您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 55-61.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.0472

• • 上一篇    下一篇

子宫腺肌病组织及原代细胞中PARP-1、HIF-1α的表达及临床意义

徐歌1,李青1,张灿灿2,田永杰1   

  • 发布日期:2022-04-22
  • 通讯作者: 田永杰. E-mail:tianyongjie@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金(ZR2019MH129)

Expressions and clinical significance of PARP-1 and HIF-1α in adenomyosis tissues and primary cells

XU Ge1, LI Qing1, ZHANG Cancan2, TIAN Yongjie1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-04-22

摘要: 目的 探讨聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶-1(PARP-1)、缺氧诱导因子-1α(HIF-1α)在子宫腺肌病(AM)组织中及原代内膜间质细胞中的表达及临床意义。 方法 利用免疫组织化学法检测PARP-1及HIF-1α在AM在位、异位内膜组织腺体中的表达并分析其相关性;提取原代细胞, PARP-1抑制剂处理后利用Western blotting测定PARP-1表达降低对HIF-1α表达量的影响。 结果 免疫组织化学结果显示,PARP-1在AM在位(26/31 vs 4/10,P=0.006)及异位(24/31 vs 4/10, P=0.027)内膜组织中的表达量增高,差异有统计学意义;HIF-1α在AM在位(24/31 vs 3/10, P=0.006)及异位(23/31 vs 3/10, P=0.012)内膜组织中的表达量增高,差异有统计学意义;二者表达量呈中度正相关(AM在位内膜中r=0.357,P=0.038;AM异位内膜中r=0.519,P=0.002),但PARP-1(P=0.052)、HIF-1α(P=0.767)在AM在位及异位内膜腺体组织中的表达差异均无统计学意义。Western blotting结果显示,PARP-1在AM异位内膜间质细胞中的表达量(1.016±0.051)高于在位内膜间质细胞(0.869±0.144),差异有统计学意义(P=0.025),且AM内膜间质细胞中PARP-1的表达量均较正常子宫内膜间质细胞增高(P<0.001),3组数据满足方差齐性(Levence=3.196,P=0.065)。使用PARP-1抑制剂后,PARP-1在正常子宫内膜(t=5.740,P=0.001)、AM在位子宫内膜(t=4.786,P=0.003)、异位子宫内膜(t=9.458,P<0.001)中的表达量均降低,且以AM异位内膜间质细胞降低最为明显。HIF-1α在AM在位及异位内膜间质细胞中的表达差异无统计学意义(P=0.896),而AM内膜间质细胞(P<0.001)中的表达量均高于正常子宫内膜间质细胞中的表达,3组数据符合方差齐性(Levence=2.233,P=0.150)。使用PARP-1抑制剂降低PARP-1的表达后,HIF-1α在正常子宫内膜(t=4.2215,P=0.014)、AM在位内膜(t=15.768,P<0.001)、异位内膜细胞(t=3.459,P=0.025)3组间质细胞中的表达量均较前降低。 结论 PARP-1和HIF-1α在AM组织及细胞中高表达,且 PARP-1表达量的变化可能影响HIF-1α的表达。

关键词: 子宫腺肌病, 聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶-1, 缺氧诱导因子-1α, 聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶-1抑制剂, 在位、异位子宫内膜

Abstract: Objective To explore the expressions and significance of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1(PARP-1)and hypoxia inducible factor-1(HIF-1α)in adenomyosis(AM)tissues and normal endometrial tissues. Methods The expressions of PARP-1 and HIF-1α in the eutopic and ectopic endometria of women with AM and in normal endometria were detected with immunohistochemistry. The primary interstitial cells were extracted from the eutopic and ectopic endometria of patients with AM. After the expression of PARP-1 was knocked down, the change of HIF-1α expression was measured. Results Immunohistochemistry results showed that the expression of PARP-1 was higher in the eutopic(26/31 vs 4/10, P=0.006)and ectopic(24/31 vs 4/10, P=0.027)endometria of AM than in normal endometria; the expression of HIF-1α was higher in the eutopic(24/31 vs 3/10, P=0.006)and ectopic(23/31 vs 3/10, P=0.012)endometria of AM than in normal endometria. There was a positive correlation(r=0.357, P=0.038 in eutopic endometrial tissues; r=0.519, P=0.002 in ectopic endometrial tissues)between expressions of PARP-1 and HIF-1α, but there was no significant difference in the expressions of PARP-1(P=0.052)and HIF-1α(P=0.767)in the eutopic and ectopic endometria of adenomyosis. Western blotting results showed that the expression of PARP-1 in ectopic endometrial interstitial cells of AM was higher than that in eutopic endometrial interstitial cells(P=0.025), and PARP-1 was highly expressed in eutopic(P<0.001)and ectopic(P<0.001)endometrial interstitial cells of AM compared with normal endometrial interstitial cells. After PARP-1 knockdown, the expressionin eutopic endometria(t=4.786, P=0.003), ectopic endometria(t=9.458, P<0.001), and normal endometria(t=5.740, P=0.001)was significantly reduced, and the reduction of ectopic endometrial interstitial cells in AM was the most obvious. There was no significant difference in the expression of HIF-1α in eutopic and ectopic endometrial interstitial cells of AM(P=0.896), and the expression of HIF-1α in eutopic endometrial stromal cells(P<0.001)and ectopic endometrial stromal cells(P<0.001)was higher than that in normal endometrium interstitial cells. After PARP-1 knockdown, the expression of HIF-1α in eutopic endometria of AM(t=15.768, P<0.001), ectopic endometrial cells(t=3.459, P=0.025), and normal endometria(t=4.221 5, P=0.014)was significantly lower than before. Conclusion Both PARP-1 and HIF-1α may be involved in the development of AM, and the expression of PARP-1 may affect the expression of HIF-1α.

Key words: Adenomyosis, Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1, Hypoxia inducible factor-1α, Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 inhibitor, Eutopic and ectopic endometria

中图分类号: 

  • R711.71
[1] Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, et al. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2020, 26(3): 392-411.
[2] Munro MG. Classification and reporting systems for adenomyosis [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2020, 27(2): 296-308.
[3] Bourdon M, Santulli P, Oliveira J, et al. Focal adenomyosis is associated with primary infertility [J]. Fertil Steril, 2020, 114(6): 1271-1277.
[4] Horton J, Sterrenburg M, Lane S, et al. Reproductive, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes of women with adenomyosis and endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2019, 25(5): 592-632.
[5] Munro MG, Critchley HO, broder MS, et al. FIGO classification system(PALM-COEIN)for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2011, 113(1): 3-13.
[6] Harrision D, Gravells P, Thompson R, et al. Poly(ADP-Ribose)glycohydrolase(PARG)vs. poly(ADP-Ribose)polymerase(PARP)- function in genome maintenance and relevance of inhibitors for anti-cancer therapy [J]. Front Mol Biosci, 2020, 7: 191. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00191.
[7] Alemasova EE, Lavrik OI. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by PARP1: reaction mechanism and regulatory proteins [J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019, 47(8): 3811-3827.
[8] 林雪艳, 李春艳, 侯小满, 等. PARP-1及EMT标志物在子宫腺肌病在位及异位内膜中的表达 [J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 36-40. LIN Xueyan, LI Chunyan, HOU Xiaoman, et al. Expressions of PARP-1 and EMT markers in eutopic and ectopic endometrium of adenomyosis [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2017, 55(9): 36-40.
[9] Prieto-Garcia E, Diaz-Garcia CV, Garcia-Ruiz I, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in tumor progression [J]. Med Oncol, 2017, 34(7): 122. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112791.
[10] Kang S, Zhao J, Liu Q, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms are associated with the risk of developing adenomyosis [J]. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2009, 50(5): 361-366.
[11] Knight M, Stanley S. HIF-1alpha as a central mediator of cellular resistance to intracellular pathogens [J]. Curr Opin Immunol, 2019, 60(10): 111-116.
[12] Zhang FJ, Luo W, Lei GH. Role of HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha in osteoarthritis [J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2015, 82(3): 144-147.
[13] 薛源, 林雪艳, 徐歌, 等. 低氧诱导因子-1α在子宫内膜异位症患者血清中的表达和对在位子宫内膜间质细胞上皮-间质转化的影响 [J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59(2): 41-47. XUE Yuan, LIN Xueyan, XU Ge, et al. Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in the serum of patients with endometriosis and its effect on epithelial mesenchymal transition of eutopic endometrial stromal cells [J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2021, 59(2): 41-47.
[14] Struble J, Reid S, Bedaiwy M. Adenomyosis: a clinical review of a challenging gynecologic condition [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016, 23(2): 164-185.
[15] Chen D, Qiao H, Wang Y, et al. Adenomyosis-derived extracellular vesicles endow endometrial epithelial cells with an invasive phenotype through epithelial-mesenchymal transition [J]. Genes Dis, 2020, 7(4): 636-648.
[16] Chen YJ, Li HY, Huang CH, et al. Oestrogen-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of endometrial epithelial cells contributes to the development of adenomyosis [J]. J Pathol, 2010, 222(3): 261-270.
[17] Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2009, 280(4): 529-538.
[18] Krishnakumar R, Kraus WL. The PARP side of the nucleus: molecular actions, physiological outcomes, and clinical targets [J]. Mol Cell, 2010, 39(1): 8-24.
[19] Kumar M, Jaiswal RK, Yadava PK, et al. An assessment of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 role in normal and cancer cells [J]. Biofactors, 2020, 46(6): 894-905.
[20] Kaufman B, Shapira-Frommer R, Schmutzler RK, et al. Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(3): 244-250.
[21] Stark TW, Hensley PJ, Spwar A, et al. Predictive value of epithelial-mesenchymal-transition(EMT)signature and PARP-1 in prostate cancer radioresistance [J]. Prostate, 2017, 77(16): 1583-1591.
[22] Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, et al. High PARP-1 expression is associated with tumor invasion and poor prognosis in gastric cancer [J]. Oncol Lett, 2016, 12(5): 3825-3835.
[23] Guo S, Zhang D, Lu X, et al. Hypoxia and its possible relationship with endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis: a preliminary study [J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2021, 19(1): 7. doi:10.1186/s12958-020-00692-y.
[24] Martínez-Romero R, Martínez-Lara E, Aguilar-Quesada R, et al. PARP-1 modulates deferoxamine-induced HIF-1alpha accumulation through the regulation of nitric oxide and oxidative stress [J]. J Cell Biochem, 2008, 104(6):2248-2260.
[25] Gonzalez-Flores A, Aguilar-Quesada R, Siles E, et al. Interaction between PARP-1 and HIF-2α in the hypoxic response [J]. Oncogene, 2014, 33(7): 891-898.
[26] Jaakkola P, Mole DR, Tian YM, et al. Targeting of HIF-alpha to the von hippel-lindau ubiquitylation complex by O2-regulated prolyl hydroxylation [J]. Science, 2001, 292(5516): 468-472.
[27] Buyn Y, Choi YC, Jeong Y, et al. MiR-200c downregulates HIF-1alpha and inhibits migration of lung cancer cells [J]. Cell Mol Biol Lett, 2019, 24: 28. doi:10.1186/s11658-019-0152-2.
[1] 张信美,徐萍. 子宫腺肌病的手术治疗策略[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 26-31.
[2] 易晓芳,黄季华. 子宫腺肌病的患者教育及全程管理[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 32-35.
[3] 彭超,周应芳. 子宫腺肌病的药物治疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 20-25.
[4] 艾星子·艾里,郭铮宇,张晓霏. 子宫腺肌病高强度聚焦超声消融治疗研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 36-42.
[5] 郭孙伟,刘惜时. 子宫腺肌病发病机制和病理生理研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 6-19.
[6] 冷金花, 史精华. 子宫腺肌病的临床表现[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 1-5.
[7] 陶国伟,王芳,董向毅,徐亚瑄,赵琳丽,胡蓓蓓. 子宫腺肌病的超声与MRI诊断及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 56-65.
[8] 王国云,潘臧钰. 子宫腺肌病动物模型研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 48-55.
[9] 颜磊,陈子江. 子宫腺肌病合并不孕的治疗[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 43-47.
[10] 耿晨,杨阳,赵月,刘浩冉,晁岚. 子宫腺肌病中差异基因筛选及Wilms tumor-1的表达[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 79-86.
[11] 杨贵霞,徐阳,马明明,宋然,朱鹏飞. 宫腹腔镜联合治疗Robert子宫合并子宫腺肌病1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 122-124.
[12] 王冰玉,杨阳,晁岚. TOLL样受体4在15例子宫腺肌病中的表达及作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(6): 47-52.
[13] 林雪艳,李春艳,侯小满,田永杰. PARP-1及EMT标志物在子宫腺肌病在位及异位内膜中的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 36-40.
[14] 张智慧,王丽丽,高华,张健,李娟,李远,武春晓,卢志明. 肺腺癌中缺氧诱导因子-1α调控程序性死亡因子配体1的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(4): 65-70.
[15] 吴卢侃璇,朱珊,于金习,吕椿子,李明江. 程序性死亡因子-1及其配体-1在子宫腺肌病中的表达及意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(10): 90-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!