您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (11): 33-37.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.0588

• 胸外科肺癌、食管癌微创诊治和加速康复专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

加速康复外科指导下微创食管癌切除术流程优化之齐鲁实践

孙振国,田辉*()   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院胸外科, 山东 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-13 出版日期:2022-11-01 发布日期:2022-11-04
  • 通讯作者: 田辉 E-mail:tianhuiql@126.com
  • 作者简介:孙振国，山东大学齐鲁医院胸外科副研究员，博士后，齐鲁卫生与健康杰出青年人才，美国约翰霍普金斯大学医学院联合培养博士。曾获得全球首届医疗品质提升大赛第1名，中国医院品质管理联盟特别突出贡献大奖。现任山东省疼痛医学会理事，山东省临床肿瘤学会肿瘤微创外科分会常务委员，山东省医学会胸外科分会学术发展学组委员兼秘书，山东省疼痛医学会加速康复外科专委会委员兼秘书，山东省研究型医院协会胸外科分会委员。擅长胸外科肺部肿瘤、食管肿瘤及纵膈肿瘤的诊疗原则及微创手术操作等。参编《胸外科疑难精要》中文版。以第一作者/通讯作者发表SCI论文8篇，累计影响因子40余分；作为项目负责人主持国家自然科学基金青年基金、中国博士后科学基金及山东省自然科学基金博士基金各1项，作为骨干成员承担国家重点研发计划项目子课题1项。获得国家发明专利1项
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81672292);国家自然科学基金(81802397);泰山学者工程专项经费资助(ts201712087);山东省重点研发计划(重大科技创新工程)(2020CXGC011303);中国博士后科学基金(2020M672073);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2017BH035)

Optimization of the procedures in minimally invasive esophagectomy: the Qilu practices

Zhenguo SUN,Hui TIAN*()   

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Received:2022-05-13 Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-04
  • Contact: Hui TIAN E-mail:tianhuiql@126.com

RichHTML

0

PDF (PC)

19

摘要：

食管癌是我国常见的发病率及死亡率均较高的恶性肿瘤，手术治疗是食管癌最主要的治疗方式，随着腔镜技术的发展，目前微创食管癌切除术(MIE)正在逐步取代传统开放食管癌切除术。加速康复外科(ERAS)是食管外科领域新兴的研究方向，山东大学齐鲁医院胸外科在ERAS原则指导下，不断优化MIE相关操作流程，让患者尽可能舒适地度过围手术期。现将山东大学齐鲁医院胸外科开展的ERAS指导下MIE流程优化措施进行总结，以期为国内外胸外科同行提供一定的参考。

关键词: 食管癌, 微创食管癌切除术, 加速康复外科, 手术流程优化, 预后

Abstract:

Esophageal cancer, as a common malignant cancer with high morbidity and mortality, is mainly treated with surgery. With the development of endoscope technology, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is taking the place of open esophagectomy. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a new research area in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Guided with the principles of ERAS, our team has optimized the procedures of MIE to ensure that patients undergo the perioperative period smoothly. In this paper, we will summarize these optimized procedures of MIE in order to provide reference for thoracic surgeons.

Key words: Esophageal cancer, Minimally invasive esophagectomy, Enhanced recovery after Surgery, Optimized surgical procedures, Prognosis

中图分类号: 

  • R735.1
1 Siegel RL , Miller KD , Fuchs HE , et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71 (1): 7- 33.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21654
2 Moody S , Senkin S , Islam SMA , et al. Mutational signatures in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from eight countries with varying incidence[J]. Nat Genet, 2021, 53 (11): 1553- 1563.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00928-6
3 Sun Z , Ji N , Zhao R , et al. Extrachromosomal circular DNAs are common and functional in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9 (18): 1464.
doi: 10.21037/atm-21-4372
4 Cerfolio RJ , Laliberte AS , Blackmon S , et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a consensus statement[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2020, 110 (4): 1417- 1426.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.036
5 van der Sluis PC , van der Horst S , May AM . Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269 (4): 621- 630.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031
6 Gergen AK , Halpern AL , Helmkamp L , et al. Outcomes after converted minimally invasive to open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2021, 112 (5): 1593- 1599.
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.11.025
7 Coelho FDS , Barros DE , Santos FA , et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2021, 47 (11): 2742- 2748.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.012
8 Zheng Y , Li Y , Liu X , et al. Minimally invasive versus open McKeown for patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28 (11): 6329- 6336.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10105-y
9 Ashok A , Niyogi D , Ranganathan P , et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection[J]. Surg Today, 2020, 50 (4): 323- 334.
doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-01956-1
10 李树海, 田辉, 岳韦名, 等. ERAS理念指导下VATS肺癌根治术流程优化之齐鲁实践[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13 (3): 132- 135.
LI Shuhai , TIAN Hui , YUE Weiming , et al. The optimization of the procedures in VATS of lung cancer in Qilu practices[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (Electronic Edition), 2020, 13 (3): 132- 135.
11 Li L , Zhao L , He J , Han Z . Application of right bronchial occlusion under artificial pneumothorax in the thoracic phase of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy[J]. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 27 (6): 339- 345.
doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00055
12 Li Q , Zhao M , Wu D , et al. Adverse outcomes of artificial pneumothorax under right bronchial occlusion for patients with thoracoscopic-assisted oesophagectomy in the prone position versus the semiprone position[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12, 919910.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.919910
13 Marshall K , McLaughlin K . Pain Management in thoracic surgery[J]. Thorac Surg Clin, 2020, 30 (3): 339- 346.
doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.03.001
14 Shang QX , Yang YS , Hu WP , et al. Prognostic significance and role of thoracic lymph node metastasis based on Chinese expert consensus in esophageal cancer[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2019, 7 (16): 381.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.07.63
15 亓磊, 田辉, 李林, 等. 微创食管癌切除术后淋巴结转移规律及预后分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11 (2): 98- 102.
QI Lei , TIAN Hui , LI Lin , et al. Clinicopathological features of lymph node metastasis and prognostic factors in esophageal cancer treated with minimally invasive esophagectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (Electronic Edition), 2018, 11 (2): 98- 102.
16 Cui T , Zhang H , Yu T , et al. Pattern of recurrence in 428 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical surgery and its implication in postoperative radiotherapeutic clinical target volume[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11, 652365.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652365.eCollection2021
17 Matsuda S , Kitagawa Y . The Potential of lymph node yield as a quality indicator of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28 (1): 9- 10.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09146-6
18 Visser E , Markar SR , Ruurda JP , et al. Prognostic value of lymph node yield on overall survival in esophageal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269 (2): 261- 268.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002824
19 Li H , Fang W , Yu Z , et al. Chinese expert consensus on mediastinal lymph node dissection in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (2017 edition)[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10 (4): 2481- 2489.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.175
