山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 42-46.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2018.1341
• • 上一篇
张晓倩,孟祥水,任庆国,南晓敏,安盼盼,帅欣艳,夏晓娜,王璇
ZHANG Xiaoqian, MENG Xiangshui, REN Qingguo, NAN Xiaomin, AN Panpan, SHUAI Xinyan, XIA Xiaona, WANG Xuan
摘要: 目的 通过磁共振波谱成像技术(MRS)对非痴呆型血管认知功能障碍(VCIND)患者脑内代谢参数的测量,探讨脑内关键部位代谢改变与VCIND相关性。 方法 利用3.0T MRS检测 VCIND患者(n=38例,VCIND组)与正常查体者(n=44例,正常对照组)在双侧额叶、颞叶、丘脑、海马、基底节及扣带回区的N-乙酰天冬氨酸(NAA)、胆碱(Cho)、肌酸(Cr)值及NAA/Cr、Cho/Cr比值,比较两组优势半球的代谢改变并行统计学分析。 结果 与正常对照组相比,VCIND组优势半球颞叶、海马、丘脑及扣带回区NAA值和额叶、海马、丘脑、扣带回NAA/Cr比值均降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组优势半球不同部位Cho及Cho /Cr 值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); VCIND组内优势侧与非优势侧各部位间代谢参数值差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 NAA 及NAA/Cr 是检测VCIND的敏感指标,VCIND患者在脑内广泛代谢异常,但优势半球额叶、颞叶、海马、丘脑、扣带回代谢改变与VCIND密切相关。
中图分类号:
[1] Smith EE. Clinical presentations and epidemiology of vascular dementia[J]. Clin Sci(Lond), 2017, 131(11): 1059-1068. [2] 赵维纳, 韩璎. 血管性认知障碍的影像学研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2018, 13(7): 647-650. [3] 张晓倩, 孟祥水. 多模态功能MRI对血管性认知障碍的研究进展[J]. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2019, 42(1): 59-61. ZHANG Xiaoqian, MENG Xiangshui. Research progress of multi-modality functional magnetic resonance imaging on vascular cognitive impairment[J]. International Journal of Medical Radiology, 2019, 42(1): 59-61. [4] Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersenrc, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards[J]. Stroke, 2006, 37(9): 2220-2241. [5] Zhang C, Zhe Y, Lan T, et al. Study on epidemiology of cognitive dysfunction after stroke in the population over the age of 45 in Inner Mongolia[J]. Int J Neurosci, 2018, 128(7): 654-662. [6] 孙宇, 韩璎, 戴建平, 等. 血管性认知障碍诊断标准的演变与解读[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2017, 12(1): 13-17. [7] Sharma S. Translational multimodality neuroimaging[J]. Curr Drug Targets, 2017, 18(9): 1039-1050. [8] Joe E, Medina LD, Ringman JM, et al. 1H MRS spectroscopy in preclinical autosomal dominant alzheimer disease[J]. Brain Imaging Behav, 2018, 1: 1-8. doi:10.1007/s11682-018-9913-1. [9] Boban J, Kozic D, Turkulov V, et al. HIV-associated neurodegeneration and neuroimmunity: multivoxel MR spectroscopy study in drug-naive and treated patients[J]. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(10): 4218-4236. [10] Veenith TV, Mada M, Carter E, et al. Comparison of inter subject variability and reproducibility of whole brain proton spectroscopy[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(12): e115304. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115304. [11] 黄明明, 曹笑婉, 沈桂权, 等. 应用3.0 T 1H-MRS技术纵向评估血管性认知障碍大鼠脑内代谢物改变[J]. 磁共振成像, 2017, 8(9): 691-696. HUANG Mingming, CAO Xiaowan, SHEN Guiquan, et al. A longitudinal study of changes of brain metabolites in vascular cognitive impairment rats using 3.0 T 1H-MRS[J]. Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2017, 8(9): 691-696. [12] 刘娟, 李文, 王润榕, 等. 无痴呆型血管性认知障碍患者多体素质子磁共振波谱的诊断价值[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2010, 43(9): 607-611. LIU Juan, LI Wen, WANG Runrong, et al. A study of multi-voxel 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with vascular cognitive impairment no dementia[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurology, 2010, 43(9): 607-611. [13] Sullivan MO, Morris RG, Markus HS. Brief cognitive assessment for patients with cerebral small vessel disease[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2005, 76(8): 1140-1145. [14] Gong L, Hou Z, Wang Z, et al. Disrupted topology of hippocampal connectivity is associated with short-term antidepressant response in major depressive disorder[J]. J Affect Disord, 2018, 225: 539-544. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.086. [15] Ho TC, Sacchet MD, Connolly CG, et al. Inflexible functional connectivity of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in adolescent major depressive disorder[J]. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2017, 42(12): 2434-2445. [16] 陆强彬, 张慧萍, 朱祖福, 等. 血管性认知功能障碍磁共振波谱成像研究[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2016, 41(12): 1673-1675. LU Qiangbin, ZHANG Huiping, ZHU Zufu, et al. Study of the magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with vascular cognitive impairment[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical College, 2016, 41(12): 1673-1675. [17] Liu YY, Yang ZX, Shen ZW, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of amnestic mild cognitive impairment and vascular cognitive impairment with no dementia[J]. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen, 2014, 29(5): 474-481. [18] Chen SQ, Cai Q, Shen YY, et al. Hydrogen proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in multidomain amnestic mild cognitive impairment and vascular cognitive impairment without dementia[J]. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen, 2016, 31(5): 422-429. [19] 郑璐. 不同亚型aMCI的认知行为及脑影像学对比研究[D]. 北京: 北京师范大学, 2011. [20] Hamoda HM, Makhlouf AT, Fitzsimmons J, et al. Abnormalities in thalamo-cortical connections in patients with first-episode schizophrenia: A two-tensor tractography study[J]. Brain Imaging Behav, 2018: 17. doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9862-8. [21] Yan T, Yu JR, Zhang YP, et al. Analysis on correlation of white matter lesion and lacunar infarction with vascular cognitive impairment[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(8): 14119-14122. [22] Thaler A, Kliper E, Maidan I, et al. Cerebral imaging markers of GBA and LRRK2 related parkinsons disease and their first-degree unaffected relatives[J]. Brain Topogr, 2018, 31(6): 1029-1036. [23] Moreno-Alcázar A, Gonzalvo B, Canales-Rodríguez EJ, et al. Larger gray matter volume in the basal ganglia of heavy cannabis users detected by voxel-based morphometry and subcortical volumetric analysis[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2018, 9: 175. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018. 00175. [24] 于洋, 尹昌浩. 血管性认知障碍的多模态影像学研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学, 2016, 19(29): 3629-3633. YU Yang, YIN Changhao. Research progress of multi-modality imaging of vascular cognitive disorders [J]. Chinese General Practice, 2016, 19(29): 3629-3633. [25] Bella R, Cantone M, Lanza G, et al. Cholinergic circuitry functioning in patients with vascular cognitive impairment-no dementia[J]. Brain Stimul, 2016, 9(2): 225-233. [26] Zhu X, Cao L, Hu X, et al. Brain metabolism assessed via proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with amnestic or vascular mild cognitive impairment[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2015, 130: 80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.12.005. [27] Liu Q, Zhu Z, Teipel SJ, et al. White matter damage in the cholinergic system contributes to cognitive impairment in subcortical vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2017, 9(7): 47-56. [28] 谭子虎, 兰汉超, 杨琼, 等. 非痴呆型血管性认知功能障碍的磁共振波谱分析特点[J]. 临床神经病学杂志, 2013, 26(5): 325-328. TAN Zihu, LAN Hanchao, YANG Qiong, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy features of vascular cognitive impairment with no dementia[J]. Journal of Clinical Neurology, 2013, 26(5): 325-328. |
[1] | 陶国伟,王芳,董向毅,徐亚瑄,赵琳丽,胡蓓蓓. 子宫腺肌病的超声与MRI诊断及进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(7): 56-65. |
[2] | 冯宝民,王舟,徐晗,李佳存,于乔文,修建军. 抗髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白IgG抗体相关疾病临床及影像特征[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 45-50. |
[3] | 左立平,蒋丰洋,周斌彬,范金蕾,梁永锋,邓展昊,于德新. 术前MRI在预测169例肝细胞肝癌微血管侵犯及早期复发的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(3): 89-95. |
[4] | 刘学业,李齐明,唐弘毅,徐秋平,陈文倩,郭泾. 年轻成人颞下颌关节髁突体积、表面积与关节盘矢向位置的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 117-121. |
[5] | 张高瑞,张玉婷,赵雨萱,王方青,于德新. MnFe2O4@CNS纳米探针在胰腺癌诊疗一体化中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(4): 48-55. |
[6] | 宋珍珍,孙小玲,李海鸥,王芳,张冉,于德新. 120例胶质瘤及瘤周水肿MRI影像组学在评估肿瘤复发中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(11): 53-60. |
[7] | 陈晓丽,桂振朝,高杨,邢梦瑶,修建军. 13例涎腺导管癌的影像学表现分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(1): 78-82. |
[8] | 扈艳雯,王志媛,郁万江,赵蕙琛,韩合理,徐志鹏,马红,张玉超,刘元涛. 52例肥胖患者脂肪分布与代谢综合征及糖代谢指标的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 101-106. |
[9] | 张丽红,王林省,陈东风,陈月芹,李娴,刘艳杰,李磊. 肾脏混合性上皮间质瘤的CT和MRI表现[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(7): 70-75. |
[10] | 张丽红,李娴,王林省,李宏磊,李磊. 含脂肪节细胞神经瘤的影像学表现与病理对照[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(12): 73-78. |
[11] | 王玉红,张丽红,王林省,陈月芹,王彦辉,王皆欢,李传福. 消化道颗粒细胞瘤的影像学表现[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(8): 66-70. |
[12] | 许玉军,柳明,何祥萌,李成利. 1.0T开放型磁共振引导经皮穿刺125I放射性粒子植入治疗晚期胰腺癌[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(2): 21-25. |
[13] | 王耸,程洪斌,伊龙,王培申,孙宪昶,安沂华. 1 060例脑性瘫痪患者MRI表现及其与临床特征的关系[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2017, 55(12): 36-42. |
[14] | 王光彬. MRI在凶险性前置胎盘诊断中的价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(9): 7-9. |
[15] | 董金叶,林祥涛,曹金凤,吴勇,赵慧,谢辉辉,肖连祥. 16~42周胎儿脊髓颈膨大发育的MRI分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(5): 74-78. |
|