您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 76-81.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.0030

• • 上一篇    

中药熏蒸联合体外冲击波对72例髋关节撞击综合征临床疗效、血清炎症因子水平的影响

孙继业1,王紫欧1,孙晓伟2,李洪涛3   

  • 发布日期:2022-04-22
  • 通讯作者: 李洪涛. E-mail:6678843@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省博士后科研启动基金(LBH-Q19182);哈尔滨市科技创新人才基金项目(2014RFQGJ054);黑龙江中医药大学“优秀创新人才支持计划”科研项目(2018RCD11);黑龙江中医药大学“杰出青年培育基金”(2019JC05)

Effects of traditional Chinese medicine fumigation combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy on 72 cases of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and serum inflammatory factor

SUN Jiye1, WANG Ziou1, SUN Xiaowei2, LI Hongtao3   

  1. 1. Graduate School of Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150400, Heilongjiang, China;
    2. The Fifth Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150400, Heilongjiang, China;
    3. The First Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150400, Heilongjiang, China
  • Published:2022-04-22

摘要: 目的 观察分析中药熏蒸联合体外冲击波治疗髋关节撞击综合征的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响。 方法 选取2019年12月至2021年9月黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院门诊及住院部收治的髋关节撞击综合征患者72例,按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组36例。对照组采用体外冲击波治疗,冲击波采取发散模式,压力设定为2.0~3.0 bar,每次治疗冲击3 000~4 000次,每3 d治疗1次。观察组在对照组的治疗基础上,进行中药熏蒸治疗,30 min/次,1次/d。两组分别治疗30 d。比较治疗前及治疗后4周的视觉模拟(VAS)评分、髋关节功能(HHS)评分、血清基质金属蛋白酶-13(MMP-13)、白细胞介素1β(IL-1β)水平、生活质量以及疗法安全性,所有数据采用SPSS26.0统计学软件进行分析,评价临床疗效。 结果 治疗后观察组总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05),两组VAS、HHS评分均较治疗前改善,组间对比显示,观察组治疗后VAS、HHS评分改善较对照组明显(P<0.05);两组治疗后炎症因子MMP-13、IL-1β水平均较治疗前降低,组间对比显示,观察组治疗后炎症因子MMP-13、IL-1β水平低于对照组(P<0.05);两组治疗后生活质量评分较治疗前增高,组间对比显示,观察组治疗后生活质量评分高于对照组(P<0.05);两组治疗后安全性评估差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 中药熏蒸与体外冲击波两种疗法的有机结合,对于缓解髋关节撞击综合征的局部疼痛、改善髋关节功能活动、降低血清炎症因子水平有明显效果,同时能有效避免口服药物的不良反应和手术造成的损伤,对髋关节撞击综合征疗效显著,值得临床推广应用。

关键词: 髋关节撞击综合征, 中药熏蒸, 体外冲击波, 疗效, 血清炎症因子, 不良反应

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)fumigation combined with extracorporeal shock wave in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome(FAI)and the effects on the level of serum inflammatory factors. Methods A total of 72 patients with FAI treated in the Outpatient and Inpatient Departments during Dec. 2019 and Sep. 2021 were divided into the observation group and control group randomly, with 36 cases in either group. The control group was treated with extracorporeal shock wave of divergent mode, pressure 2.0-3.0 bar, 3 000-4 000 times once every 3 days. The observation group received the same treatment as the control group, plus fumigation once a day for 30 min. Both groups were treated for 30 days. The visual analogue score(VAS), Harris hip score(HHS), serum matrix metalloproteinase-13(MMP-13), interleukin-1β(IL-1β)level, quality of life and safety of treatment before treatment and 4 weeks after treatment were analyzed with SPSS 26.0 software to compared the clinical efficacy. Results After treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). The VAS and HHS scores of the two groups were improved compared with those before treatmnt, and the improvement in VAS and HHS of the observation group was more obvious than that of the control group(P<0.05). The levels of MMP-13 and IL-1β in both groups were lower than those before treatment, and those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). The quality of life score of both groups was higher after treatment, and that of the observation group after treatment was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in the treatment safety between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion The combination of TCM fumigation and extracorporeal shock wave has a significant effect on alleviating the local pain of FAI, improving the functional activities of hip joint and reducing the levels of serum inflammatory factors. Meanwhile, it can effectively avoid the adverse reactions of oral drugs and damage caused by surgery. Therefore, it is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, Traditional Chinese medicine fumigation, Extracorporeal shock wave, Curative effect, Serum inflammatory factors, Adverse reactions

