十字花科蔬菜摄入量与肾细胞癌罹患风险的Meta分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2014.156

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的应用Meta分析方法定量评价十字花科蔬菜（CV）摄入量与肾细胞癌（RCC）罹患风险之间的关系。方法制定检索策略和文献的纳入排除标准，系统检索ProQuest、Web of Science、EMBASE和PUBMED数据库1966年1月至2013年12月间的文献。使用Stata 11.0软件应用随机效应模型和固定效应模型估计合并相对风险RR和相应的95%置信区间（CI）。通过Meta回归探讨异质性的潜在来源。同时应用亚组分析、累积Meta分析和敏感性分析。结果共12篇文献（6篇队列研究和6篇病例对照研究）符合纳入标准，1 228 518例研究对象（包括5 773例RCC病例）。文献汇总结果显示，CV摄入量与RCC罹患风险间的关联性差异有统计学意义[RR=0.81， 95%CI（0.72～0.91）]。亚组分析结果显示，美国人群中，CV摄入量与低RCC罹患风险明显相关[RR=0.77， 95%CI （0.70～0.86）]；欧洲人群中，CV摄入量与RCC罹患风险无明显的相关性[RR=0.87， 95%CI （0.71～1.07）]。结论 Meta分析的结果表明，美国人群摄入较高剂量的CV对RCC具有保护作用。

关键词: 肿瘤风险, 十字花科蔬菜, Meta分析, 肾细胞癌

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the association between cruciferous vegetables (CV) consumption and the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods After the retrieval strategy and criteria for inclusion and exclusion were formulated, databases of ProQuest, Web of Science, EMBASE and PUBMED were searched for literatures publicized during Jan. 1966 to Dec. 2013. Pooled relative risks (RR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by random-effect and fixed-effect models. Meta-regression was used to detect potential sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses, cumulative meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were also conducted. Results A total of 12 studies (6 case-control, 6 cohorts) were included in the analysis, involving 1 228 518 participants (5 773 RCC cases). An obvious negative correlation was found between CV and RCC risk [RR=0.81, 95% CI (0.72-0.91)]. In subgroup analyses, CV was obviously related to lower RCC risk among studies carried out in America [RR=0.77, 95%CI (0.70-0.86)]; nevertheless, CV had no obvious correlation with RCC risk among studies carried out in Europe [RR=0.87, 95%CI (0.71-1.07)]. Conclusion The results of the present Meta-analysis indicated that high consumption of CV is negatively correlated with RCC risk in Americans.

Key words: Cancer risk, Meta-analysis, Renal cell carcinoma, Cruciferous vegetables

中图分类号:

R692

赵龙, 关广聚. 十字花科蔬菜摄入量与肾细胞癌罹患风险的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(7): 82-89.

ZHAO Long, GUAN Guangju. Meta-analysis for consumption of cruciferous vegetables and the morbidity risk of renal cell carcinoma[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2014, 52(7): 82-89.

