您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报（医学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 56-61.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.986

• • 上一篇    下一篇

足月选择性剖宫产分娩新生儿不良结局的影响因素

洪海洁1,孙文娟1,张媛2,徐永萍1   

  1. 山东大学第二医院 1.产科;2. 循证医学中心, 山东 济南 250033
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-17 出版日期:2016-05-16 发布日期:2016-05-16
  • 通讯作者: 徐永萍. E-mail:xyp1117@sdu.edu.cn E-mail:xyp1117@sdu.edu.cn

Influencing factors of adverse outcomesin term neonates delivered by elective caesarean

HONG Haijie1, SUN Wenjuan1, ZHANG Yuan2, XU Yongping1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics;
    2. Center of Evidence-based Medicine, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-10-17 Online:2016-05-16 Published:2016-05-16

PDF (PC)

209

摘要： 目的 分析足月选择性剖宫产分娩的新生儿不良结局发生的影响因素。 方法 选择2011年11月至2014年10月在山东大学第二医院行选择性剖宫产的产妇及其新生儿的临床资料进行回顾性分析。收集产妇和新生儿的基本资料。新生儿不良结局包括需转入重症监护室(NICU)治疗和患呼吸系统疾病。利用t检验、卡方检验和二元Logistic回归进行统计学分析。 结果 共3 290例产妇及其新生儿纳入研究,其中250例新生儿需转NICU治疗,110例新生儿患呼吸系统疾病。影响新生儿转NICU的因素为:产妇产次、体质量指数(BMI)、分娩孕周和新生儿性别;影响新生儿呼吸系统疾病发生的因素为:产妇产次、分娩孕周和新生儿性别。有3次及其以上分娩史的产妇分娩的新生儿发生不良结局的风险明显升高。BMI较低的产妇分娩的新生儿需转NICU的风险降低。37+0~6周分娩的新生儿转NICU的发生风险是39+0~7周的1.9倍(OR=1.9,95%CI=1.2~3.0);37+0~6周和38+0~6周分娩的新生儿呼吸系统疾病的发生风险分别是39+0~7周的2.5倍(OR=2.5,95%CI=1.4~4.7)和1.8倍(OR=1.8,95%CI=1.1~2.7)。男性新生儿呼吸系统疾病和转NICU的发生风险分别是女性新生儿的2.2倍(OR=2.2,95%CI=1.4~3.4)和1.3倍(OR=1.3,95%CI=1.0~1.7),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 足月选择性剖宫产的最佳分娩孕周为39~40周;短时间出现产兆后进行的剖宫产未能减少新生儿不良结局的发生;男性新生儿不良结局的发生风险增加;BMI较高和有3次及以上分娩史的产妇分娩的新生儿不良结局发生风险增加。

关键词: 剖宫产, 选择性, 影响因素, 新生儿不良结局, 足月

Abstract: Objective To analyze the influencing factors of adverse outcomes in neonates delivered at term by elective caesarean. Methods Clinical data of mothers and babies delivered by elective caesarean section during Nov.1, 2011 and Oct.31, 2014 at the Second Hospital of Shandong University were retrospectively reviewed. The neonatal adverse outcomes were analyzed with t-test, chi-square test and logistic regression analysis, including transference to NICU and respiratory diseases. Results A total of 3,290 mothers and their neonates were enrolled, of which 250 neonates needed to be transferred to NICU, and 110 neonates developed a respiratory disease. The factors that caused the neonates to be transferred to NICU were parity, BMI, delivery gestational age and fetal sex. The factors that caused the neonates to develop a respiratory disease were parity, delivery gestational age and fetal sex. The risk of adverse outcomes in neonates whose mothers parity was three times and above was significantly higher. The risk of transference to NICU was lower in neonates delivered by mothers with smaller BMI. The risk of transference to NICU for neonates delivered in 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)54卷5期 -洪海洁,等.足月选择性剖宫产分娩新生儿不良结局的影响因素 \=-37+0-6 weeks was 1.9 times than those delivered in 39+0-7 weeks(OR=1.9, 95%CI=1.2-3.0). The risk of respiratory disease for neonates delivered in 37+0-6 weeks and 38+0-6 weeks were respectively 2.5 times and 1.8 times than those delivered in 39+0-7 weeks(OR=2.5, 95%CI=1.4-4.7 and OR=1.8, 95%CI=1.1-2.7). The risk of a respiratory disease and transference to NICU in male neonates were respectively 2.2 times and 1.3 times than in female neonates(OR=2.2, 95%CI=1.4~3.4 and OR=1.3, 95%CI=1.0-1.7). The differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05). Conclusion The best delivery gestational age for elective cesarean section is 39-40 weeks. Cesarean sections conducted shortly after onset of labor do not reduce the risk of neonatal adverse outcomes. The risk of adverse outcomes in male neonates is higher than in female neonates. The risk of neonatal adverse outcomes in mothers with higher BMI, or whose parity is three times and above is increased.