中图分类号: 

  • R274.9
[1] 张洪, 蒋毅, 吕明, 等. 髋关节撞击综合征的诊断和治疗[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2009, 3(3): 352-357. ZHANG Hong, JIANG Yi, LV Ming, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: diagnosis and treatment [J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2009, 3(3): 352-357.
[2] Pun S, Kumar D, Lane NE. Femoroacetabular impingement [J]. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2015, 67(1): 17-27.
[3] 彭博文, 董晓俊. 益肾祛痹汤联合超声电导药物透入治疗髋关节撞击综合征的临床研究[J]. 内蒙古中医药, 2019, 38(5): 99-102. PENG Bowen, DONG Xiaojun. The clinical research of Yishen Qubi Decoction combined with Ultrasound conductance drug penetration on Femoroacetabular Impingement [J]. Nei Mongol Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2019, 38(5): 99-102.
[4] 张洋, 钱秀娟, 季卫锋. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征的诊治进展[J]. 中医正骨, 2019, 31(12): 37-39. ZHANG Yang, QIAN Xiujuan, JI Weifeng. Advancement of diagnosis and treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement syndrome [J]. The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology, 2019, 31(12): 37-39.
[5] 范立真, 施松波, 张旭, 等. 髋关节撞击综合征诊断与治疗研究进展[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊), 2018, 18(A2): 143-144.
[6] 邵丽娜,翟俊娜.髋关节撞击综合征诊断及治疗研究进展[J]. 当代体育科技, 2021, 11(22): 22-25. SHAO Lina, ZHAI Junna. Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement[J]. Contemporary Sports Technology, 2021, 11(22): 22-25.
[7] 国家中医药管理局. 中医病证诊断疗效标准[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 1994.
[8] 中华人民共和国卫生部. 中药新药临床研究指导原则[S]. 北京: 中国中医药科技出版社, 2002: 181-182.
[9] Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, O,Donnell J, et al. The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome(FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement [J]. Br J Sports Med, 2016, 50(19): 1169-1176.
[10] 严广斌. 视觉模拟评分法[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(2): 34.
[11] Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1969, 51(4): 737-755.
[12] Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003(417): 112-120. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000096804.78689.c2.
[13] Kuhns BD, Weber AE, Levy DM, et al. The natural history of femoroacetabular impingement [J]. Front Surg, 2015, 2: 58. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2015.00058.
[14] Li AE, Jawetz ST, Greditzer HG, et al. MRI for the preoperative evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement [J]. Insights Imaging, 2016, 7(2): 187-198.
[15] 陈琳华. 多层螺旋CT平扫及后处理重建技术诊断髋关节撞击综合征临床观察[J]. 实用医学影像杂志, 2019, 20(5): 513-515.
[16] 陈静, 邹月芬, 冯阳, 等. 单侧髋3.0 T MRI在髋关节撞击综合征患者中的应用价值[J]. 磁共振成像, 2018, 9(1): 54-57. CHEN Jing, ZOU Yuefen, FENG Yang, et al. Unilateral hip 3.0 T MRI application in femoroacetabular impingement [J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2018, 9(1): 54-57.
[17] 杨国平. 凸轮型FAI患者通过髋关节镜下治疗对髋关节活动度和功能的影响[J]. 当代医学, 2020, 26(31): 79-81. YANG Guoping. Effect of hip arthroscopy treatment on hip joint mobility and function in patients with cam-type FAI [J]. Contemporary Medicine, 2020, 26(31): 79-81.
[18] 章亚东, 张洪, 罗殿中, 等. 髋关节撞击综合征的发病机理和治疗方法[J]. 中国骨肿瘤骨病, 2011, 10(5): 481-483.
[19] 中国研究型医院学会冲击波医学专业委员会. 中国骨肌疾病体外冲击波疗法指南(2019年版)[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2019, 11(4): 1-10.
[20] 龚星星, 郭志民. 中药熏蒸疗法在骨伤科的基础及临床研究现状[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2014, 22(10): 78-80.
[21] Haneda M, Rai MF, Keefe RJ, et al. Inflammatory response of articular cartilage to femoroacetabular impingement in the hip [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2020, 48(7): 1647-1656. doi:10.1177/0363546520918804.
[22] 摆雪, 孙芸, 张洪平, 等. 膝痹膏摩法对膝痹兔滑膜基质金属蛋白酶的影响[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2017, 35(8): 2138-2141. BAI Xue, SUN Yun, ZHANG Hongping, et al. Effect of xibigao method on rabbits knee osteoarthritis synovial matrix metalloproteinase [J]. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2017, 35(8): 2138-2141.
[23] 张峰, 刘庆春, 王春成. 补肾活血汤对大鼠骨性关节炎TNF-α、IL-1β、MMP-1表达的影响[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2019, 37(8): 1999-2003. ZHANG Feng, LIU Qingchun, WANG Chuncheng. Effect of bushen Huoxue Decoction on expressions of TNF-α, IL-1β and MMP-1 in rats with osteoarthritis [J]. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2019, 37(8): 1999-2003.
[24] 赖震, 石仕元, 费骏, 等. 海桐皮汤熏蒸对兔实验性膝骨关节炎软骨细胞凋亡的影响[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2013,31(1): 161-163. LAI Zhen, SHI Shiyuan, FEI Jun, et al. Influence of Haitongpi Decoction on apoptosis of cartilage cells in experimental rabbit knee osteoarthritis [J]. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2013, 31(1): 161-163.
[25] 赖震, 石仕元, 费骏, 等. 海桐皮汤熏蒸对兔实验性膝骨关节炎氧自由基代谢的影响[J]. 浙江中西医结合杂志, 2012, 22(12): 938-940. LAI Zhen, SHI Shiyuan, FEI Jun, et al. Influence of haitongpi decoction on the metabolism of oxygen free radicals in experimental rabbit kenn osteoarthritis [J]. Zhejiang Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, 2012, 22(12): 938-940.
[26] 邓尧. 体外冲击波配合穿蛭膏对家兔膝骨关节炎IL-1β及TNF-α表达的影响分析[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2017, 42(2): 130-133. DENG Yao. Effect of extracorporeal shock wave with Chuan-Zhi Plaster on expression of interleukin-1β and tumor necrosisfactor-α in cartilage in rabbits with knee osteoarthritis [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2017, 42(2): 130-133.
[1] 李青,林雪艳,刘天航,李晓文,范明喆,赵瑞瑞,田永杰. 经阴道网片盆底重建术的疗效中长期随访[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 71-75.
[2] 王喆,刘玉洁,毛倩,管佩霞,包绮晗,李承圣,乔晓伟,潘庆忠,王素珍. 基于逆概率加权法的早期三阴性乳腺癌不同治疗方案的疗效评价[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 113-118.