参考文献

[1] Chow W H, Dong L M, Devesa S S. Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2010, 7(5): 245-257.
[2] Jemal A, Bray F, Center M M, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2): 69-90.
[3] Conaway C C, Yang Y M, Chung F L. Isothiocyanates as cancer chemopreventive agents: their biological activities and Metabolism in rodents and humans[J]. Curr Drug Metab, 2002, 3(3): 233-255.
[4] Szaefer H, Krajka-Kuźniak V, Bartoszek A, et al. Modulation of carcinogen metabolizing cytochromes P450 in rat liver and kidney by cabbage and sauerkraut juices: comparison with the effects of indole-3-carbinol and phenethyl isothiocyanate[J]. Phytother Res, 2012, 26(8): 1148-1155.
[5] Saw C L, Cintrón M, Wu T Y, et al. Pharmacodynamics of dietary phytochemical indoles I3C and DIM: Induction of Nrf2-mediated phase II drug metabolizing and antioxidant genes and synergism with isothiocyanates[J]. Biopharm Drug Dispos, 2011, 32(5): 289-300.
[6] Kim S H, Sehrawat A, Singh S V. Dietary chemopreventative benzyl isothiocyanate inhibits breast cancer stem cells in vitro and in vivo[J]. Cancer Prev Res (Phila), 2013, 6(8): 782-790.
[7] Gerhauser C. Epigenetic impact of dietary isothiocyanates in cancer chemoprevention[J]. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 2013, 16(4): 405-410.
[8] Melchini A, Traka M H, Catania S, et al. Antiproliferative activity of the dietary isothiocyanate erucin, a bioactive compound from cruciferous vegetables, on human prostate cancer cells[J]. Nutr Cancer, 2013, 65(1): 132-138.
[9] Lee J E, Männistö S, Spiegelman D, et al. Intakes of fruit, vegetables, and carotenoids and renal cell cancer risk: a pooled analysis of 13 prospective studies[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2009, 18(6): 1730-1739.
[10] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement[J]. Int J Surg, 2010, 8(5): 336-341.
[11] Willett W C, Howe G R, Kushi L H. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies[J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 1997, 65(4 Suppl): 1220S-1228S; discussion 1229S-1231S.
[12] Higgins J P, Thompson S G, Deeks J J, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses[J]. BMJ, 2003, 327(7414): 557-560.
[13] Zhou Y, Zhuang W, Hu W, et al. Consumption of large amounts of allium vegetables reduces risk for gastric cancer in a meta-analysis[J]. Gastroenterology, 2011, 141(1): 80-89.
[14] Aune D, Lau R, Chan D S, et al. Nonlinear reduction in risk for colorectal cancer by fruit and vegetable intake based on meta-analysis of prospective studies[J]. Gastroenterology, 2011, 141(1): 106-118.
[15] Woolf B. On estimating the relation between blood group and disease[J]. Ann Hum Genet, 1955, 19(4): 251-253.
[16] DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials[J]. Control Clin Trials, 1986, 7(3): 177-188.
[17] Higgins J P, Thompson S G. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from Meta-regression[J]. Stat Med, 2004, 23(11): 1663-1682.
[18] Begg C B, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias[J]. Biometrics, 1994, 50(4): 1088-1101.
[19] Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test[J]. BMJ, 1997, 315(7109): 629-634.
[20] Bertoia M, Albanes D, Mayne S T, et al. No association between fruit, vegetables, antioxidant nutrients and risk of renal cell carcinoma[J]. Int J Cancer, 2010, 1269(6): 1504-1512.
[21] Brock K E, Ke L, Gridley G, et al. Fruit, vegetables, fiber and micronutrients and risk of US renal cell carcinoma[J]. Br J Nutr, 2012, 108(6): 1077-1085.
[22] Hu J, Mao Y, White K. Diet and vitamin or mineral supplements and risk of renal cell carcinoma in Canada[J]. Cancer Causes Control, 2003, 14(8): 705-714.
[23] Lee J E, Giovannucci E, Smith-Warner S A, et al. Intakes of fruits, vegetables, vitamins A, C, and E, and carotenoids and risk of renal cell cancer[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2006, 15(12): 2445-2452.
[24] Lindblad P, Wolk A, Bergstrom R, et al. Diet and risk of renal cell cancer: a population-based case-control study[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 1997, 6(4): 215-223.
[25] Maclure M, Willett W. A case-control study of diet and risk of renal adenocarcinoma[J]. Epidemiology, 1990, 1(6): 430-440.
[26] Rashidkhani B, Lindblad P, Wolk A. Fruits, vegetables and risk of renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study of Swedish women[J]. Int J Cancer, 2005, 113(3): 451-455.
[27] van Dijk B A, Schouten L J, Kiemeney L A, et al. Vegetable and fruit consumption and risk of renal cell carcinoma: results from the Netherlands cohort study[J]. Int J Cancer, 2005, 117(4): 648-654.
[28] Weikert S, Boeing H, Pischon T, et al. Fruits and vegetables and renal cell carcinoma: findings from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC)[J]. Int J Cancer, 2006, 118(12): 3133-3139.
[29] Daniel C R, Park Y, Chow W H, et al. Intake of fiber and fiber-rich plant foods is associated with a lower risk of renal cell carcinoma in a large US cohort[J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 2013, 97(5): 1036-1043.
[30] Hsu C C, Chow W H, Boffetta P, et al. Dietary risk factors for kidney cancer in Eastern and Central Europe[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2007, 166(1): 62-70.
[31] Yuan J M, Gago-Dominguez M, Castelao J E, et al. Cruciferous vegetables in relation to renal cell carcinoma[J]. Int J Cancer, 1998, 77(2): 211-216.
[32] Wu Q J, Yang Y, Vogtmann E, et al. Cruciferous vegetables intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. Ann Oncol, 2013, 24(4): 1079-1087.
[33] 陈朔, 王敏, 陈建, 等. 雷帕霉素对莱菔硫烷诱导人结肠癌细胞UGT1A同工酶及CYP3A4表达的调控[J]. 山东大学学报: 医学版, 2013, 51(11): 30-36.
[34] Wu Q J, Yang Y, Wang J, et al. Cruciferous vegetables consumption and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies[J]. Cancer Sci, 2013, 104(8): 1067-1073.
[35] Wu Q J, Xie L, Zheng W, et al. Cruciferous vegetables consumption and the risk of female lung cancer: a prospective study and a meta-analysis[J]. Ann Oncol, 2013, 24(7): 1918-1924.
[36] Liu B, Mao Q, Lin Y, et al. The association of cruciferous vegetables intake and risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. World J Urol, 2013, 31(1): 127-133.
[37] Liu B, Mao Q, Cao M, et al. Cruciferous vegetables intake and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Urol, 2012, 19(2): 134-141.
[38] 赵龙, 关广聚. 糖尿病肾病发病机制研究进展[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2013, 29(7): 554-558.

