您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报 (医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (3): 39-44.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2022.0087

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

面孔审美外显与内隐加工的神经机制——一项脑成像的激活似然估计法元分析

贾凡路*,张文君*,李开云,侯婷婷,林丰勋   

  • 发布日期:2022-03-09
  • 通讯作者: 贾凡路. E-mail:spe_jiafl@ujn.edu.cn 林丰勋. E-mail:sep_linfx@ujn.edu.cn*为共同第一作者.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(32100856;31800913);教育部人文社科(21YJC880028);济南大学博士基金资助项目(160100446)

Neural mechanisms of explicit and implicit face aesthetic processing: an activate likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies

JIA Fanlu*, ZHANG Wenjun*, LI Kaiyun, HOU Tingting, LIN Fengxun   

  1. Social Cognitive and Affective Brain Sciences Laboratory, School of Education and Psychology, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, Shandong, China
  • Published:2022-03-09

摘要: 目的 探讨面孔审美外显和内隐加工的神经机制的异同。 方法 对24项功能磁共振成像研究进行激活似然估计的元分析,检测了健康成年人在面孔审美加工相关任务中的大脑激活。研究首先通过独立的激活似然估计元分析分别识别面孔审美外显和内隐加工的大脑激活区域,后进行联合分析、差异分析,以评估两种加工之间共同的和独特的神经活动。 结果 独立的激活似然估计元分析结果显示,面孔审美外显加工激活了前扣带回,面孔审美内隐加工激活了左侧尾状核和前扣带回。联合分析结果显示,前扣带回在外显与内隐加工中都出现明显激活。而差异分析结果并未发现参与面孔审美的外显和内隐加工的大脑激活存在显著差异。 结论 奖赏区参与面孔审美的外显和内隐加工,前扣带回是支持面孔审美的重要脑区。面孔审美神经基础的确定为临床开展审美心理障碍干预提供了可靠的参数。

关键词: 外显加工, 内隐加工, 面孔审美, 奖赏系统, 激活似然估计元分析

Abstract: Objective To explore the neural mechanisms of explicit and implicit face aesthetic processing. Methods An activation likelihood estimation(ALE)meta-analysis of 24 neuroimaging experiments was performed, and brain activations of healthy adults in face aesthetic processing tasks were examined. Firstly, individual ALE meta-analysis was conducted to identify the brain activation regions underlying explicit and implicit face aesthetic processing. After that, conjunction analysis and subtraction analysis were conducted respectively to investigate the similarities or differences of neural systems between explicit and implicit face aesthetic processing. Results The individual ALE analysis showed that anterior cingulate cortex(ACC)involved in explicit face aesthetic processing, while implicit face aesthetic processing aroused the activations of left caudate nucleus and anterior cingulate gyrus. The conjunction analysis showed that the anterior cingulate gyrus was recruited for both implicit and explicit aesthetic processing. However, no significant difference was identified on the brain activities between implicit and explicit aesthetic processing in the subtraction analysis. Conclusion The reward area might involve in both explicit and implicit face aesthetics processing, and ACC might be a crucial brain region for face aesthetics. The determination of the neural basis underlying face aesthetics provides reliable parameters for clinical intervention of aesthetic psychological disorders.

Key words: Explicit processing, Implicit processing, Face aesthetics, Reward system, Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R395.1
[1] Lambrou C, Veale D, Wilson G. The role of aesthetic sensitivity in body dysmorphic disorder [J]. J Abnorm Psychol, 2011, 120(2): 443-453.
[2] 张小将, 刘迎杰, 刘昌. 面孔审美加工的神经机制及个体差异[J]. 心理科学, 2015, 38(3): 574-579. ZHANG Xiaojiang, LIU Yingjie, LIU Chang. The neural substrate underlying the aesthetic processing of facial beauty and individual differences [J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2015, 38(3): 574-579.
[3] Aharon I, Etcoff N, Ariely D, et al. Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence [J]. Neuron, 2001, 32(3): 537-551.
[4] ODoherty J, Winston J, Critchley H, et al. Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness [J]. Neuropsychologia, 2003, 41(2): 147-155.
[5] Liang X, Zebrowitz LA, Zhang Y. Neural activation in the “reward circuit” shows a nonlinear response to facial attractiveness [J]. Soc Neurosci, 2010, 5(3): 320-334.
[6] Kocsor F, Feldmann A, Bereczkei T, et al. Assessing facial attractiveness: individual decisions and evolutionary constraints [J]. Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol, 2013, 3(1): e21432.
[7] Chatterjee A, Thomas A, Smith SE, et al. The neural response to facial attractiveness [J]. Neuropsychology, 2009, 23(2): 135-143.
[8] Wager TD, Lindquist M, Kaplan L. Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data: current and future directions [J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2007, 2(2): 150-158.
[9] Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience [J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2013, 14(5): 365-376.
[10] Eklund A, Nichols TE, Knutsson H. Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2016, 113(28): 7900-7905.
[11] 徐华伟, 牛盾, 李倩. 面孔吸引力和配偶价值: 进化心理学视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(7): 1130-1138. XU Huawei, NIU Dun, LI Qian. Facial attractiveness and mate value: An evolutionary psychology perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1130-1138.
[12] Turkeltaub PE, Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, et al. Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analyses [J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2015, 33(1): 1-13.
[13] Winston JS, ODoherty J, Kilner JM, et al. Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness [J]. Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45(1): 195-206.
[14] Iaria G, Fox CJ, Waite CT, et al. The contribution of the fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in processing facial attractiveness: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence [J]. Neuroscience, 2008, 155(2): 409-422.
[15] Cloutier J, Heatherton TF, Whalen PJ, et al. Are attractive people rewarding? sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness [J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2008, 20(6): 941-951.
[16] Tsukiura T, Cabeza R. Remembering beauty: Roles of orbitofrontal and hippocampal regions in successful memory encoding of attractive faces [J]. NeuroImage, 2011, 54(1): 653-660.
[17] Cooper JC, Dunne S, Furey T, et al. Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex mediates rapid evaluations predicting the outcome of romantic interactions [J]. J Neurosci, 2012, 32(45): 15647-15656.
[18] McGlone F, Österbauer RA, Demattè LM, et al. The crossmodal influence of odor hedonics on facial attractiveness: behavioural and fMRI measures [M]. London: IntechOpen, 2013.
[19] Vartanian O, Goel V, Lam E, et al. Middle temporal gyrus encodes individual differences in perceived facial attractiveness [J]. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts, 2013, 7(1): 1-10.
[20] Smith DV, Clithero JA, Boltuck SE, et al. Functional connectivity with ventromedial prefrontal cortex reflects subjective value for social rewards [J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2014, 9(12): 2017-2025.
[21] Ueno A, Ito A, Kawasaki I, et al. Neural activity associated with enhanced facial attractiveness by cosmetics use [J]. Neurosci Lett, 2014, 566: 142-146. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.02.047.
[22] Pegors TK, Kable JW, Chatterjee A, et al. Common and unique representations in pFC for face and place attractiveness [J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2015, 27(5): 959-973.
[23] Shen H, Chau DKP, Su J, et al. Brain responses to facial attractiveness induced by facial proportions: evidence from an fMRI study [J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: e35905. doi: 10.1038/srep35905.
