Journal of Shandong University (Health Sciences) ›› 2021, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (7): 32-37.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.1671

Previous Articles    

Effect of Gn stimulation duration on pregnancy outcome of IVF-ET in long GnRHa protocol

WU Xiaolin, LI Ping   

  1. Women and Childrens Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, Xiamen 361000, Fujian, China
  • Published:2021-07-16

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of the duration of gonadotropin(Gn)in the controlled ovarian hyper stimulation(COH)cycle on the number of eggs obtained, embryo development, and pregnancy outcome in those with good ovarian response, and to analyze the possible factors that contributed to the prolongation of Gn use. Methods A total of 3 054 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer(IVF-ET)were divided into groups A, B, and C according to the days of Gn use(group A: Gn days≤7 d; group B: 8 d ≤Gn days ≤11 d; group C: Gn days ≥12 d).The baseline data, COH and pregnancy outcomes were compared. The possible factors leading to the prolongation of Gn use were analyzed with Logistics regression. Results The highest BMI and FSH levels were found in group C(P=0.001), while the lowest AMH and AFC levels were found in group C(P=0.022, 0.002). The Gn starting dose, total Gn dose and downregulation days in group A were the least among the three groups(P<0.001). There were no significant differences among the three groups in indicators related to COH treatment and pregnancy outcomes(P=0.86, 0.57, 0.91, 0.64). Logistics regression showed that higher BMI and Gn starting dose were risk factors of prolonged Gn use, while higher AMH and AFC, lower FSH level and shorter downregulation days were protective factors of prolonged Gn use. Conclusion The duration of Gn use has no significant effect on the pregnancy outcomes of IVF-ET. Higher BMI and Gn starting dose can significantly prolong Gn use, while higher AMH and AFC, lower FSH level and shorter downregulation days can significantly shorten Gn use.

Key words: Long GnRHa protocol, Usage days of gonadotropin, In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET), Pregnancy outcome

CLC Number: 

  • R711.6
[1] Sekhon L, Shaia K, Santistevan A, et al. The cumulative dose of gonadotropins used for controlled ovarian stimulation does not influence the odds of embryonic aneuploidy in patients with normal ovarian response [J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2017, 34(6): 749-758.
[2] Eskew AM, Jungheim ES. A history of developments to improve in vitro fertilization [J]. Missouri Medicine, 2017, 114(3): 156-159.
[3] von Wolff M. The role of natural cycle IVF in assisted reproduction [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2019, 33(1): 35-45.
[4] 吴雅琴, 陈士岭, 陈薪, 等. 卵泡发育迟缓周期中延长Gn用药时间对临床结局的影响[C].中华医学会第六次全国生殖医学学术会议专刊,2012: 1.
[5] 何艺磊, 杨硕, 乔杰, 等. 提高卵巢功能正常患者促排卵治疗卵巢反应性预测准确率: 一项诊断试验研究[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2018, 37(6): 454-473. HE Yilei, YANG Shuo, QIAO Jie, et al. Improving the prediction of ovarian response to ovulation Induction in patients with normal ovarian [J]. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018, 37(6): 454-473.
[6] 张玲, 黄玲玲, 李萍, 等. 短效激动剂长方案不同时期添加黄体生成素对IVF-ET结局影响的研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(24): 5895-5898.
[7] Revelli A, Casano S, Salvagno F, et al. Milder is better? advantages and disadvantages of “mild” ovarian stimulation for human in vitro fertilization [J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2011, 9(1): 25. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-25.
[8] Sarkar P, Ying L, Plosker S, et al. Duration of ovarian stimulation is predictive of in-vitro fertilization outcomes [J]. Minerva Ginecol, 2019,71(6): 419-426.
[9] Purandare N, Emerson G, Kirkham C, et al. The duration of gonadotropin stimulation does not alter the clinical pregnancy rate in IVF or ICSI cycles [J]. Ir J Med, 2017, 186(3): 653-657.
[10] Martin JR, Mahutte NG, Arici A, et al. Impact of duration and dose of gonadotrophins on IVF outcomes [J]. Repord Biomed Online, 2006, 13(5): 645-650.
[11] Erika MM, Amy ES, Zimmerman M, et al. High FSH dosing is associated with reduced live birth rate in fresh but not subsequent frozen embryo transfers [J]. Hum Reprod, 2017, 32(7): 1402-1409.
[12] Baker VL, Brown MB, Luke B, et al. Gonadotropin dose is negatively correlated with live birth rate: analysis of more than 650,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles [J]. Fertil Steril, 2015, 104(5): 1145-1152.
[13] Pal L, Jindal S, Witt BR, et al. Less is more: increased gonadotropin use for ovarian stimulation adversely influences clinical pregnancy and live birth after in vitro fertilization [J]. Fertil Steril, 2008, 89(6): 1694-1701.
[14] Chuang M, Zapantis A, Taylor M, et al. Prolonged gonadotropin stimulation is associated with decreased ART success [J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2010, 27(12): 711-717.
[15] Sekhon L, Shaia1 K, Santistevan A,et al. The cumulative dose of gonadotropins used for controlled ovarian stimulation does not influence the odds of embryonic aneuploidy in patients with normal ovarian response [J]. Assist Reprod Genet, 2017, 34(6): 749-758.
[16] 程丹, 杨菁, 熊承良, 等. 黄体中期GnRHa长方案中Gn刺激时间与IVF结局的关系[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版), 2013, 42(3): 294-298. CHENG Dan, YANG Qing, XIONG Chenliang, et al. Effect of gonadotropin stimulation time on IVF outcomes in GnRH agonist long protocol [J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2013, 42(3): 294-298.
[17] Kalem MN, Kalem Z, Sarı T, et al. Effect of body mass index and age on in vitro fertilization in polycystic ovary syndrome [J]. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, 2016, 17(2): 83-90.
[18] Wei Z, Cheng X, Li H, et al. Effects of prolonging administration gonadotropin on unexpectedly poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization [J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2010, 8: 26. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-8-26.
[19] Cao X, Chang HY, Xu JY, et al. The effectiveness of different down-regulating protocols on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in endometriosis: a meta-analysis [J]. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2020,18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00571-6.
[20] 刘铃铃, 刘振贤, 程虹. PCOS患者COH中不同时长Gn临床妊娠结局及Gn时间延长的相关因素分析[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2020, 28(9): 1462-1466. LIU Lingling, LIU Zhenxian, CHENG Hong. Analysis of the relative factors of clinical pregnancy outcomes and prolonged Gn duration of COH patients with different Gn duration [J]. Chinese Journal of Family Planning, 2020, 28(9): 1462-1466.
[21] Siristatidis CS, Gibreel A, Basios G, et al. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary suppression in assisted reproduction [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, 11(8): 1305-1305.
[22] 董方莉, 孙莹璞, 苏迎春, 等. 不同控制性超排卵方案中的卵泡发育不同步分析[J]. 生殖与避孕, 2010, 30(9): 596-599. FANG Lidong, SUN Yingpu, SU Yingchun, et al. Analysis of follicle developmental unsynchronization in the different protocols of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation [J]. Reproduction and Contraception, 2010, 30(9): 596-599.
[1] DENG Xiaohui, XU Yaxuan. Fertility evaluation and assisted reproduction in elder women [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2017, 55(1): 5-10.
[2] WANG Likui, SANG Hongai, MA Yuyan, XU Yintao, WANG Linlin. Clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a study of 66 cases with 67 pregnancies [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2014, 52(12): 69-72.
[3] . Effect of systematic prenatal health education and appropriate 
prenatal diagnosis on pregnancy outcome
[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2009, 47(9): 134-136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!