您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (8): 34-43.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2021.1339

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于数据库构建乳腺癌焦亡相关基因的预后风险模型

贺士卿1,李皖皖1,董书晴1,牟婧怡1,刘宇莹1,魏思雨1,刘钊2,张家新2   

  1. 1.徐州医科大学, 江苏 徐州 221004;2.徐州医科大学附属医院甲乳外科, 江苏 徐州 221004
  • 发布日期:2022-07-27
  • 通讯作者: 刘 钊. E-mail:xylzhao9999@163.com张家新. E-mail:zhangjiaxin1969@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(16611622);中国乳腺肿瘤青年学者科研项目(CYBER-2021-010);徐州市重点研发计划(KG21218)

Construction of a prognostic risk model of pyroptosis-related genes in breast cancer based on database

HE Shiqing1, LI Wanwan1, DONG Shuqing1, MOU Jingyi1, LIU Yuying1, WEI Siyu1, LIU Zhao2, ZHANG Jiaxin2   

  1. 1.Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221004, Jiangsu, China;
    2. Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221004, Jingsu, China
  • Published:2022-07-27

摘要: 目的 探究焦亡相关差异表达基因(DEGs)在乳腺癌中预后价值并构建预后风险模型。 方法 从癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)和肿瘤基因表达数据库(GEO)官网下载乳腺癌的基因测序、临床数据,筛选焦亡相关DEGs。将乳腺癌患者进行聚类分析。在TCGA队列中以最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)方法建立模型。利用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线、受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)、单因素及多因素Cox回归独立预后因素分析等评价该模型。GEO队列为验证集。通过GO、KEGG、ssGSEA分析风险DEGs的富集情况。 结果 筛选出焦亡相关DEGs,聚类分析可见C2组总生存期(OS)延长,差异有统计学意义(P=0.020)。该模型K-M生存分析显示,高风险组OS缩短(TCGA队列中P<0.001,GEO队列中P=0.018)。ROC曲线下面积(AUC)表明该模型具有一定预测能力。单因素、多因素Cox回归分析表明,年龄、M、N分期和风险评分为OS的独立预测因子。GO、 KEGG富集与ssGSEA分析证实了风险相关DEGs与免疫炎症因子和通路有关。 结论 本研究构建了由9个焦亡相关基因组成的乳腺癌预后风险模型,为乳腺癌患者的风险预后评估提供了参考。

关键词: 乳腺癌, 焦亡, 免疫, 预后, 预测模型

Abstract: Objective To explore the prognostic value of pyroptosis-related differentially expressed genes(DEGs)in breast cancer and to construct a prognostic risk model. Methods Gene sequencing and clinical data of breast cancer were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas(TCGA)and Gene Expression Ominibus(GEO)to screen for pyroptosis-related DEGs. A cluster analysis was performed on breast cancer patients. The model of TCGA cohort was established by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO)method, which was then evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival curve, receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC), univariate and multivariate Cox regression independent prognostic factor analysis. The GEO cohort was used as the validation set. Enrichment of DGEs was analyzed with GO, KEGG, and ssGSEA. Results Pyroptosis-related DEGs were screened, cluster analysis showed that the overall survival(OS)of C2 group was prolonged, and the difference was statistically significant?(P=0.020). K-M survival analysis showed that OS was shortened in the high-risk group(P<0.001 in the TCGA cohort, P=0.018 in the GEO cohort). The area under the ROC curve(AUC)showed that the model had certain predictive ability. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression showed that age, M and N stage, and risk score were independent predictors of OS. GO, KEGG and ssGSEA analyses confirmed that pyroptosis-related DEGs were related to immune inflammatory factors and pathways. Conclusion This study constructed a prognostic risk model of breast cancer composed of 9 pyroptosis-related genes, which can provide reference for the risk and prognosis assessment of breast cancer patients.