[24] 胡媛艳. 性别二态性对男性面孔吸引力感知偏好的影响[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2019.
[25] Bray S, ODoherty J. Neural coding of reward-prediction error signals during classical conditioning with attractive faces [J]. J Neurophysiol, 2007, 97(4): 3036-3045.
[26] Smith DV, Hayden BY, Truong T, et al. Distinct value signals in anterior and posterior ventromedial prefrontal cortex [J]. J Neurosci, 2010, 30(7): 2490-2495.
[27] 翟洪昌, 张维, 苏经宇. 面孔吸引力加工的功能磁共振成像[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2010, 40(6): 551-560. ZHAI Hongchang, ZHANG Wei, SU Jingyu. Functional MRI of the perception of facial attractiveness [J]. Scientia Sinica Vitae, 2010, 40(6): 551-560.
[28] Yu H, Zhou Z, Zhou X. The amygdalostriatal and corticostriatal effective connectivity in anticipation and evaluation of facial attractiveness [J]. Brain Cogn, 2013, 82(3): 291-300.
[29] Ito A, Abe N, Kawachi Y, et al. Distinct neural correlates of the preference-related valuation of supraliminally and subliminally presented faces [J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2015, 36(8): 2865-2877.
[30] Wang T, Mo L, Mo C, et al. Is moral beauty different from facial beauty? Evidence from an fMRI study [J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2015, 10(6): 814-823.
[31] Rolls ET. The cingulate cortex and limbic systems for emotion, action, and memory [J]. Brain Struct Funct, 2019, 224(9): 3001-3018.
[32] McCabe C, Rolls ET, Bilderbeck A, et al. Cognitive influences on the affective representation of touch and the sight of touch in the human brain [J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2008, 3(2): 97-108.
[33] Nan JW, Frangos E, Komisaruk BR. Brain activity unique to orgasm in women: an fMRI analysis [J]. J Sex Med, 2017, 14(11): 1380-1391.
[34] Bush G, Vogt BA, Holmes J, et al. Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: A role in reward-based decision making [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2002, 99(1): 523-528.
[35] 邹立巍. 大学生手机使用依赖与抑郁症状关联及脑结构与奖赏环路相关功能变化调节效应的随访研究 [D]. 合肥: 安徽医科大学, 2021.
[36] 张焱. 海洛因成瘾者前扣带回神经网络静息态功能磁共振研究 [D]. 西安: 第四军医大学, 2012.
[37] 丁伟娜, 孙锦华, 孙雅文, 等. 青少年网络游戏成瘾奖赏系统的fMRI研究 [J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2013, 32(9): 1126-1129. DING Weina, SUN Jinhua, SUN Yawen, et al. The fMRI study of reward system in adolescents with internet gaming addiction [J]. Journal of Clinical Radiololgy, 2013, 32(9): 1126-1129.
[38] Hahn AC, Perrett DI. Neural and behavioral responses to attractiveness in adult and infant faces [J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2014, 46: 591-603.
[39] Bromberger B, Sternschein R, Widick P, et al. The right hemisphere in esthetic perception [J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2011, 5: e109. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00109.
[40] Yang T, Formuli A, Paolini M, et al. The neural determinants of beauty [J]. Eur J Neurosci, 2022, 55(1): 91-106.
[1] 叶艺,张洁,赵秋阁,范秀珍. 老年服务择业动机量表在毕业学年大学生中的修订及信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2022, 60(2): 75-80.
[2] 孙富云,王维鹏,张会会,耿艳,安小霞,李双双,张彬彬. 结直肠癌术后患者人格特质与抑郁、焦虑症状的关联性[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2021, 59(7): 91-96.
[3] 潘芳. 基于不同理论模式的老年人心理健康评估的研究进展[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 1-5.
[4] 李长瑾,洪炜,赵佳,甘伟. 老年人生活质量与心理弹性的关系及领悟社会支持的中介作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 6-10.
[5] 李花芳,张红静. 中文版文化价值取向量表信效度检验及其与心理健康的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 122-127.
[6] 张伯华,王玥,杨永信,宋婧杰,张胜伟,胡霜,盛洁,谭梦,冯晔. 基于中医人格分型的网瘾交往障碍者抑制控制能力的ERP研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(11): 76-81.
[7] 余慧慧, 雷震, 王淑康, 潘芳. 老年高血压与糖尿病共病患者的不良情绪与相关因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(12): 81-85,96.
[8] 张灿灿, 苏永刚, 张红静. 文化适应压力量表中文版的修订[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(11): 89-94.
[9] 余慧慧, 雷震, 路翠艳, 江虹, 王淑康, 潘芳. 团体心理干预对糖尿病患者心理和生理状况的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(5): 89-94.
[10] 雷震,江虹,尹世平,丁娟,潘芳. 积极心理干预对社区老年人心理健康与幸福感水平的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2014, 52(2): 93-96.
[11] 张伯华,胡霜,盛洁. 中医院校大学生网络成瘾与五态人格的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(9): 105-108.
[12] 丁娟,江虹,潘芳. 癫痫患者婚姻质量与心理应激的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(8): 99-102.
[13] 陈瑨1,祁珍华1,江虹1,张灿灿1,江平胤2,党红梅2,赵鹏2,张红静1 . 脑卒中偏瘫患者D型人格特征[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(2): 104-.
[14] 张宇哲1,江虹1,孙琳1,李青1,孙华2,于洪鸾1,高进1,潘芳1. 长期低剂量氯胺酮对青年早期食蟹猴自发活动和丘脑神经细胞凋亡的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(8): 26-.
[15] 吕丽1,江虹1,李文杰1,陈翠2,张红静1. 突发性耳聋患者的情绪特征及应对方式[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(7): 155-158.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!