您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (4): 34-38.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2016.1005

• 介入呼吸病专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

支气管超声下经引导鞘肺活检术诊断肺周围性疾病的价值

张华楠1,王超超1,张媛2,徐少华1,王莹1,王伟1   

  1. 1.山东大学第二医院呼吸内科, 山东 济南 250033;2.山东大学第二医院循证医学中心, 山东 济南 250033
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-17 出版日期:2017-04-10 发布日期:2017-04-10
  • 通讯作者: 王伟. E-mail:ww8160@163.com E-mail:ww8160@163.com

Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial lung biopsy with guide-sheath for the diagnosis of pulmonary peripheral lesions

ZHANG Huanan1, WANG Chaochao1, ZHANG Yuan2, XU Shaohua1, WANG Ying1, WANG Wei1   

  1. 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China;
    2. Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong, China
  • Received:2016-08-17 Online:2017-04-10 Published:2017-04-10

摘要: 目的 评价支气管超声下经引导鞘肺活检术(EBUS-GS-TBLB)对肺周围性病变(PPL)的诊断价值和安全性,考察提高EBUS-GS-TBLB诊断阳性率的相关因素。 方法 回顾性分析2015年1月至2016年3月于山东大学第二医院在不同引导设备下行经支气管肺组织活检的67例PPL患者的临床资料,根据引导设备的不同分为传统组(n=38)和支气管超声导向鞘(EBUS-GS)组(n=29);比较两组间的诊断率及影响EBUS-GS-TBLB诊断阳性率的相关因素。 结果 传统组和EBUS-GS组在性别、年龄、病灶大小上的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组具有可比性。传统组、EBUS-GS组的诊断率分别为47.4%(18/38)和75.9%(22/29),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.55, P=0.018)。EBUS-GS组中EBUS-GS-TBLB对病灶直径>2 cm的诊断率为94.1%(16/17),病灶直径≤2 cm的诊断率为50.0%(6/12),差异有统计学意义(P=0.011)。EBUS-GS-TBLB中超声探头能穿过病灶的诊断阳性率为89.4%(17/19),探头不能穿过病灶的诊断阳性率为50.0%(5/10),差异有统计学意义(P=0.030)。EBUS-GS-TBLB诊断率与病灶的位置无明显相关性(P>0.05)。 结论 EBUS-GS-TBLB可提高肺周围性疾病的诊断率,并发症少,用于诊断PPL安全有效。EBUS-GS-TBLB诊断的阳性率与病灶的大小、超声探头及病灶关系等因素有关。

关键词: 支气管镜检查, 超声介入, 活组织检查, 肺周围性病变

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value and safety of endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial lung biopsy with guide-sheath(EBUS-GS-TBLB)in peripheral pulmonary lesions(PPL), and to investigate the related factors of improving EBUS-GS-TBLB diagnostic rate. Methods A total of 67 patients with suspected PPL who underwent transbronchial lung biopsy in the Department of Respiratory Medicine of the Second Hospital of Shandong University between January 2015 and March 2016 were prospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into the conventional group(n=38)and the endobronchial ultrasound group with guide sheath group(EBUS-GS group, n=29). The diagnostic rate and the related factors were analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in gender, age and lesion size of the two groups(P>0.05). The diagnostic rate of the EBUS-GS group was 75.9%(22/29), which was higher than that of the conventional group, 47.4%(18/38),(χ2=5.55, P=0.018). In EBUS-GS group, the diagnostic rate of the lesion diameter >2 cm was 94.1%(16/17), while the lesion diameter ≤2 cm was 50.0%(6/12). The difference was statistically significant(P=0.011). The diagnostic rate of EBUS probe within the lesions was 89.4%(17/19), while probe outside the lesions was 50.0%(5/10). The difference was statistically significant(P=0.030). There was no correlation between the diagnostic rate and the location of the lesions(P>0.05)in EBUS-GS- 山 东 大 学 学 报 (医 学 版)55卷4期 -张华楠,等.支气管超声下经引导鞘肺活检术诊断肺周围性疾病的价值 \=-TBLB. Conclusion The procedure of EBUS-GS-TBLB is minimally invasive, has higher diagnostic rate and fewer complications, so it is a safe and effective method to diagnose PPL. The diagnostic rate of EBUS-GS-TBLB is related to both the lesion size and ultrasonic probe position.

Key words: Bronchoscopy, Peripheral pulmonary lesions, Uhrasonography interventional, Biopsy

中图分类号: 

  • R574
[1] Kanne JP. Screening for lung cancer:what have we learned?[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2014, 202(3): 530-535.
[2] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会肺癌学组,中国肺癌防治联盟专家组.肺部结节诊治中国专家共识[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2015, 38(4): 249-254.
[3] Wongsurakiat P, Wongbunnate S, Dejsomritrutai W, et al. Diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage and postbronchoscopic sputum cytology in peripheral lung cancer[J]. Respirology, 1998, 3(2): 131-137.
[4] Tang CC, Hsiao CJ, Chen H, et al. Value of bronchoalveolar Lavage combined with transbronchial lung biopsy in the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer[J]. Chang Gung Med J, 2000, 23(11): 695-700.
[5] Baaklini WA, Reinoso MA, Gorin AB, et al. Diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy inevaluating solitary pulmonary nodules[J]. Chest, 2000, 117(4): 1049-1054.
[6] Ishida T, Asano F, Yamazaki K, et al. Virtual bronchoscopic navigation combined with endobmnchial ultrasound to diagnose small pefipheral pulmonary lesions: a randomised trial[J]. Thorax, 2011, 66(12): 1072-1077.
[7] Kikuchi E, Yamazaki K, Sukoh N, et al. Endobronchial ultrasonography with guide-sheath for peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Eur Respir J, 2004, 24(4): 533-537.
[8] Kurimoto N, Miyazawa T, Okimasa S, et al. Endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath increases the ability to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions endoscopically[J]. Chest, 2004, 126(3): 959-965.
[9] Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C, et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy[J]. Thorax, 2003, 58(11): 920-936.
[10] Wdliamson JP, James AL, Phillips MJ, et al. Quantifying tracheobmnchial tree dimensions:methods,limitations and emerging techniques[J]. Eur Respir J, 2009, 34(1): 42-55.
[11] Shinagawa N, Nakano K, Asahina H, el al. Endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath in the diagnosis of benign peripheral diseases[J]. Ann Thorae Surg, 2012, 93(3): 951-957.
[12] Herth FJ, Eberhardt R, Becker HD, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy in fluomscopically invisible solitary pulmonary nodules:a prospective trial[J]. Chest, 2006, 129(1): 147-150.
[13] Chao,TY, Lie CH, Chung YH, et al. Differentiating peripheral pulmonary lesions based on images of endobronchial ultrasonography[J]. Chest, 2006, 130(4): 1191-1197.
[14] Eberhardt R, Emst A, Herth FJ. Ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy of solitary pulmonary nodules less than 20 mm[J]. Eur RespirJ, 2009, 34(6): 1284-1287.
[15] Steinfort DP, Khor YH, Manser RL, et al. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer:systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Respir J, 201l, 37(4): 902-910.
[16] Zaric B, Stojsic V, Sarcev T, et al. Advanced bronchoscopic techniques in diagnosis and staging of lung cancer[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2013, 5(S4): S359-S370.
[17] Shinagawa N, Nakano K, Asahina H, et al. Endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath in the diagnosis of benign peripheral diseases[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2012, 93(3): 951-957.
[18] Izumo T, Sasada S, Chavez C, et al. The diagnostic value of histology and cytology samples during endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2015, 45(4): 362-366.
[19] Chavez C, Sasada S, Izumo T, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath for small malignant pulmonary nodules: a retrospective comparison between centfal and peripheral lcations[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2015, 7(4): 596-602.
[20] 李王平,马李杰,潘蕾,等. 导向鞘引导的超声内镜在300例肺周围病变诊断中的应用分析[J].中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2015, 8(5): 556-559. LI Wangping, MA Lijie, PAN Lei, et al. Analysis of diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesion in 300 patients with endobronchial ultrasonography-guide sheath[J]. Chin J Lung Dis(Electronic Edition), 2015, 8(5): 556-559.
[21] 唐纯丽,罗为展,钟长镐,等. 径向超声联合虚拟导航引导肺活检对肺外周结节的诊断价值[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2016, 39(1): 38-40. TANG Chinli, LUO Weizhan, ZHONG Changhao, et al. The diagnostic utility of virtual bronchoscopic navigation combined with endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial lung biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis, 2016, 39(1): 38-40.
[22] 李明,彭爱梅,张国良,等. 支气管超声下经引导鞘肺活检术诊断肺周围性病变的价值[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2014, 37(1): 36-40. LI Ming, PENG Aimei, ZHANG Guoliang, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial lung biopsy with guide-sheath for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis, 2014, 37(1): 36-40.
[23] 李晓,赵辉,周足力,等. 支气管超声导向鞘(EBUS-GS)引导肺活检术的临床应用[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2015, 31(2): 104-105.
[24] Huang CT, Ho CC, Tsai YJ, et al. Factors influencing visibility and diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy using endobronchial ultrasound in peripheral pulmonary lesions[J]. Respirology, 2009, 14(6): 859-864.
[25] Chen A, Chenna P, Loiselle A, et al. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a 5-year institutional experience[J]. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2014, 11(4): 578-582.
[1] 遇晓1,于丕先2,赵丹丹3,刘付臣3,焉传祝3. 腺苷受体A3在特发性炎症性肌病中的表达[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(6): 105-.
[2] 李萍,梁晓红,纪永利,董亮,高洋,崔文超. 沿心脏切线方向穿刺植入5-FU缓释粒子治疗恶性心包积液81例疗效分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2012, 50(12): 77-.
[3] 王莎莎,邵杨,张栋,王利江,姜淑娟. TBNA在支气管腔外病变中的临床应用价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2010, 48(1): 120-122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!