-16. |
| [6] | 王潇,孔文茹,崔伟亮,王姝麒. 羊角棉总生物碱增强氟尿嘧啶对结直肠癌化疗敏感性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 30-37. |
| [7] | 魏闫若雪,李梓绮,刘春铖,刘晓晗,赵然,刘玉昆. 结直肠癌中SP1的瘤内异质性表达及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 89-94. |
| [8] | 刘春铖,刘晓晗,魏闫若雪,李梓绮,刘玉昆,赵然. 结直肠癌中含溴结构域蛋白9的亚细胞定位模式及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 24-30. |
| [9] | 杨雪彦,吴寅平,吕丽,赵泽华,马行宇,李凤彩,王凯,范玉琛. 单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值动态变化对慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭预后的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 61-69. |
| [10] | 刁玉洁,林琳,李文瑄,王洲洋,江蓓,胡迎迎,刘广义. NPR预测ANCA相关血管炎不良肾脏预后及其协同多因素优化模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(2): 60-68. |
| [11] | 于丽,王弋嘉,杨勇,刘学焕,万雪花,包翠萍,苗蓓亮,李斯琪,李静,刘筠. 基于光学表面波技术探究具核梭杆菌介导的自噬与细胞折射率的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(10): 87-97. |
| [12] | 董雅琪,王新慧,赵颖慧,王传新. 血清外泌体LINC02163作为结直肠癌远处转移标志物的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(9): 19-28. |
| [13] | 宋兆录,董正璇,彭传真,黄彩娜,胡克清,黄永胜,阎磊. 肾透明细胞癌中预后相关RNA编辑位点的筛选[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(9): 69-78. |
| [14] | 刘艳,冷珊珊,夏晓娜,董昊,黄陈翠,孟祥水. 基于影像组学参数评估376例幕上自发性脑出血患者的功能状态[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 59-67. |
| [15] | 胡立勇,钟浩,房娟娟,国巍,张雨露,范医东. 基于数据库分析CCR基因对肾透明细胞癌预后的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 49-55. |
|
||