16S rDNA基因序列分析在非哺乳期乳腺炎病原菌检测中的应用价值

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2017.418

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨16S rDNA基因序列分析在非哺乳期乳腺炎患者病原菌检测中的应用价值。方法采集33份非哺乳期乳腺炎标本,分别进行传统的细菌镜检、微生物培养与鉴定,并提取其DNA进行PCR扩增及16S rDNA测序分析。结果革兰染色法41.18%(7/17)查见G+细菌,35.29%(6/17)查见G-细菌。微生物培养仅1例阳性(1/5)且呈现两种细菌生长。16S rDNA测序阳性率为100%,其中39.39%(13/33)为混合细菌感染,27.27%(9/33)为假单胞菌属,6.06%(2/33)为kroppenstedtii.棒状杆菌,6.06%(2/33)为屎肠球菌,3.03%(1/33)为坚硬芽孢杆菌,3.03%(1/33)为芽孢八叠球菌,3.03%(1/33)为金黄色葡萄球菌,12.12%(4/33)为宏基因组文库细菌。结论应用16S rDNA测序技术检测非哺乳期乳腺炎病原菌具有简便快速、灵敏度高、特异性强等优点,且可为临床合理选择抗生素提供线索。

关键词: 16S rDNA, 非哺乳期乳腺炎, 细菌, 检测, 病因

Abstract: Objective To investigate the application value of 16S rDNA gene sequencing in detecting pathogens in patients with non-puerperal mastitis. Methods A total of 33 samples of non-puerperal mastitis were collected. Traditional bacteria microscopy examination, microbial culture and identification were conducted. Meanwhile, the DNA was extracted for PCR amplification and 16S rDNA gene sequencing analysis. Results Bacterial staining group: 17 samples were collected for Gram staining, 41.18%(7/17)of which were Gram positive, and 35.29%(6/17)were Gram negative. Microbial culture group: 5 pus samples were incubated, 1 of which was positive with 2 types of bacteria. 16S rDNA sequencing group: all 33 cases were positive, 39.39%(13/33)of which were mixed bacterial infections, 27.27%(9/33)were Pseudomous, 6.06%(2/33)were kroppenstedtii. corynebacterium, 6.06%(2/33)were faecium. Enterococci, 3.03%(1/33)were Bacillus firmus, 3.03%(1/33)were Sporosarcina, 3.03%(1/33)were Staphylococcus aureus, and 12.12%(4/33)were uncultured bacterium clone. Conclusion The application of 16S rDNA sequencing technique to detect pathogens in non-puerperal mastitis is safe, simple, highly sensitive and strongly distinctive. It may provide guidance for the rational use of antibiotics.

Key words: 16S rDNA, Non-puerperal mastitis, Bacteria, Detection, Pathogenesis

中图分类号:

R372

周飞,刘璐,刘丽媛,王斐,于理想,相玉娟,马忠兵,余之刚. 16S rDNA基因序列分析在非哺乳期乳腺炎病原菌检测中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(1): 57-61.

ZHOU Fei, LIU Lu, LIU Liyuan, WANG Fei, YU Lixiang, XIANG Yujuan, MA Zhongbing, YU Zhigang. Application of 16S rDNA gene sequencing in the detection of pathogens in non-puerperal mastitis[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2018, 56(1): 57-61.

参考文献

[1] 刘璐,周飞,于理想,等. 非哺乳期乳腺炎临床特征及危险因素分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2016, 36(7): 774-777. LIU Lu, ZHOU Fei, YÜ Lixiang, et al. An analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors for non-puerperal mastitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 2016, 36(7):774-777.
[2] Rahal RM, de Freitas-Junior R, Carlos dCL, et al. Mammary duct ectasia: an overview[J]. Breast J, 2011, 17(6): 694-695.
[3] Dabbas N, Chand M, Pallett A, et al. Have the organisms that cause breast abscess changed with time? Implications for appropriate antibiotic usage in primary and secondary care[J]. Breast J, 2010, 16(4): 412-415.
[4] Baslaim MM, Khayat HA, Al-Amoudi SA. Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: a heterogeneous disease with variable clinical presentation[J]. World J Surg, 2007, 31(8): 1677-1681.
[5] Aitken RJ, Hood J, Going JJ, et al. Bacteriology of mammary duct ectasia[J]. Br J Surg, 1988, 75(10): 1040-1041.
[6] 盖晓冬, 张凯, 陈少杰, 等. 乳腺导管扩张症72例细菌学研究[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2014, 17(4): 271-273. GAI Xiaodong, ZHANG Kai, CHEN Shaojie, et al. Bacteriological study on 72 cases of mammary duct ectasia[J]. Chin J Curr Adv Gen Surg, 2014, 17(4): 271-273.
[7] Boussier R, Rogez S, François B, et al. Two-step bacterial broad-range polymerase chain reaction analysis of heart valve tissue improves bacteriological diagnosis of infective endocarditis[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2013, 75(3): 240-244.
[8] Allen EK, Pitkäranta A, Mäki M, et al. Bacteria in the nose of young adults during wellness and rhinovirus colds: detection by culture and microarray methods in 100 nasal lavage specimens[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2013, 3(9): 731-739.
[9] Loong SK, Khor CS, Jafar FL, et al. Utility of 16S rDNA sequencing for identification of rare pathogenic bacteria[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2016, 30(6): 1056-1060.
[10] Yadav S, Kundu S, Ghosh SK, et al. Molecular analysis of methanogen richness in landfill and marshland targeting 16S rDNA sequences[J]. Archaea, 2015, 2015: 563414. doi:10.1155/2015/563414.
[11] 周飞, 余之刚. 非哺乳期乳腺炎性疾病的细菌学研究进展[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志, 2013, 7(3): 202-205.
[12] Ramalingam K, Srivastava A, Vuthaluru S, et al. Duct ectasia and periductal mastitis in Indian women[J]. Indian J Surg, 2015, 77(Suppl 3): 957-962.
[13] Cobo F, Rodríguez-Granger J, Sampedro A, et al. Breast abscess due to finegoldia magna in a non-puerperal women[J]. Anaerobe, 2017, 47: 183-184. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.06.001
[14] Rahal RM, Júnior RF, Reis C, et al. Prevalence of bacteria in the nipple discharge of patients with duct ectasia[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2005, 59(9): 1045-1050.
[15] Renshaw AA, Derhagopian RP, Gould EW. Cystic neutrophilic granulomatous mastitis: an underappreciated pattern strongly associated with gram-positive bacilli[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2011, 136(3): 424-427.
[16] Harris KA, Hartley JC. Development of broad-range 16S rDNA PCR for use in the routine diagnostic clinical microbiology service[J]. J Med Microbiol, 2003, 52(Pt 8): 685-691.
[17] Wang J, Gu J, Wang Y, et al. 16S rDNA gene sequencing analysis in functional dyspepsia treated with fecal microbiota transplantation[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2017, 64(3): e80-e82.
[18] Shin J, Lee S, Go MJ, et al. Analysis of the mouse gut microbiome using full-length 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 29681. doi: 10.1038/srep29681.
[19] Tian Y, Li YH. Comparative analysis of bacteria associated with different mosses by 16S rRNA and 16S rDNA sequencing[J]. J Basic Microbiol, 2017, 57(1): 57-67.
[20] Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2014, 12(9): 635-645.
[21] Longman CF, Campion T, Butler B, et al. Imaging features and diagnosis of tuberculosis of the breast[J]. Clin Radiol, 2017, 72(3): 217-222.
[22] Thimmappa D, Mallikarjuna MN, Vijayakumar A. Breast tuberculosis[J]. Indian J Surg, 2015, 77(Suppl 3): 1378-1384.
[23] Ramaema DP, Buccimazza I, Hift RJ. Prevalence of breast tuberculosis: Retrospective analysis of 65 patients attending a tertiary hospital in Durban, South Africa[J]. S Afr Med J, 2015, 105(10): 866-869.
[24] Walker AW, Martin JC, Scott P, et al. 16S rRNA gene-based profiling of the human infant gut microbiota is strongly influenced by sample processing and PCR primer choice[J]. Microbiome, 2015, 3: 26. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0087-4.
[25] Piotrowska A, Gosiewski T, Bulanda M, et al. Using of the 16S rDNA sequencing for identification of Lactobacillus species[J]. Med Dosw Mikrobiol, 2016, 68(1): 5-11.

相关文章 15

[1]	王陆敏,周士英,黄启坤,刘艳丽. DNAH5基因新发突变致原发性纤毛运动障碍1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 103-108.
[2]	陈峰,高沛,朱可嘉,丁森泰. 膀胱淋巴上皮瘤样癌1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 118-120.
[3]	石玉华,王秋敏,戚丹. 辅助生殖技术前沿研究热点及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(9): 97-102.
[4]	罗湘杭,周若玙. 骨质疏松的病因及发病机制研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 10-15.
[5]	董宏杰,张俊梅,王帅,王宏伟,张坤迪,胡玮,谢晓鸿,谢时灵,谷立川. 新型冠状病毒混合样品检测研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 1-5.
[6]	林玉玺,李传玺,王霖,马伟. 男男性行为人群性取向告知与艾滋病病毒检测:社会规范与自我效能的链式中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(3): 113-119.
[7]	付依林,郭田,宫颖,姚振宇,管庆波,徐潮,周新丽,张海清,郑冬梅,刘鲁娜,赵家军. 554例内分泌科住院患者低钾血症的病因和临床特点的回顾性分析:来自单中心的研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(10): 39-46.
[8]	戈宗元,贺婉佶,琚烈,姚轩,王璘,黄烨霖,杨志文,熊健皓,包怡宁,李明,张兵,赵昕. 眼科人工智能的算法新进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(11): 17-23.
[9]	牛占丛,王彦霞,王晓亚,王晓庆,李亚轻,边竞. 新型冠状病毒肺炎2例报告[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(10): 134-136.
[10]	李焕杰,欧兰香,陈虹,陈健,耿军,高志鹏,王岩,丁兴龙,陈振,朱之炜,刘伦琴,汪运山. 新型冠状病毒IgM-IgG抗体检测试剂盒的制备及对15例患者临床应用初试[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(10): 120-126.
[11]	刘荫华,赵婧祎,辛灵. 美国临床肿瘤学会多基因检测临床实践指南更新及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(1): 1-5.
[12]	余之刚,王斐. 乳腺癌多基因检测的再思考:机遇与挑战[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(1): 22-26.
[13]	薛付忠. 健康医疗大数据驱动的健康管理学理论方法体系[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(6): 1-29.
[14]	杜蘅,袁晓东. 阿尔茨海默病病因及发病机制研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(10): 21-27.
[15]	梁璐,梁凯,蒋玲,张晓黎. 两例家族性Gitelman综合征患者基因型和表型特点[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(12): 86-89.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed