您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (11): 52-59.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.252

• • 上一篇    

骨科手术机器人辅助微创治疗骨盆环损伤108例临床分析

刘华水1,段升军1,赵国辉1,张朕1,朱礼明1,王学光1,贾逢爽1,刘士懂1,刘珉岑1,李明2,陈华3   

  1. 1.济南市第三人民医院创伤骨科, 山东 济南 250113;2.浙江省宁波市第六人民医院, 浙江 宁波315040;3.中国人民解放军总医院骨科, 北京 100852
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 刘士懂. E-mail:6a6b6c@163.com;陈华. E-mail:chenhua0270@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划数字诊疗装备研发重点专项(2017YFC0114002)

Robot-assisted minimally invasive treatment of pelvic ring injuries: a clinical analysis of 108 cases

LIU Huashui1, DUAN Shengjun1, ZHAO Guohui1, ZHANG Zhen1, ZHU Liming1, WANG Xueguang1, JIA Fengshuang1, LIU Shidong1, LIU Mincen1, LI Ming2, CHEN Hua3   

  1. 1. Department of Traumatology, Third Peoples Hospital of Jinan, Jinan 250113, Shandong, China;
    2. Sixth Peoples Hospital of Ningbo, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China;
    3. Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100852, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

摘要: 目的 探讨骨科手术机器人辅助微创治疗骨盆环损伤手术策略和技巧,以及开展该手术应注意的问题。 方法 回顾性分析骨科手术机器人辅助微创治疗骨盆环损伤患者108例临床资料,其中男71例,女37例,21~79岁,平均41.6岁;单纯前环损伤6例,前后环联合损伤102例。根据骨折类型、程度、复位效果和骨性通道情况制定手术方案。记录手术并发症及疗效。 结果 6例单纯前环损伤患者行机器人辅助经皮耻骨支螺钉固定;7例后环损伤合并耻骨联合分离患者行“杂交手术”;40例后环损伤合并单侧前环损伤患者行机器人辅助经皮空心螺钉骶髂关节、耻骨支固定;55例后环损伤合并双侧前环损伤患者,14例单纯螺钉固定,24例联合INFIX固定,17例“杂交手术”。机器人辅助共置入螺钉344枚,其中326枚一次置钉成功并位置满意。平均手术时间106 min,平均透视29.2次,每枚螺钉平均透视时间6.1 s。18枚导钉置入位置不满意,6枚位于骨性通道内未二次规划置钉,7枚切出,4枚穿透骨皮质经重新规划直到位置满意并完成置钉,1枚穿透耻骨皮质导致“死亡之冠”出血,改为“杂交手术”。术后随访平均4.2个月,固定失败2例。末次随访Majeed评分平均89.4分。 结论 根据骨盆环损伤类型制定不同的手术策略,掌握一定的手术技巧,机器人辅助手术为骨盆环损伤的微创治疗提供新的方式。

关键词: 骨盆, 骨折固定术,内, 机器人, 外科手术, 微创

Abstract: Objective To explore the surgical strategies, techniques and precautions of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for pelvic ring injuries. Methods The clinical data of 108 cases of pelvic ring injuries treated with robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery were reviewed. There were 71 male and 37 female, average age was 41.6 years(range, 21-79 years), including 6 cases of isolated anterior pelvic ring injuries and 102 cases of combined anterior and posterior pelvic ring injuries. The surgical plans were formulated based on the type and degree of injuries, effectiveness of the reduction, and integrity of the osseous channel. The surgical complications and efficacy were recorded. Results Percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of the pubic ramus was performed in 6 patients with isolated anterior pelvic ring injuries. Percutaneous cannulated sacroiliac screw fixation and open screw or plate fixation of the symphysis pubis was performed in 7 patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries combined with symphysis pubis separation. Percutaneous cannulated 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)57卷11期 -刘华水,等.骨科手术机器人辅助微创治疗骨盆环损伤108例临床分析 \=-sacroiliac screw and pubic ramus screw fixation was performed in 40 patients with posterior pelvic ring injury combined with unilateral anterior pelvic ring injury. For the 55 patients with posterior pelvic ring injury combined with bilateral anterior pelvic ring injury, cannulated screw fixation alone was performed in 14 cases, INFIX fixation in 24 cases, and “hybrid surgery” in 17 cases. A total of 344 screws were inserted with robotic assistance, of which 326 were successfully inserted to a satisfactory position on the first attempt. The average operation time was 106 minutes. Fluoroscopies were performed with an average of 29.2 times, and it took 6.1 s to place one screw. There were 18 unsatisfactory guiding needle placements during the surgeries, 6 of which remained in the bone tunnel and were not re-planned, 7 cut out, 4 penetrated the cortex and were re-planned to satisfactory position, 1 penetrated the pubic cortex, causing hemorrhage of the “crown of death” and was changed to “hybrid surgery”. During the follow-up of 4.2 months, 2 fixation failures were observed, and the average Majeed score was 89.4 points. Conclusion Robot-assisted surgery provides a novel modality for the minimally invasive treatment of pelvic ring injuries when the surgical strategy is properly formulated and surgeons have good techniques.