Key words: Term baby, Cesarean section, Elective, Neonatal adverse outcomes, Influencing factors

中图分类号: 

  • R719.8
[1] Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Lumbiganon P, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse shorter maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health [J]. BMC Med, 2010, 8: 71. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-71.
[2] Wilmink FA, Hukkelhoven CW, Lunshof S, et al. Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: a 7-year retrospective analysis of a national registry [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 202(3): 250.e1-8.
[3] Terada K, Ito M, Kumasaka S, et al. Timing of elective cesarean singleton delivery and neonatal respiratory outcomes at a Japanese perinatal center[J]. J Nippon Med Sch, 2014, 81(4):285-288.
[4] Doan E, Gibbons K, Tudehope D.The timing of elective caesarean deliveries and early neonatal outcomes in singleton infants born 37-41 weeks gestation[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2014, 54(4):340-347.
[5] Glavind J, Uldbjerg N. Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 27(2):121-127.
[6] 郭琦, 李雷, 边旭明. 足月择期剖宫产的时机与新生儿结局的分析[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2011, 14(1): 12-18. GUO Qi, LI Lei, BIAN Xuming, et al. Timing of elective cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes[J]. Chin J Perinat Med, 2011, 14(1):12-18.
[7] Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section[J]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1995, 102(2):101-106.
[8] Zanardo V, Simbi AK, Franzoi M, et al. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2004, 93(5):643-647.
[9] Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, et al. Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective cesarean section: cohort study[J]. BMJ, 2008, 336(7635):85-87.
[10] Kolas T, Saugstad OD, Daltveit AK, et al. Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 195(6):1538-1543.
[11] Senturk MB, Cakmak Y, Gündogˇdu M, et al. Does performing cesarean section after onset of labor has positive effect on neonatal respiratory disorders?[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2015, 18: 1-4.[Epub ahead of print].
[12] Glavind J, Kindberg SF, Uldbjerg N, et al. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial[J]. BJOG, 2013, 120(9):1123-1132.
[13] Vilchez G, Chelliah A, Argoti P, et al. Maternal race and neonatal outcomes after elective repeat cesarean delivery[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2014, 27(4):368-371.
[14] Chiossi G, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Timing of delivery and adverse outcomes in term singleton repeat cesarean deliveries[J]. Obstet Gynecool, 2013, 121(3):561-569.
[15] Hutcheon JA, Strumpf EC, Harper S, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after implementation of a hospital policy to limit low-risk planned caesarean deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation: an interrupted time-series analysis[J]. BJOG, 2015, 122(9):1200-1206.
[16] Ertugrul S, Gün I, Müngen E, et al. Evaluation of neonatal outcomes in elective repeat cesarean delivery at term according to weeks of gestation [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2013, 39(1):105-112.
[17] Mohammed AB, Bayo AI, Abu-Jubara MF. Timing of elective repeated cesarean delivery in patients with previous two or more cesarean section[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2013, 26(1):10-12.
[18] 刘洪莉, 漆洪波, 罗欣. 择期选择性剖宫产终止妊娠的时机及母儿结局[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2014, 17(4):224-229. LIU Hongli, QI Hongbo, LUO Xin, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes[J]. Chin J Perinat Med, 2014, 17(4):224-229.
[19] Melamed N, Hadar E, Keidar L, et al. Timing of planned repeat cesarean delivery after two or more previous cesarean sections-risk for unplanned cesarean delivery and pregnancy outcome[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2014, 27(5):431-438.
[20] Yee W, Amin H, Wood S. Elective cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory distress[J]. Obestet Gynecol, 2008, 111(4):823-828.
[21] Riskin A, Gonen R, Kugelman A, et al. Does cesarean section before the scheduled date increase the risk of neonatal morbidity?[J]. Isr Med Assoc J, 2014, 16(9):559-563.
[22] Carey MA, Card JW, Voltz JW, et al. The impact of sex and sex hormones on lung physiology and disease: lessons from animal studies[J]. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2007, 293(2):L272-278.
[23] Crane JM, Murphy P, Burrage L, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of extreme obesity in pregnancy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2013, 35(7):606-611.
[1] 范嘉音,赵迪,郭磊,贾莉英. 山东省三地家庭卫生筹资公平性探讨[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(9): 89-94.
[2] 李江冰,宋心红,林海燕,张冬芝,李向一,许艺博,王丽,薛付忠. 健康管理人群缺血性异常心电图的影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(6): 77-81.
[3] 赵丽婷,张晓菲,吕翠霞,董蕾,李琳,傅继华,王志萍. 山东省参与艾滋病防治社会组织工作人员从业年限及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(5): 112-116.
[4] 蔡远楚,王家林,张军,姚能亮,孙晓杰. 山东省5县癌症幸存者工作状况及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(4): 96-100.
[5] 张曼,马琳,阚艳敏. 数学方程法对足月胎儿出生体质量的预测[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(1): 92-96.
[6] 尚建强. 血管内介入在凶险性前置胎盘并胎盘植入患者剖宫产术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(9): 14-17.
[7] 李继军,左常婷,王谢桐,尚建强. 腹主动脉球囊阻断术在凶险性前置胎盘并胎盘植入剖宫产术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(9): 22-25.
[8] 仇杰,臧丽娇,庄根苗,安丽. 不同胎龄围生期窒息与多器官功能损伤的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(9): 64-68.
[9] 陈吴康,吕翠霞,张晓菲,董蕾,杜以慧,傅继华. 女性性工作者吸食冰毒情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(9): 73-76.
[10] 袁源,司珩,刘宏伟,刘春华,王哲,阮玉华,邢辉. 不同时期抗病毒治疗对艾滋病患者耐药产生的影响分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(9): 77-81.
[11] 叶聪. 冠状动脉旁路移植术后桡动脉桥血管通畅率的影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(8): 34-38.
[12] 盖林林,管立学,李海波,褚锦锦,朱芸,李明. 免疫性疾病患者T-SPOT.TB筛查结果及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(6): 82-86.
[13] 王艺桦,马琳,阚艳敏,王文韬. 剖宫产术后早期子宫切口缺陷的超声观察及相关因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(5): 39-44.
[14] 丁李路, 孙强. 我国卫生总费用影响因素通径分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(12): 86-89.
[15] 王亨, 李佳佳, 徐凌忠. 流动人口医疗保险参保影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(12): 90-93.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发