Key words: Breast cancer, Pyroptosis, Immunity, Prognosis, Prediction model

中图分类号: 

  • R737.9
[1] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021 [J]. CACancer J Clin, 2021, 71(1): 7-33.
[2] Britt KL, Cuzick J, Phillips KA. Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention [J]. NatRev Cancer, 2020, 20(8): 417-436.
[3] Barzaman K, Karami J, Zarei Z, et al. Breast cancer: biology, biomarkers, and treatments [J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2020, 84: 106535. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106535.
[4] Liu X, Lieberman J. A mechanistic understanding of pyroptosis: the fiery death triggered by invasive infection [J]. Adv Immunol 2017, 135: 81-117. doi: 10.1016/bs.ai.2017.02.002.
[5] 胡颖超, 杨硕. 细胞焦亡的研究进展[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(8): 1245-1251. HU Yingchao, YANG Shuo. Advance in research of phroptosis [J]. 2021, 41(8): 1245-1251.
[6] Tan Y, Chen Q, Li X, et al. Pyroptosis: a new paradigm of cell death for fighting against cancer [J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2021, 40(1): 153.
[7] Ni J, Peng Y, Yang FL, et al. Overexpression of CLEC3A promotes tumor progression and poor prognosis in breast invasive ductal cancer [J]. OncoTargets Ther, 2018, 11: 3303-12. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S161311.
[8] Bakaeean B, Gholamin M, Tabatabaee Yazdi SA, et al. Novel biomarkers aim at detecting metastatic sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer [J]. Iran Biomed J, 2020, 24(3): 183-191.
[9] Ren C, Pan R, Hou L, et al. Suppression of CLEC3A inhibits osteosarcoma cell proliferation and promotes their chemosensitivity through the AKT1/mTOR/HIF1α signaling pathway [J]. Mol Med Rep, 2020, 21(4): 1739-1748.
[10] Tsunezumi J, Higashi S, Miyazaki K. Matrilysin(MMP-7)cleaves C-type lectin domain family 3 member A(CLEC3A)on tumor cell surface and modulates its cell adhesion activity [J]. J Cell Biochem, 2009, 106(4): 693-702.
[11] Miki M, Oono T, Fujimori N, et al. CLEC3A, MMP7, and LCN2 as novel markers for predicting recurrence in resected G1 and G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [J]. Cancer Med, 2019, 8(8): 3748-3760.
[12] Qi T, Qu J, Tu C, et al. Super-enhancer associated five-gene risk score model predicts overall survival in multiple myeloma patients [J]. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2020, 8: 596777. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.596777.
[13] Zhang G, Liu Y, Dong F, et al. Transcription/expression of KLRB1 gene as a prognostic indicator in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen, 2020, 23(7): 667-674.
[14] Qin R, Cao L, Ye C, et al. A novel prognostic prediction model based on seven immune-related RNAs for predicting overall survival of patients in early cervical squamous cell carcinoma [J]. BMC Med Genomics, 2021, 14(1): 49.
[15] Ma C, Luo H, Cao J, et al. Identification of a novel tumor microenvironment-associated eight-gene signature for prognosis prediction in lung adenocarcinoma [J]. Front Mol Biosci, 2020, 7: 571641. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.571641.
[16] Zheng M, Mullikin H, Hester A, et al. Development and validation of a novel 11-gene prognostic model for serous ovarian carcinomas based on lipid metabolism expression profile [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(23): 9169.
[17] Zhang Y, Di X, Chen G, et al. An immune-related signature that to improve prognosis prediction of breast cancer [J]. Am J Cancer Res, 2021, 11(4): 1267-1285.
