您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 92-96.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.703

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

数学方程法对足月胎儿出生体质量的预测

张曼,马琳,阚艳敏   

  1. 华北理工大学附属医院超声科, 河北 唐山 063000
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-13 出版日期:2017-01-10 发布日期:2017-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 马琳. E-mail: malinlsh@163.com E-mail:malinlsh@163.com

Estimation of birth weight of term fetus based on mathematical equations

ZHANG Man, MA Lin, KAN Yanmin   

  1. Department of Ultrasound, the North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, China
  • Received:2016-06-13 Online:2017-01-10 Published:2017-01-10

摘要: 目的 建立新的预测足月胎儿出生体质量(FW)的回归方程;比较新建方程与现有19种方程(5种临床参数方程及14种超声参数方程)的准确性。 方法 选取2015年10月~2016年4月于产前0~5 d在华北理工大学附属医院进行超声检查并住院分娩的单胎孕足月孕妇224例,收集孕妇的临床及超声资料。根据胎儿实际体质量,分为非巨大儿组(FW<4 000 g,n=183)和巨大儿组(FW≥4 000 g,n=41)。使用绝对误差评价不同方程预测FW的准确性。采用Pearson相关性分析及多重线性回归法建立新的回归方程,方差分析、LSD检验比较不同方程准确性。 结果 新建立了3个方程:临床参数方程、超声参数方程、联合参数方程。在非巨大儿组、巨大儿组及整体中预测FW绝对误差最小的均为联合参数方程:EFW = 40.39×宫高+84.60×AC+244.17×TCD+221.79×FSTT+141.98×LL+127.31×BPD-4 467.98。5种临床参数方程中,预测FW绝对误差最小的分别为卓晶如法(非巨大儿组、整体)和罗来敏法(巨大儿组);14种超声参数方程中,在非巨大儿组及整体中绝对误差最小的方程均为Hadlock FP(BPD, HC, AC, FL)法;在巨大儿组中为Merz E(BPD, AC)法。与已知方程相比,新建立的联合参数方程绝对误差最小(P<0.05)。 结论 联合参数方程可以较准确地预测FW,且与已知的19种方程比较,其预测FW的绝对误差最小。

关键词: 足月, 绝对误差, 胎儿体质量, 准确性, 回归方程

Abstract: Objective To establish a new accurate equation and to compare the accuracy with 19 kinds of known equations(5 clinical parameter equations and 14 ultrasonic parameter equations)for estimation of the birth weight of term fetus(FW). Methods A total of 224 term pregnant women with singleton between October 2015 and April 2016 in the North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital were included in the present study. They were divided into macrosomia group(FW<4 000 g, n=183)and non-macrosomia group(FW≥4 000 g, n=41). An ultrasound examination was performed 5 days before delivery. Clinical data and ultrasound data were collected. The data were analyzed with Pearson correlation analysis, multiple linear regression, analysis of variance, and LSD test. Results Three new equations were established: clinical parameter equation, ultrasonic parameter equation and joint parameter equation. Among them, the joint parameter equation showed the smallest absolute error in different groups, EFW(estimated FW)= 40.39×fundal height+84.60×AC+244.17×TCD+221.79×FSTT+141.98×LL+127.31×BPD-4 467.98. Among the 5 kinds of clinical parameter equations, Zhuo Jingru equation for the macrosomia group and the overall subjects, and Luo Laimin equation for the non-macrosomia group showed the smallest absolute error. Among the 14 kinds of ultrasound parameter equations, Hadlock FP(BPD, HC, AC, FL)for macrosomia group and the overall subjects, and Merz E(BPD, AC)for non-macrosomia group showed smallest absolute error. Conclusion The new established joint parameter equation can estimate FW more accurately.

Key words: Absolute error, Term, Regression equation, Fetal weight, Accuracy

中图分类号: 

  • R445.1
[1] 向淑真. 正常新生儿出生体重与分娩方式的关系[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2015, 30(1):72-74.
[2] 王小新, 姜海利, 邹丽颖, 等. 2221例新生儿出生体重影响因素分析[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2016, 44(4):89-91.
[3] Lindqvist PG, Molin J. Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 25(3):258-264.
[4] 樊云. 新生儿出生体重对产程进展及分娩结局的影响[J]. 江苏医药, 2015, 41(13):1581-1582.
[5] 张敏鸽, 刘明晖. 预测胎儿体重的研究进展[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2013, 21(2):123-127.
[6] 付敏丹, 俞美珍, 魏亚平. 不同公式估计胎儿体重准确性的对比研究[J]. 中外妇儿健康, 2011, 19(5): 153-154.
[7] Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements[J]. Radiology, 1984, 150(2): 535-540.
[8] 罗红, 周世英, 杨太珠, 等. 单项超声测量指标预测临产胎儿体重[J]. 华西医学, 2001, 16(2): 216-217.
[9] 关步云, 周郅隆, 刘棣临. 超声测量小脑横径监护胎儿生长发育的研究[J]. 中华医学杂志, 1992, 72(2): 55-57.
[10] 邓文, 丁依玲, 朱伏凡,等. 超声测量胎儿股骨皮下组织厚度预测胎儿体重的临床应用[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2003, 5(3): 331-333. DENG Wen, DING Yiling, ZHU Fufan, et al. Birth weight prediction for ultrasonic measurement of fetal thigh soft tissue thickness[J]. Journal of Chinese Physician, 2003, 5(3): 331-333.
[11] Warsof SL, Wolf P, Coulehan J, et al. Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1986, 67(4):569-673.
[12] Schild RL, Fell K, Fimmers R, et al. A new formula for calculating weight in the fetus of[13] Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements—a prospective study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1985, 151(3):333-337.
[14] Merz E, Lieser H, Schicketanz KH, et al. Intrauterine fetal weight assessment using ultrasound. A comparison of several weight assessment methods and development of a new formula for the determination of fetal weight[J]. Ultraschall Med, 1988, 9(1):15-24.
[15] Ott WJ, Doyle S, Flamm S, et al. Accurate ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Prospective analysis of new ultrasonic formulas[J]. Am J Perinatol, 1986, 3(4): 307-310.
[16] Combs CA, Jaekle RK, Rosenn B, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume[J]. Obstet Gyecol, 1993, 82(3): 365-370.
[17] Scioscia M, Scioscia F, Vimercati A, et al. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 31(3): 314-320.
[18] Mattsson N, Rosendahl H, Luukkaala T. Good accuracy of ultrasound estimations of fetal weight performed by midwives[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007, 86(6):688-692.
[19] Johnsen SL, Wilsgaard T, Rasmussen S, et al. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2006, 127(2):172-185.
[20] Casson RJ, Newland HS, Muecke J, et al. Gonioscopy findings and prevalence of occludable angles in a Burmese population: the Meiktila Eye Study[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2007, 91(7): 856-859.
[21] Kalantari M, Negahdari A, Roknsharifi S, et al. A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight[J]. Iran J Reprod Med Vol, 2013, 11(11): 933-938.
[22] 彭燕, 熊艳, 刘清,等. 巨大儿产前超声快速预测方法的探讨[J]. 上海医药, 2015, 36(3):49-51. PENG Yan, XIONG Yan, LIU Qing, et al. Exploration of the method for the antenatal rapid ultrasound prediction of macrosomia[J]. Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal, 2015, 36(3):49-51.
[23] Burd I, Srinivas S, Paré E, et al. Is sonographic assessment of fetal weight influenced by formula selection?[J]. Ultrasound Med, 2009, 28(8):1019-1024.
[24] 傅静,James F Cnota. 超声不同数学公式评估中国胎儿体重的准确性分析[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2014, 31(1):4709-4713. FU Jing, James F Cnota. Accuracy of fetal weight estimation by ultrasound with different formulas in localized Chinese population[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Physics, 2014, 31(1):4709-4713.
[25] Nicholas S, Tuuli MG, Dicke J, et al. Estimation of fetal weight in fetuses with abdominal wall defects: comparison of 2 recent sonographic formulas to the Hadlock formula[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2010, 29(9):1069-1074.
[26] Mirghani HM, Weerasinghe S, Ezimokhai M, et al. Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight at term: an evaluation of eight formulae[J]. Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2005, 31(5): 409-413.
[1] 仇杰,臧丽娇,庄根苗,安丽. 不同胎龄围生期窒息与多器官功能损伤的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(9): 64-68.
[2] 洪海洁,孙文娟,张媛,徐永萍. 足月选择性剖宫产分娩新生儿不良结局的影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(5): 56-61.
[3] 王蕊蕊,刘洪,刘东旭. 基于三维图像识别颅面部标志点的准确性及可靠性评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(9): 83-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!