山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 82-86.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.0589
• • 上一篇
孔昕欣1,2,孙书珍2,李倩2,陈元2,周爱华2,王莉2,姚秀俊2
KONG Xinxin1,2, SUN Shuzhen2, LI Qian2, CHEN Yuan2, ZHOU Aihua2, WANG Li2, YAO Xiujun2
摘要: 目的 抗H因子抗体阳性的溶血尿毒综合征是溶血尿毒综合征(HUS)中的严重亚型,通过探讨患儿的临床特点、治疗及转归情况,为临床诊治提供依据。 方法 回顾性收集2011年5月至2017年12月收治的7例抗H因子抗体阳性HUS患儿临床资料,其中男5例、女2例,5.83~13.5岁,平均7.93岁,分析其一般情况、前驱感染、临床特点、治疗及转归,并随访3~8年。 结果 前驱感染:发热、咳嗽等上呼吸道感染症状占57.14%(4/7),呕吐、腹痛等消化系统症状占71.42%(5/7);临床特点:所有患儿均抗H因子抗体阳性、ADAMTS13活性正常,H因子浓度2例正常,5例降低;7例均呈现中至重度贫血、血小板减少症、高胆红素血症、大量蛋白尿、严重的急性肾损害及低补体C3血症。3例行肾穿刺活检,3例行基因检测。治疗与转归:急性期7例患儿均早期给予丙种球蛋白、血浆置换联合大剂量甲强龙冲击治疗,后序贯口服糖皮质激素,1例死亡,6例缓解(平均治疗27.83 d)。5例因尿常规持续异常加用免疫抑制剂治疗。随访3~8年,4例完全缓解,2例部分缓解。4例复测抗H因子抗体2例转阴性,2例仍阳性。 结论 抗H因子抗体阳性HUS患儿临床表现重,急性期在对症支持治疗基础上,早期积极使用血浆置换、丙种球蛋白,并联合大剂量甲强龙冲击治疗,可迅速控制病情,续贯长疗程应用维持性免疫抑制治疗,可减少复发,延长患儿缓解期。抗H因子抗体和补体C3有可能作为预后监测指标。
中图分类号:
[1] Fakhouri F, Zuber J, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, et al. Hemolytic uremic syndrome [J]. The Lancet, 2017, 390(10095): 681-696. [2] Raina R, Krishnappa V, Blaha T, et al. Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment [J]. Ther Apher Dial, 2019, 23(1): 4-21. [3] Goodship TH, Cook HT, Fakhouri F, et al. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes”(KDIGO)Controversies Conference [J]. Kidney Int, 2017, 91(3): 539-551. [4] Loirat C, Fakhouri F, Ariceta G, et al. An international consensus approach to the management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children [J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2016, 31(1): 15-39. [5] Song D, Liu XR, Chen Z, et al. The clinical and laboratory features of Chinese Han anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome [J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2017, 32(5): 811-822. [6] Schaefer F, Ardissino G, Ariceta G, et al. Clinical and genetic predictors of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome phenotype and outcome [J]. Kidney Int, 2018, 94(2): 408-418. [7] Blanc C, Togarsimalemath SK, Chauvet S, et al. Anti-factor H autoantibodies in C3 glomerulopathies and in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: one target, two diseases [J]. J Immunol, 2015, 194(11): 5129-5138. [8] 管娜, 刘晓宇, 姚勇, 等. 抗H因子自身抗体相关性溶血尿毒综合征临床特点、治疗及随访[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2014, 52(3): 223-226. [9] Loirat C, Frémeaux-Bacchi V. Anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: the earlier diagnosed and treated, the better [J]. Kidney Int, 2014, 85(5): 1019-1022. [10] Puraswani M, Khandelwal P, Saini H, et al. Clinical and immunological profile of anti-factor H antibody associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a nationwide database [J]. Front Immunol, 2019, 10: 1282. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01282. [11] Dragon-Durey MA, Blanc C, Garnier A, et al. Anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: review of literature of the autoimmune form of HUS [J]. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2010, 36(6): 633-640. [12] Brocklebank V, Johnson S, Sheerin TP, et al. Factor H autoantibody is associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children in the United Kingdom and Ireland [J]. Kidney Int, 2017, 92(5): 1261-1271. [13] Sinha A, Gulati A, Saini S, et al. Prompt plasma exchanges and immunosuppressive treatment improves the outcomes of anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome in children [J]. Kidney Int, 2014, 85(5): 1151-1160. [14] Monteferrante G, Brioschi S, Caprioli J, et al. Genetic analysis of the complement factor H related 5 gene in haemolytic uraemic syndrome [J]. Molecular Immunology, 2007, 44(7): 1704-1708. [15] Caprioli J, Noris M, Brioschi S, et al. Genetics of HUS: the impact of MCP, CFH, and IF mutations on clinical presentation, response to treatment, and outcome [J]. Blood, 2006, 108(4): 1267-1279. [16] Bagga A, Khandelwal P, Mishra K, et al. Hemolytic uremic syndrome in a developing country: Consensus guidelines [J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2019, 34(8): 1465-1482. [17] Khandelwal P, Gupta A, Sinha A, et al. Effect of plasma exchange and immunosuppressive medications on antibody titers and outcome in anti-complement factor H antibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome [J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2015, 30(3): 451-457. |
[1] | 巩性军,吴树明,张供,李守先,庞昕焱. 无顶冠状静脉窦综合征的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 129-. |
[2] | 李献云,杨甫德. 自杀倾向的认知行为治疗[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 1-9. |
[3] | 薛美娟,石艳,邵琳琳,王琳,张昀,张阿敏. 遗传性血栓性血小板减少性紫癜1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 121-124. |
[4] | 王静,刘粉,曾荣,黄思源,许长娟,梁子婷,董亮. 以胸膜病变为特征的IgG4相关性肺疾病1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 114-116. |
[5] | 潘鹏飞,徐立升,纪坤乾,王得翔,李玉. 以呼吸衰竭起病的线粒体肌病1例及文献回顾[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 54-59. |
[6] | 宋钰峰,宁豪,姚志刚,吴海虎,刘非凡,吕家驹. 肾上腺海绵状血管瘤临床及影像特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 37-42. |
[7] | 陈峰,高沛,朱可嘉,丁森泰. 膀胱淋巴上皮瘤样癌1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 118-120. |
[8] | 罗德素,刘培来,苗壮. 分期外固定架牵引联合铰链膝假体置换术治疗复杂创伤性膝关节炎1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 121-124. |
[9] | 于金明,颜薇薇,陈大卫. 肺癌放射免疫新实践[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 1-8. |
[10] | 哈春芳,李茹月. 卵巢癌耐药机制与靶向治疗策略的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 117-123. |
[11] | 王沂峰,何丽清. 外阴癌腹股沟淋巴结手术的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 103-109,116. |
[12] | 王克芳,吴臣. 慢性病管理依从问题研究的困境及"破局"思路[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 124-129. |
[13] | 邓晓惠,郭玲. 免疫治疗在胚胎反复种植失败中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 32-37. |
[14] | 邹俊逸,张辉,张歆杰,李子佳,许明雷,王东. 110例原位心脏移植临床经验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 86-91. |
[15] | 许长娟,梁子婷,曾荣,黄思源,王静,董亮. 结节性硬化症合并肺淋巴管肌瘤病1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 119-121. |
|