不同入路腰方肌阻滞对胃癌根治患者术后恢复的影响

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.0236

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较超声引导不同入路腰方肌阻滞对腹腔镜胃癌根治患者的术后镇痛效果、免疫功能及早期恢复的影响。方法择期行腹腔镜胃癌根治术患者120例,随机分为Q1组(QLB1)、Q2组(QLB2)、Q3组(QLB3)、C组,每组30例。四组均采用相同全麻方案复合不同入路的超声引导双侧腰方肌阻滞。记录术后0、6、12、24、48 h时刻静息和动态视觉模拟(VAS)评分,术后48 h内补救性镇痛药物使用量,围术期舒芬太尼使用总量;检测T0(术前即刻)、T1(术后24 h)、T2(术后48 h)时刻T细胞亚群水平;记录术后首次下床时间,首次排气时间,术后住院天数及术后不良反应发生率。结果除术后48 h外,四组其余时刻VAS评分比较,静息:Q2组P<0.05),Q3组P<0.05);动态:Q2组P<0.05)。术后48 h内补救性镇痛药物使用量比较:Q2组<其余三组(P<0.05)。围术期舒芬太尼使用总量比较:C组>其余三组(P<0.05)。四组各组内不同时刻T细胞亚群水平比较:T1P<0.05),T2P<0.05)。T1时刻各组CD3⁺、CD4⁺和CD4⁺/CD8⁺水平比较:C组P<0.05);T2时刻各组CD3⁺、CD4⁺和CD4⁺/CD8⁺水平比较:Q1组P<0.05),C组P<0.05)。术后首次下床时间和首次排气时间比较:Q2组P<0.05)。术后住院天数比较:C组>其余三组(P<0.05)。术后不良反应发生率Q2组P<0.05)。结论超声引导腰方肌阻滞可为腹腔镜胃癌根治患者提供满意的术后镇痛,降低手术对T细胞亚群的影响减轻机体细胞免疫抑制,加速患者术后康复,利于其转归。其中,QLB2在减轻动态疼痛和免疫抑制方面效果优于QLB1和QLB3。

关键词: 胃癌, 不同入路腰方肌阻滞, 术后镇痛, T细胞亚群, 早期恢复

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of quadrates lumborum block via different approaches on postoperative analgesia, immune function and early recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Methods A total of 120 patients selected for laparoscopic radical gastrectomy were randomly divided into group Q1(QLB1), group Q2(QLB2), group Q3(QLB3)and group C, with 30 cases in each group. All groups used the same general anesthesia scheme, but the ultrasound-guided bilateral quadrates lumborum block were through different approaches. The resting and dynamic visual analogue score(VAS)at 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after operation, use of remedial analgesics within 48 h after operation, and total usage of sufentanil during perioperative period were recoded. The levels of T cell subsets at T0(right before operation), T1(24h after operation)and T2(48h after operation)were recorded. The first time out of bed, first exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization days and incidence of adverse reactions were also recorded. Results At 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 2 h after operation, the resting VAS score: group Q2P<0.05), group Q3P<0.05); the dynamic VAS score: group Q2P<0.05). The use of remedial analgesics within 48 hours after operation was lower in group Q2 than in the other three groups(P<0.05). The use of sufentanil was higher in group C than in the other three groups(P<0.05). The levels of T cell subsets at different times: T1 < T0(P<0.05), T2 < T0(P<0.05). At T1, the levels of CD3⁺, CD4⁺ and CD4⁺/CD8⁺: group CP<0.05). At T2, the levels of CD3⁺, CD4⁺ and CD4⁺/CD8⁺: group Q1P<0.05), group CP<0.05). The first time out of bed and first exhaust time: group Q2P<0.05). The postoperative hospital stay was longer in group C than in the other three groups(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was lower in group Q2 than in group C(P<0.05). Conclusions Ultrasound guided lumbar quadratus block can provide satisfactory analgesia for patients after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, reduce the effects of surgery on T cell subsets and cellular immunosuppression, accelerate the postoperative rehabilitation and facilitate the prognosis. QLB2 is superior to QLB1 and QLB3 in reducing dynamic pain and immunosuppression.

