您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 34-41.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2018.1301

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

艾地苯醌联合治疗帕金森病疗效的临床观察

张晓韬1,2,何天齐1,2,朱梅佳2,唐吉友2,赵张宁2,毛飞2,方雨晴2,刘小民2,马高亭2,张小雨2,张霄2,王敏3,李秀华2   

  1. 1. 潍坊医学院, 山东 潍坊 261000;2. 山东大学附属千佛山医院神经内科, 山东 济南 250014;3. 山东师范大学生命科学学院动物抗性重点实验室, 山东 济南 250014
  • 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 李秀华. E-mail:lxh731023@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重大科技创新工程项目(2018CXGC1502);首都医科大学神经生物国家重点实验室开放课题(3500-112291)

Clinical observation of the effects of idebenone on Parkinsons disease

ZHANG Xiaotao1,2, HE Tianqi1,2, ZHU Meijia2, TANG Jiyou2, ZHAO Zhangning2, MAO Fei2, FANG Yuqing2, LIU Xiaomin2, MA Gaoting2, ZHANG Xiaoyu2, ZHANG Xiao2, WANG Min3, LI Xiuhua2   

  1. 1. Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261000, Shandong, China;
    2. Department of Neurology, Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology of Shandong Province, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-09-27

PDF (PC)

66

摘要： 目的 观察艾地苯醌(IDE)对帕金森病患者的运动及非运动症状的改善情况,探讨IDE对帕金森病患者的神经保护作用。 方法 选取帕金森病患者200例随机分为IDE治疗组(常规治疗+IDE治疗)和常规治疗组(常规治疗),分别监测两组治疗前及治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月统一帕金森评分量表(UPDRS)-Ⅲ(开期、关期)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MOCA)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)、帕金森非运动症状评价量表(NMSS)评分变化,监测治疗前及治疗后6、12、18个月血超氧化物歧化酶、血尿酸结果的变化。 结果 (1)IDE治疗组治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月UPDRS-Ⅲ(开期)评分分别为16.64±6.08、14.69±5.33 、12.81±4.73、11.04±3.95、9.66±3.43、8.47±3.09,常规治疗组治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月UPDRS-Ⅲ(开期)评分分别为16.79±6.44、15.64±6.16、14.58±5.86、13.54±5.56、12.41±5.11、11.16±4.65;治疗后9、12、15、18个月UPDRS-Ⅲ(开期)评分同一时间点相比较,IDE治疗组低于常规治疗组,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后3、6个月两组UPDRS-Ⅲ(开期)评分相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)IDE治疗组治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月UPDRS-Ⅲ(关期)评分分别为23.09±8.63、21.10±7.13、19.30±6.24、17.39±5.37、15.65±4.78、14.05±4.25;常规治疗组治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月UPDRS-Ⅲ(关期)评分分别为19.85±7.20、19.63±6.85、19.13±6.57、18.32±6.28、17.35±5.97、16.10±5.64;两组治疗后15、18个月UPDRS-Ⅲ(关期)评分同一时间点比较,IDE治疗组低于常规治疗组,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组治疗后3、6、9、12个月UPDRS-Ⅲ(关期)评分同一时间相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)IDE治疗组在治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月MOCA评分分别为21.68±4.59、23.02±3.60、24.39±2.66、25.30±2.12、25.94±1.81、24.72±2.23;常规治疗组在治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月MOCA评分分别为22.13±4.64、22.69±4.23、23.40±3.69、24.20±3.18、25.17±2.66、24.27±2.94;治疗后9、12、15个月MOCA评分同一时间点相比较,IDE治疗组高于常规治疗组,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组治疗后3、6、18个月MOCA评分同一时间点相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(4)IDE治疗组在治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月PSQI评分别为6.36±4.26、5.33±3.84、4.59±3.45、3.32±2.92、2.71±2.38、2.20±2.02,常规治疗组在治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月PSQI评分为6.12±4.19、5.25±3.85、4.50±3.50、3.51±3.27、3.26±3.03、3.04±2.84,两组治疗后18个月PSQI评分同一时间点相比较,IDE治疗组优于常规治疗组,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组治疗后3、6、9、12、15个月PSQI评分同一时间点比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(5)IDE治疗组在治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月NMSS评分分别为54.69±31.87、52.01±30.11、46.84±30.76、41.20±29.60、38.77±26.67、36.63±25.39;常规治疗组在治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月NMSS评分为54.56±33.26、52.42±32.02、50.38±30.65、46.97±28.05、43.18±24.65、41.03±23.48;两组在治疗后3、6、9、12、15、18个月NMSS评分同一时间相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(6)IDE治疗组在治疗后6、12、18个月血尿酸水平分别为(253.81±111.86)μmol/L、(272.56±111.04)μmol/L、(280.12±111.09)μmol/L,常规治疗组在治疗后6、12、18个月血尿酸水平分别为(217.82±103.24)μmol/L、(198.90±102.36)μmol/L、(191.97±101.81)μmol/L,两组治疗后6、12、18个月血尿酸水平同一时间点相比较,IDE治疗组优于常规治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(7)IDE治疗组在治疗后6、12、18个月血超氧化物歧化酶水平分别为(154.45±39.96)U/mL、(162.45±42.08)U/mL、(172.90±41.78)U/mL,常规治疗组在治疗后6、12、18个月血超氧化物歧化酶水平分别为(126.47±41.30)U/mL、(119.36±39.71)U/mL、(112.17±37.17)U/mL,两组治疗后6、12、18个月血超氧化物歧化酶水平同一时间点相比较,IDE治疗组优于常规治疗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 IDE能改善帕金森病患者的运动及部分非〓山〓东〓大〓学〓学〓报〓(医〓学〓版)57卷4期〓-张晓韬,等.艾地苯醌联合治疗帕金森病疗效的临床观察〓\=-运动症状,延缓病情的进展,对帕金森病具有一定的神经保护作用。

