您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(医学版)》

山东大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (7): 87-91.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2015.138

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

食管癌伴神经内分泌分化的临床病理特点及诊断标志物

刘连科1, 邵明雯2, 马兰1, 孙婧1, 管丹1, 束永前1   

  1. 1. 南京医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤科, 江苏 南京 210029;
    2. 武警江苏省总队医院内科, 江苏 扬州 225003
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-03 修回日期:2015-05-20 发布日期:2015-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 刘连科。E-mail:liulianke@csco.org.cn E-mail:liulianke@csco.org.cn
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(JX10231801);中国高校医学期刊临床专项资金(11520112)

Clinico-pathological characteristics and diagnostic biomarkers in patients with esophageal carcinoma accompanied by neuroendocrine cell differentiation

LIU Lianke1, SHAO Mingwen2, MA Lan1, SUN Jing1, GUAN Dan1, SHU Yongqian1   

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China;
    2. Department of Internal Medicine, Jiangsu Armed Police General Hospital, Yangzhou 225003, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2015-02-03 Revised:2015-05-20 Published:2015-07-10

摘要: 目的 探讨食管癌伴神经内分泌分化(E-NED)的临床病理特点及诊断标志物。方法 回顾性分析 2008年1月至2013年12月经病理证实的低分化食管癌378例患者的临床病理资料, 其中无NED(E-NNED)349例, E-NED 29例, 免疫组织化学检测29例E-NED以及随机选取20例E-NNED患者肿瘤组织中突触素(Syn)、嗜铬蛋白A(CgA)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、神经细胞黏附分子(CD56)、蛋白基因产物9.5(PGP9.5)、促泌素(SCGN)、甲状腺转录因子1(TTF-1)的表达。结果 E-NED与E-NNED患者的年龄、性别、病变长度等临床病理因素差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。除TTF-1外, E-NED患者的Syn、CgA、NSE、CD56、PGP9.5及SCGN表达均高于E-NNED患者(P<0.05)。在联合检测中, Syn分别与CD56、PGP9.5或SCGN构成的3种组合敏感性、阳性预测值及诊断正确率均高于Syn+CgA组合(P<0.05)。E-NED与E-NNED患者的1、2、3年生存率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 E-NED与E-NNED可能是不同的食管癌病理类型, PGP9.5、SCGN均可作为E-NED的诊断标志物, Syn与CD56、PGP9.5或SCGN联合检测可提高诊断敏感性和正确率。

关键词: 突触素, 食管癌, 神经内分泌分化, 预后, 神经细胞黏附分子, 蛋白基因产物9.5, 促泌素

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinico-pathological characteristics and diagnostic markers in esophageal carcinoma accompanied by neuroendocrine cell differentiation (E-NED). Methods The clinico-pathological data of 378 patients with poorly differentiated esophageal carcinoma from Jan. 2008 to Dec. 2013, including 349 without neuroendocrine differentiation (E-NNED) and 29 with neuroendocrine differentiation (E-NED), were retrospectively analyzed. The expressions of synaptophysin (SYN), chromogranin A (CgA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), neural cell adhesion molecule (CD56), protein gene product (PGP9.5), secretagogin (SCGN) and thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) in the esophageal carcinoma tissues of 29 patients with E-NED and 20 ones randomly selected from the 349 patients with E-NNED were detected using immunohistochemistry. Results There were no significant differences between the patients with E-NED and E-NNED in terms of the age, gender, length of lesion and other clinico-pathological factors. Except for TTF-1, the expressions of Syn, CgA, NSE, CD56, PGP9.5 and SCGN were significantly higher in patients with E-NED than those with E-NNED (P<0.05). The sensitivity, positive predictive value anddiagnostic accuracy were all higher in the combined detection of Syn and CD56, PGP9.5 or SCGN than Syn and CgA (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the patients with E-NED and E-NNED regarding 1, 2 and 3-year survival rates. Conclusion E-NED and E-NNED may be different pathological types of esophageal carcinoma. Both PGP9.5 and SCGN can be considered as the diagnostic markers of E-NED, and the combined detection of Syn and CD56, PGP9.5 or SCGN can improve the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy.

Key words: Esophageal carcinoma, Neuroendocrine cell differentiation, Secretagogin, Prognosis, Synaptophysin, Neural cell adhesion molecule, Protein gene product 9.5

中图分类号: 