20 Lin Z , Chen W , Chen Y , et al. Achieving adequate lymph node dissection in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinomas by radical lymphadenectomy: Beyond the scope of numbers of harvested lymph nodes[J]. Oncol Lett, 2019, 18 (2): 1617- 1630.
21 Soeno T , Harada H , Hosoda K , et al. Lymph node progression and optimized node dissection of middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the latest therapeutic surgical strategy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019, 26 (4): 996- 1004.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07190-5
22 田辉, 李树海, 李林, 等. 微创食管切除术质量控制之齐鲁实践[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59 (9): 78- 82.
TIAN Hui , LI Shuhai , LI Lin , et al. Quality control of minimally invasive esophagectomy in Qilu Hospital[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2021, 59 (9): 78- 82.
23 吕龙飞, 李林, 李树海, 等. 腔镜下细针导管空肠造瘘在微创McKeown食管癌切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2020, 58 (7): 77- 81.
LU Longfei , LI Lin , LI Shuhai , et al. Application of laparoscopic fine needle catheter jejunostomy in minimally invasive McKeown resection of esophageal cancer[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2020, 58 (7): 77- 81.
24 Hayashi M , Kawakubo H , Shoji Y , et al. Analysis of the effect of early versus conventional nasogastric tube removal on postoperative complications after transthoracic esophagectomy: a single-center, randomized controlled trial[J]. World J Surg, 2019, 43 (2): 580- 589.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4825-1
25 Tian Y , Li L , Li S , et al. Comparison of circular stapling, triangulating stapling and T-shape stapling for cervical anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2020, 8 (24): 1679.
doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7278
26 李树海, 岳韦名, 李林, 等. 胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术后颈部残胃闭锁端瘘的诊治经验[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2016, 3 (1): 56- 58.
LI Shuhai , YUE Weiming , LI Lin , et al. The experience of the treatment of cervical anastomotic leakage after combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery (Electronic Edition), 2016, 3 (1): 56- 58.
27 Young A , Alvarez Gallesio JM , Sewell DB , et al. Outcomes of robotic esophagectomy[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2021, 13 (10): 6163- 6168.
28 Daiko H , Oguma J , Fujiwara H , et al. Robotic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy using four robotic arms alone in esophageal and esophagogastric cancer (RETML-4): a prospective feasibility study[J]. Esophagus, 2021, 18 (2): 203- 210.
29 Na KJ , Kang CH , Park S , et al. Robotic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis[J]. J Robot Surg, 2022, 16 (4): 841- 848.
30 Sarkaria IS , Rizk NP , Goldman DA , et al. Early quality of life outcomes after robotic-assisted minimally invasive and open esophagectomy[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2019, 108 (3): 920- 928.
[1] 李梓绮,魏闫若雪,刘晓晗,刘春铖,赵然,刘玉昆. 长链非编码RNA HEATR3反义RNA 1参与结直肠癌发生发展的功能及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 108-115.
[2] 刘保国,宋翔,赵晓文,毛亚丽. 血清STAT5B、NKAIN1 mRNA检测在乳腺癌中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 68-74.
[3] 王磊,常霄,王梓萌,李娇娇,崔书君,杨飞,朱月香. 瘤内及瘤周DCE-MRI影像组学对宫颈癌患者无进展生存期的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 45-54.
[4] 贾若曦,吕丽,刘涵云,吴寅平,李凤彩,赵泽华,王凯,范玉琛. 血细胞计数相关标志物对慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭患者28天预后的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 89-99.
[5] 杜雪,李春霞,刘云霞,张涛. 基于MFPC-Cox的结直肠癌患者预后动态预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 101-110.
[6] 杨卫芳,徐宏,刘元涛,赵蕙琛. 促甲状腺激素受体抗体在Graves病复发中的作用机制及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 116-121.
[7] 胡冰涛,张文灿,王崇怡,林翔宇,王凯斌,冯运泽,刘郴,徐万龙,李乐,司海朋. 基于加速康复外科理念的单孔分体内镜微创技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床效果分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 1-7.
[8] 马志虎,于晓凤,孙玉亮,王刚,裴艳涛,陈斌,史安浩,乔丽,朱磊. 加速康复外科综合治疗在三角纤维软骨复合体损伤患者围术期中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(3): 28-35.
[9] 刘文钊,张远,马湘萍,魏峰涛,卜培莉. 内皮活化和应激指数预测值与心力衰竭患者死亡风险的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 27-35.
[10] 陈文亮,王欢欢,郝金锦,弓蕊,赵强,张飞,高磊,董静逊. lncRNA PVT1表达在胃癌预后评估及恶性进展中的作用:基于列线图模型与细胞功能实验的研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(10): 61-71.
[11] 郭姝画,樊扬,田风,王传新,杜鲁涛,李培龙,郭兴,徐硕. 微原纤维相关蛋白3在调控胶质瘤干细胞间充质表型转化中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 9-16.
[12] 魏闫若雪,李梓绮,刘春铖,刘晓晗,赵然,刘玉昆. 结直肠癌中SP1的瘤内异质性表达及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 89-94.
[13] 刘春铖,刘晓晗,魏闫若雪,李梓绮,刘玉昆,赵然. 结直肠癌中含溴结构域蛋白9的亚细胞定位模式及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 24-30.
[14] 杨雪彦,吴寅平,吕丽,赵泽华,马行宇,李凤彩,王凯,范玉琛. 单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值动态变化对慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭预后的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 61-69.
[15] 刁玉洁,林琳,李文瑄,王洲洋,江蓓,胡迎迎,刘广义. NPR预测ANCA相关血管炎不良肾脏预后及其协同多因素优化模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(2): 60-68.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发