您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 82-86.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.0589

• • 上一篇    

抗H因子抗体阳性溶血尿毒综合征7例分析

孔昕欣1,2,孙书珍2,李倩2,陈元2,周爱华2,王莉2,姚秀俊2   

  • 发布日期:2022-04-22
  • 通讯作者: 孙书珍. E-mail:ssztml@163.com

Analysis of 7 cases of anti-H factor antibody-positive hemolytic uremic syndrome

KONG Xinxin1,2, SUN Shuzhen2, LI Qian2, CHEN Yuan2, ZHOU Aihua2, WANG Li2, YAO Xiujun2   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Pediatrics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong Frist Medical University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-04-22

摘要: 目的 抗H因子抗体阳性的溶血尿毒综合征是溶血尿毒综合征(HUS)中的严重亚型,通过探讨患儿的临床特点、治疗及转归情况,为临床诊治提供依据。 方法 回顾性收集2011年5月至2017年12月收治的7例抗H因子抗体阳性HUS患儿临床资料,其中男5例、女2例,5.83~13.5岁,平均7.93岁,分析其一般情况、前驱感染、临床特点、治疗及转归,并随访3~8年。 结果 前驱感染:发热、咳嗽等上呼吸道感染症状占57.14%(4/7),呕吐、腹痛等消化系统症状占71.42%(5/7);临床特点:所有患儿均抗H因子抗体阳性、ADAMTS13活性正常,H因子浓度2例正常,5例降低;7例均呈现中至重度贫血、血小板减少症、高胆红素血症、大量蛋白尿、严重的急性肾损害及低补体C3血症。3例行肾穿刺活检,3例行基因检测。治疗与转归:急性期7例患儿均早期给予丙种球蛋白、血浆置换联合大剂量甲强龙冲击治疗,后序贯口服糖皮质激素,1例死亡,6例缓解(平均治疗27.83 d)。5例因尿常规持续异常加用免疫抑制剂治疗。随访3~8年,4例完全缓解,2例部分缓解。4例复测抗H因子抗体2例转阴性,2例仍阳性。 结论 抗H因子抗体阳性HUS患儿临床表现重,急性期在对症支持治疗基础上,早期积极使用血浆置换、丙种球蛋白,并联合大剂量甲强龙冲击治疗,可迅速控制病情,续贯长疗程应用维持性免疫抑制治疗,可减少复发,延长患儿缓解期。抗H因子抗体和补体C3有可能作为预后监测指标。

关键词: 溶血尿毒综合征, 抗H因子抗体, 临床特点, 治疗, 随访

Abstract: Objective Anti-H factor antibody-positive hemolytic uremic syndrome(HUS)is a severe subtype of HUS. The clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of children with such disease were discussed to provide reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods Clinical data of 7 patients with anti-H factor antibody-positive HUS during May 2011 and Dec. 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, including 5 male and 2 female, aged 5.83 to 13.5(mean 7.93)years. The general condition, pre-infection, clinical characteristics, treatment, outcome and 3-8-year follow-up results were analyzed. Results Pre-infection: upper respiratory tract infection symptoms such as fever and cough were discovered in 57.14%(4/7)patients; digestive system symptoms such as vomiting and abdominal pain manifested in 71.42%(5/7)patients. Clinical features: all children were positive for anti-H factor antibody, ADAMTS13 activity was normal, 2 cases of H factor titer were normal, and the other were decreased; All cases showed moderate to severe anemia, thrombocytopenia, hyperbilirubinemia, massive proteinuria, severe acute kidney damage, and low-complement C3. Renal biopsy was performed in 3 cases and genetic testing in 3 cases. Treatment and outcome: all patients in the acute phase were treated with Gamma globulin, plasma exchange and high-dose methylprednisolone, followed by oral glucocorticoids. The outcome was 1 death and 6 relief, with the mean treatment time of 27.83 days. Five patients were treated with immunosuppressive agents due to persistent abnormalities in urine routine. After 3-8 years of follow-up, 4 patients had complete remission and 2 had partial remission; of the 4 cases who repeated amti H factor antibody examination, 2 were negative and 2 were still positive. Conclusion Children with anti-H factor antibody-positive HUS have severe clinical manifestations. On the basis of symptomatic supportive therapy in the acute phase, early use of plasma exchange, Gamma globulin, combined with high-dose methylprednisol impact therapy, can quickly control the condition. Long-term application of immunosuppressive agents can reduce recurrence and prolong the remission period. H factor antibody and C3 may be used as indicators of prognostic monitoring.