Key words: Pelvis, Fracture internal fixation, Robotics, Surgery, Minimally invasive surgery

中图分类号: 

  • R683.3
[1] Leung KS, Tang N, Cheung LW, et al. Image-guided navigation in orthopaedic trauma [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2010, 2(10): 1332-1337.
[2] Zheng G, Nolte LP. Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery: current state and future perspective [J]. Front Surg, 2015, 23(2): 66.
[3] Karthik K, Colegate-Stone T, Dasgupta P, et al. Robotic surgery in trauma and orthopaedics: a systematic review [J]. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97(3): 292-299.
[4] 王满宜, 王军强. 计算机辅助导航骨科手术及医用机器人技术在创伤骨科的应用[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2005, 7(11): 1004-1009. WANG Manyi, WANG Junqiang. Medical robots and computer assisted navigation used in surgery of orthopaedic trauma [J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2005, 7(11): 1004-1009.
[5] 刘华水, 段升军, 贾逢爽, 等. TiRobot机器人辅助经皮空心螺钉内固定治疗不稳定型骨盆骨折[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(7): 103-109. LIU Huashui, DUAN Shengjun, JIA Fengshuang, et al. TiRobot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation in unstable pelvic ring fractures [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Science), 2017, 55(7): 103-109.
[6] 蒋侃凌, 田维, 贾健. TiRobot手术机器人辅助经皮骶髂螺钉固定治疗骨盆后环不稳定损伤[J]. 天津医科大学学报, 2017, 23(3): 247-251. JIANG Kanling, TIAN Wei, JIA Jian. TiRobot surgical robotic navigation and location system assisted percutaneous iliosacral screws for treatment of unstable pelvic posterior ring injuries[J]. Journal of Tianjin Medical University, 2017, 23(3): 247-251.
[7] 赵春鹏, 王军强, 苏永刚, 等. 机器人辅助经皮螺钉内固定治疗骨盆和髋臼骨折[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 274-280. ZHAO Chunpeng, WANG Junqiang, SU Yonggang, et al. Clinical research on robot-assisted percutaneous pelvic and acetabular screws surgery[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(2): 274-280.
[8] Liu HS, Duan SJ, Liu SD, et al. Robot-assisted percutaneous screw placement combined with pelvic internal fixator for minimally invasive treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2018,14(5):1927.
[9] Zwingmann J, Konrad G, Kotter E, et al. Computer-navigated iliosacral screw insertion reduces malposition rate and radiation exposure [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(7): 1833-1838.
[10] Wong JM, Bewsher S, Yew J, et al. Fluoroscopically assisted computer navigation enables accurate percutaneous screw placement for pelvic and acetabular fracture fixation[J]. Injury, 2015, 46(6): 1064-1068.
[11] Ward EF, Tomasin J, Vander Griend RA. Open reduction and internal fixation of vertical shear pelvic fractures [J]. J Trauma, 1987, 27(3): 291-295.
[12] 张巍, 张立海, 陶笙, 等. 微创治疗骨盆前后环骨折的疗效与并发症分析[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2014, 30(7): 647-651. ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Lihai, TAO Sheng, et al. Clinical effect and complication of minimally invasive surgery in treatment of anterior and posterior pelvic ring injury [J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2014, 30(7): 647-651.
[13] 任明光, 罗从风, 陈健, 等. C型臂机透视与导航下经皮空心螺钉内固定治疗骨盆骨折的比较研究[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2007, 9(10): 923-927. REN Mingguang, LUO Congfeng, CHEN Jian, et al. Comparison between the C-arm fluoroscopy and computer navigation in minimally invasive fixation with cannulated screws for pelvic fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2007, 9(10): 923-927.
[14] Giráldez-Sánchez MA, Lázaro-Gonzálvez Á, Martínez-Reina J, et al. Percutaneous iliosacral fixation in external rotational pelvic fractures. A biomechanical analysis [J]. Injury, 2015, 6(2): 327-332.
[15] Zhang L, Peng Y, Du C, et al. Biomechanical study of four kinds of percutaneous screw fixation in in two types of unilateral sacroiliac joint dislocation: a finite element analysis [J]. Injury, 2014, 45(12): 2055-2059.
[16] Vaidya R, Colen R, Vigdorchik J, et al. Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with an internal anterior fixator and posterior fixation: initial clinical series [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2012, 26(1): 1-8.
[17] 刘华水, 段升军, 贾逢爽, 等. TiRobot机器人辅助经皮空心螺钉联合INFIX治疗不稳定型骨盆骨折一例[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2017, 37(16): 1054-1056. LIU Huashui, DUAN Shengjun, JIA Fengshuang, et al. Robot-assisted transcutaneous screw combined with INFIX for unstable pelvic fracture: a case report [J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics, 2017, 37(16): 1054-1056.
[18] Carmack DB, Moed BR, McCarroll K, et al. Accuracy of detecting screw penetration of the acetabulum with intraoperative fluoroscopy and computed tomography[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001, 83(9): 1370-1375.
[1] 匡风霞,赵晓虹,韩宝佳,高成杰. 对控制机器人甲状腺癌根治术患者手术应激反应麻醉深度的探讨[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 81-86.
[2] 李明波,黄燕波,任东成,刘俊城,谭成双,徐继禧,丁金勇. 3种不同的腰椎内固定融合方式的有限元分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 55-64.
[3] 田辉,李树海,李林,亓磊,鲁铭,程传乐. 微创食管切除术质量控制之齐鲁实践[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 78-82.
[4] 庄大勇,贺青卿,李小磊,周鹏,岳涛,徐婧. 达芬奇机器人在儿童及青少年甲状腺癌中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 45-48.
[5] 吴刚, 王世隆, 段笑然, 汪洋, 张洪川. 外侧入路关节镜辅助微创距下关节融合[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 107-114.
[6] 张伟,谭文浩,李贻斌. 基于深度强化学习的四足机器人运动控制发展现状与展望[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 61-66.
[7] 吕龙飞,李林,李树海,亓磊,鲁铭,程传乐,田辉. 腔镜下细针导管空肠造瘘在微创McKeown食管癌切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 77-81.
[8] 吴昊,徐克,韩靓,徐菲菲,王东琴,达鹏,殷勇. 改良颈腮腺入路切除咽旁间隙高位良性肿瘤[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(12): 72-76.
[9] 赵健,韩晓玲,王刚,刘江,周嘉晖,王海锋,江志伟,黎介寿. 多模式止痛对机器人45例远端胃切除术后肠功能的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(9): 43-47.
[10] 董昌正,周伟,李风周,臧义丰,丁印鲁. 全腹腔镜下全胃+胆囊+阑尾切除经自然腔道取标本手术1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(7): 122-124.
[11] 邱贵兴. 腰椎疾患诊治新进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(5): 1-2.
[12] 王冰. 腰椎完全内镜经椎板间入路技术的临床教程[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(5): 23-29.
[13] 刘新宇,贾军. 腰椎管狭窄症脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(5): 30-35.
[14] 贾军,赵钇伟,原所茂,田永昊,刘新宇,郑燕平. 腰椎管狭窄单节段经椎间孔椎体间融合手术前后矢状位参数值的变化[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(5): 36-42.
[15] 朱锡德,孟凡国,张建宁. 细孔钻颅微创治疗老年创伤性脑内血肿[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(3): 69-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!