关键词: 帕金森病, 艾地苯醌, 氧化应激, 运动症状, 非运动症状

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of idebenone(IDE)on the motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with Parkinsons disease(PD)and to explore its neuroprotective effect. Methods A total of 200 PD patients were randomly divided into the IDE group(IDE+routine treatment)and routine group(routine treatment). The scores of Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating-III(on-stimulation), UPDRS-III(off-stimulation), Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MOCA), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI), and Non-Motor Symptoms Scale for Parkinsons Disease(NMSS)were monitored before treatment and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months after treatment. Furthermore, changes of plasma superoxide dismutase(SOD)and uric acid were detected before treatment and 6, 12 and 18 months after treatment. Results (1) In month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 after treatment, the score of UPDRS-III(on-stimulation)in the IDE group versus that in the routine group was 16.64±6.08 vs 16.79±6.44, 14.69±5.33 vs 15.64±6.16, 12.81±4.73 vs 14.58±5.86, 11.04±3.95 vs 13.54±5.56, 9.664±3.43 vs 12.41±5.11 and 8.471±3.09 vs 11.16±4.65, respectively. In month 3 and 6, there was no difference between the two groups (P>0.05). In month 9, 12, 15 and 18, the score was significantly lower in the IDE group than in the routine group(P<0.05). (2) In month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 after treatment, the score of UPDRS-III(off-stimulation)in the IDE group versus that in the routine group was 23.09±8.63 vs 19.85±7.20, 21.10±7.13 vs 19.63±6.85, 19.30±6.24 vs 19.13±6.57, 17.39±5.37 vs 18.32±6.28, 15.65±4.78 vs 17.35±5.97 and 14.05±4.25 vs 16.10±5.64, respectively. In month 3, 6, 9 and 12, there was no difference between the two groups(P>0.05). In month 15 and 18, the score was significantly lower in the IDE group than in the routine group(P<0.05). (3) In month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 after treatment, the MOCA score in the IDE group versus that in the routine group was 21.68±4.59 vs 22.13±4.64, 23.02±3.60 vs 22.69±4.23, 24.39±2.66 vs 23.40±3.69, 25.30±2.12 vs 24.20±3.18, 25.94±1.81 vs 25.17±2.66 and 24.72±2.23 vs 24.27±2.94, respectively. In month 3, 6 and 18, there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). In month 9, 12 and 15, the score was significantly higher in the IDE group than in the routine group(P<0.05). (4) In month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 after treatment, the PSQI score in the IDE group versus that in the routine group was 6.36±4.26 vs 6.12±4.19, 5.33±3.84 vs 5.25±3.85, 4.59±3.45 vs 4.50±3.50, 3.32±2.92 vs 3.51±3.27, 2.71±2.38 vs 3.26±3.03 and 2.20±2.02 vs 3.04±2.84, respectively. In month 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15, there was no difference between the two groups(P>0.05). In month 18, the score was significantly lower in the IDE group than in the routine group(P<0.05). (5) In month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 after treatment, the NMSS score in the IDE group versus that in the routine group was 54.6±31.87 vs 54.56±33.26, 52.01±30.11 vs 52.42±32.02, 46.84±30.76 vs 50.38±30.65, 41.20±29.60 vs 46.97±28.05, 38.77±26.67 vs 43.18±24.65, 36.63±25.39 vs 41.03±23.48, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). (6) In month 6, 12 and 18 after treatment, the level of uric acid in the IDE group versus the routine group was(253.81±111.86)vs (217.82±103.24)μmol/L,(272.56±111.04)vs (198.90±102.36)μmol/L, and(280.12±111.09)μmol/L vs(191.97±101.81)μmol/L, respectively. The level of uric acid was significantly higher in the IDE group than in the routine group(P<0.05). (7) In month 6, 12 and 18, the SOD level in the IDE group versus that in the routine group was(154.45±39.96)vs (126.47±41.30)U/mL,(162.45±42.08)vs (119.36±39.71)U/mL, and(172.90±41.78)vs (112.17±37.17)U/mL, respectively. The SOD level was significantly higher in the IDE group than in the routine group(P<0.05). Conclusion IDE can improve the motor and non-motor symptoms in PD patients and slow down the progression of the disease. It has a certain neuroprotective effect on PD.

Key words: Parkinsons disease, Idebenone, Oxidative stress, Motor symptom, Non-motor symptom

中图分类号: 

  • R574
[1] Sarkar S, Raymick J. Neuroprotective and Therapeutic Strategies against Parkinsons Disease: Recent Perspectives[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2016, 17(6): 904.
[2] Liu Y, Schubert DR. The specificity of neuroprotection by antioxidants[J]. J Biomed Sci, 2009, 16(1): 98-111.
[3] Bentinger M, Tekle M. Coenzyme Q-biosynthesis and functions[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2010, 396(1): 74-79.
[4] Geromel V, Darin N, Chrétien D, et al. Coenzyme Q(10)and idebenone in the therapy of respiratory chain diseases: rationale and comparative benefits[J]. Mol Genet Metab, 2002, 77(1-2):21-30.
[5] Leonardi A, Crasci L, Panico A. Antioxidant activity of idebenone-loaded neutral and cationic solid-lipid nanoparticles[J]. Pharm Dev Technol, 2015, 20(6): 716-723.
[6] 崔亚欢, 陈乃耀. 帕金森病的发病机制研究[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2019, 21(1): 106-110.
[7] 陈东万, 曹红元, 严家川, 等. 帕金森病患者血清氧化应激标志物的变化特点[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2015, 15(34): 6671-6674. CHEN Dongwan, CAO Hongyuan, YAN Jiachuan, et al. Characteristics of oxidative stress biomarkers in serum of patients with Parkinsons disease[J]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 2015, 15(34): 6671-6674.
[8] 王引明, 孔亮, 胡玲玲. 帕金森病患者尿酸、超氧化物歧化酶和血清营养指标的变化[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2013, 7(23): 76-77.
[9] 李晓鹏, 赵鹏, 钱进. 血尿酸与帕金森病的相关性及其作用机制研究进展[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建, 2018, 13(9): 464-466.
[10] 雷革胜, 苗建亭, 李柱一. 帕金森病血抗氧化系统变化及L-多巴的影响[J]. 中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志, 2002, 9(3): 172-173, 176. LEI Gesheng, MIAO Jianting, Li Zhuyi. The change of blood antioxidant system in parkinson disease and the influence of L-dopa[J]. Chinese Journal of Neuroimmunology and Neurology, 2002, 9(3): 172-173, 176.
[11] 许继平, 李玉莲, 蔺新英, 等. 帕金森病患者血液抗氧化功能的变化及多巴制剂与Vit E对其影响的研究[J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志, 2000, 17(1): 46-48. XU Jiping, LI Yulian, LIN Xinying, et al. The change of blood antioxidant function in Parkinson disease and the effect of Dopa and Vit E on it[J]. Journal of Apoplexy and Nervous Diseases, 2000, 17(1): 46-48.
[12] 王丽君, 罗蔚锋, 王恒会, 等. 帕金森病患者血尿酸水平[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2008, 41(3): 157-158.
[13] Rhodes SL, Buchanan DD, Ahmed I, et al. Pooled analysis of iron-related genes in Parkinsons disease: association with transferring[J]. Neurobiol Dis, 2014, 62(2): 172-178.
[14] Annanmaki T, Pessala-Driver A, Hokkanen L, et al. Uric acid associates with cognition in Parkinsons disease[J]. Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 2008, 14(7): 576-578.
[15] Schwarzschild MA, Schwid SR, Marek K, et al. Serum urate as a predictor of clinical and radiographic progression in Parkinson disease[J]. Arch Neurol, 2008, 65(6): 716-723.
[16] 王大勇. 血清尿酸水平与帕金森病运动障碍及左旋多巴治疗的效果观察[J]. 中国实用医药, 2018, 13(17): 141-142.
[17] Martignoni E, Blandini F, Godi L, et al. Peripheral markers of oxidative stress in Parkinsons disease the role of L-DOPA[J]. Free Radic Biol Med, 1999, 27(3-4): 428-437.
[18] Wieland E, Schütz E, Armstrong VW, et al. Idebenone protects hepatic microsomes against oxygen radical-mediated damage in organ preservation solutions[J]. Transplantation, 1995, 60(5): 444-451.
[19] Parkinson MH, Schulz JB, Giunti P. Co-enzyme Q10 and idebenone use in Friedreichs ataxia[J]. J Neurochem, 2013, 126(Suppl 1): 125-141.
[20] Gillis JC, Benefield P. Idebenone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in age-related cognitive disorders[J]. Drugs Aging, 1994, 5(2): 133-152.
[21] Curti D, Izzo E, Brambilla L, et al. Effect of a ubiquinone-like molecule on oxidative energy metabolism in rat cortical synaptosomes at different ages[J]. Neurochem Res, 1995, 20(9): 1001-1006.
[22] Sterky FH, Hoffman AF, Milenkovic D, et al. Altered dopamine metabolism and increased vulnerability to MPTP in mice with partial deficiency of mitochondrial complex I in dopamine neurons[J]. Hum Mol Genet, 2012, 21(5): 1078-1089.
[23] Horvath TL, Diano S, Leranth C, et al. Coenzyme Q induces nigral mitochondrial uncoupling and prevents dopamine cell loss in a primate model of Parkinsons disease[J]. Endocrinology, 2003, 144(7): 2757-2760.
[24] Yan A, Liu Z, Song L, et al. Idebenone Alleviates Neuroinflammation and Modulates Microglial Polarization in LPS-Stimulated BV2 Cells and MPTP-Induced Parkinsons Disease Mice[J]. Front Cell Neurosci, 2018, 12: 529.
[25] Di Prospero NA, Baker A, Jeffries N. Neurological effects of high-dose idebenone in patients with Friedreichs ataxia: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2007, 6(10): 878-886.
[1] 吴虹,张正铎,唐延金,祁少俊,高希宝. 5-甲基四氢叶酸对大鼠动脉粥样硬化的潜在干预作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(8): 6-13.
[2] 张秀芳,李沛铮,张博涵,孙丛丛,刘艺鸣. 生长分化因子15在LPS诱导的帕金森病模型中的保护作用及机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 1-7.
[3] 刘敏,张玉超,马小莉,刘昕宇,孙露,左丹,刘元涛. 孤核受体NR4A1在H2O2诱导小鼠肾脏足细胞损伤中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 16-21.
[4] 虎娜,孙苗,邢莎莎,许丹霞,海小明,马玲,杨丽,勉昱琛,何瑞,陈冬梅,马会明. 月见草油抵抗多囊卵巢综合征大鼠卵巢氧化应激[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(5): 22-30.
[5] 赵海龙,王皓,方雨晴,毛飞,赵张宁,田祥奇,徐新荣,王敏,李秀华. 增服艾地苯醌对34例帕金森病抑郁患者的疗效观察[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 38-44.
[6] 刘丽雯,马俊,李沛铮,张秀芳,刘艺鸣. 128例帕金森病照料者负担及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(4): 45-49.
[7] 黄辉宁,杜娟娟,孙燚,侯应龙,高梅. 硫化氢通过glutaredoxin-1调节氧化应激减轻急性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诱发房颤的机制[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(1): 1-5.
[8] 李敏启,杜娟,杨盼盼,寇雨莹,柳珊珊. 氧化应激调控骨质疏松症的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(6): 16-24.
[9] 刘淑丹,张飞燕,郭松林,梁雪云,陈冬梅. 氧化苦参碱改善缺氧缺血引起的HaCaT细胞氧化应激损伤[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(3): 26-34.
[10] 向琳,陈腊梅,王婧雯,李海铭,李浩宇,王菊,范玉琛,王凯. 30名健康志愿者饮用饮久舒对肝代谢酶的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(3): 81-85.
[11] 李湘青,殷欣,赵雪莲,赵培庆. NK细胞亚群CD56bright在帕金森患者外周血中的表达及临床意义[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(2): 34-40.
[12] 杜昊,程玉刚,黄鑫,刘少壮,张光永,胡三元. 袖状胃切除术对2型糖尿病大鼠肺组织损伤的影响[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 57(4): 20-26.
[13] 郭配,李秀华,张晓韬,何天齐,朱梅佳,唐吉友,赵张宁,毛飞. 伴有睡眠障碍帕金森病患者的睡眠特征及其影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(4): 76-80.
[14] 张秀玲,张磊,刘丹,梁江久. 山东汉族人群ApoE基因多态性与房颤的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2018, 56(3): 79-84.
[15] 勾云, 周波, 魏操,陈运华, 徐利,刘芬, 张春林, 文敏. 硫辛酸对帕金森病大鼠黑质线粒体的保护作用[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 55(8): 18-23.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发