您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 62-67.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.1428

• • 上一篇    

河北省某医院体检3 512例育龄女性生育选择及压力现状

杨丛品,罗卓野,许秀华,李爱民,郝桂敏   

  • 发布日期:2022-04-22
  • 通讯作者: 郝桂敏. E-mail:haoguimin@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    河北省省级科技计划(20377714D);国家重点研发河北省省级科技计划(20377714D);国家重点研发计划(2021YFC2700605)

Reproductive choices and pressure in 3,512 women of childbearing age in a hospital in Hebei Province

YANG Congpin, LUO Zhuoye, XU Xiuhua, LI Aimin, HAO Guimin   

  1. Department of Reproductive Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, China
  • Published:2022-04-22

PDF (PC)

225

摘要： 目的 分析调查河北省体检的育龄夫妇生育选择及生育相关压力现状。 方法 选取2019年1月至2020年12月在河北医科大学第二医院生殖医学科体检的已婚女性3 512例作为研究对象,按照有无生育意愿分为有生育意愿组2 885例和无生育意愿组627例,采用生育相关压力量表(FPI)评估生育压力,分析年龄、受教育程度、夫妻关系、婆媳关系、家庭人均月收入、户口、职业、夫妻类型、婚姻状况、家住类型、身体情况、是否有子女对河北省育龄夫妇生育选择、生育相关压力的影响,并采用二分类Logistic回归评估生育选择的危险因素。 结果 单因素分析结果显示,年龄、夫妻关系、婆媳关系、家庭人均月收入、户口、职业、夫妻类型、家住类型、身体情况是生育选择的影响因素(χ2=293.486、57.562、21.619、24.150、55.434、167.625、30.897、363.966、48.487,P均<0.001); FPI评分无生育意愿组与有生育意愿组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);年龄、家庭人均月收入、职业、夫妇类型、家住类型、是否有子女是影响生育相关压力的因素(t/F=28.405、5.412、5.892、5.213、22.873、2.240,P均<0.001)。二分类Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄大(P<0.001)、夫妻关系差(P<0.001)、婆媳关系差(P<0.001)、家庭人均月收入高(P<0.001)、农村户口(P<0.001)、职业农民(P<0.001)、非夫妻两人生活(P<0.001)、身体情况差(P<0.001)是与生育意愿有关联的影响因素。 结论 河北省育龄女性无生育意愿的原因主要与夫妻关系、婆媳关系、经济情况、夫妻个人情况、职业和户口等有关,生育压力主要来源于年龄、夫妻个人情况、经济情况和婆媳关系。

关键词: 育龄女性, 生育选择, 生育相关压力, 压力现状, 危险因素

Abstract: Objective To analyze and investigate the current situation of fertility and fertility-related pressure in couples of childbearing age in Hebei Province. Methods A total of 3,512 married women who underwent physical examination in the Reproductive Medicine Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical Uiversity were selected during Jan.2019 and Dec.2020 as the research objects. According to their willingness to bear children, they were divided into the willing group(n=2,885)and unwilling group(n=627). The Fertility Problem Inventory(FPI)was used to evaluate fertility pressure. The impacts of age, education level, husband-wife relationship, mother-in-law and daughter-in-law relationship, per capita monthly household income, household registration, occupation, family type, marital status, type of residence, physical condition, and children on the reproductive choices of couples were investigated. The risk factors of reproductive choices were assessed with binary Logistic regression. Results Univariate analysis showed age, husband-wife relationship, mother-in-law and daughter-in-law relationship, per capita monthly household income, household registration, occupation, family type, type of residence, and physical condition were the influencing factors of reproductive choices(χ2=293.486, 57.562, 21.619, 24.150, 55.434, 167.625, 30.897, 363.966, 48.487, P<0.001). There was significant difference in FPI score between the two groups(P<0.001). Age, per capita monthly household income, occupation, family type, type of residence, and children were factors of fertility-related pressure(t/F=28.405, 5.412, 5.892, 5.213, 22.873, 2.240, P<0.001). The result of binary Logistic regression analysis showed that, advanced age(P<0.001), poor husband-wife relationship(P<0.001), poor mother-in-law and daughter-in-law relationship(P<0.001), high monthly household income(P<0.001), rural household registration(P<0.001), farmer as occupation(P<0.001), non-husband-wife family type(P<0.001), poor physical condition(P<0.001)were independent influencing factors of willingness to bear children. Conclusion The willingness of women of childbearing age to have children are related to husband-wife relationship, mother-in-law and daughter-in-law relationship, economic status, husband and wifes personal situation, occupation and household registration. The fertility-related pressure mainly comes from age, husband and wifes personal situation, economic status and mother-in-law and daughter-in-law relationship.

Key words: Women of childbearing age, Reproductive choices, Fertility-related pressure, Pressure status, Risk factor

中图分类号: 

  • R715.2
[1] 杨晓畅,蒲川.全面二孩政策下重庆市育龄妇女的生育意愿及其影响因素分析研究[J].中国全科医学,2018,21(14):1744-1749. YANG Xiaochang, PU Chuan. Status and associated factors for second-birth intentions among women of childbearing age in chongqing during the implementation of the universal two-child policy in China[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2018, 21(14): 1744-1749.
[2] Bala R, Singh V, Rajender S, et al. Environment, lifestyle, and female infertility[J]. Reprod Sci, 2021, 28(3): 617-638.
[3] 钱坤,高玉玲,项同生,等. 不孕症女性生育压力与病耻感的相关研究[J]. 皖南医学院学报, 2019, 38(1):90-93. QIAN Kun, GAO Yuling, XIANG Tongsheng, et al. Survey on the fertility problem and stigma in infertile women[J]. Acta Academiae Medicinae Wannan,2019, 38(1): 90-93.
[4] Zurlo MC, Cattaneo Della Volta MF, Vallone F. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the fertility problem inventory-short form[J]. Health Psychol Open, 2017, 4(2):2055102917738657. doi: 10.1177/2055102917738657.
[5] 贺丹,张许颖,庄亚儿,等.2006~2016年中国生育状况报告——基于2017年全国生育状况抽样调查数据分析[J].人口研究,2018,42(6):35-45.
[6] Ciritel AA, De Rose A, Arezzo MF. Childbearing intentions in a low fertility context: the case of Romania[J]. Genus, 2019, 75(1):4. doi:10.1186/s41118-018-0046-6.
[7] 孙梅,崔文娟.影响生育力的因素及高龄生育的策略[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2019,57(2):23-28. SUN Mei, CUI Wenjuan. Risk factors affecting fertility and strategies for advanced age fertility[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Science), 2019, 57(2): 23-28.
[8] Juliana P, Ditte V, Hviid M, et al. Infertility-related stress and the risk of antidepressants prescription in women: a 10-year register study[J]. Hum Reprod, 2019, 34(8): 1505-1513.
[9] Luo LY, Li S. Impact of infertility-related psychological stress on the quality of life of azoospermia patients[J]. National J Androl, 2018, 24(5): 425-430.
[10] Chen SM, Zhang Y, Wang YB. Individual differences in relative fertility costs and fertility benefits and their effects on fertility desire for a second child in China: a latent profile analysis[J]. Reprod Health, 2019, 16(1): 110. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0770-1.
[11] Palomba S, Daolio J, Romeo S, et al. Lifestyle and fertility: the influence of stress and quality of life on female fertility[J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2018, 16(1): 113. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0434-y.
[12] Groene EA, Mutabuzi C, Chinunje D, et al. Comparing infertility-related stress in high fertility and low fertility countries[J]. Sex Reprod Healthc, 2021, 29:100653. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100653.
[13] 郭晓婕,张竑. 南京城市职业女性二胎生育意愿调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2021,29(4):661-666. GUO Xiaojie, ZHANG Hong. Investigation and analysis of influencing factors on the second child intention of professional women[J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning,2019,42(4):126-128.
[14] 张冲,李想. 女性生育意愿与生育行为偏离的影响因素[J]. 中国卫生统计,2020,37(6):902-904. ZHANG Chong, LI Xiang. Factors influencing the deviation of womens fertility intention and fertility behavior[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics,2020,37(6):902-904.
[15] 高杨,邹丽. 城市与农村育龄女性二胎生育意愿及生育行为差异研究[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2020, 28(4):475-478. GAO Yang, ZOU Li. Research on the difference of fertility intention and behavior of the second child of females of childbearing age from urban and rural areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 2020, 28(4): 475-478.
[16] Götmark F, Andersson M. Human fertility in relation to education, economy, religion, contraception, and family planning programs[J]. BMC Public Health, 2020, 20(1): 265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8331-7.
[17] Qian Y, Liu XY, Fang B, et al. Investigating fertility intentions for a second child in contemporary China based on user-generated content[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020,17(11): 3905. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113905.
[18] Luo D, Yan X, Xu R, et al. Chinese trends in adolescent marriage and fertility between 1990 and 2015: a systematic synthesis of national and subnational population data[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2020, 8(7): e954-e964.
[19] 田葱,王卫杰,李娟,等. 开封市城乡育龄夫妇二胎生育意愿及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国社会医学杂志, 2019, 36(4): 381-384. TIAN Cong, WANG Weijie, LI Juan, et al. Study on the parental willingness of second child and its influencing factors in urban and rural couples in Kaifeng City[J]. Chinese Journal of Social Medicine, 2019, 36(4): 381-384.
[20] Chen M, Luo Y, Fu J, et al. Reproductive health status and related knowledge among women aged 20-39 years in rural China: a cross-sectional study[J]. Reprod Health, 2020,17(1): 90.
[21] 白璐,张雨青,房玉英.正念在不孕症患者生育压力与创伤后应激障碍间的中介及调节作用[J].山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59(2): 83-87. BAI Lu, ZHANG Yuqing, FANG Yuying. Infertility stress and posttraumatic stress disorder in infertile women: mindfulness as a mediator and moderator[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences),2021, 59(2): 83-87.
[22] Li W, Chen S, Wang J, et al. Fertility cost in China should be borne by the state[J]. Lancet Glob Health. 2019, 7(6): e708. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30155-X.
[1] 吕岩红,张志勉. 2 809名体检人群中高血压与幽门螺杆菌感染的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 43-47.
[2] 陈丽宇,肖娟,吕仙忠,段宝敏,洪凡真. 影响孕产妇下肢深静脉血栓预后的危险因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 38-42.
[3] 司海朋,张文灿,李乐,周鑫. Kümmell's病的危险因素和诊治研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 25-32.
[4] 王纬,王凤琴,韩艳丽. 腹腔镜下右附件囊肿剥除术后发生心脏骤停1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 123-124.
[5] 陈擎仪,张烜,王娟,孙继伟,曹丹凤, 曹枫林. 妊娠期女性自杀意念的危险因素及其累积效应[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 91-94.
[6] 孙胜房,马会力,贾竹亭,李民涛. 车祸所致880例四肢开放性损伤并发早期感染的危险性因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 72-77.
[7] 孙启晶,陈方方,李春晓,张才擎. PNI及HGB评估中晚期非小细胞肺癌患者预后的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(4): 55-59.
[8] 仇成轩, 杜怡峰. 重视阿尔茨海默病和老年痴呆症的人群干预研究[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(10): 1-6.
[9] 杜蘅,袁晓东. 阿尔茨海默病病因及发病机制研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(10): 21-27.
[10] 王艺桦,马琳,阚艳敏,王文韬. 剖宫产术后早期子宫切口缺陷的超声观察及相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(5): 39-44.
[11] 刘正琴, 吴树明, 庞昕焱. 亚砷酸导致恶性心律失常1例[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(11): 95-96.
[12] 何昶江. 普外科手术切口感染因素探讨[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(S2): 23-23.
[13] 张颖，陈红梅，吴欣怡. 山东省寿光市高中生干眼患病率及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(3): 82-85.
[14] 贾堂宏1，侯廷成1，谢忠元1，窦克宏1，张济2，边学峰2，时延申3，牛纪伦4，杨华5. 济南市社区人群代谢综合征检出率及危险因素调查[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(7): 100-106.
[15] 冯斐1，燕锦2，袁萍1，胡晓琴1，徐琳2，杨艳芳1. 饮食习惯、生活方式与结直肠癌关系的配对病例对照研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(7): 107-112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵婷婷,齐亚娜,张颖,袁冰,韩明勇. 小鼠乳腺癌诱导转移前肺组织微环境的改变[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 24 -29 .
[2] 陈兆波,方敏,薛浩然,刘春艳. 去泛素化酶USP35促进非小细胞肺癌细胞迁移和侵袭[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 30 -37 .
[3] 李鸿皓,于晶,陈亚丽,郭守刚. 20例NMOSD患者CD4+CD25+FoxP3+调节性T细胞数量和FoxP3 mRNA的表达水平[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 50 -54 .
[4] 徐歌,李青,张灿灿,田永杰. 子宫腺肌病组织及原代细胞中PARP-1、HIF-1α的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 55 -61 .
[5] 赵海龙,王皓,方雨晴,毛飞,赵张宁,田祥奇,徐新荣,王敏,李秀华. 增服艾地苯醌对34例帕金森病抑郁患者的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 38 -44 .
[6] 袁宏涛,纪淙山,康冰,秦松楠,于鑫鑫,高琳,王锡明. CT影像组学对肾上腺乏脂腺瘤与结节样增生的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 0, (): 68 -75 .
[7] 申雨霏,赵美,胡宓. 有自杀意念中学生的求助意愿、求助行为现状及其相关因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 0, (): 99 -106 .
[8] 邵娜,殷昊,李亚冉,张保坤,黄伟伟,鲁珊珊,唐吉友. Suvorexant改善慢性睡眠剥夺小鼠学习记忆损害的机制探讨[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 17 -23 .
[9] 刘丽雯,马俊,李沛铮,张秀芳,刘艺鸣. 128例帕金森病照料者负担及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 45 -49 .
[10] 孙继业,王紫欧,孙晓伟,李洪涛. 中药熏蒸联合体外冲击波对72例髋关节撞击综合征临床疗效、血清炎症因子水平的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 0, (): 76 -81 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发