您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (11): 68-71.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.1065

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

体素内不相干运动磁共振成像对糖尿病患者肾脏功能的评价作用

俞璐,刘强   

  1. 山东大学附属山东省医学影像学研究所, 山东 济南 250021
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-03 出版日期:2016-11-10 发布日期:2016-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 刘强. E-mail:2002md@163.com E-mail:2002md@163.com

Introvoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for the assessment of renal function of diabetes mellitus

YU Lu, LIU Qiang   

  1. Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute of Shandong University, Jinan 250021, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-11-03 Online:2016-11-10 Published:2016-11-10

摘要: 目的 探讨体素内不相干运动磁共振成像(IVIM-MRI)评价糖尿病患者肾脏功能的价值。 方法 采用3.0T磁共振分别对20例糖尿病患者(糖尿病组)和正常对照组进行肾脏IVIM扫描,比较两组间及组内皮、髓质的弥散系数(D)、灌注分数(f)、灌注相关弥散系数(D* )间的差异。 结果 糖尿病组皮质D值及f值大于正常对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.187, P=0.035; t=2.334, P=0.025);糖尿病组髓质D值及f值大于正常对照组,但差异无统计学意义(t=1.753, P=0.088; t=0.682, P=0.499);糖尿病组皮、髓质D*值均大于正常对照组,但差异无统计学意义(t=0.088, P=0.93; t=0.592, P=0.557)。同组内皮质与髓质间D、 f值及D*值差异均有统计学意义(糖尿病组:t=9.64, P=0.002; t=12.163, P=0.001; t=15.993, P=0.001;正常对照组:t=11.228, P=0.001; t=12.055, P=0.001; t=14.708, P=0.001)。 结论 IVIM-MRI可无创地评价糖尿病患者肾脏功能,增加了其在临床的应用范围。

关键词: 体素内不相干运动磁共振成像, 糖尿病, 弥散系数, 肾功能, 灌注分数

Abstract: Objective To investigate the value of introvoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging(IVIM-MRI)in evaluating renal function of diabetes mellitus. Methods IVIM-MRI was performed in 20 cases of diabetes mellitus(diabetic group)and 20 healthy controls(control group)using 3.0T MR system. The differences of diffusion coefficient(D), perfusion fraction(f), and pseudodiffusion coefficient(D*)were compared. Results D and f values of renal cortex of the diabetic group were significantly higher than those of the control group(t=2.187, P=0.035; t=2.334, P=0.025). D and f values of renal medulla of the diabetic group were higher than those of control group, but with no significant differences(t=1.753, P=0.088; t=0.682, P=0.499). D* values of renal medulla and cortex of the diabetic group were higher than those of the control group, but without significant differences(t=0.088, P=0.93; t=0.592, P=0.557). D, f, D* values of renal medulla were significantly different from those of renal cortex in both diabetic and control groups(diabetes mellitus group t=9.64, P=0.002; t=12.163, P=0.001; t=15.993, P=0.001; control group t=11.228, P=0.001; t=12.055, P=0.001; t=14.708, P=0.001). Conclusion Introvoxel incoherent motion MR imaging can evaluate the renal function of diabetic patients non-invasively.

Key words: Diabetes mellitus, Renal function, Perfusion fraction, Introvoxel incoherent motion MR imaging, Diffusion coefficient

中图分类号: 

  • R587.1
[1] Bourillon C, Rahmouni A, Lin C, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging of multiple myeloma lesions: correlation with whole-body dynamic contrast agent-enhanced MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2015, 277(3):773-783.
[2] Marzi S, Stefanetti L, Sperati F, et al. Relationship between diffusion parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion MRI and perfusion measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of soft tissue tumors[J]. NMR Biomed, 2016, 29(1):6-14.
[3] Pang Y, Turkbey B, Bernardo M, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion(IVIM)MR imaging for prostate cancer: an evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different b-value combinations[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2013, 69(2):553-562.
[4] Bokacheva L, Kaplan JB, Giri DD, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T differentiates malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and breast parenchyma[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014, 40(4):813-823.
[5] Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T, et al. Salivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors[J]. Radiology, 2012, 263(3):770-777.
[6] Rheinheimer S, Stieltjes B, Schneider F, et al. Investigation of renal lesions by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging applying intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters-initial experience[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(3):310-316.
[7] Gaing B, Sigmund EE, Huang WC, et al. Subtype differentiation of renal tumors using voxel-based histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters[J]. Invest Radiol, 2015, 50(3):144-152.
[ 8] Hennedige T, Koh TS, Hartono S, et al. Intravoxel incoherent imaging of renal fibrosis induced in a murine model of unilateral ureteral obstruction[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 33(10):1324-1328.
[9] Lee CH, Yoo KH, Je BK, et al. Using intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging to evaluate cortical defects in the first episode of upper urinary tract infections: preliminary results[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014, 40(3):545-551.
[10] Eckerbom P, Hansell P, Bjerner T, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging of the kidney: pilot study[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2013, 765:55-58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4989-8_8.
[11] Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of the kidney: alterations in diffusion and perfusion in patients with renal dysfunction[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 31(3):414-417.
[12] Notohamiprodjo M, Chandarana H, Mikheev A, et al. Combined intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion tensor imaging of renal diffusion and flow anisotropy[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2015, 73(4):1526-1532.
[13] Doganay S, Kocakoç E, Ciçekçi M, et al. Ability and utility of diffusion-weighted MRI with different b values in the evaluation of benign and malignant renal lesions[J]. Clinical Radiology, 2011, 66(5):420-425.
[14] Notohamiprodjo M, Chandarana H, Mikheev A, et al. Combined intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion tensor imaging of renal diffusion and flow anisotropy[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2015, 73(4):1526-1532.
[1] 孔令群,王学文,王海滨,曹学峰,吴燕彬,张兴元. 副神经节瘤1例报告[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(9): 110-112.
[2] 张宝文,雷香丽,李瑾娜,罗湘俊,邹容. miR-21-5p靶向调控TIMP3抑制2型糖尿病肾病小鼠肾脏系膜细胞增殖及细胞外基质堆积[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 7-14.
[3] 张亮,徐敏,庄向华,娄福臣,娄能俊,吕丽,郭文娟,郑凤杰,陈诗鸿. 内质网应激与凋亡在糖尿病周围神经病变中的表达变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(8): 13-17.
[4] 苏萍,杨亚超,杨洋,季加东,阿力木·达依木,李敏,薛付忠,刘言训. 健康管理人群2型糖尿病发病风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(6): 82-86.
[5] 张振堂,杨洋,韩福俊,陈向华,季晓康,王永超,王淑康,孙苑潆,李敏,陈亚飞,王丽,薛付忠,刘言训. 基于社区2型糖尿病患者的心脑血管事件5年风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(6): 108-113.
[6] 李帅,王雅琳,孙忠文,朱梅佳. Nod样受体蛋白3炎性体在2型糖尿病脑微血管内皮细胞中的变化及变化机制[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(3): 6-11.
[7] 巩璐伟,周丽珍,苏国海. 培哚普利通过调节Akt-FoxO1通路保护糖尿病性心肌病大鼠心功能损伤[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(10): 65-70.
[8] 谢海滨,武群政,刘少壮,黄鑫,程玉刚,胡三元,张光永. 肝线粒体相关内质网膜在袖状胃切除术改善糖尿病大鼠胰岛素敏感性中的作用[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(10): 36-40.
[9] 杨洋,张光,张成琪,宋心红,薛付忠,王萍,王丽,刘言训. 基于体检队列的2型糖尿病风险预测模型[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(9): 69-72.
[10] 彭力,强晔,赵蕙琛,陈诗鸿,姚伟东,刘元涛. 2型糖尿病患者应用西格列汀的短期疗效及影响因素[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(8): 60-63.
[11] 林栋,管庆波. 2型糖尿病男性患者血清睾酮水平低下对非酒精性脂肪肝的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(7): 33-37.
[12] 史蕊,孙佩,王璐璐,丁琳,夏金,王燕,逄曙光. 鼠神经生长因子联合维生素D、甲钴胺治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的临床观察[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(4): 64-67.
[13] 木哈达斯·吐尔逊依明,帕它木·莫合买提,托兰古丽·买买提库尔班. CDKAL1(rs10946398 C/A)基因多态性与2型糖尿病易感性关系Meta分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(2): 75-85.
[14] 于宁,高燕燕,咸玉欣,牛佳鹏,李莉,王静,曹彩霞. 艾塞那肽对2型糖尿病合并非酒精性脂肪肝患者肝脏脂肪含量及血清chemerin水平的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(11): 51-55.
[15] 赵蕙琛,柴家超,张亮,袁明振,彭力,刘元涛. 糖尿病大鼠阴茎海绵体硫化氢含量及其合成酶表达的变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(10): 25-28.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!