导航穿刺治疗17例脑出血致脑疝手术疗效分析

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2019.1334

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨神经导航辅助脑内血肿穿刺术对幕上高血压性脑出血合并脑疝征象的治疗效果及安全性。方法 2015年7月至2018年12月选取山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)符合纳入标准的33例患者,分成导航辅助微创穿刺组和传统开颅手术组进行血肿清除治疗,比较两组手术时间、血肿清除率及术后并发症发生率。采用格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)对患者的术前及术后第1天神经功能缺损情况进行评估,Modified Rankin Scale(mRS)评分作为患者术后的随访量表,评估患者术后的神经功能康复情况。结果两组患者在基线比较上无差别,在手术持续时间方面,微创穿刺组明显短于开颅组(P<0.01),而开颅组血肿清除率高于微创穿刺组(P<0.01)。术后第1天GCS评分差异无统计学意义(P=0.29),6个月后mRS评分差异有统计学意义(P=0.026),在再出血及脑积水并发症发生率方面,两组差异无统计学意义。结论神经导航辅助脑内血肿穿刺治疗幕上合并脑疝征象的脑出血具有操作迅速、安全、神经功能恢复更佳等特点,可以改善患者的预后。

关键词: 幕上脑出血, 脑疝, 微创手术, 神经导航, 预后

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neuronavigation-guided aspiration for large supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage complicated with hernia. Methods A total of 33 patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage treated during Jul. 2017 and Dec. 2018 were divided into 2 groups: neuronavigation-guided minimally surgery group(n=17)and craniotomy group(n=16). The operation time, evacuation rate and postoperative complications were compared. The preoperative and postoperative 1d neurological status were evaluated with Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS). The neurological recovery was evaluated with modified Rankin Scale(mRS). Results There were no significant difference in baseline parameters between the 2 groups. The neuronavigation-guided group had significantly shorter operation time but higher evacuation rate than the craniotomy group(P<0.01). There was no difference in postoperative 1d GCS(P=0.29). The mRS score was significantly improved in neuronavigation-guided group 6 months after surgery(P=0.026). There was no significant differences in the incidence of complications such as rehemorrhage and hydrocephalus. Conclusion Neuronavigation-guided minimally invasive aspiration is simple, safe and effective in the treatment of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage with hernia. It can facilitate recovery of neurological function and improve patients prognosis.

Key words: Supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage, Hernia, Minimally invasive surgery, Neuronavigation, Prognosis

中图分类号:

R743.34

张春云,何伟,姜彬,危兆胜,王志刚. 导航穿刺治疗17例脑出血致脑疝手术疗效分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 58(2): 44-48.

ZHANG Chunyun, HE Wei, JIANG Bin, WEI Zhaosheng, WANG Zhigang. Safety and efficacy of neuronavigation-guided minimally invasive aspiration for 17 patients of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage with hernia[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences), 2020, 58(2): 44-48.

参考文献 25

[1]	Heros RC. Cerebellar hemorrhage and infarction [J]. Stroke, 1982, 13(1): 106-109.
[2]	Arnone GD, Esfahani DR, Wonais M, et al. Surgery for cerebellar hemorrhage: a national surgical quality Improvement program database analysis of patient outcomes and factors associated with 30-day mortality and prolonged entilation [J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 106543-106550.
[3]	Broderick J, Connolly S, Feldmann E, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group [J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(6): 2001-2023.
[4]	Chartrain AG, Kellner CP, Fargen KM, et al. A review and comparison of three neuronavigation systems for minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2018, 10(1): 66-74.
[5]	Batjer HH, Reisch JS, Allen BC, et al. Failure of surgery to improve outcome in hypertensive putaminal hemorrhage. a prospective randomized trial [J]. Arch Neurol, 1990, 47(10):1103-1106.
[6]	Juvela S, Heiskanen O, Poranen A,et al. The treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. a prospective randomized trial of surgical and conservative treatment [J]. J Neurosurg, 1989, 70(5):755-758.
[7]	Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Fernandes HM, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage(STICH): a randomised trial [J]. Lancet, 2005, 365(9457): 387-397.
[8]	Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Rowan EN, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas(STICH II): a randomised trial [J]. Lancet, 2013, 382(9890): 397-408.
[9]	Hadjiathanasiou A, Schuss P, Ilic I, et al. Decompressive craniectomy for intracerebral haematoma: the influence of additional haematoma evacuation [J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2018,41(2):649-654.
[10]	Bhatia K, Hepburn M, Ziu E, et al. Modern approaches to evacuating intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2018, 20(12): 132. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-1078-4.
[11]	Fu C, Wang N, Chen B, et al. Surgical management of moderate basal ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage: comparison of safety and efficacy of endoscopic surgery,minimally invasive puncture and drainage, and craniotomy [J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 122:e995-e1001. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.192.
[12]	Hersh EH, Gologorsky Y, Chartrain AG, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2018, 18(6): 34.
[13]	Choo YS, Chung J, Joo JY, et al. Borderline basal ganglia hemorrhage volume: patient selection for good clinical outcome after stereotactic catheter drainage [J]. J Neurosurg, 2016, 125(5): 1242-1248.
[14]	Prasad K, Mendelow AD, Gregson B. Surgery for primary supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2008, 4: Cd000200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000200.
[15]	Awad IA, Polster SP, Carrion-Penagos J, et al. Surgical performance determines functional outcome benefit in the minimally invasive surgery plus recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation(MISTIE)procedure [J]. Neurosurgery, 2019, 84(6): 1157-1168.
[16]	Li Y, Yang R, Li Z, et al. Surgical evacuation of spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral hemorrhage: comparison of safety and efficacy of stereotactic aspiration, endoscopic surgery, and craniotomy [J]. World Neurosurgery, 2017, 105:332-340. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu. 2017.05.134.
[17]	陈俊瑜, 胡飞, 岑波, 等. 神经导航引导下硬通道多靶点穿刺引流治疗高血压脑出血48例疗效分析[J]. 华中科技大学学报(医学版), 2017, 46(1):72-75. CHEN Junyu, HU Fei, CEN Bo, et al. Clinical analysis of treatment of 48 cases with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage by hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage by flinty channel multi-target puncture and drainage guided by neural navigation [J]. Acta Medicinae Universitatis Scientiae et Technologiae Huazhong, 2017, 46(1):72-75.
[18]	Ge C, Zhao W, Guo H, et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of craniotomy and craniopuncture therapy for the early stage of moderate volume spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage in basal ganglia: using the CTA spot sign as an entry criterion [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2018, 169:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.04.002.
[19]	Eroglu U, Kahilogullari G, Dogan I, et al. Surgical management of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages: endoscopic versus open surgery [J]. World Neurosurgery, 2018, 114e60-e65. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.056.
[20]	Wang T, Guan Y, Du J, et al. Factors affecting the evacuation rate of intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia treated by minimally invasive craniopuncture [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2015, 134:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.020.
[21]	Algattas H, Kimmell KT, Vates GE. Risk of reoperation for hemorrhage in patients after craniotomy [J]. World Neurosurgery, 2016, 87:531-539. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.020.
[22]	Winkler EA, Minter D, Yue JK, et al. Cerebral edema in traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology and prospective therapeutic targets[J]. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2016, 27(4): 473-488.
[23]	Bareyre F, Wahl F, McIntosh TK, et al. Time course of cerebral edema after traumatic brain injury in rats: effects of riluzole and mannitol [J]. Journal of Neurotrauma, 1997, 14(11): 839-849.
[24]	Kuo LT, Chen CM, Li CH, et al. Early endoscope-assisted hematoma evacuation in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: case selection, surgical technique, and long-term results [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2011, 30(4): E9. doi:10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10313.
[25]	Liu LJ, Xue ZC, Yang GQ, et al. Optimal time window for minimally invasive aspiration and drainage of the hematoma in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage [J]. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue, 2004, 16(9): 544-546.

相关文章 15

[1]	李梓绮,魏闫若雪,刘晓晗,刘春铖,赵然,刘玉昆. 长链非编码RNA HEATR3反义RNA 1参与结直肠癌发生发展的功能及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 108-115.
[2]	刘保国,宋翔,赵晓文,毛亚丽. 血清STAT5B、NKAIN1 mRNA检测在乳腺癌中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 68-74.
[3]	王磊,常霄,王梓萌,李娇娇,崔书君,杨飞,朱月香. 瘤内及瘤周DCE-MRI影像组学对宫颈癌患者无进展生存期的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 45-54.
[4]	贾若曦,吕丽,刘涵云,吴寅平,李凤彩,赵泽华,王凯,范玉琛. 血细胞计数相关标志物对慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭患者28天预后的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 89-99.
[5]	杜雪,李春霞,刘云霞,张涛. 基于MFPC-Cox的结直肠癌患者预后动态预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(5): 101-110.
[6]	杨卫芳,徐宏,刘元涛,赵蕙琛. 促甲状腺激素受体抗体在Graves病复发中的作用机制及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(4): 116-121.
[7]	刘文钊,张远,马湘萍,魏峰涛,卜培莉. 内皮活化和应激指数预测值与心力衰竭患者死亡风险的关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(11): 27-35.
[8]	陈文亮,王欢欢,郝金锦,弓蕊,赵强,张飞,高磊,董静逊. lncRNA PVT1表达在胃癌预后评估及恶性进展中的作用:基于列线图模型与细胞功能实验的研究[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(10): 61-71.
[9]	郭姝画,樊扬,田风,王传新,杜鲁涛,李培龙,郭兴,徐硕. 微原纤维相关蛋白3在调控胶质瘤干细胞间充质表型转化中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(6): 9-16.
[10]	魏闫若雪,李梓绮,刘春铖,刘晓晗,赵然,刘玉昆. 结直肠癌中SP1的瘤内异质性表达及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(5): 89-94.
[11]	刘春铖,刘晓晗,魏闫若雪,李梓绮,刘玉昆,赵然. 结直肠癌中含溴结构域蛋白9的亚细胞定位模式及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(4): 24-30.
[12]	杨雪彦,吴寅平,吕丽,赵泽华,马行宇,李凤彩,王凯,范玉琛. 单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值动态变化对慢加急性乙型肝炎肝衰竭预后的诊断价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(3): 61-69.
[13]	刁玉洁,林琳,李文瑄,王洲洋,江蓓,胡迎迎,刘广义. NPR预测ANCA相关血管炎不良肾脏预后及其协同多因素优化模型[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 62(2): 60-68.
[14]	宋兆录,董正璇,彭传真,黄彩娜,胡克清,黄永胜,阎磊. 肾透明细胞癌中预后相关RNA编辑位点的筛选[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(9): 69-78.
[15]	刘艳,冷珊珊,夏晓娜,董昊,黄陈翠,孟祥水. 基于影像组学参数评估376例幕上自发性脑出血患者的功能状态[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2023, 61(5): 59-67.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed