您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 77-81.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.060

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

血清miR-210在结直肠癌患者血清中的表达及临床意义

方茜, 曲爱林, 张欣, 杜鲁涛, 杨咏梅, 王传新   

  1. 山东大学齐鲁医院检验科, 山东 济南 250012
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-16 修回日期:2015-03-16 发布日期:2015-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 王传新。 E-mail: wcx6601@126.com E-mail:wcx6601@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81271916,81301506);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2013HM104);山东大学基本科研业务费专项资金(2014QLKY03)

Expression and clinical significance of miR-210 in the serum of patients with colorectal cancer

FANG Qian, QU Ailin, ZHANG Xin, DU Lutao, YANG Yongmei, WANG Chuanxin   

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-01-16 Revised:2015-03-16 Published:2015-06-10

摘要: 目的 探讨miR-210在结直肠癌(CRC)患者血清中的表达及临床意义。方法 通过逆转录实时荧光定量PCR(qRT-PCR)方法,检测48例CRC患者(CRC组)和40例健康体检者(对照组)血清miR-210的表达水平,分析其与临床病理参数的关系。通过检测CRC组中12例患者术前、术后1个月和术后复发时血清中miR-210的表达水平,分析其变化趋势。检测两组CEA和CA199的水平,通过ROC曲线比较miR-210、CEA、CA199对于CRC的诊断效能。结果 CRC组血清miR-210的表达水平高于对照组,并且与肿瘤大小、浸润程度、淋巴结转移、临床分期密切相关(P均<0.05),而与性别、年龄、肿瘤类型及肿瘤分化程度无相关性(P均 > 0.05)。CRC组中12例患者术后1个月血清miR-210的表达较术前降低(P < 0.001),术后复发时血清miR-210的表达较术后1个月升高(P < 0.001)。miR-210诊断CRC的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.835,其诊断效能高于CEA(AUC:0.672, Z=2.230, P < 0.05)和CA199(AUC:0.651, Z=2.427, P < 0.05)。miR-210诊断CRC的特异性为82.5%,敏感性为70.8%,诊断临界值为38.31,阳性预测值为82.9%,阴性预测值为70.2%,准确性为76.1%。结论 循环miR-210有望成为早期诊断结直肠癌的新的非侵入性分子标志物。

关键词: 结直肠癌, miR-210, 血清, 分子标志物

Abstract: Objective To explore the expression and clinical significance of miR-210 in serum of patients with colorectal cancer(CRC). Methods The expression levels of miR-210 in serum of 48 CRC patients(CRC group) and 40 healthy people(control group) were tested by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), followed by the analysis on the association of miR-210 expression levels with clinicopathological characteristics. The expression levels of miR-210 in serum of 12 patients in CRC group were determined before operation, at one month after operation and recurrence after operation. The expression levels of CA199 and CEA of the two groups were tested. The diagnostic value for CRC was evaluated by comparing the ROC curves of miR-210, CA199 and CEA. Results The expression level of serum miR-210 in CRC group was higher than that in control group, and the expression level of miR-210 in CRC group was associated with tumor size, local invasion, lymph nodes metastasis and clinical TNM stage (all P < 0.05). However, there was no significant correlation between miR-210 expression and gender, age, tumor type and differentiation(all P > 0.05). The expression levels of miR-210 in serum of 12 patients in CRC group at the first month after operation was lower than those before operation(P < 0.001), and its expressions in postoperative recurrence patients of CRC group were higher than that at the first month after operation(P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that AUC for miR-210 was 0.835, which was higher than that of CEA(AUC: 0.672, Z=2.230, P < 0.05) and CA199(AUC: 0.651, Z=2.427, P < 0.05), while the diagnostic specificity, sensitivity, cutoff value, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate of miR-210 were 82.5%, 70.8%, 38.31, 82.9%, 70.2% and 76.1%, respectively. Conclusion Circulating miR-210 might be used as a novel non-invasive biomarker for early diagnosis of CRC.

Key words: Serum, Biomarkers, Colorectal cancer, MiR-210

中图分类号: 

  • R735.3+4
[1] Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2014, 64(2): 104-117.
[2] Senore C, Ederle A, Fantin A, et al. Acceptability and side-effects of colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in a screening setting[J]. J Med Screen, 2011, 18(3):128-134.
[3] Khalid-de Bakker CA, Jonkers DM, Sanduleanu S, et al. Test performance of immunologic fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy compared with primary colonoscopy screening for colorectal advanced adenomas[J]. Cancer Prev Res (Phila), 2011, 4(10):1563-1571.
[4] Zhang L, Huang J, Yang N, et al. MicroRNAs exhibit high frequency genomic alterations in human cancer[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006, 103(24): 9136-9141.
[5] Zeng W, Tu Y, Zhu Y, et al. Predictive power of circulating miRNAs in detecting colorectal cancer[J]. Tumour Biol, 2014 Dec 20.[Epub ahead of print].
[6] Dong Y, Yu J, Ng SS, et al. MicroRNA dysregulation as a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2014, 6: 405-422.
[7] Boisen MK, Dehlendorff C, Linnemann D, et al. Tissue microRNAs as predictors of outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first line capecitabine and oxaliplatin with or without bevacizumab[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9 (10): e109430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109430. eCollection 2014.
[8] Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008, 105(30): 10513-10518.
[9] Ailin Q, Lutao D,Yongmei Y, et al. Hypoxia-inducible miR-210 is an independent prognostic factor and contributes to metastasis in colorectal cancer[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3): e90952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090952. eCollection 2014.
[10] 刘慧,杜鲁涛,杨咏梅,等. miR-182在结直肠癌中的表达及其对结直肠癌细胞迁移能力的影响[J].山东大学学报:医学版, 2013, 51(12):70-74. LIU Hui, DU Lutao, YANG Yongmei, et al. Expression of miR-182 in colorectal cancer and its effect on the migration of colorectal cancer cells[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2013, 51(12):70-74.
[11] Yang L, Belaguli N, Berger DH. MicroRNA and colorectal cancer[J]. World J Surg, 2009, 33(4):638-646.
[12] Heneghan HM, Miller N, Lowery AJ, et al. Circulating microRNAs as novel minimally invasive biomarkers for breast cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2010, 251(3):499-505.
[13] Crosby ME, Devlin CM, Glazer PM, et al. Emerging roles of microRNAs in the molecular responses to hypoxia[J]. Curr Pharm Des, 2009, 15(33): 3861-3866.
[14] Huang X, Ding L, Bennewith KL, et al. Hypoxia-inducible miR-210 regulates normoxic gene expression involved in tumor initiation[J]. Mol Cell, 2009, 35(6): 856-867.
[15] McCormick R, Buffa FM, Ragoussis J, et al. The role of hypoxia regulated microRNAs in cancer[J]. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 2010, 345:47-70.
[16] Redova M, Poprach A, Besse A, et al. MiR-210 expression in tumor tissue and in vitro effects of its silencing in renal cellcarcinoma[J]. Tumour Biol, 2013, 34(1): 481-491.
[1] 李波波 李道堂 刘曙光 王兴武. 食管癌患者血清中DKK-1的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 58-61.
[2] 张辉 时庆 侯怀水 李栋. 人脐带间充质干细胞的无动物血清培养及向肝细胞诱导分化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 88-.
[3] 李宁 张征 张宏群 高希宝. 济南居民膳食硒摄入量与血清硒参考值调查[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 121-122.
[4] 张媛 李英敏 冯月秋 常彩云 潘华伟 王束玫. 血清脂联素水平与肥胖、胰岛素抵抗的关系探讨[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 124-.
[5] 李宁,李娟,谢艳,李培龙,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 长链非编码RNA AL109955.1在80例结直肠癌组织中的表达及对细胞增殖与迁移侵袭的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 38-46.
[6] 刘京康,杨建勇,孟丽华,姜洁. 血清miR-17-92簇在HPV阳性宫颈癌中的早期诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(5): 86-90.
[7] 林栋,管庆波. 2型糖尿病男性患者血清睾酮水平低下对非酒精性脂肪肝的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(7): 33-37.
[8] 马琳,张冬,唐蕾,叶嗣源,焉传祝,曹丽丽. 肌萎缩侧索硬化预后相关的血液学标志物[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(4): 46-50.
[9] 张振堂,方立竹,薛在峰,赵丽,马东强,温红玲,刘建伟,张笑爽,于学杰. 2012年3月~2013年2月青岛市黄岛区肾综合征出血热流行特征[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(11): 82-86.
[10] 宓特,屈传强,王翔,尹苓,薛媛,杜怡峰. 血清淀粉样蛋白A与脑梗死急性期认知功能的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(10): 40-45.
[11] 张荣军, 韩波, 高聆, 朱梅, 丁国玉, 梁燕. siRNA沉默CD40基因对实验性自身免疫性心肌炎大鼠的作用及IL-22表达的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(5): 36-40.
[12] 于磊, 李振. 白细胞介素33在脑血管病患者血清中的表达及其作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(4): 75-79.
[13] 蔡晓青, 赵青云, 郭园园, 栾玉霞. 药物/聚合物微纳纤维的制备与释药性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(12): 33-37.
[14] 丁娟, 郑桂喜, 杜鲁涛, 尹作花, 张建, 王传新. 外周血sHLA-G与PGR、GPR联合检测在胃癌诊断中的效能评估[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(11): 59-63.
[15] 李宝丰, 章莹, 夏虹, 任东青, 郭国祯. 电磁脉冲辐照对大鼠血清Na+、K+、ALT、AST及左心室肌超微结构的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(11): 21-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!