相关文章 15

[1]	林萍珍,薛娇美,杨蓓,李萌,周麦琳,曹枫林. 基于Pearson相关系数的癌症患者创伤后成长与心理适应相关性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(9): 110-121.
[2]	杜金阁,陈慧,杨孝荣,吕明. STAT4 rs7574865位点单核苷酸多态性与系统性红斑狼疮易感性Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(5): 95-102.
[3]	史培堃,曾贝妮,吴伟芳,胡晓燕,马天加,周亚滨. Keap1在肾细胞癌中的表达及其作用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(3): 94-99.
[4]	王丽丽,霍彬,王磊,汪浩,侯定坤,霍小东,王金焕,臧立,曹强,柴树德,王海涛. 亚肺叶切除联合¹²⁵I粒子植入治疗早期肺癌有效性的Meta分析与系统评价[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(10): 76-83.
[5]	徐闯,戚大春,李贤让,祖萌,李健,刘明廷. 初次髋关节置换术后引流与否的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(6): 43-49.
[6]	木哈达斯·吐尔逊依明,帕它木·莫合买提,托兰古丽·买买提库尔班. CDKAL1(rs10946398 C/A)基因多态性与2型糖尿病易感性关系Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(2): 75-85.
[7]	孙祥耀,海涌,张希诺. 经皮内固定术与传统后路开放内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折不良事件比较的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(11): 56-63.
[8]	苏静, 薛娇美, 孙菲菲, 郭兆新, 程翔宇, 孟力维, 刘照旭. 肾单位保留术和肾癌根治术治疗T1b期肾癌的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(9): 65-70.
[9]	刘京生, 刘桂华, 杜昆, 赵倩, 翁韶波, 赵学英, 张喜庄, 金讯波. 中国人群中血清TK1对不同恶性肿瘤诊断价值的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(9): 71-79.
[10]	吴珍, 宋国栋, 王伟. 他汀类药物对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺病治疗效果的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(2): 12-18.
[11]	王音, 马喆, 陶国伟, 刘韶平, 丁婷婷, 石琳琳. 关于产前诊断胼胝体发育不全患儿预后的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(10): 66-72.
[12]	孙媛媛, 高伟, 崔英, 张红, 焦建芬, 李衎, 徐瑞彩. 肿瘤化疗患者应用植入式静脉输液港与PICC效果比较的系统评价[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 53(10): 73-81.
[13]	许月芳, 刘皈阳, 张鑫. 氨曲南治疗下呼吸道感染疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(Z2): 198-200.
[14]	王威严, 杨清锐, 袁苑, 杨杏林, 张源潮. 类风湿关节炎与TNFAIP3基因多态性关联研究的meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(8): 75-80.
[15]	徐慧荣, 李健宁, 李增军, 徐忠法. 机器人手术与腹腔镜手术在直肠癌低位前切除术中疗效的Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 52(7): 60-65.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed