您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 55-59.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.1416

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

6例盆腔侵袭性血管粘液瘤影像特征

陈国丹1,周勤2,刘治玲3,李福艳4,朱庆章5,于永梅6,曾庆师1   

  1. 1.山东大学, 山东省千佛山医院放射科, 山东 济南 250014;2.中山大学第一附属医院放射科, 广东 广州 510080;3.山东第一医科大学附属省立医院医学影像科, 山东 济南 250021;4.山东省医学影像学研究所放射科, 山东 济南 250021;5.兰陵县人民医院放射科, 山东 兰陵 277700;6.济宁市第一人民医院放射科, 山东 济宁 272000
  • 发布日期:2021-03-05
  • 通讯作者: 曾庆师. E-mail:zengqingshi@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重点研发计划项目(2019GSF108079)

Imaging manifestations of 6 cases of aggressive angiomyxoma

CHEN Guodan1, ZHOU Qin2, LIU Zhiling3, LI Fuyan4, ZHU Qingzhang5, YU Yongmei6, ZENG Qingshi1   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China;
    3. Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China;
    4. Department of Radiology, Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China;
    5. Department of Radiology, The Peoples Hospital of Lanling, Lanling 277700, Shandong, China;
    6. Department of Radiology, Jining No.1 Peoples Hospital, Jining 272000, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-03-05

摘要: 目的 探讨盆腔侵袭性血管粘液瘤(AA)的影像特征及其与盆腔实体肿瘤影像的初步鉴别。 方法 收集2012年4月至2020年5月具有术前影像学检查的AA患者6例(AA组)以及具有相似临床和影像表现的盆腔肿块待诊患者14例(对照组)的资料,以病理学诊断为金标准,对其临床及影像资料进行回顾性分析和鉴别,Fisher精确检验用于AA组和对照组的统计学分析。 结果 AA组中,6例(6/6)T2WI均表现为高信号,增强扫描5例(5/6)明显强化,1例(1/6)中度强化,内部均有“分层样”或“漩涡样”低信号和弥散受限,其中5例(5/6)跨盆膈生长延伸至会阴,3例(3/6)表现出“手指样”突起,3例(3/6)合并囊变。对照组中血管肌纤维母细胞瘤与AA组影像表现最为相似。鉴别时,肿块跨盆膈延伸会阴(P<0.001)、“漩涡样”或“分层样”表现(P<0.001)与对照组之间的差异具有统计学意义。 结论 AA在MRI上具有一定的影像特点,发生于女性的盆腔及会阴区,出现特征性“分层状”或“漩涡样”改变的软组织肿瘤应该考虑AA的可能。

关键词: 侵袭性血管粘液瘤, 磁共振, 血管肌纤维母细胞瘤, 盆腔肿物

Abstract: Objective To explore the imaging characteristics of pelvic aggressive angiomyxoma(AA)and to differentiate it from other pelvic masses. Methods The clinical and imaging data of 6 AA patients AA group and 14 patients with pelvic masses(controls)who had similar clinical and imaging manifestations treated during April 2012 and May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Fishers exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results In the AA group, all cases showed high signal on T2WI. Contrast-enhanced scan showed significant enhancement in 5 cases, and moderate enhancement in 1 case. “Layering” or “swirling” low signals and diffusion restriction were observed in all cases. The angiomyxoma crossed the pelvic diaphragm and extended to perineum in 5 cases, showed “finger-like” projections in 3 cases, and had cystic changes in 3 cases. In the control group, the imaging manifestations of angiomyofibroblastoma(AMF)were the most similar to those of AA group. There were significant differences in the neoplasm crossing the pelvic diaphragm and extending to the perineum(P<0.001), and “layered” or “swirled” signals(P<0.001)between the two groups. Conclusion AA has certain imaging characteristics on MRI, commonly arising in the pelvic cavity and perineum in females. “Layered” or “swirled” signals in soft tissue neoplasms may indicate the presence of AA.

Key words: Aggressive angiomyxoma, MRI, Angiomyfibroblastoma, Pelvic neoplasm

中图分类号: 

  • R737.3
[1] Chen H, Zhao H, Xie Y, et al. Clinicopathological features and differential diagnosis of aggressive angiomyxoma of the female pelvis: 5 case reports and literature review [J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2017, 96(20): e6820. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006820.
[2] Jingping Z, Chunfu Z. Clinical experiences on aggressive angiomyxoma in China(report of 93 cases)[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2010, 20(2): 303-307.
[3] Fuca G, Hindi N, Ray-Coquard I, et al. Treatment outcomes and sensitivity to hormone therapy of aggressive angiomyxoma: a multicenter, international, retrospective study [J]. Oncologist, 2019, 24(7): e536-e541.
[4] Zou R, Xu H, Shi Y, et al. Retrospective analysis of clinicopathological features and prognosis for aggressive angiomyxoma of 27 cases in a tertiary center: a 14-year survey and related literature review [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2020, 302(1): 219-229.
[5] Song M, Glasgow M, Murugan P, et al. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the vulva and bladder [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 130(4): 885-888.
[6] Addesso M, Caputo A, DAntonio A, et al. A large paraprostatic mass in a man: rare presentation of aggressive angiomyxoma [J]. Urology, 2020, 143: e3-e4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.014.
[7] Ma J, Wan J, Jiang B, et al. Huge abdominal and perineal aggressive angiomyxoma: A misdiagnosed case report and literature review [J]. Cell Mol Biol(Noisy-le-grand), 2018, 64(6): 110-113.
[8] 闫浩, 秦幸茹, 任莹. 侵袭性血管粘液瘤的影像诊断研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2018, 29(9): 645-648. YAN Hao, QIN Xingru, REN Ying. Imaging diagnosis research of aggressive angiomyxoma [J].Chin Clin Med Imaging, 2018, 29(9): 645-648.
[9] Outwater EK, Marchetto BE, Wagner B, et al. Aggressive angiomyxoma: findings on CT and MR imaging [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1999, 172(2): 435-438.
[10] Zhao CY, Su N, Jiang YX, et al. Application of ultrasound in aggressive angiomyxoma: Eight case reports and review of literature [J]. World J Clin Cases, 2018, 6(14): 811-819.
[11] Abduljabbar A, Wazzan M. Recurrent aggressive angiomyxoma presented with perianal mass and typical imaging swirl sign [J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2020, 72: 486-489.
[12] Zou R, Xu H, Shi Y, et al. Retrospective analysis of clinicopathological features and prognosis for aggressive angiomyxoma of 27 cases in a tertiary center: a 14-year survey and related literature review [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2020, 302(1): 219-229.
[13] Miguez Gonzalez J, Dominguez Oronoz R, Lozano Arranz P, et al. Aggressive Angiomyxoma: Imaging Findings in 3 Cases With Clinicopathological Correlation and Review of the Literature [J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2015, 39(6): 914-921.
[14] Brunelle S, Bertucci F, Chetaille B, et al. Aggressive angiomyxoma with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic contrast enhancement: a case report and review of the literature [J]. Case Rep Oncol, 2013, 6(2): 373-781.
[15] Kumar N, Goyal A, Manchanda S, et al. Aggressive pelvic angiomyxoma and its mimics: can imaging be the guiding light? [J]. Br J Radiol, 2020, 93(1111): 20200255. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200255.
[16] Surabhi VR, Garg N, Frumovitz M, et al. Aggressive angiomyxomas: a comprehensive imaging review with clinical and histopathologic correlation [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2014, 202(6): 1171-1178.
[17] 李肖肖, 解亚闻, 田庚. 血管肌纤维母细胞瘤10例报道和文献复习[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2019, 11(8): 75-78. LI Xiaoxiao, XIE Yawen, TIAN Geng, et al. Angiomy of ibroblastoma: ten cases report and review of literature[J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology, 2019, 11(8): 75-78.
[18] Shoji T, Takeshita R, Mukaida R, et al. Angiomy of ibroblastoma of the vulva diagnosed preoperatively: a case report [J]. Mol Clin Oncol, 2017, 7(3): 407-411.
[19] Nougaret S, Nikolovski I, Paroder V, et al. MRI of tumors and tumor mimics in the female pelvis: anatomic pelvic space-based approach [J]. Radiographics, 2019, 39(4): 1205-1229.
[20] Okolo S. Incidence, aetiology and epidemiology of uterine fibroids [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2008, 22(4): 571-588.
[21] 虞浩, 许尚文, 王晓阳, 等. 外周型原始神经外胚层肿瘤的影像学表现[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2017, 15(4): 24-26. YAN Hao, XU Shangwen, WANG Xiaoyang,et al. Imaging manifestations of peripheralprimitive neuroectodermal tumor [J]. Chinese Journal of CT and MRI, 2017, 15(4): 24-26.
[1] 王韶卿 刘毅慧 付婷婷 成金勇 刘强. 肝癌31磷磁共振波谱数据的分类[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 42-46.
[2] 陶国伟,王芳,董向毅,徐亚瑄,赵琳丽,胡蓓蓓. 子宫腺肌病的超声与MRI诊断及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 56-65.
[3] 孙浩瑜,姜鑫,陈守臻,曲思凤,史本康. 多参数磁共振联合前列腺健康指数对PSA灰区临床有意义前列腺癌的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(6): 46-50.
[4] 左立平,蒋丰洋,周斌彬,范金蕾,梁永锋,邓展昊,于德新. 术前MRI在预测169例肝细胞肝癌微血管侵犯及早期复发的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 89-95.
[5] 冯宝民,王舟,徐晗,李佳存,于乔文,修建军. 抗髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白IgG抗体相关疾病临床及影像特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 45-50.
[6] 许英杰,吕洪涛,荣风年. 妊娠期外阴血管肌纤维母细胞瘤1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(11): 130-132.
[7] 田瑶天,王宝,李叶琴,王滕,田力文,韩波,王翠艳. 基于可解释性心脏磁共振参数的机器学习模型预测儿童心肌炎的预后[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 43-49.
[8] 刘学业,李齐明,唐弘毅,徐秋平,陈文倩,郭泾. 年轻成人颞下颌关节髁突体积、表面积与关节盘矢向位置的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 117-121.
[9] 张高瑞,张玉婷,赵雨萱,王方青,于德新. MnFe2O4@CNS纳米探针在胰腺癌诊疗一体化中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 48-55.
[10] 孙鼎琪,傅强,张辉,刘帅,刁统祥,曹庆伟,张克勤. 多参数磁共振与经直肠超声融合前列腺靶向穿刺活检在检测PI-RADS≥3前列腺癌中的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 108-113.
[11] 宋珍珍,孙小玲,李海鸥,王芳,张冉,于德新. 120例胶质瘤及瘤周水肿MRI影像组学在评估肿瘤复发中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 53-60.
[12] 陈晓丽,桂振朝,高杨,邢梦瑶,修建军. 13例涎腺导管癌的影像学表现分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 78-82.
[13] 吴强,何泽鲲,刘琚,崔晓萌,孙双,石伟. 基于机器学习的脑胶质瘤多模态影像分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 81-87.
[14] 孙珊珊,房雷,赵翠萍,钟庆,高翔,李玲. 伴可逆性后部脑病综合征MR表现的急性间歇性卟啉病1例报告并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(2): 118-121.
[15] 陆菁菁,夏宇. 子宫内膜异位症的影像学诊断[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(6): 40-45.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吕龙飞,李林,李树海,亓磊,鲁铭,程传乐,田辉. 腔镜下细针导管空肠造瘘在微创McKeown食管癌切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 77 -81 .
[2] 邵海港, 王璇, 王青. 山东地区人下颌第一前磨牙根管系统解剖研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(9): 85 -89 .
[3] 史爽,李娟,米琦,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 胃癌miRNAs预后风险评分模型的构建与应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 47 -52 .
[4] 李玉亮,王永正,王晓华,张福君,朱立东,张万明,李 征,李振家,张开贤 . 动脉灌注吉西他滨联合125I粒子胰腺内植入治疗进展期胰腺癌[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, 45(4): 393 -396 .
[5] 唐芳1,2 ,张颖倩3 ,王志强4 ,康殿民4 ,王洁贞1 ,薛付忠1 . 自然疫源性疾病疫源地空间结构的二维
最小生成树模型及其应用
[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(01): 106 -110 .
[6] 李洧,李道卫,叶茜,高顺翠,姜淑娟. 经支气管镜针吸活检在纵隔疾病诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(11): 1063 -1065 .
[7] 王晓菊1 ,汪明明2 ,徐皖苏2 ,赵胜梅3 ,崔速南2 ,李晓迎2 ,刘春华1
. 慢性HBV活动性感染者外周血淋巴细胞
泛素mRNA的表达及临床意义

[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2009, 47(02): 58 -61 .
[8] 王旭平,赵玲,冯玉新,商林珊,刘金成,曹伟朋,朱晓音,辛华. 绞股蓝总苷对谷氨酸诱导的胎鼠大脑皮层神经元氧化性损伤保护机制的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2006, 44(6): 564 -567 .
[9] 王学萍,杨洪玲. 洛汀新治疗高血压50例报告[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2007, (2): 213 .
[10] 朱晓丽1,郭淑玲1,苏磊1,冯玉新2,袁方曙1. 蠕形螨全蛋白提取及相对分子量鉴定[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(5): 58 -62 .