Key words: Gastric cancer, Quadrates lumborum block via different approaches, Analgesic effect after surgery, T cell subsets, Early recovery

中图分类号:

R614.4

付佳,王路路,胡帅,陈哲平,刘东义,李青松,卢国栋,张贺,赵鑫,冯昌. 不同入路腰方肌阻滞对胃癌根治患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 50-57.

FU Jia, WANG Lulu, HU Shuai, CHEN Zheping, LIU Dongyi, LI Qingsong, LU Guodong, ZHANG He, ZHAO Xin, FENG Chang. Effects of different approaches of quadrates lumborum block on postoperative recovery of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2022, 60(8): 50-57.

参考文献

[1] 陈贵兵,徐晓倩,龚加庆,等. 手辅助腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术安全性及疗效比较的Meta分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2017, 20(3): 320-325. CHEN Guibing, XU Xiaoqian, GONG Jiaqing, Safety and efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2017, 20(3): 320-325.
[2] Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(12): 1350-1357
[3] 黄昌明, 涂儒鸿, 林建贤. 全腹腔镜胃癌根治术消化道重建技术与进展[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(9): 931-934. HUANG Changming, TU Ruhong, LIN Jianxian. Technology and development of digestive tract reconstruction in totally laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, 2020, 19(9): 931-934.
[4] 谷军保, 鲍学斌, 马钊. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术对患者免疫功能凝血功能及预后的影响[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2020, 42(7): 598-602. GU Junbao, BAO Xuebin, Ma Zhao. Influence of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy on immune function and coagulation function and prognosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Oncology, 2020, 42(7): 598-602.
[5] Byrne K, Levins KJ, Buggy DJ. Can anesthetic-analgesic technique during primary cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? [J]. Can J Anaesth, 2016, 63(2): 184-192.
[6] Kim R. Effects of surgery and anesthetic choice on immunosuppression and cancer recurrence [J]. J Transl Med, 2018, 16(1): 8.
[7] Cui X, Zhu C, Chen P, et al. Effect of pectoral nerve block type II under general anesthesia on the immune function of patients with breast cancer [J]. Am J Surg, 2020, 220(4): 938-944.
[8] 刘格, 邹学军. 区域阻滞在剖宫产术后镇痛的研究进展[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2021, 42(4): 435-439. LIU Ge, ZOU Xuejun. Regional anesthetic techniques for post-caesarean delivery analgesia [J]. International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, 2021, 42(4): 435-439.
[9] Wick EC, Grant MC, Wu CL. Postoperative multimodal analgesia pain management with nonopioid analgesics and techniques: a review [J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(7): 691-697.
[10] 万里, 米卫东. 2020年区域麻醉技术及研究进展[J]. 中华医学信息导报, 2021, 36(4): 15.
[11] Blanco. Tap block under ultrasound guidance: the description of a “no pops” technique: 271 [J]. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2007, 32(5): 130-130.
[12] Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Barrington M. Quadratus lumborum block: anatomical concepts, mechanisms, and techniques [J]. Anesthesiology, 2019, 130(2): 322-335.
[13] 李纯青. 腰方肌阻滞的临床应用进展[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2018, 34(6): 616-619.
[14] Singh NP, Makkar JK, Borle A, et al. The analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum block in caesarean delivery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis [J]. J Anesth, 2020, 34(6): 814-824.
[15] Ishio J, Komasawa N, Kido H, et al. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery [J]. J Clin Anesth, 2017, 41: 1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.05.015.
[16] Dam M, Hansen CK, Poulsen TD, et al. Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduces opioid consumption and speeds ambulation and discharge from hospital: a single centre randomised controlled trial [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2019, 123(2): e350-e358.
[17] Zhu M, Qi Y, He H, et al Analgesic effect of the ultrasound-guided subcostal approach to transmuscular quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial [J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2019, 19(1): 154.
