JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES) ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (9): 18-21.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.545

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prophylactic abdominal aorta arteries balloon occlusion in cesarean section for pernicious placenta previa and placenta increta in third trimester

ZHANG Chunhua, ZUO Changting, WANG Xietong   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-05-16 Online:2016-09-10 Published:2016-09-10

Abstract: Objective To explore the efficacy of prophylactic abdominal aorta arteries balloon occlusion in cesarean section for pernicious placenta previa and placenta increta. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in 140 cases of pernicious placenta previa and placenta increta admitted to our hospital during March 2003 and March 2016. The study group(n=111)underwent prophylactic abdominal aorta arteries balloon placement before cesarean section and occlusion after delivery. The control group(n=29)received conventional haemostasis druring cesarean section. The amount of blood loss and blood transfusion during operation, hysterectomy rate, infection rate and neonatal asphyxia rate of the two groups were compared with T test or Chi-square test. Results The volume of intraoperative hemorrhage and volume of intraoperative blood transfusion in the study group and control group were(2 139.19±1 533.748)mL vs(3 968.97±3 103.811)mL,(1 713.06±1 391.495)mL vs(3 237.93±2 461.186)mL,(P=0.004, P=0.003). The hysterectomy rate in the study group and control group was 18.01%(20/111)vs 79.31%(23/29),(P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in the infection rate and neonatal asphyxia rate(P=1.000, P=0.634). Conclusion Prophylactic abdominal aorta arteries balloon occlusion is effective in reducing intraoperative blood loss, transfusion and hysterectomy rate in patients with pernicious placenta previa and placenta increta.

Key words: Pernicious placenta previa, Balloon occlusion, Abdominal aorta arteries, Placenta increta

CLC Number: 

  • R714.7
[1] Chattopadhyay SK, Kharif H, Sherbeeni MM. Placenta praevia and accrete after previous caesarean section[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,1993, 52(3): 151-156.
[2] Huang G, Zhou R, Hu Y. A new suture technique for cesarean delivery complicated by hemorrhage in cases of placenta previa accreta[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2014, 124(3): 262-263.
[3] Silver RM, Fox KA, Barton JR, et al. Centre of excellence for placenta accreta[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212(5): 561-568.
[4] Hull AD, Moore TR. Multiple repeat cesareans and the threat of placenta accreta: incidence, diagnosis, management[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2011, 38(2): 285-296.
[5] Arduini M, Epicoco G, Clerici G. B-Lynch suture, intrauterine balloon, and endouterine hemostatic suture for the management of postpartum hemorrhage due to placentaprevia accrete[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2010, 108(3): 191-193.
[6] Hwu YM, Chen CP, Chen HS, et al. Parallel vertical compression sutures: a technique to control bleeding from placenta praevia or accreta during caesarean section[J]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 2005, 112(10): 1420-1423.
[7] Clausen C, Stensballe J, Albrechtsen CK, et al. Balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries in the multidisciplinary management of placenta percreta[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2013, 92(4): 386-391.
[8] Shrivastava V, Nageotte M, Major C, et al. Case-control comparison of cesarean hysterectomy with and without prophylactic placement of intravascular balloon catheters for placenta accrete[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 197(4): 402.e1-5.
[9] Levine AB, Kuhlman K, Bonn J. Placenta accreta: Comparison of cases managed with and without pelvic artery balloon catheters[J]. J Matern Fetal Med, 2009, 8(4): 173-176.
[10] Soyer P, Morel O, Fargeaudou Y, et al. Value of pelvic embolization in the management of severe postpartum hemorrhage due to placenta accreta, increta or percreta[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 80(3): 729-735.
[11] Palacios Jaraquemada JM, García Mónaco R, Barbosa NE, et al. Lower uterine blood supply: extrauterine anastomotic system and its application in surgical devascularization techniques[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2007, 86(2): 228-234.
[12] Ramoni A, Strobl EM, Tiechl J, et al. Conservative managementof abnormally invasive placenta: four case reports[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2013, 92(4): 468-471.
[13] National Radiological Protection Board. Board statement on diagnostic medical exposures to ionizing radiation during pregnancy[M]. Documents of the NRPB 4(4). London: HMSO, 1993.
[1] WANG Guangbin. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pernicious placenta previa [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(9): 7-9.
[2] TAO Guowei, WANG Xiaoling, SHI Linlin, DING Tingting. Diagnostic value of prenatal ultrasound in placenta accreta of different trimesters of pregnancy [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(9): 10-13.
[3] SHANG Jianqiang. Role of intravascular interventional therapy in cesarean section for pernicious placenta previa complicated with placenta accreta [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(9): 14-17.
[4] LI Jijun, ZUO Changting, WANG Xietong, SHANG Jianqiang. Application of abdominal aorta balloon occlusion in cesarean section for patients with pernicious placenta previa complicated by placenta accreta [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(9): 22-25.
[5] ZUO Changting, LIAN Yan. Review on diagnosis and treatment of pernicious placenta previa [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(9): 1-6.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!