[3] 苗壮,刘培来,卢群山,姚天笑,李松林,罗德素. 双柱活动型单髁假体治疗膝关节内侧骨关节炎的早期疗效分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(5): 90-95.
[4] 罗应舒,李宾,许昌芹,姜军梅,许洪伟. 240例上消化道黏膜下肿瘤内镜治疗的疗效及并发症评估[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(3): 74-80.
[5] 赵文博,甄长青,袁代,单宁宁,王娜,封丽丽,李沛沛,丁梅,李英,张凌岩,王欣. 膦甲酸钠治疗血液病患者合并EB病毒感染的临床疗效[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 96-99.
[6] 底学敏,牛书雷,赵静,杜随,于慧敏,张宏涛,王娟. CT引导下125I粒子植入治疗晚期胃癌淋巴结转移[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 79-84.
[7] 颜进项,孟雷,董亚南,张爱军,岳洪胜,李波,钟良君,白爱国. 优化救治流程与Solitaire FR支架在治疗急性脑动脉闭塞中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(7): 49-54.
[8] 刘松涛,沈斌,林辉,李香伟,温昭科. 全胸腔镜下心脏不停跳与停跳二尖瓣置换术的对比[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(8): 39-43.
[9] 王军锋,刘倩,孙小刚,李金良,徐加龙,吕其刚,马楠,王若义. 门静脉左支血管转流术治疗小儿门静脉海绵样变性的疗效评估[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(7): 28-32.
[10] 徐闯,戚大春,李贤让,祖萌,李健,刘明廷. 初次髋关节置换术后引流与否的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(6): 43-49.
[11] 宋轲,刘寰,武文亮,刘海春,李尚志,陈允震. 骨髓间充质干细胞、血小板凝胶和体外冲击波联合应用治疗骨不连[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(6): 1-6.
[12] 张斌,张良文,迟令懿,王传伟,朱树干. 显微血管减压术治疗原发性三叉神经痛疗效的相关因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(6): 69-72.
[13] 张明明,安永辉,韩彩莉,张瑛琪,马明,李娜,邹长鹏. CIK细胞联合光动力治疗中晚期食管癌的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(1): 38-41.
[14] 王玉琴, 哈秀英, 徐卫国. 三种抗精神分裂症药物的疗效和经济学评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(Z2): 196-197.
[15] 孟菲, 王耀华, 黄研, 吕浩. 某医院中药注射剂不合理用药情况的分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(Z1): 223-224.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵婷婷,齐亚娜,张颖,袁冰,韩明勇. 小鼠乳腺癌诱导转移前肺组织微环境的改变[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 24 -29 .
[2] 陈兆波,方敏,薛浩然,刘春艳. 去泛素化酶USP35促进非小细胞肺癌细胞迁移和侵袭[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 30 -37 .
[3] 徐歌,李青,张灿灿,田永杰. 子宫腺肌病组织及原代细胞中PARP-1、HIF-1α的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 55 -61 .
[4] 李鸿皓,于晶,陈亚丽,郭守刚. 20例NMOSD患者CD4+CD25+FoxP3+调节性T细胞数量和FoxP3 mRNA的表达水平[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 50 -54 .
[5] 赵海龙,王皓,方雨晴,毛飞,赵张宁,田祥奇,徐新荣,王敏,李秀华. 增服艾地苯醌对34例帕金森病抑郁患者的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 38 -44 .
[6] 杨丛品,罗卓野,许秀华,李爱民,郝桂敏. 河北省某医院体检3 512例育龄女性生育选择及压力现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 62 -67 .
[7] 袁宏涛,纪淙山,康冰,秦松楠,于鑫鑫,高琳,王锡明. CT影像组学对肾上腺乏脂腺瘤与结节样增生的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 68 -75 .
[8] 申雨霏,赵美,胡宓. 有自杀意念中学生的求助意愿、求助行为现状及其相关因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 0, (): 99 -106 .
[9] 邵娜,殷昊,李亚冉,张保坤,黄伟伟,鲁珊珊,唐吉友. Suvorexant改善慢性睡眠剥夺小鼠学习记忆损害的机制探讨[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 17 -23 .
[10] 刘丽雯,马俊,李沛铮,张秀芳,刘艺鸣. 128例帕金森病照料者负担及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 45 -49 .