[18] Ahmed A, Fawzy M, Nasr MAR, et al. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair, a comparative study between two approaches [J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2019, 19(1): 184.
[19] Ueshima H, Yoshiyama S, Otake H. RETRACTED: The ultrasound-guided continuous transmuscular quadratus lumborum block is an effective analgesia for total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Clin Anesth, 2016, 31: 35. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.033.
[20] Ueshima H, Otake H, Lin JA. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block: an updated review of anatomy and techniques [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017: 2752876. doi:10.1155/2017/2752876.
[21] Akerman M, Pej ci c N, Veli ckovi c I. A Review of the Quadratus Lumborum Block and ERAS [J]. Front Med(Lausanne), 2018, 5: 44.
[22] Dam M, Moriggl B, Hansen CK, et al. The Pathway of Injectate Spread with the Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block: A Cadaver Study [J]. Anesth Analg, 2017, 125(1): 303-312.
[23] Carline L, McLeod GA, Lamb C. A cadaver study comparing spread of dye and nerve involvement after three different quadratus lumborum blocks [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2016, 117(3): 387-394.
[24] Adhikary SD, El-Boghdadly K, Nasralah Z, et al. A radiologic and anatomic assessment of injectate spread following transmuscular quadratus lumborum block in cadavers [J]. Anaesthesia, 2017, 72(1): 73-79.
[25] Kang W, Lu D, Yang X, et al. Postoperative analgesic effects of various quadratus lumborum block approaches following cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial [J]. J Pain Res, 2019, 12: 2305-2312. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S202772.
[26] Ökmen K, Metin Ökmen B, Topal S. Ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled double-blind study [J]. J Clin Anesth, 2018, 49: 112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.027.
[27] Khan U, Ghazanfar H. T Lymphocytes and Autoimmunity [J]. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol, 2018, 341: 125-168. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2018.05.008.
[28] Zhou M, Liu W, Peng J, et al. Impact of propofol epidural anesthesia on immune function and inflammatory factors in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery [J]. American Journal of Translational Research, 2021, 13(4): 3064-3073.
[29] 汪辉德, 钟庆, 翁艳. 全身麻醉联合连续椎旁神经阻滞应用于食管癌根治术对血流动力学及免疫指标的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(8): 628-630. WANG Huide, ZHONG Qing, WEN Yan. General anesthesia combined continuous paravertebral nerve block used in esophageal cancer rad-ical and its influence on patients with haemodynamics and immune indexes [J]. Journal of Clinical Surgery, 2018, 26(8): 628-630.
[30] Zhang W, Cong X, Zhang L, et al. Effects of thoracic nerve block on perioperative lung injury, immune function, and recovery after thoracic surgery [J]. Clin Transl Med, 2020, 10(3): e38. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.38.
[31] Buggy DJ, Freeman J, Johnson MZ, et al. Systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised endpoints in perioperative medicine: postoperative cancer outcomes [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2018, 121(1): 38-44.
[32] Sen Y, Xiyang H, Yu H. Effect of thoracic paraspinal block-propofol intravenous general anesthesia on VEGF and TGF-β in patients receiving radical resection of lung cancer [J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2019,98(47): e18088. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018088.
[33] Sessler DI, Pei L, Huang Y, et al. Recurrence of breast cancer after regional or general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2019, 394(10211): 1807-1815.
[34] Murouchi T, Iwasaki S, Yamakage M. Quadratus lumborum block: analgesic effects and chronological ropivacaine concentrations after laparoscopic surgery [J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2016, 41(2): 146-150.
[35] Wikner M. Unexpected motor weakness following quadratus lumborum block for gynaecological laparoscopy [J]. Anaesthesia, 2017, 72(2): 230-232.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed