您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (9): 101-107.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0315

• 主动脉疾病基础与临床研究进展专刊—临床研究 • 上一篇    

腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后发生髂支闭塞的危险因素及处理对策

王浙宇,许懿,赵昌波,杨硕菲,倪其泓,陈佳佺,王韦仑,李一男,郭相江,叶猛,张岚,薛冠华   

  1. 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院血管外科, 上海 200127
  • 发布日期:2024-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 薛冠华. E-mail:guanhuaxue@yeah.net
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82370497)

Risk factors and management for iliac branch occlusion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

WANG Zheyu, XU Yi, ZHAO Changbo, YANG Shuofei, NI Qihong, CHEN Jiaquan, WANG Weilun, LI Yinan, GUO Xiangjiang, YE Meng, ZHANG Lan, XUE Guanhua   

  1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
  • Published:2024-10-10

摘要: 目的 分析腹主动脉瘤主动脉腔内修复术(endovascular aortic repair, EVAR)后发生髂支闭塞的危险因素及处理对策。 方法 收集上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院2021年1月至2023年5月期间收治的191例接受EVAR的腹主动脉瘤患者的临床资料。采用病例对照匹配设计,根据性别、年龄和所使用的支架的商业类型按照1∶2比例将发生髂支闭塞与未发生髂支闭塞的病例进行匹配,作为病例组(n=26)和对照组(n=52)。采用单因素和条件Logistic回归,分析病例组与对照组相比发生髂支闭塞的危险因素。对髂支闭塞进行吸栓溶栓、球囊扩张或支架植入处理。 结果 EVAR术后13.61%(26/191)患者发生髂支闭塞并进行相应处理,其中1例患者在1个月后对侧再次出现髂支闭塞,2例患者吸栓后予以继续溶栓1 d后进行球囊扩张,所有患者术后髂动脉恢复血流。条件Logistic回归分析显示腹主动脉分叉直径<20 mm(OR=4.544,95%CI: 1.397~14.779)、术前髂总动脉严重扭曲(OR=5.971,95%CI: 1.528~23.336)及髂总动脉钙化>50%(OR=4.165,95%CI: 1.189~14.587)与髂支闭塞相关。 结论 腹主动脉直径<20 mm、术前髂总动脉严重扭曲和髂总动脉钙化>50%可能是EVAR术后髂支闭塞的独立危险因素。髂支闭塞经吸栓、球囊扩张或支架植入后可以得到明显改善。

关键词: 腹主动脉瘤, 腔内治疗, 移植物闭塞, 危险因素, 病例对照研究

Abstract: Objective To analyze the risk factors of iliac branch occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair(EVAR)for abdominal aortic aneurysm and the countermeasures. Methods Clinical data of 191 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm undergoing EVAR admitted to Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine between January 2021 and May 2023 were collected. Using a case-control matched design, the cases with and without iliac branch occlusion were matched in a 1∶2 ratio according to gender, age and commercial type of stent used, as the case group(n=26)and control group(n=52). Univariate and conditional Logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze the risk factors of iliac branch occlusion in the case group compared with the control group. Iliac branch occlusion was treated with thrombolysis, balloon dilatation or stent implantation. Results Iliac branch occlusion occurred in 13.61%(26/191)of the patients after EVAR, and the corresponding treatment was carried out. Among them, 1 patient had another limb occlusion in the contralateral side after 1 month, and 2 patients were given continuation of thrombolysis after thrombus aspiration for 1 day and then balloon dilatation was performed. All patients recovered blood flow from iliac artery after operation. Conditional Logistic regression analysis showed that abdominal aortic bifurcation diameter <20 mm(OR=4.544, 95%CI: 1.397-14.779), preoperative severe distortion of iliac artery before operation(OR=5.971, 95%CI: 1.528-23.336)and calcification of common iliac artery >50%(OR=4.165, 95%CI: 1.189-14.587)were associated with iliac branch occlusion. Conclusion Abdominal aorta diameter <20 mm, severe preoperative distortion of common iliac artery, and calcification of common iliac artery >50% may be independent risk factors for iliac branch occlusion after EVAR. It can be improved obviously after embolectomy, balloon dilatation or stent implantation.

Key words: Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Endovascular procedures, Graft occlusion, Risk factors, Case-control studies

中图分类号: 

  • R543.1
[1] Bogdanovic M, Stackelberg O, Lindström D, et al. Limb graft occlusion following endovascular aneurysm repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with the zenith alpha, excluder, and endurant devices: a multicentre cohort study[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2021, 62(4): 532-539.
[2] 原通, 司逸, 黄丽红, 等. 腹主动脉瘤患者腔内修复术后再入院预后因素分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2020, 58(11): 847-851. YUAN Tong, SI Yi, HUANG Lihong, et al. Analysis of prognosis factors for reintervention after endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. Chinese Journal of Surgery, 2020, 58(11): 847-851.
[3] De Freitas S, D’Ambrosio N, Fatima J. Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2023, 103(4): 595-614.
[4] Cochennec F, Becquemin JP, Desgranges P, et al. Limb graft occlusion following EVAR: clinical pattern, outcomes and predictive factors of occurrence[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2007, 34(1): 59-65.
[5] Faure EM, Becquemin JP, Cochennec F, et al. Predictive factors for limb occlusions after endovascular aneurysm repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2015, 61(5): 1138-1145.
[6] Sivamurthy N, Schneider DB, Reilly LM, et al. Adjunctive primary stenting of Zenith endograft limbs during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: implications for limb patency[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 43(4): 662-670.
[7] Hammond A, Hansrani V, Lowe C, et al. Meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of iliac limb occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2018, 68(6): 1916-1924.
[8] Moulakakis KG, Antonopoulos CN, Klonaris C, et al. Bilateral endograft limb occlusion after endovascular aortic repair: predictive factors of occurrence[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2018, 46: 299-306. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2017.07.019.
[9] Basra M, Hussain P, Li MM, et al. Factors related to limb occlusion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair(EVAR)[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2024, 99: 312-319. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.035.
[10] Armatowicz P, Szostek M, Jakuczun W, et al. Extra-anatomical bypass operation in patients with unilateral graft limb occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. Kardiol Pol, 2024, 82(1): 72-74.
[11] 厉祥涛, 张欢, 牛帅, 等. 腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后髂支闭塞的诊疗现状[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2019, 34(12): 1093-1096. LI Xiangtao, ZHANG Huan, NIU Shuai, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of iliac branch occlusion after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 34(12): 1093-1096.
[12] Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, et al. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2011, 41(Suppl 1): S1-S58.
[13] Troisi N, Donas KP, Weiss K, et al. Outcomes of Endurant stent graft in narrow aortic bifurcation[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2016, 63(5): 1135-1140.
[14] Marques De Marino P, Martinez Lopez I, Pla Sanchez F, et al. Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with narrow aortic bifurcation using Excluder bifurcated stent grafts[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2018, 67(1): 113-118.
[15] Bianchini Massoni C, Gargiulo M, Freyrie A, et al. Abdominal aortic bifurcation anatomy and endograft limb size affect the use of adjunctive iliac stenting after bifurcated endograft deployment for abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. J Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 59(2): 237-242.
[16] Veraldi GF, Mezzetto L, Vaccher F, et al. Technical success and long-term results with excluder/C3 endoprosthesis in narrow aortic bifurcations: first Italian multicentre experience[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2018, 52: 57-66. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2018.03.025.
[17] Briggs C, Babrowski T, Skelly C, et al. Anatomic and clinical characterization of the narrow distal aorta and implications after endovascular aneurysm repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2018, 68(4): 1030-1038.
[18] Orrico M, Ronchey S, Alberti V, et al. Outcomes of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in narrow aortic bifurcations using the ultra-low profile “INCRAFT” device: a retrospective multicenter study[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2020, 72(1): 122-128.
[19] Torrado J, Buckley L, Durán A, et al. Restenosis, stent thrombosis, and bleeding complications: navigating between Scylla and Charybdis[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 71(15): 1676-1695.
[20] Hu SQ, Li ZH, Shen DL, et al. Exosome-eluting stents for vascular healing after ischaemic injury[J]. Nat Biomed Eng, 2021, 5(10): 1174-1188.
[21] Mantas GK, Antonopoulos CN, Sfyroeras GS, et al. Factors predisposing to endograft limb occlusion after endovascular aortic repair[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2015, 49(1): 39-44.
[22] Wyss TR, Dick F, Brown LC, et al. The influence of thrombus, calcification, angulation, and tortuosity of attachment sites on the time to the first graft-related complication after endovascular aneurysm repair[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2011, 54(4): 965-971.
[23] Simonte G, Isernia G, Pecoraro F, et al. Rotational mechanical thrombectomy to treat iliac limb occlusion after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: the rotational mechanical thrombectomy Italian study[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2024, 35(1): 25-31.
[24] Chacko P, Hans SS, Nahirniak P, et al. Clinical patterns, predictors, and results of graft limb occlusion following endovascular aneurysm repair[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2023, 94: 341-346. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2023.02.014.
[25] Han XF, Liu GR, Li TZ, et al. Application of the AngioJet ultra thrombectomy device for the percutaneous mechanical treatment(PMT)of iliac limb occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair(EVAR)[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2022, 78: 161-169. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.016.
[26] 韩晓峰, 刘光锐, 李铁铮, 等. AngioJet机械吸栓治疗腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后髂支闭塞病变[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2020, 35(10): 801-805. HAN Xiaofeng, LIU Guangrui, LI Tiezheng, et al. AngioJet Ultra thrombectomy for the treatment of limb endovascular aortic graft occlusion[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 35(10): 801-805.
[27] Gong MF, Zhao Q, Jiang R, et al. AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy coupled with dose-reduced rt-PA for massive inferior vena cava filter-related thrombosis: a single-center retrospective study[J]. Asian J Surg, 2024, 47(1): 263-268.
[28] Freitas B, Steiner S, Bausback Y, et al. Rotarex mechanical debulking in acute and subacute arterial lesions[J]. Angiology, 2017, 68(3): 233-241.
[29] Pan T, Tian SY, Liu Z, et al. Combination of Rotarex®S rotational atherothrombectomy and drug-coated balloonangioplasty for femoropopliteal total In-stent occlusion[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2022, 80: 213-222. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.058.
[30] Rusch R, Trentmann J, Hummitzsch L, et al. Effectiveness and safety of percutaneous thrombectomy devices: comparison of rotarex and angiojet in a physiological circulation model[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2020, 59(6): 983-989.
[1] 卫任,郭伟. 腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗现状[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 13-18.
[2] 史潇兮,辛世杰. 腹主动脉瘤的开放手术[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 26-29.
[3] 霍正坤,孔祥骞,吴学君. 感染性主动脉瘤诊疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 42-48.
[4] 周永康,孙境,张帅,钱向阳. 胸腹主动脉瘤开放修复脊髓保护策略的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 49-54.
[5] 范立彬,张鸿坤. 腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后Ⅱ型内漏的预防及治疗进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 55-60.
[6] 牛帅,吴学君. 铁死亡在腹主动脉瘤中的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 74-79.
[7] 孙境,张帅,齐红霞,李远,周永康,胡可鉴,钱向阳. 常温自身动脉转流内脏优先策略在胸腹主动脉置换手术中的脊髓保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(9): 80-85.
[8] 郭鑫,孟君,郑世良,董秀红. 老年胃癌患者衰弱与人体成分的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 40-47.
[9] 李建,孙云. 新入维持性血液透析患者2年内死亡的危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 48-53.
[10] 宋甜田,李作坤,王书会. 个体化预测老年心脏瓣膜置换术后医院感染风险Nomogram模型的构建[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(1): 48-56.
[11] 曲永强,赵泽宇,吴兴原,韩玮,段瑞生,李衍滨,李亨. 颈动脉分叉处支架置入术后严重持续性低血压的危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(7): 78-82.
[12] 张晓慧,潘正论. 动脉瘤周围腹膜后纤维化1例并文献复习[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(6): 117-120.
[13] 宋晗,王振华,韦铎亮,徐凯,李博文,赵鑫. 术前MELD分级对304例急性StandfordA型主动脉夹层患者术后早期结局的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 31-36.
[14] 张蒙,马伟. 1990—2019年中国人类免疫缺陷病毒/获得性免疫缺陷综合征流行趋势及疾病负担[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 84-89.
[15] 穆彦熹,李金洲,陈康,梁红英,姚亚龙,汪文杰,陈晓. 443例胃癌根治术后发生肺部并发症的危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(4): 37-41.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!