  • R735.1
[1] 汪慧访, 武爱文, 袁鹏, 等. 具有神经内分泌特征胃癌的诊治及预后分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2011, 14(2): 96-99. WANG Huifang, WU Aiwen, YUAN Peng, et al. Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma and gastric carcinoma with neuroendocrine cell differentiation: a clinical and prognostic analysis[J]. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 2011, 14(2): 96-99.
[2] Schartinger VH, Falkeis C, Laimer K, et al. Neuroendocrine differentiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2012, 126(12):1261-1270.
[3] 杜芸, 王永军, 杨会钗, 等. 食管早期鳞癌的神经内分泌分化及其意义[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2006, 18(6): 459-461. DU Yun, WANG Yongjun, YANG Huichai, et al. Neuroendocrine differentiation and its significance in early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Carcino Genesis, Terato Genesis & Mutagenesis, 2006, 18(6): 459-461.
[4] Yuan A , Liu J, Liu Y, et al. Chromogranin A-positive tumor cells in human esophageal squamous cell carcinomas[J]. Pathol Oncol Res, 2007, 13(4): 321-325.
[5] Bartley AN, Rashid A, Fournier KF, et al. Neuroendocrine and mucinous differentiation in signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: evidence for a common cell of origin in composite tumors[J]. Hum Pathol, 2011, 42(10): 1420-1429.
[6] Segawa Y, Takata S, Fujii M, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of neuroendocrine differentiation in non-small-cell lung cancer and its clinical implications[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2009, 135(8):1055-1059.
[7] 2013年中国胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤病理诊断共识专家组. 中国胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤病理诊断共识(2013版)[J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2013, 42(10): 691-694. 2013 Chinese Pathological Diagnostic Consensus Expert Group of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor. Consensus of pathological diagnosis for Chinese gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine[J]. Chinese J Pathol, 2013, 42(10): 691-694.
[8] 李景南, 张红杰, 陈洁, 等. 胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤内科诊治若干建议[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2014, 34(6): 361-367.
[9] 盛伟琪.胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤病理诊断的规范和进展[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2013, 23(6) : 401-407. SHENG Weiqi. Advances and pathological diagnostic standard of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms[J]. China Oncology, 2013, 23(6):401-407.
[10] Stotz M, Eisner F, Szkandera J, et al. Clinico-pathological characteristics and clinical outcome of different histological types of pancreatic cancer in a large Middle European series[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2013, 66(9):753-757.
[11] 于红梅, 刘晓文, 龙子雯, 等. 胃癌伴神经内分泌分化的临床病理及预后分析[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2013, 23(1): 42-46. YU Hongmei, LIU Xiaowen, LONG Ziwen, et al. Analysis of clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cancer with neuroendocrine cell differentiation[J]. China Oncology, 2013, 23(1): 42-46.
[12] Cho YB, Yang SS, Lee WY, et al. The clinical significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in T3-T4 node-negative colorectal cancer[J]. Int J Surg Pathol, 2010, 18(3): 201-206.
[13] 张军, 郑锴, 郭燕, 等. 非小细胞肺癌神经内分泌分化与其生物学特性及预后关系的研究[J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2010, 13(9): 873-876. ZHANG Jun, ZHENG Kai, GUO Yan, et al. Research on the relationship between non-small cell lung cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation and the biological characteristics and prognosis[J]. Chin J Lung Cancer, 2010, 13(9): 873-876.
[14] Gottschling S, Jensen K, Herth FJ, et al. Lack of prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation and stem cell antigen co-expression in resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2013, 33(3): 981-990.
[15] Tian Z, Wei B, Tang F, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor grading and staging in mammary carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation[J]. Hum Pathol, 2011, 42(8): 1169-1177.
[16] Sawaki M, Yokoi K, Nagasaka T, et al. Prognostic importance of neuroendocrine differentiation in Japanese breast cancer patients[J]. Surg Today, 2010, 40(9): 831-835.
[1] 栗英林,宋道庆,徐忠华. 应用生物信息学方法分析肾透明细胞癌中FKBP11的表达[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(9): 45-51.
[2] 史爽,李娟,米琦,王允山,杜鲁涛,王传新. 胃癌miRNAs预后风险评分模型的构建与应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 47-52.
[3] 吕龙飞,李林,李树海,亓磊,鲁铭,程传乐,田辉. 腔镜下细针导管空肠造瘘在微创McKeown食管癌切除术中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 77-81.
[4] 路璐,孙志钢,张楠. 继发性嗜血细胞综合征1例[J]. 山东大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 1(7): 122-124.
[5] 李星凯,刘战业,姜运峰,李军. 原发性中央型和周围型肺鳞癌临床病理学及预后差异[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(9): 73-78.
[6] 韩福燕,成士清,王召宝,鞠瑛. 食管癌患者外周血红细胞分布宽度检测的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(7): 67-72.
[7] 宗帅,肖东杰,刘华,郏雁飞,马晓丽,李焕杰,黎娉,郑燕,汪运山. CSN5在胃癌中的表达及与患者预后的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(7): 12-16.
[8] 孙启晶,陈方方,李春晓,张才擎. PNI及HGB评估中晚期非小细胞肺癌患者预后的临床价值[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(4): 55-59.
[9] 董尧,宋亚林,田涛,高建国. 确诊8年未经治疗却无明显进展的阴茎恶性黑色素瘤1例报道[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(3): 125-126.
[10] 林家香,郭子嘉,苏鹏,王晓,郭雅欣,吴晓娟,相磊,周志强, 王妍,崔秀杰,潘爱凤,郭成浩. 致癌蛋白CIP2A在乳腺导管上皮恶变中的作用及预测浸润性导管癌患者预后的能力[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(3): 100-106.
[11] 周兰兰,潘学谊,郭煜. 48例急性混合细胞表型白血病患者的临床特征及预后[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(2): 79-83.
[12] 张希英,翟春颜,李劲松,韩博. 中国尤文肉瘤患者EZH2蛋白表达与临床病理学参数及预后的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(2): 84-91.
[13] 刘惠苓,王兴文,冯少滨,冯虹,韩俊庆. B类I型清道夫受体的高表达与结肠癌患者预后的相关性[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(10): 84-89.
[14] 李晓宁,崔连群. 急性心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者非梗死相关动脉处理的时机[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(8): 50-54.
[15] 王雯,刘尧,龙飞,马卫霞,苏莉莉. 外周血淋巴细胞/单核细胞比值与恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者预后的关系[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2016, 54(8): 72-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!