[18] Park YJ, Ryu H, Choi G, et al. IL-27 confers a protumorigenic activity of regulatory T cells via CD39 [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2019, 116(8): 3106-3111.
[19] Wang L, Liu J, Tai J, et al. A prospective study revealing the role of an immune-related eRNA, WAKMAR2, in breast cancer [J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 15328.
[20] Ignacio RMC, Gibbs CR, Kim S, et al. Serum amyloid A predisposes inflammatory tumor microenvironment in triple negative breast cancer [J]. Oncotarget, 2019, 10(4): 511-526.
[21] Jiao J, Jiang L, Luo Y. N6-methyladenosine-related RNA signature predicting the prognosis of ovarian cancer [J]. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov, 2021, 16(3): 407-416.
[22] Liang J, Zhao W, Tong P, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins(IAPs)for therapeutic targeting in cancer [J]. BMC Med Genomics, 2020, 13(1): 7.
[23] Cao C, Lin S, Zhi W, et al. LOXL2 expression status is correlated with molecular characterizations of cervical carcinoma and associated with poor cancer survival via epithelial-mesenchymal transition(EMT)phenotype [J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10: 284. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00284.
[24] Shahi P, Wang CY, Chou J, et al. GATA3 targets semaphorin 3B in mammary epithelial cells to suppress breast cancer progression and metastasis [J]. Oncogene, 2017, 36(40): 5567-5575.
[25] Milioli HH, Sousa KS, Kaviski R, et al. Comparative proteomics of primary breast carcinomas and lymph node metastases outlining markers of tumor invasion [J]. Cancer Genomics Proteomics, 2015, 12(2): 89-101.
[1] 徐平 于国放 李霞. 不同类型甲状腺上动脉PSV对Graves病与桥本氏甲状腺炎鉴别诊断的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 62-64.
[2] 黄方 康瑞 吴春林. VEGFC、NF-κBp65及Survivin在鼻咽癌中的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 83-.
[3] 王欣,邢春燕,杨艳平. 血清磷酸丙酮酸水合酶检测对诊断侵袭性白念珠菌感染的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 92-94.
[4] 闫鹏 王蓉 杜怡峰 沈伦乾. 老年性痴呆患者尿中AD7c-NTP含量的研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2209, 47(6): 106-.
[5] 吴志晓,赵红洋. 孟德尔随机化分析免疫细胞表型与孤独症谱系障碍的因果关联[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(3): 83-92.
[6] 王建民,李晓峰,由志涛,董圣杰,赵宇驰,李占菊,邹德鑫,张剑锋,孙涛,杜伟. 基于可解释机器学习的后路腰椎椎体间融合术后慢性疼痛风险预测模型构建[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(2): 78-88.
[7] 古春青,郭睿思,周勤勤,刘恒辉,巴婉玉,孙士玲,王冰,郑玉玲,吴宿慧. 基于网络药理学和动物实验探讨酸枣仁-远志药对治疗乳腺癌相关性失眠的作用机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2026, 64(1): 99-108.
[8] 孙爽爽,仉率杰,张伯韬,袁莹,于媛媛,薛付忠. 基于真实世界研究的18~50岁人群急性缺血性卒中影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 40-46.
[9] 李梓绮,魏闫若雪,刘晓晗,刘春铖,赵然,刘玉昆. 长链非编码RNA HEATR3反义RNA 1参与结直肠癌发生发展的功能及其临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(9): 108-115.
[10] 申路佳,逯天威,巩伟明,赵岩松,王淑康,袁中尚. 代谢风险评分在2型糖尿病人群心血管结局预测中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(8): 69-78.
[11] 张政,王建伟,杨玉娟,张宇,宋西成. 哮喘儿童2008及2019年免疫球蛋白E变化及相关危险因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 32-36.
[12] 刘保国,宋翔,赵晓文,毛亚丽. 血清STAT5B、NKAIN1 mRNA检测在乳腺癌中的应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(7): 68-74.
[13] 王磊,常霄,王梓萌,李娇娇,崔书君,杨飞,朱月香. 瘤内及瘤周DCE-MRI影像组学对宫颈癌患者无进展生存期的预测价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 45-54.
[14] 王丽云,高天勤,刘雨佳,陈青,陈柳,沙凯辉. 基于机器学习产后压力性尿失禁风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 55-66.
[15] 王雪梅,杨豪,宋洋,程世超,张婷婷,王艳春. 抗糖尿病药物与女性恶性肿瘤的因果关联:一项两样本孟德尔随机化分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 63(6): 67-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!