您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1): 104-108.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2013.583

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

自锁托槽与传统结扎翼托槽对牙根吸收影响的系统评价

卢璐1,2,李贺1,闫艺3,郭泾1   

  1. 1. 山东大学口腔医院正畸科,济南 250012; 2.山东省口腔生物医学重点实验室, 济南  250012;
    3. 济南市历下区人民医院口腔科,济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2013-09-27 出版日期:2014-01-10 发布日期:2014-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 郭泾,E-mail:guojing@sdu.edu.cn

Root resorption associated with self-ligating versus conventional ligating orthodontic bracket systems: a systematic review

LU Lu1,2, LI He1, YAN Yi3, GUO Jing1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China;
    2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine, Jinan 250012, China;
    3. Department of Stomatology, People′s Hospital of Lixia District of Jinan, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2013-09-27 Online:2014-01-10 Published:2014-01-10

摘要:

目的  系统评价正畸治疗过程中,自锁托槽与结扎翼托槽对牙根吸收程度的影响。方法  计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库、中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库、Cochrane library临床随机对照试验库、Medline数据库、PubMed、Embase数据库,筛选出比较自锁托槽组与结扎翼托槽组对牙根吸收影响的文献,检索时间均从建库至2013年6月30日。由两位研究者独立评价纳入研究的质量并提取资料,采用RevMan 5.2.1软件进行Meta分析。结果  最终纳入3个研究。Meta分析结果显示,自锁托槽组与传统结扎翼托槽组的根外吸收量在上颌中切牙[MD=-0.20,95%CI(-1.45~1.05),P=0.75]、上颌侧切牙[MD=0.53,95%CI(-0.50~1.56),P=0.31]、下颌中切牙[MD=-0.01,95%CI(-0.22~0.20),P=0.92]和下颌侧切牙[MD=-0.31,95%CI(-1.33~0.71),P=0.55]均差异无统计学意义。结论   矫治器类型可能并不是影响牙根吸收的主要因素,正畸医生可根据自锁托槽和传统结扎翼托槽各自的优缺点并结合患者错牙合畸形的具体情况选用托槽。

关键词: 正畸治疗, 牙根吸收, 系统评价, 自锁托槽, 结扎翼托槽

Abstract:

Objective  To evaluate root resorption associated with self-ligating and conventional ligating bracket systems in orthodontic treatment. Methods  Electronic databases such as CNKI, Wan Fang Data, VIP, CBM, the Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed and EMbase, were searched from the day of they were established to June 30, 2013, in order to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the root resorption associated with self-ligating versus conventional ligating brackets. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with two reviewers independently, and Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2.1 software. Results  Three RCTs including 464 teeth were identified. The Results   of Meta-analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups in maxillary incisors (MD = 0.20, 95%CI -1.45 to 1.05, P=0.75), maxillary lateral incisors (MD=0.53, 95%CI -0.50, 1.56, P=0.31), mandibular incisors (MD=-0.01, 95%CI  -0.22, 0.20, P=0.92) and mandibular lateral incisors (MD=-0.31, 95%CI -1.33, 0.71, P=0.55). Conclusion  As the type of orthodontic appliance may not be the major factor influencing root absorption, and suitable brackets can be chosen by orthodontic dentists according to the merits and demerits of self-ligating and traditional ligating brackets and deformity of patients’ teeth.

Key words: Root resorption, Self-ligating brackets, Orthodontic treatment, Conventional ligating brackets, Systematic review

[1] 韩婷, 杜菁, 于佳莉, 郑文舟, 王燕. 47例撕脱性损伤恒牙再植后牙根吸收的影响因素分析[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(8): 115-119.
[2] 孙菲,李淑香,王琳,张丽,肖水清. 菌毛蛋白V型与正畸患者牙龈炎性反应的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(3): 59-63.
[3] 王丽丽,霍彬,王磊,汪浩,侯定坤,霍小东,王金焕,臧立,曹强,柴树德,王海涛. 亚肺叶切除联合125I粒子植入治疗早期肺癌有效性的Meta分析与系统评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(10): 76-83.
[4] 孙媛媛, 高伟, 崔英, 张红, 焦建芬, 李衎, 徐瑞彩. 肿瘤化疗患者应用植入式静脉输液港与PICC效果比较的系统评价[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2015, 53(10): 73-81.
[5] 丛淑敏1,王旭霞2,张丽娜2,李涛2,王胜林3,李静2,张君2,4. 伊班膦酸钠在正畸源性根吸收中对破骨细胞的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(9): 44-49.
[6] 张伟伟,毛玉龙,魏琳,郭泾 . 应用In-Ovation自锁托槽系统排齐和整平牙列过程中上颌牙槽弓及牙弓的变化[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2008, 46(11): 1098-1101.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!