基于中医人格分型的网瘾交往障碍者抑制控制能力的ERP研究

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.1068

山东大学学报（医学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (11): 76-81.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.1068

基于中医人格分型的网瘾交往障碍者抑制控制能力的ERP研究

张伯华¹,王玥²,杨永信³,宋婧杰¹,张胜伟⁴,胡霜¹,盛洁¹,谭梦¹,冯晔¹

1.山东中医药大学人文社科学院, 山东济南 250355;2.山东省交通医院门诊部, 山东济南 250031;3.临沂市精神卫生中心网戒中心, 山东临沂 276005;4.青岛市按摩康复医院中医内科, 山东青岛 266071

收稿日期:2015-11-04 出版日期:2016-11-10 发布日期:2016-11-10
通讯作者: 张伯华. E-mail:bhzh03@163.com杨永信. E-mail:15092970062@126.com E-mail:bhzh03@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(81273627);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2013HM073)

Inhibitory control ability of ERP research on internet addiction disabilities based on personality types of traditional Chinese medicine

ZHANG Bohua¹, WANG Yue², YANG Yongxin³, SONG Jingjie¹, ZHANG Shengwei⁴, HU Shuang¹, SHENG Jie¹, TAN Meng¹, FENG Ye¹

1. College of Humanities and Social Science, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong, China;
2. Outpatient Department, Shandong Jiaotong Hospital, Jinan 250031, Shandong, China;
3. Linyi Mental Health Center, Internet Addiction Treatment Center, Linyi 276005, Shandong, China;
4. Internal Medicine of TCM, Qingdao Massage Rehabilitation Hospital, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China

Received:2015-11-04 Online:2016-11-10 Published:2016-11-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨不同人格分型的网瘾交往障碍者抑制控制能力的ERPs成分差异,揭示阴阳人格对抑制控制的影响及脑电生理学证据。方法采用网络成瘾临床诊断标准、人际关系综合诊断量表及五态性格量表筛选出偏阴人格组及偏阳人格组网瘾交往障碍者各16例。采用ERP技术,通过Go/Nogo研究范式检测两组被试前额叶执行控制功能,分析ERPs成分差异。结果偏阳和偏阴人格两组被试均成功诱发出了明显的N2和P3波形;两组被试P3成分分析,Nogo刺激较Go刺激均诱发出幅值更大、潜伏期更早的P3,Fcz电极位置诱发出的P3最大、Nogo效应最明显;两组被试差异表现在偏阳组被试存在显著的N2Nogo幅值效应,偏阴组被试不存在该刺激效应。结论与偏阳组相比,偏阴组网瘾交往障碍者在抑制控制机能(冲突信息的监测和行为反应抑制)上存在更大程度的损害。

Abstract: Objective To explore the component difference of event-related potentials(ERPs)of the control ability of different personality types of internet addiction interpersonal barriers patients, and to reveal the electrophysiological evidence as well as the effect on inhibitory control ability. Methods A total of 32 patients with internet addiction interpersonal barriers who had Yin(n=16)and Yang(n=16)personality were selected according to the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Internet Addiction, Interpersonal Comprehensive Diagnostic Scale and Five-pattern Personality Inventory in this study. The prefrontal executive control function of the two groups was tested with Go/Nogo paradigm, and the differences of ERPs were analyzed. Results The N2 and P3 waves were successfully induced in the two types of personalities. Analysis of the composition of P3 indicated that, Nogo stimulation evoked a larger amplitude and earlier latency of P3 than Go stimulation; Fcz electrode induced the most powerful P3, with the most obvious Nogo effect. The 山东大学学报 (医学版)54卷11期 -张伯华,等.基于中医人格分型的网瘾交往障碍者抑制控制能力的ERP研究 \=-subjects with Yang personality had significant N2 Nogo amplitude effect, while subjects with Yin personality had not. Conclusion Compared with subjects with Yang personality, those with Yin personality have poorer inhibitory control function on monitoring of and response to conflicting information.

Key words: Interpersonal barriers, Internet addiction, Personality types of TCM, Inhibitory control ability, Event-related potentials

中图分类号:

R395.1

张伯华,王玥,杨永信,宋婧杰,张胜伟,胡霜,盛洁,谭梦,冯晔. 基于中医人格分型的网瘾交往障碍者抑制控制能力的ERP研究[J]. 山东大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 54(11): 76-81.

ZHANG Bohua, WANG Yue, YANG Yongxin, SONG Jingjie, ZHANG Shengwei, HU Shuang, SHENG Jie, TAN Meng, FENG Ye. Inhibitory control ability of ERP research on internet addiction disabilities based on personality types of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY (HEALTH SCIENCES), 2016, 54(11): 76-81.

参考文献

[1] Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex[J]. Trends Cogn Science, 2004, 8(4): 170-177.
[2] 林敏, 邓赐平. 行为抑制的认知神经基础:基于两种行为抑制任务范式的差异分析[J]. 心理科学, 2007,30(5): 11, 20-22.
[3] Bannon S, Gonsalvez CJ, Croft RJ, et al. Response inhibition deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder[J]. Psychiatry Res, 2002, 110(2): 165-174.
[4] Verdejo-Garacia A, Toribio I, Orozco C, et al. Neuronpsychological functional in methadone maintenance patients versus abstinent heroin abusers[J]. Drug Alcohol Depend, 2005, 78(3): 283-288.
[5] 党丽洁. 青少年网络成瘾者冲突控制的ERP研究[D]. 北京:中国政法大学, 2007: 30-33.
[6] 孙冶. 网络游戏成瘾者抑制性控制的事件相关电位研究[D]. 大连: 大连医科大学,2010: 23-30.
[7] 王玥, 张伯华. 网瘾人际交往障碍者中医体质与五态人格、述情障碍的相关研究[J]. 精神医学杂志,2014,27(3): 178-181. WANG Yue, ZHANG Bohua. Correaltion of TCM constitution with five-pattern personality and alexithymia in internet addictive patients with interpersonal dysfunction[J]. Journal of Psychiatry, 2014, 27(3): 178-181.
[8] 吕文卿. 中医院校大学生网络成瘾的心理因素及情欲顺势团体心理干预研究[D]. 济南: 山东中医药大学,2012: 10-11,18.
[9] 张伯华,胡霜,盛洁. 中医院校大学生网络成瘾与五态人格的关系[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2013, 51(9):95-99. ZHANG Bohua, HU Shuang, SHENG Jie. Relationship between TCM college studentsIAD cases and the five-state personality theory[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Health Sciences), 2013, 51(9):95-99.
[10] 刘炳伦,郝伟,杨德森,等.网络依赖诊断量表初步编制[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(3): 227-229, 232. LIU Binglun, HAO Wei, YANG Desen, et al. Development of Diagnostic scale for internet addiction disorder[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2006,14(3):227-229, 232.
[11] 郑日昌. 大学生心理诊断[M]. 济南: 山东教育出版社, 1999:339-341.
[12] 薛崇成, 杨秋莉. 五态性格测验表手册[M]. 北京: 中国中医研究院针灸研究所, 1988: 10,35,54.
[13] 凌红. 网络成瘾与冲动控制: ERP探索及团体辅导实验[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2009:3,24-25.
[14] 张丽虹. 青少年网瘾家庭成因分析及干预研究[J]. 淮海工学院学报,2011,8(5): 26-27.
[15] 静进. 我国儿童青少年面临的主要心理问题与对策[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2010, 24(25): 321-324.
[16] 张兰君. 大学生网络成瘾倾向多因素研究[J]. 健康心理学杂志, 2003, 11(4): 279-280. ZHANG Lanjun. The multi-factor research of undergraduates addiction tendency for internet[J]. Health Psychology Journal, 2003, 11(4): 279-280.
[17] BEARD KW.Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction[J]. Cyber Psychol Behav, 2001, 4(3): 337-383.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于中医人格分型的网瘾交往障碍者抑制控制能力的ERP研究

Inhibitory control ability of ERP research on internet addiction disabilities based on personality types of traditional Chinese medicine

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

多维度评价

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张伯华，胡霜，盛洁. 中医院校大学生网络成瘾与五态人格的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2013, 51(9): 105-108.
[2]	李英存1,刘炳伦1,2,李仁军2,王洪军2,胡岱梅2,王玮2,王盟1. 某中学初一学生网络成瘾的心理干预[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(4): 125-.