您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（医学版）》

山东大学学报（医学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (11): 89-94.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.221

• 医学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

文化适应压力量表中文版的修订

张灿灿1, 苏永刚2, 张红静1   

  1. 1. 山东大学 医学院医学心理系, 山东 济南 250012;
    2. 山东大学 外国语学院, 山东 济南 250100
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-01 出版日期:2015-11-10 发布日期:2015-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 张红静.E-mail:zhjing@sdu.edu.cn E-mail:zhjing@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金(13BSH065)

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Acculturative Stress Scale

ZHANG Cancan1, SU Yonggang2, ZHANG Hongjing1   

  1. 1. Institute of Medical Psychology, School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China;
    2. School of English, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
  • Received:2015-03-01 Online:2015-11-10 Published:2015-11-10

PDF (PC)

582

摘要： 目的 修订中文版文化适应压力量表(ASSIS),并检测该量表的信效度.方法 采用翻译的中文版文化适应压力量表、一般健康问卷(GHQ-28)和正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)对山东某大学342名中国学生进行测评与比较.结果 文化适应压力量表各项目与总分的相关均达显著性水平(r=0.417~0.788, P<0.01),决断值CR均达显著性水平(P<0.01),具有较好的项目区分度;探索性因素分析得出5个因子,共解释62.51%的方差变异;量表Cronbach s α系数为0.928,各分量表的Cronbach s α 系数在0.765~0.867之间,信度较好;各维度间的相关系数为0.507~0.805(P<0.01),具有较好的构想效度;文化适应压力量表与GHQ-28和PANAS各维度均显著相关(r=-0.228~0.433, P<0.01),具有较好的效标关联效度.实证效度较好,不同类型或地区的学生在不同维度上的得分存在统计学差异(P<0.05).结论 修订的文化适应压力量表具有较好的信度和效度,可作为心理测量工具应用于中国学生群体.

关键词: 中国学生, 效度, 文化适应压力, 信度, 探索性因素分析

Abstract: Objective To develop a Chinese version of Acculturative Stress Scale for International Students (ASSIS), and to test its reliability and validity. Methods Chinese version of ASSIS, General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) were used to investigate 342 Chinese students from a university of Shandong province. Results The correlation between each item of the ASSIS and its scale was significant (r=0.417 to 0.788, P<0.01). Critical ration had reached significant level (P<0.01), with good item discrimination. Exploratory factor analysis produced 5 factors: perceived discrimination, fear, home sickness, stress due to change and perceived hate, which accounted for 62.51% of the variance. Reliability analysis confirmed that Cronbach s α coefficient of the ASSIS was 0.928, and Cronbach s α coefficient of the 5 subscales ranged from 0.765 to 0.867. The correlation between subscales was 0.507 to 0.805 (P<0.01). The spearman correlation coefficients among the ASSIS and the GHQ-28, PANAS were significant (r=-0.228 to 0.433, P<0.05, P<0.01). There existed statistical differences among different groups of students in different dimensions (P<0.05). Conclusion The Chinese version of ASSIS has good reliability and validity in application to Chinese students.

Key words: Acculturative stress, Reliability, Validity, Exploratory factor analysis, Chinese students

中图分类号: 

  • R395.1
[1] 严文华. 跨文化适应与应激、应激源研究: 中国学生、学者在德国[J]. 心理科学, 2007, 30(4):1010-1012. YAN Wenhua. A research on the adjustment, stressor and strain of Chinese students and academics in Germany[J]. Psychological Science, 2007, 30(4):1010-1012.
[2] 邦苏. 中南大学留学生文化应激、社会支持与孤独感的研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2010:7-21.
[3] 朱国辉. 高校来华留学生跨文化适应问题研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2011:133-137.
[4] 张海钟, 姜永志, 赵文进, 等. 中国区域跨文化心理学理论探索与实证研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(8):1229-1236. ZHANG Haizhong, JIANG Yongzhi, ZHAO Wenjin, et al. A theoretical exploration and empirical research of the regional cross-culture psychology of China [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(8):1229-1236.
[5] 史靖宇, 赵旭东. 上海新疆高中维族学生跨文化适应情况调查[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2008, 22(3):217-218.
[6] 古晋泽. 中国留美学生的心理压力及其成因[J]. 晋城职业技术学院学报, 2012, 5(6):59-61. GU Jinze. Psychological stress that Chinese international students experience in the United States and its Causes as well as leading consequences [J]. Journal of Jincheng Institute of Technology, 2012, 5(6):59-61.
[7] Muhammad Zahid abbas, 梁雪梅, 刘可智. 中国某高校留学生跨文化适应压力及其心理因素[J]. 四川精神卫生, 2014, 27(2):97-101. Muhammad Zahid abbas, LIANG Xuemei, LIU Kezhi. An evaluation of acculturation stress, mental health issues and adaptation difficulties of international students in China[J]. Sichuan Mental Health, 2014, 27(2):97-101.
[8] Jieru Bai. Development and validation of the acculturative stress scale for Chinese college students in the United States (ASSCS)[D]. Indiana University, 2012:84-89.
[9] 肖琼, Ingemar Ottosson, Ingegerd Carlsson. 留学瑞典的中国学生与瑞典大学生应激源及应对策略的跨文化比较[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(2):309-312. XIAO Qiong, Ingemar Ottosson, Ingegerd Carlsson. Stressors and coping strategies in Chinese and Swedish students at a Swedish university[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2013, 21(2):309-312.
[10] Vega WA. Gil AG, Warheit GJ, et al. Acculturation and delinquent behavior among Cuban American adolescents: Toward and empirical model[J]. Am J Community Psychol, 1993, 21(1):113-125.
[11] Sandhu DS, Asrabadi BR. Development of an acculturative stress scale for international students: preliminary findings [J]. Psychol Rep, 1994, 75(1): 435-448.
[12] 肖三蓉. 美国华人移民的异文化压力与心理健康[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2009: 28-46.
[13] Yakunina ES, Weigold IK, Weigold A, et al. International students' personal and multicultural strengths: reducing acculturative stress and promoting adjustment [J]. Journal of Counseling Development, 2013, 91(2):216-223.
[14] He FX, Lopez V, Leigh MC. Perceived acculturative stress and sense of coherence in Chinese nursing students in Australia[J]. Nurse Education Today, 2012, 32(4):345-350.
[15] Bhandari P. Stress and health related quality of life of Nepalese students studying in South Korea: a cross sectional study[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2012, 10:26. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-26.
[16] 龚晓梅, 刘爱真. 来华印度留学生的跨文化压力调查对管理的启示[J]. 云南农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2010, 4(2):39-42. GONG Xiaomei, LIU Aizhen. Implications of management from the survey on acculturative stress of indian international students in China [J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 2010, 4(2):39-42.
[17] 李智. 来华留学生异文化压力、心理弹性与心理健康的关系研究[D]. 浙江:杭州师范大学, 2011:43-44.
[18] Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire [J]. Psychological Medicine, 1979, 9(1):131-145.
[19] 陈翠, 张红静, 江虹, 等. 一般健康问卷(GHQ-28)应用于大学生心理健康研究的信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报: 医学版, 2010, 48(3):159-162. CHEN Cui, ZHANG Hongjing, JIANG Hong, et al. Assessing the general mental health o f college students: psychometric properties of GHQ-28[J]. Journal of Shandong University: Health Sciences, 2010, 48(3):159-162.
[20] 张作记. 行为医学量表手册[M]. 北京:中华医学电子音像出版社, 2005:236-237.
[21] 黄丽, 杨廷忠, 季忠民. 正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2003, 17(1):54-56. HUANG Li, YANG Tingzhong, JI Zhongmin. Applicability of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale in Chinese[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2003, 17(1):54-56.
[22] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010:194-208.
[23] 吴明隆. SPSS统计应用实务问卷分析与应用统计[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003:107-109.
[24] 薛云珍, 梁宝勇. 应激评价量表的初步修订[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(2):145-147. XUE Yunzhen, LIANG Baoyong. The reliability and validity of Chinese version of SAM [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2009, 17(2):145-147.
[25] Jibeen T, Khalid R. Development and preliminary validation of multidimensional acculturative stress scale for pakistani immigrants in Toronto, Canada[J]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2010, 34(3):233-243.
[1] 成媛媛1，唐茂芹2. 简明幸福与生活质量满意度问卷在焦虑障碍患者中的信效度[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(7): 147-150.
[2] 王欣欣1， 贾存显1，2，庄茂强1 ，高琦1，刘丽媛1，刘慧1，韩梅1. 在农村自尊量表评价以及自尊与自杀死亡的病例对照研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(7): 159-162.
[3] 韩梅1，贾存显1,2，邱惠敏3，马吉祥4，路长飞1，刘慧1. 简易应对方式量表评价及其与农村自杀死亡关系研究[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(10): 160-164.
[4] 王东芳1，贾存显1，徐爱强2，张吉玉2，路长飞1，王欣欣1. 特质焦虑量表在农村自杀死亡及其对照组中的信度和效度评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2011, 49(1): 111-.
[5] 刘保锋1，袁长海1，于敬敏2，秦敬柱1，郭丽1，耿文革3. SF-36量表在三峡移民生命质量测定中的信度和效度评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(7): 129-132.
[6] 陈翠，张红静，江虹，李文杰，吕丽. 一般健康问卷（GHQ-28）应用于大学生心理健康研究的信效度检验[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(3): 159-162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(医学版)》编辑部　
地址:山东大学科技期刊社（济南市历城区山大南路27号山东大学中心校区明德楼B座721室） 电话: 0531-88366918 E-mail: xbyxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发