Key words: Hemolytic uremic syndrome, Anti-H factor antibody, Clinical characteristics, Treatment, Follow-up

中图分类号: 

  • R574
[1] Fakhouri F, Zuber J, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, et al. Hemolytic uremic syndrome [J]. The Lancet, 2017, 390(10095): 681-696.
[2] Raina R, Krishnappa V, Blaha T, et al. Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment [J]. Ther Apher Dial, 2019, 23(1): 4-21.
[3] Goodship TH, Cook HT, Fakhouri F, et al. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes”(KDIGO)Controversies Conference [J]. Kidney Int, 2017, 91(3): 539-551.
[4] Loirat C, Fakhouri F, Ariceta G, et al. An international consensus approach to the management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children [J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2016, 31(1): 15-39.
[5] Song D, Liu XR, Chen Z, et al. The clinical and laboratory features of Chinese Han anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome [J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2017, 32(5): 811-822.
[6] Schaefer F, Ardissino G, Ariceta G, et al. Clinical and genetic predictors of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome phenotype and outcome [J]. Kidney Int, 2018, 94(2): 408-418.
[7] Blanc C, Togarsimalemath SK, Chauvet S, et al. Anti-factor H autoantibodies in C3 glomerulopathies and in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: one target, two diseases [J]. J Immunol, 2015, 194(11): 5129-5138.
[8] 管娜, 刘晓宇, 姚勇, 等. 抗H因子自身抗体相关性溶血尿毒综合征临床特点、治疗及随访[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2014, 52(3): 223-226.
[9] Loirat C, Frémeaux-Bacchi V. Anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: the earlier diagnosed and treated, the better [J]. Kidney Int, 2014, 85(5): 1019-1022.
[10] Puraswani M, Khandelwal P, Saini H, et al. Clinical and immunological profile of anti-factor H antibody associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a nationwide database [J]. Front Immunol, 2019, 10: 1282. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01282.
[11] Dragon-Durey MA, Blanc C, Garnier A, et al. Anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: review of literature of the autoimmune form of HUS [J]. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2010, 36(6): 633-640.
[12] Brocklebank V, Johnson S, Sheerin TP, et al. Factor H autoantibody is associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children in the United Kingdom and Ireland [J]. Kidney Int, 2017, 92(5): 1261-1271.
[13] Sinha A, Gulati A, Saini S, et al. Prompt plasma exchanges and immunosuppressive treatment improves the outcomes of anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome in children [J]. Kidney Int, 2014, 85(5): 1151-1160.
[14] Monteferrante G, Brioschi S, Caprioli J, et al. Genetic analysis of the complement factor H related 5 gene in haemolytic uraemic syndrome [J]. Molecular Immunology, 2007, 44(7): 1704-1708.
[15] Caprioli J, Noris M, Brioschi S, et al. Genetics of HUS: the impact of MCP, CFH, and IF mutations on clinical presentation, response to treatment, and outcome [J]. Blood, 2006, 108(4): 1267-1279.
[16] Bagga A, Khandelwal P, Mishra K, et al. Hemolytic uremic syndrome in a developing country: Consensus guidelines [J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2019, 34(8): 1465-1482.
[17] Khandelwal P, Gupta A, Sinha A, et al. Effect of plasma exchange and immunosuppressive medications on antibody titers and outcome in anti-complement factor H antibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome [J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2015, 30(3): 451-457.
[1] 巩性军,吴树明,张供,李守先,庞昕焱. 无顶冠状静脉窦综合征的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 129-.
[2] 李献云,杨甫德. 自杀倾向的认知行为治疗[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 1-9.
[3] 薛美娟,石艳,邵琳琳,王琳,张昀,张阿敏. 遗传性血栓性血小板减少性紫癜1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 121-124.
[4] 王静,刘粉,曾荣,黄思源,许长娟,梁子婷,董亮. 以胸膜病变为特征的IgG4相关性肺疾病1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 114-116.
[5] 潘鹏飞,徐立升,纪坤乾,王得翔,李玉. 以呼吸衰竭起病的线粒体肌病1例及文献回顾[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 54-59.
[6] 宋钰峰,宁豪,姚志刚,吴海虎,刘非凡,吕家驹. 肾上腺海绵状血管瘤临床及影像特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 37-42.
[7] 陈峰,高沛,朱可嘉,丁森泰. 膀胱淋巴上皮瘤样癌1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 118-120.
[8] 罗德素,刘培来,苗壮. 分期外固定架牵引联合铰链膝假体置换术治疗复杂创伤性膝关节炎1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 121-124.
[9] 于金明,颜薇薇,陈大卫. 肺癌放射免疫新实践[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 1-8.
[10] 哈春芳,李茹月. 卵巢癌耐药机制与靶向治疗策略的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 117-123.
[11] 王沂峰,何丽清. 外阴癌腹股沟淋巴结手术的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 103-109,116.
[12] 王克芳,吴臣. 慢性病管理依从问题研究的困境及"破局"思路[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 124-129.
[13] 邓晓惠,郭玲. 免疫治疗在胚胎反复种植失败中的应用进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 32-37.
[14] 邹俊逸,张辉,张歆杰,李子佳,许明雷,王东. 110例原位心脏移植临床经验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 86-91.
[15] 许长娟,梁子婷,曾荣,黄思源,王静,董亮. 结节性硬化症合并肺淋巴管肌瘤病1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(8): 119-121.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐歌,李青,张灿灿,田永杰. 子宫腺肌病组织及原代细胞中PARP-1、HIF-1α的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 55 -61 .
[2] 赵婷婷,齐亚娜,张颖,袁冰,韩明勇. 小鼠乳腺癌诱导转移前肺组织微环境的改变[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 24 -29 .
[3] 陈兆波,方敏,薛浩然,刘春艳. 去泛素化酶USP35促进非小细胞肺癌细胞迁移和侵袭[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 30 -37 .
[4] 邵娜,殷昊,李亚冉,张保坤,黄伟伟,鲁珊珊,唐吉友. Suvorexant改善慢性睡眠剥夺小鼠学习记忆损害的机制探讨[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 17 -23 .
[5] 杨丛品,罗卓野,许秀华,李爱民,郝桂敏. 河北省某医院体检3 512例育龄女性生育选择及压力现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 62 -67 .
[6] 赵海龙,王皓,方雨晴,毛飞,赵张宁,田祥奇,徐新荣,王敏,李秀华. 增服艾地苯醌对34例帕金森病抑郁患者的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 38 -44 .
[7] 李鸿皓,于晶,陈亚丽,郭守刚. 20例NMOSD患者CD4+CD25+FoxP3+调节性T细胞数量和FoxP3 mRNA的表达水平[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 50 -54 .
[8] 袁宏涛,纪淙山,康冰,秦松楠,于鑫鑫,高琳,王锡明. CT影像组学对肾上腺乏脂腺瘤与结节样增生的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 68 -75 .
[9] 刘丽雯,马俊,李沛铮,张秀芳,刘艺鸣. 128例帕金森病照料者负担及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 45 -49 .
[10] 孙继业,王紫欧,孙晓伟,李洪涛. 中药熏蒸联合体外冲击波对72例髋关节撞击综合征临床疗效、血清炎症因子水平的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 76 -81 .